Platform Desertion by App Developers

References

• Adner, R., and Kapoor, R. Value creation in innovation ecosystems: How the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic Management Journal, 31, 3 (2010), 306–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alonso, R.; Dessein, W.; and Matouschek, N. When does coordination require centralization. American Economic Review, 98, 1 (2008), 145–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, T., and Rubin, H. Estimators of the parameters of a single equation in a complete set of stochastic equations. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 21 (1949), 570–582.
   Google Scholar
• Andres, H.P., and Zmud, R.W. A contingency approach to software project coordination. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18, 3 (2002), 41–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argyres, N., and Bigelow, L. Innovation, modularity, and vertical deintegration: Evidence from the early us auto industry. Organization Science, 21, 4 (2010), 842–853.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Athey, S., and Roberts, J. Organizational design: Decision rights and incentive contracts. American Economic Review, 91, 2 (2001), 200–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakos, Y.J., and Katsamakas, E. Design and ownership of two-sided networks: Implications for Internet platforms. Journal of Management Information Systems, 25, 2 (2008), 171–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin, C., and Clark, K. Design Rules: The Power of Modularity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, C., and Clark, K. The architecture of participation: Does code architecture mitigate free riding in the open source development model? Management Science, 52, 7 (2006), 1116–1127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartling, B.; Fehr, E.; and Schmidt, K. Screening, competition, and job design: Economic origins of good jobs. American Economic Review, 102, 2 (2012), 834–864.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basmann, R. On finite sample distributions of generalized classical linear identifiability test statistics. Journal of American Statistical Association, 55, 292 (1960), 650–659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, T. Potential problems in the statistical control of variables in organizational research: A qualitative analysis with recommendations. Organizational Research Methods, 8, 3 (2005), 274–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boudreau, K. Open platform strategies and innovation: Granting access vs. devolving control. Management Science, 56, 10 (2010), 1849–1872.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bresnahan, T., and Greenstein, S. Mobile computing: The next platform rivalry. American Economic Review, 104, 5 (2014), 475–480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brusoni, S.; Prencipe, A.; and Pavitt, K. Knowledge specialization, organizational coupling, and boundaries of the firm: Why do firms know more than they make? Administrative Science Quarterly, 46 (2001), 597–621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burrows, P. How Apple feeds its army of app makers. Businessweek, June 13–19 (2011), 39–40.
   Google Scholar
• Ceccagnoli, M.; Huang, P.; Forman, C.; and Wu, D. Cocreation of value in a platform ecosystem: The case of enterprise software. MIS Quarterly, 36, 1 (2012), 263–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceccagnoli, M.; Huang, P.; Forman, C.; and Wu, D. Digital platforms: When is participation valuable? Communications of the ACM, 57, 2 (2014), 38–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cennamo, C., and Santalo, J. Platform competition: Strategic tradeoffs in platform markets. Strategic Management Journal, 34 (2013), 1331–1350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, J.; Nazareth, D.L.; and Jain, H.K. Implementing service-oriented architecture in organizations. Journal of Management Information Systems, 26, 4 (2010), 253–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dessein, W. Authority and communication in organizations. Review of Economics Studies, 69, 2 (2002), 811–838.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dey, D.; Lahiri, A.; and Zhang, G. Hacker behavior, network effects, and the security software market. Journal of Management Information Systems, 29, 2 (2012), 77–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dougherty, D., and Dunne, D. Organizing ecologies of complex innovation. Organization Science, 22, 5 (2011), 1214–1223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Economist platforms: Something to stand on. Economist, January 18, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Eick, S.; Graves, T.; Karr, A.; Marron, J.; and Mockus, A. Does code decay? Assessing evidence from change management data. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 27, 1 (2001), 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ethiraj, S., and Levinthal, D. Modularity and innovation in complex systems. Management Science, 50, 2 (2004), 159–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fama, E., and Jensen, M. Separation of agency and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26 (June 1983), 301–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faraj, S., and Xiao, Y. Coordination in fast response organizations. Management Science, 52, 8 (2006), 1155–1169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, J., and Saloner, G. Converters, compatibility, and the control of interfaces. Journal of Industrial Economics, 40 (March 1992), 9–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garen, J. The returns to schooling: A selectivity bias approach with a continuous choice variable. Econometrica, 52, 5 (1984), 1199–1218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gokpinar, B.; Hopp, W.; and Iravani, S. The impact of misalignment of organizational structure and product architecture on quality in complex product development. Management Science, 56, 3 (2010), 468–484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulati, R., and Singh, H. The architecture of cooperation: Managing coordination costs and appropriation concerns in strategic alliances. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43 (1998), 781–814.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herath, H.S.B., and Herath, T.C. Investments in information security: A real options perspective with Bayesian postaudit. Journal of Management Information Systems, 25, 3 (2009), 337–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, P.; Ceccagnoli, M.; Forman, C.; and Wu, D. Appropriability mechanisms and the platform partnership decision: Evidence from enterprise software. Management Science, 59, 1 (2013), 102–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamel, R. Effect of modularity on system evolution. IEEE Software, January 1987, 48–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kude, T.; Dibbern, J.; and Heinzl, A. Why do complementors participate? An analysis of partnership networks in the enterprise software industry. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 59, 2 (2012), 250–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lahiri, A.; Dewan, R.M.; and Freimer, M.L. The disruptive effect of open platforms on markets for wireless services. Journal of Management Information Systems, 27, 3 (2011), 81–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langlois, R. Modularity in technology and organization. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 49 (2002), 19–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, J.-H.; Stratopoulos, T.C.; and Wirjanto, T.S. Path dependence of dynamic information technology capability: An empirical investigation. Journal of Management Information Systems, 28, 3 (2012), 45–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lusch, R., and Nambisan, S. Service innovation: A service-dominant logic perspective. MIS Quarterly, 39, 1 (2015), 155–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacCormack, A.; Rusnak, J.; and Baldwin, C. Exploring the structure of complex software designs: An empirical study of open source and proprietary code. Management Science, 52, 7 (2006), 1015–1030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mähring, M. IT project governance. Ph.D. diss. Economic Research Institute, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Malone, T., and Crowston, K. The interdisciplinary study of coordination. ACM Computing Surveys, 26, 1 (1994), 87–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mantena, R., and Saha, R.L. Co-opetition between differentiated platforms in two-sided markets. Journal of Management Information Systems, 29, 2 (2012), 109–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messerschmitt, D., and Szyperski, C. Software Ecosystem. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Mikkola, J., and Gassman, O. Managing modularity of product architectures: Toward an integrated theory. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 50, 2 (2003), 204–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nambisan, S. Complementary product integration by high technology new ventures: The role of initial technology strategy. Management Science, 48, 3 (2002), 382–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nault, B. Information technology and organization design: Locating decisions and information. Management Science, 44, 10 (1998), 1321–1335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nidumolu, S. The effect of coordination and uncertainty on software project performance: Residual performance risk as an intervening variable. Information Systems Research, 6, 3 (1995), 191–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OpenSignal Android fragmentation visualized. 2013. opensignal.com/reports/fragmentation-2013 (accessed July 8, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Parnas, D. On the criteria to be used in decomposing systems into modules. Communications of the ACM, 15, 9 (1972), 1053–1058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parnas, D.; Clements, P.; and Weiss, D. The modular structure of complex systems. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 11, 3 (1985), 259–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, T.L.; Cheney, P.H.; Sweeney, P.D.; and Hightower, R.T. The effects of information technology project complexity on group interaction. Journal of Management Information Systems, 21, 3 (2005), 223–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rysman, M. The economics of two-sided markets. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 23, 3 (2009), 125–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez, R. Strategic flexibility in product competition. Strategic Management Journal, 16 (1995), 135–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez, R., and Mahoney, J. Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product organization and design. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 1 (1996), 63–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarker, S.; Sarker, S.; Sahaym, A.; and Bjorn-Andersen, N. Exploring value cocreation in relationships between an ERP vendor and its partners: A revelatory case study. MIS Quarterly, 36, 1 (2012), 317–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schilling, M. Toward a general modular systems theory and its application to interfirm product modularity. Academy of Management Review, 25, 2 (2000), 312–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semadeni, M.; Withers, M.; and Certo, S. The perils of endogeneity and instrumental variables in strategy research: Understanding through simulations. Strategic Management Journal, 35, 7 (2014), 1070–1079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srikanth, K., and Puranam, P. The firm as a coordination system: Evidence from software services offshoring. Organization Science, 25, 4 (2014), 1253–1271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strietfeld, D. As boom lures app creators, tough part is making a living. New York Times, November 17, 2012. www.nytimes.com/2012/11/18/business/as-boom-lures-app-creators-tough-part-is-making-a-living.html. Accessed February 2, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Subramanyam, R.; Ramasubbu, N.; and Krishnan, M. In search of efficient flexibility: Effects of software component granularity on development effort, defects, and customization effort. Information Systems Research, 23, 3 (2012), 787–803.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, M. How does the variance of product ratings matter? Management Science, 58, 4 (2012), 696–707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temizkan, O.; Kumar, R.L.; Park, S.; and Subramaniam, C. Patch release behaviors of software vendors in response to vulnerabilities: An empirical analysis. Journal of Management Information Systems, 28, 4 (2012), 305–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, L.; Autio, E.; and Gann, D. Architectural leverage: Putting platforms in context. Academy of Management Perspectives, 28, 2 (2014), 198–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiwana, A. Does technological modularity substitute for control? A study of alliance performance in software outsourcing. Strategic Management Journal, 29, 7 (2008), 769–780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiwana, A. Governance-knowledge fit in systems development projects. Information Systems Research, 20, 2 (2009), 180–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiwana, A. Evolutionary competition in platform ecosystems. Information Systems Research, 26, 2 (2015), 266–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiwana, A., and Konsynski, B. Complementarities between organizational IT architecture and governance structure. Information Systems Research, 21, 2 (2010), 288–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiwana, A.; Konsynski, B.; and Bush, A. Platform evolution: Coevolution of architecture, governance, and environmental dynamics. Information Systems Research, 21, 4 (2010), 675–687.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ülkü, S.; Schmidt, G.; and Dimofte, C. Consumer valuation of modularly upgradeable products. Management Science, 58, 9 (2012), 1761–1776.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Ven, A., and Delbecq, A. Determinants of coordination modes within organizations. American Sociological Review, 41 (April 1976), 322–338.
   Google Scholar
• Venturebeat, 700k of the 1.2 M apps available for iPhone, Android, and Windows are zombies, August 26, 2013, http://venturebeat.com/2013/08/26/700k-of-the-1-2m-apps-available-for-iphone-android-and-windows-are-zombies/. Accessed February 2, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Wareham, J.; Fox, P.; and Giner, J. Technology ecosystem governance. Organization Science, 25, 4 (2014), 1195–1215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worren, N.; Moore, K.; and Cardona, P. Modularity, strategic flexibility, and firm performance: A study of the home appliance industry. Strategic Management Journal, 23 (2002), 1123–1140.
   Google Scholar
• Xia, W., and Lee, G. Complexity of information systems development projects: Conceptualization and measurement development. Journal of Management Information Systems, 22, 1 (2005), 45–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaheer, S.; Albert, S.; and Zaheer, A. Time scales and organization theory. Academy of Management Review, 24, 4 (1999), 725–741.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zweben, S.H.; Edwards, S.H.; Weide, B.W.; and Hollingsworth, J.E. The effects of layering and encapsulation on software development cost and quality. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 21, 3 (1995), 200–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar