Task Division for Team Success in Crowdsourcing Contests: Resource Allocation and Alignment Effects

References

• Archak, N. Money, glory and cheap talk: Analyzing strategic behavior of contestants in simultaneous crowdsourcing contests on TopCoder.com. Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web. New York: Association for Computer Machinery, 2010, pp. 21–30.
   Google Scholar
• Asproni, G. Motivation, teamwork, and agile development. Agile Times, 4, 1 (2004), 8–15.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, T.T.; Bedell, M.D.; and Johnson, J.L. The social fabric of a team-based MBA program: Network effects on student satisfaction and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 6 (1997), 1369–1397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balkundi, P., and Harrison, D.A. Ties, leaders, and time in teams: Strong inference about network structure’s effects on team viability and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 1 (2006), 49–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bass, B. Individual capability, team performance, and team productivity. In M. D. Dunnette and E. A. Fleishman (eds.) Human Performance and Productivity. Vols. 1, 2, and 3. New York: Psychology Press, 2014, pp. 179–222.
   Google Scholar
• Bayus, B.L. Crowdsourcing new product ideas over time: An analysis of the Dell IdeaStorm community. Management Science, 59, 1 (2013), 226–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergiel, B.J.; Bergiel, E.B.; and Balsmeier, P.W. Nature of virtual teams: A summary of their advantages and disadvantages. Management Research News, 31, 2 (2008), 99–110.
   Google Scholar
• Borgatti, S.P. Centrality and network flow. Social Networks, 27, 1 (2005), 55–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgatti, S.P.; Jones, C.; and Everett, M. G. Network measures of social capital. Connections, 21, 2 (1998), 27–36.
   Google Scholar
• Boudreau, K.J.; Lacetera, N.; and Lakhani, K.R. Incentives and problem uncertainty in innovation contests: An empirical analysis. Management Science, 57, 5 (2011), 843–863.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brabham, D.C. Crowdsourcing as a model for problem solving. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 14, 1 (2008), 75–90.
   Google Scholar
• Burt, R.S. Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, H., and Lim, N. Should managers use team-based contests? Management Science, 59, 12 (2013), 2823–2836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chidambaram, L., and Tung, L.L. Is out of sight, out of mind? An empirical study of social loafing in technology-supported groups. Information Systems Research, 16, 2 (2005), 149–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, S.G., and Bailey, D.E. What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23, 3 (1997), 239–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, D.J., and Kagel, J. H. Are two heads better than one? Team versus individual play in signaling games. American Economic Review, 95, 3 (2005), 477–509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, R., and Cummings, J.N. Tie and network correlates of individual performance in knowledge-intensive work. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 6 (2004), 928–937.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowdsourcing.org. 10 of the 11 best global brands use creative crowdsourcing. http://www.crowdsourcing.org/editorial/10-of-the-11-best-global-brands-use-creative-crowdsourcing-/16935 ( accessed on March 20, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Cummings, J.N. Work groups, structural diversity, and knowledge sharing in a global organization. Management Science, 50, 3 (2004), 352–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniel, S.; Agarwal, R.; and Stewart, K. J. The effects of diversity in global, distributed collectives: A study of open source project success. Information Systems Research, 24, 2 (2013), 312–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davenport, T.H.; Thomas, R.J., and Cantrell, S. The mysterious art and science of knowledge-worker performance. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44,1 (Fall 2002), 22–30.
   Google Scholar
• Ebrahim, N.A.; Ahmed, S.; and Taha, Z. Virtual teams: A literature review. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 3, 3 (2009), 2653–2669.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, L.C. Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1, 3 (1979), 215–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girotra, K.; Terwiesch, C.; and Ulrich, K.T. Idea generation and the quality of the best idea. Management Science, 56, 4 (2010), 591–605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guimera, R.; Uzzi, B.; Spiro, J.; and Amaral, L.A.N. Team assembly mechanisms determine collaboration network structure and team performance. Science, 308, 5722 (2005), 697–702.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guinan, P.J.; Cooprider, J.G.; and Faraj, S. Enabling software development team performance during requirements definition: A behavioral versus technical approach. Information Systems Research, 9, 2 (1998), 101–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahn, J.; Moon, J.Y.; and Zhang, C. Emergence of new project teams from open source software developer networks: Impact of prior collaboration ties. Information Systems Research, 19, 3 (2008), 369–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J.F., Jr.; Black, W.C.; Babin, B.J.; and Anderson, R.E. Multivariate Data Analysis. 7th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Häussler, C., and Sauermann, H. The Anatomy of Teams: Division of Labor and Allocation of Credit in Collaborative Knowledge Production. (2014). http://ssrn.com/abstract=2434327
   Google Scholar
• Hertel, G.; Geister, S.; and Konradt, U. Managing virtual teams: A review of current empirical research. Human Resource Management Review, 15, 1 (2005), 69–95.
   Google Scholar
• Howe, J. Crowdsourcing: Why the Power of the Crowd Is Driving the Future of Business. New York: Crown Business, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, Y.; Singh, P.; and Srinivasan, K. Crowdsourcing “Blockbuster” ideas: A dynamic structural model of ideation. Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Information Systems. Atlanta, GA: Association for Information Systems, 2011, pp. 19–22.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvenpaa, S.L., and Leidner, D.E. Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organizational Science, 10, 6 (1999), 791–815.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, P.; Heimann, V.; and O’Neill, K. The“wonderland” of virtual teams. Journal of Workplace Learning, 13, 1 (2001), 24–30.
   Google Scholar
• Kanawattanachai, P., and Yoo, Y. The impact of knowledge coordination on virtual team performance over time. MIS Quarterly, 31, 4 (2007), 783–808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane, G.C., and Borgatti, S.P. Centrality-IS proficiency alignment and workgroup performance. MIS Quarterly, 35, 4 (2011), 1063–1078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kor, Y.Y., and Sundaramurthy, C. Experience-based human capital and social capital of outside directors. Journal of Management, 35, 4 (2009), 981–1006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakhani, K.R.; Fayard, A.-L.; Levina, N.; and Pokrywa, S.H. OpenIDEO. Case 612-066. Boston:Harvard Business School Press, February 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, Y.J. Division of labor in teams. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 6, 1 (1997), 403–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, D.; Geng, X.; and Whinston, A.B. Optimal design of consumer contests. Journal of Marketing, 71, 4 (2007), 140–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magni, M.; Angst, C.M.; and Agarwal, R. Everybody needs somebody: The influence of team network structure on information technology use. Journal of Management Information Systems, 29, 3 (2012), 9–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marden, J.I. Analyzing and Modeling Rank Data. London: Chapman and Hall, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Martins, L.L.; Gilson, L.L.; and Maynard, M.T. Virtual teams: What do we know and where do we go from here? Journal of Management, 30, 6 (2004), 805–835.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehra, A. Distributed leadership in teams: The network of leadership perceptions and team performance. Leadership Quarterly, 17, 3 (2006), 232–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehra, A.; Dixon, A.L.; Brass, D.J.; and Robertson, B. The social network ties of group leaders: Implications for group performance and leader reputation. Organization Science, 17, 1 (2006), 64–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mo, J.; Zheng, Z.; and Geng, X. Winning crowdsourcing contests: A micro-structural analysis of multi-relational networks. Paper presented at the 5th China Summer Workshop on Information Management. Harbin, China, June 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Netflix Prize: Forum. Grand Prize awarded to team BellKor’s Pragmatic Chaos. http://www.netflixprize.com/community/viewtopic.php?id=1537 ( accessed on March 20, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Netflix Prize: Forum. Netflix Progress Prize 2007 awarded to team KorBell. http://www.netflixprize.com/community/viewtopic.php?id=799 ( accessed on March 20, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Pillis, E.D., and Furumo. Counting the cost of virtual teams. Communications of the ACM, 50, 12 (2007), 93–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, A.; Piccoli, G.; and Ives, B. Virtual teams: A review of current literature and directions for future research. SIGMIS Database, 35, 1 (2004), 6–36.
   Google Scholar
• Reagans, R., and Zuckerman, E.W. Networks, diversity, and productivity: The social capital of corporate R&D teams. Organization Science, 12, 4 (2001), 502–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salas, E.; Rosen, M.A.; Burke, C.S.; Goodwin, G.F.; and Fiore, S.M. The making of a dream team: When expert teams do best. In K.A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P.J. Feltovich, and R.R. Hoffman (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006, pp. 439–453.
   Google Scholar
• Sarker, S.; Ahuja, M.; Sarker, S.; and Kirkeby, S. The role of communication and trust in global virtual teams: A social network perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 28, 1 (2011), 273–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savage, N. Gaining wisdom from crowds. Communications of the ACM, 55, 3 (2012), 13–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seltzer, E., and Mahmoudi, D. Citizen participation, open innovation, and crowdsourcing: Challenges and opportunities for planning. Journal of Planning Literature, 28, 1 (2012), 3–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, P.V., and Tan, Y. Developer heterogeneity and formation of communication networks in open source software projects. Journal of Management Information Systems, 27, 3 (2011), 179–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A. The Wealth of Nations, Cannan, E. (ed.), New York: Modern Library, 1937.
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson, W.B., and Radin, R.F. Social capital and social influence on the board of directors. Journal of Management Studies, 46, 1 (2009), 16–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sudhakar, G.P.; Farooq, A.; and Patnaik, S. Soft factors affecting the performance of software development teams. Team Performance Management, 17, 3/4 (2011), 187–205.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, E. A group effort: More companies are turning to the wisdom of the crowd to find ways to innovate. Marketing News, 44, 2 (2010), 22–28.
   Google Scholar
• Terwiesch, C., and Xu, Y. Innovation contests, open innovation, and multiagent problem solving. Management Science, 54, 9 (2008), 1529–1543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vance, A. Fight club for geeks. Business Week, January 9, 2012, pp. 37–38.
   Google Scholar
• Woolley, A.W.; Chabris, C.F.; Pentland, A.; Hashmi, N.; and Malone, T.W. Evidence for a collective intelligence factor in the performance of human groups. Science, 330, 6004 (2010), 686–688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Y.; Chen, P.Y.; and Banker, R. Impact of past performance and strategic bidding on winner determination of open innovation contest. Proceedings of the 21st Workshop on Information Systems and Economics. Atlanta, GA: Association for Information Systems, 2010, pp. 11–12.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Y.; Chen, P.Y.; and Pavlou, P. Open innovation: Strategic design of online contests. Proceedings of the 20th Workshop on Information Systems and Economics. Atlanta, GA: Association for Information Systems, 2009, pp. 14–15.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng, H.; Li, D.; and Hou, W. Task Design, motivation, and participation in crowdsourcing contests. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 15, 4 (2011), 57–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar