The Determinants and Impacts of Aesthetics in Users’ First Interaction with Websites

References

• Ajzen, I. Nature and operation of attitudes. Annual Review of Psychology, 52 (2001), 27–58.
   Google Scholar
• AlDiri, K.; Hobbs, D.; and Qahwaji, R. The importance of gender, IT experience, and media-rich social cues on initial trust in e-commerce websites. In I. Lee (ed.), Encyclopedia of E-Business Development and Management in the Global Economy. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 2010, pp. 709–718.
   Google Scholar
• Alf. E.F. Jr., and Graf, R.G. Asymptotic confidence limits for the difference between two squared multiple correlations: A simplified approach. Psychological Methods, 4, 1 (1999), 70–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnheim, R. Order and complexity in landscape design. In R. Arnheim (ed.), Toward a Psychology of Art. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1966, pp. 123–135.
   Google Scholar
• Averill, J.R.; Stanat, P.; and More, T.A. Aesthetics and the environment. Review of General Psychology, 2, 2 (1998), 153–174.
   Google Scholar
• Babin, B.J.; Darden, W.R.; and Griffin, M. Work and/or fun: Measuring hedonic and utilitarian shopping value. Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 4 (1994), 644–656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bambauer-Sachse, S.; Hüttl, V.; and Gierl, H. Can advertising elements improve consumer evaluations of brand extensions with a moderate or low fit? Psychology and Marketing, 28, 2 (2011), 205–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barclay, D.; Thompson, R.; and Higgins, C. The partial least squares (PLS) approach to causal modeling: Personal computer adoption and use as an illustration. Technology Studies, 2, 2 (1995), 285–309.
   Google Scholar
• Beardsley, M.C. Aesthetics: Problems in the Philosophy of Criticism. Cambridge, Indianapolis: Hackett, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Berlyne, D.E. Aesthetics and Psychobiology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Bhargave, R., and Montgomery, N.V. The social context of temporal sequences: Why first impressions shape shared experiences. Journal of Consumer Research, 40, 3 (2013), 501–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloch, P.H. Product design and marketing: Reflections after fifteen years. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28, 3 (2011), 378–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady, E. The Sublime in Modern Philosophy: Aesthetics, Ethics, and Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Budescu, D.V. Dominance analysis: A new approach to the problem of relative importance of predictors in multiple regression. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3 (1993), 542–551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, S., and Xu, Y.C. Designing not just for pleasure: effects of web site aesthetics on consumer shopping value. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 15, 4 (2011), 159–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chitturi, R.; Raghunathan, R.; and Mahajan, V. Delight by design: The role of hedonic versus utilitarian benefits. Journal of Marketing, 72, 3 (2008), 48–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, D., and Cox, A.D. Beyond first impressions: The effects of repeated exposure on consumer liking of visually complex and simple product designs. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 30, 2 (2002), 119–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coyle, J.R., and Thorson, E. The effects of progressive levels of interactivity and vividness in web marketing sites. Journal of advertising, 30, 3 (2001), 65–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Grosbois, D. Corporate social responsibility reporting by the global hotel industry: Commitment, initiatives and performance. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 31, 3 (2012), 896–905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, L., and Poole, M.S. Affect in web interfaces: A study of the impacts of web page visual complexity and order. MIS Quarterly, 34, 4 (2010), 711–730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dion, K.; Berscheid, E.; and Walster, E. What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 3 (1972), 285–290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dix, R. Addison and the concept of “novelty” as a basic aesthetic category. British Journal of Aesthetics, 26, 4 (1986), 383–390.
   Google Scholar
• Djajadiningrat, J.P.; Gaver, W.W.; and Fres, J.W. Interaction relabelling and extreme characters: Methods for exploring aesthetic interactions. Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques. New York, 2000, pp. 66–71.
   Google Scholar
• Djamasbi, S.; Siegel, M.; and Tullis, T. Generation Y, web design, andeye tracking. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 68, 5 (2010), 307–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman, A. Beardsley’s legacy: The theory of aesthetic value. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 63, 4 (2005), 409–412.
   Google Scholar
• Gregor, S.; Lin, A.C.; Gedeon, T.; Riaz, A.; and Zhu, D. Neuroscience and a nomological network for the understanding and assessment of emotions in information systems research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 30, 4 (2014), 13–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann, J.; Sutcliffe, A.; and Angeli, A.D. Towards a theory of user judgement of aesthetics and user interface quality. ACM Transactions on Computer–Human Interaction, 15, 4 (2008), 1–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassenzahl, M. The interplay of beauty, goodness, and usability in interactive products. Human–Computer Interaction, 19, 4 (2004), 319–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hekkert, P.; Snelders, D.; and van Wieringen, P.C.W. “Most advanced, yet acceptable”: Typicality and novelty as joint predictors of aesthetic preference in industrial design. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 1 (2003), 111–125.
   Google Scholar
• Heller, D. Aesthetics and interaction design: Some preliminary thoughts. Interactions, 12, 5 (2005), 4850.
   Google Scholar
• Holbrook, M.B. Aims, concepts, and methods for the representation of individual differences in esthetic responses to design features. Journal of Consumer Research, 13, 3 (1986), 337347.
   Google Scholar
• Hong, W.; Thong, J.Y.L.; and Tam, K.Y. Does animation attract online users’ attention? The effects of flash on information search performance and perceptions. Information Systems Research, 15, 1 (2004), 6086.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, S., and Kaplan, R. Cognition and Environment. New York: Praeger, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Karvonen, K. The beauty of simplicity. ACM Conference on Universal Usability. Washington: ACM, 2000, pp. 85–90.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, H.-W.; Gupta, S.; and Koh, J. Investigating the intention to purchase digital items in social networking communities: A customer value perspective. Information and Management, 48, 6 (2011), 228–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J.; Lee, J.; and Choi, D. Designing emotionally evocative homepages: An empirical study of the quantitative relations between design factors and emotional dimensions. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 59, 6 (2003), 899–940.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubovy, M. Visual aesthetics. In A.E. Kazdin (ed.), Encyclopedia of Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000, pp. 188–193.
   Google Scholar
• Landis, J.R., and Koch, G.G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 1 (1977), 159–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landwehr, J.R.; Wentzel, D.; and Herrmann, A. Product design for the long run: Consumer responses to typical and atypical designs at different stages of exposure. Journal of Marketing, 77, 5 (2013), 92–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavie, T., and Tractinsky, N. Assessing dimensions of perceived visual aesthetics of web sites. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 60, 3 (2004), 269–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, H.; Saraf, N.; Hu, Q.; and Xue, Y. Assimilation of enterprise systems: The effect of institutional pressures and the mediating role of top management. MIS Quarterly, 31, 1 (2007), 59–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, Y.-K.; Lee, S.-S.; and Kim, D.-J. Interactivity attributes for expression-oriented interaction design. International Journal of Design, 5, 3 (2011), 113–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindgaard, G.; Dudek, C.; Sen, D.; Sumegi, L.; and Noonan, P. An exploration of relations between visual appeal, trustworthiness and perceived usability of homepages. ACM Transactions on Computer–Human Interaction, 18, 1 (2011), 1–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindgaard, G.; Fernandes, G.; Dudek, C.; and Brown, J. Attention web designers: You have 50 milliseconds to make a good first impression. Behaviour and Information Technology, 25, 2 (2006), 115–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowry, P.B.; Vance, A.; Moody, G.; Beckman, B.; and Read, A. Explaining and predicting the impact of branding alliances and web site quality on initial consumer trust of e-commerce web sites. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24, 4 (2008), 199–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maritain, J. Beauty and imitation. In M. Rader (ed.), A Modern Book of Esthetics. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1966, pp. 27–34.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, J.K., and Ahn, W.-K. Order effects in contingency learning: The role of task complexity. Memory and Cognition, 34, 3 (2006), 568–576.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, B.A.S.; Sherrard, M.J.; and Wentzel, D. The role of sensation seeking and need for cognition on web-site evaluations: A resource-matching perspective. Psychology and Marketing, 22, 2 (2005), 109–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martindale, C.; Moore, K.; and Borkum, J. Aesthetic preference: Anomalous findings for Berlyne’s psychobiological theory. American Journal of Psychology, 103, 1 (1990), 53–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, G.C., and Benbasat, I. Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research, 2, 3 (1991), 192–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moshagen, M., and Thielsch, M.T. Facets of visual aesthetics. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 68, 10 (2010), 689–709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muth, C., and Carbon, C.C. The aesthetic aha: On the pleasure of having insights into Gestalt. Acta Psychologica, 144, 1 (2013), 25–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadkarni, S., and Gupta, R. A task-based model of perceived website complexity. MIS Quarterly, 31 (2007), 501–524.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D.A. The Design of Everyday Things. New York: Basic Books, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D.A. Emotional Design: Why We Love (Or Hate) Everyday Things. New York: Basic Books, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, J., and Griffith, D. An emerging web site design model for marketing. Commnications of the ACM, 41, 3 (1998), 44–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, S.E.; Schloss, K.B.; and Sammartino, J. Visual aesthetics and human preference. Annual Review of Psychology, 64 (2013), 77–107.
   Google Scholar
• Parboteeah, D.V.; Valacich, J.S.; and John D. Wells. The influence of website characteristics on a consumer’s urge to buy impulsively. Information Systems Research, 20, 1 (2009), 60–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P.M.; MacKenzie, S.B.; Lee, J.-Y.; and Podsakoff, N.P. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 5 (2003), 879–903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pope, N.K.L.; Voges, K.E.; and Brown, M.R. The effect of provocation in the form of mild erotica on attitude to the ad and corporate image: Differences between cause-related and product-based advertising. Journal of Advertising, 33, 1 (2004), 69–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preacher, K.J., and Hayes, A.F. SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36, 4 (2004), 717–731.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rawsthorn, A. Does the iPhone have “it”? Early signs are promising. International Herald Tribune, June 25, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Reber, R.; Schwarz, N.; and Winkielman, P. Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver’s processing experience? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 4 (2004), 364–382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reimann, M.; Zaichkowsky, J.; Neuhaus, C.; Bender, T.; and Weber, B. Aesthetic package design: A behavioral, neural, and psychological investigation. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20, 4 (2010), 431–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rindova, V.P., and Petkova, A.P. When is a new thing a good thing? Technological change, product form design, and perceptions of value for product innovations. Organization Science, 18, 2 (2007), 217–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schenkman, B.N., and Jonsson, R.U. Aesthetics and preferences of web pages. Behaviour and Information Technology, 19, 5 (2000), 367–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorlacius, L. A model of visual, aesthetic communication focusing on web sites. Digital Creativity, 13, 2 (2002), 85–99.
   Google Scholar
• Tractinsky, N.; Cokhavi, A.; Kirschenbaum, M.; and Sharfi, T. Evaluating the consistency of immediate aesthetic perceptions of web pages. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 64, 11 (2006), 1071–1083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tractinsky, N.; Katz, A.S.; and Ikar, D. What is beautiful is usable. Interacting with Computers, 13, 2 (2000), 127–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuch, A.N.; Presslaber, E.E.; Stöcklin, M.; Opwis, K.; and Bargas-Avila, J.A. The role of visual complexity and prototypicality regarding first impression of websites: Working towards understanding aesthetic judgments. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 70, 11 (2012), 794–811.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tung, L.L.; Xu, Y.; and Tan, F.B. Attributes of web site usability: A study of web users with the repertory grid technique. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 13, 4 (2009), 97–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Heijden, H. User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS Quarterly, 28, 4 (2004), 695–704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veryzer, R.W. The place of product design and aesthetics in consumer research. Advances in Consumer Research, 22, 1 (1995), 641–645.
   Google Scholar
• Veryzer, R.W., and Hutchinson, J.W. The influence of unity and prototypicality on aesthetic responses to new product designs. Journal of Consumer Research, 24, 4 (1998), 374–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolterstorff, N. Art in Action: Toward a Christian Aesthetic. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, P.; Wallace, J.; and McCarthy, J. Aesthetics and experience-centered design. ACM Transactions on Computer–Human Interaction, 15, 4 (2008), 18:11–18:21.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, P., and Li, N. The importance of affective quality. Communications of the ACM, 48, 9 (2005), 105–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar