6,576
Views
165
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric

References

  • Agarwal, R., and Karahanna, E. Time flies when you’re having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quarterly, 24, 4 (2000), 665–694.
  • Barclay, D.; Higgins, C.; and Thompson, R. The partial least squares (PLS) approach to causal modeling: Personal computer adoption and use as an illustration. Technology Studies, 2, 2 (1995), 285–309.
  • Baron, R.M., and Kenny, D.A. The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 6 (1986), 1173–1182.
  • Beardsley, M.C. Aesthetic Theory and Educational Theory. Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press, 1970.
  • Berlyne, D. Aesthetics and Psychobiology. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1971.
  • Bronowski, J. The Visionary Eye. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1978.
  • Bunchball, I. Gamification 101: An introduction to the use of game dynamics to influence behavior. White Paper, 2010. Available at: www.csh.rit.edu/~ajman/summer2012/gamification101.pdf (accessed on March 19, 2016)
  • Cai, S., and Xu, Y. Designing not just for pleasure: Effects of web site aesthetics on consumer shopping value. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 15, 4, (2011), 159–188.
  • Chen, Y.; Burton, T.; Vorvoreanu, M.; and Whittinghill, D. M. Cogent: A case study of meaningful gamification in education with virtual currency. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 10, 1 (2015), 39–45.
  • Cheong, C.; Cheong, F.; and Filippou, J. Quick quiz: A gamified approach for enhancing learning. Proceedings of Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS), Jeju Island, Republic of Korea, June 18–22, 2013.
  • Chiu, C.M.; Wang, E.T.; Fang, Y.H.; and Huang, H. Y. Understanding customers’ repeat purchase intentions in B2C e‐commerce: The roles of utilitarian value, hedonic value and perceived risk. Information Systems Journal, 24, 1 (2014), 85–114.
  • Chuang, Y.H.; Lin, C.S.; and Shu, W. Continuance of social network services games. International Journal of Global Management Studies, 3, 1 (2011), 1–15.
  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York, NY: Harper and Row, 1990.
  • Dale, S. Gamification making work fun, or making fun of work? Business Information Review, 31, 2 (2014), 82–90.
  • Davis, F.D.; Bagozzi, R.P.; and Warshaw, P.R. Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 14 (1992), 1111–1132.
  • Deci, E.L., and Ryan, R.M. The what and why of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 4 (2000), 227–268.
  • Deng, L.; Turner, D.E.; Gehling, R.; and Prince, B. User experience, satisfaction, and continual usage intention of IT. European Journal of Information Systems, 19, 1 (2010), 60–75.
  • Dergousoff, K., and Mandryk, R.L. Mobile gamification for crowdsourcing data collection: Leveraging the freemium model. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Seoul, Republic of Korea, April 18–23, 2015, pp. 1065–1074.
  • Deterding, S.; Dixon, D.; Khaled, R., and Nacke, L. From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining gamification. Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments, Tampere, Finland, September 28–30, 2011, pp. 9–15.
  • Deterding, S. Eudaimonic design, or: Six invitations to rethink gamification. In M. Fuchs, S. Fizek, P. Ruffino, P. Ruffino, and N. Schrape (eds.), Rethinking Gamification. Lüneburg, Germany: Meson Press, 2014, pp. 305–323.
  • Dewey, J. Art as Experience. New York, NY: Berkeley Publishing, 1934.
  • Fornell, C., and Bookstein, F.L. Two structural equation models: LISREL and PLS applied to consumer exit-voice theory. Journal of Marketing Research, 19, 4 (1982), 440–452.
  • Ghani, J.A., and Deshpande, S.P. Task characteristics and the experience of optimal flow in human–computer interaction. Journal of Psychology, 128, 4 (1994), 381–391.
  • Grosse-Hering, B.; Mason, J.; Aliakseyeu, D.; Bakker, C.; and Desmet, P. Slow design for meaningful interactions. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Paris, France, April 27–May 5, 2013, pp. 3431–3440.
  • Guo, Y.M., and Poole, M.S. Antecedents of flow in online shopping: A test of alternative models. Information Systems Journal, 19, 4 (2009), 369–390.
  • Hair, J.F.; Black, W.C.; and Babin, B.J. Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective, 7th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2009.
  • Hamari, J. Transforming homo economicus into homo ludens: A field experiment on gamification in a utilitarian peer-to-peer trading service. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 124 (2013), 236–245.
  • Hamari, J., and Koivisto, J. Social motivations to use gamification: An empirical study of gamifying exercise. Proceedings of European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Utrecht, Netherlands, June 5–8, 2013, pp. 1–12.
  • Hamari, J., and Koivisto, J. Measuring flow in gamification: Dispositional flow scale-2. Computers in Human Behavior, 40 (2014), 133–143.
  • Hamari, J.; Koivisto, J.; and Sarsa, H. Does gamification work? A literature review of empirical studies on gamification. Proceedings of 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), Waikoloa, Hawaii, USA, January 6–9, 2014, pp. 3025–3034.
  • Hamari, J., and Koivisto, J. “Working out for likes”: An empirical study on social influence in exercise gamification. Computers in Human Behavior, 50 (2015), 333–347.
  • Hamari, J.; Shernoff, D.J.; Rowe, E.; Coller, B.; Asbell-Clarke, J.; and Edwards, T. Challenging games help students learn: An empirical study on engagement, flow and immersion in game-based learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 54 (2016), 170–179.
  • Harter, J.K.; Schmidt, F.L.; and Hayes, T.L. Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 2 (2002), 268–279.
  • Harwood, T., and Garry, T. An investigation into gamification as a customer engagement experience environment. Journal of Services Marketing, 29, 6 (2015), 533–546.
  • Hinkin, T.R. A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organizational Research Methods, 1, 1 (1998), 104–121.
  • Hsu, S.H.; Chang, J.W.; and Lee, C.C. Designing attractive gamification features for collaborative storytelling websites. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16, 6 (2013), 428–435.
  • Huotari, K., and Hamari, J. Defining gamification: A service marketing perspective. Proceedings of the 16th International Academic MindTrek Conference, Tampere, Finland October 3–5, 2012, pp. 17–22.
  • Jennings, M. Theory and models for creating engaging and immersive ecommerce websites. Proceedings of the ACM SIGCPR conference on Computer Personnel Research, Chicago, April 6–8, 2000, pp. 77–85.
  • Jiang, Z.; Wang, W.; Tan, B.C.; and Yu, J. The determinants and impacts of aesthetics in users’ first interaction with websites. Journal of Management Information Systems, 33, 1 (2016), 229–259.
  • Kankanhalli, A.; Taher, M.; Cavusoglu, H.; and Kim, S.H. Gamification: A new paradigm for online user engagement. Proceedings of International Conference on Information Systems, Orlando, FL, December 16–19, 2012, pp. 1–10.
  • Kankanhalli, A.; Tan, B.C.; and Wei, K.K. Contributing knowledge to electronic knowledge repositories: an empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly, 29, 1 (2005), 113–143.
  • Kapp, K.M. The Gamification of Learning and Instruction Fieldbook: Ideas into Practice. San Francisco, CA: Wiley, 2013.
  • Kaptelinin, V., and Nardi, B.A. Acting with Technology: Activity Theory and Interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2009.
  • Kim, H.; Suh K.S.; and Lee, U.K. Effects of collaborative online shopping on shopping experience through social and relational perspectives. Information and Management, 50, 4 (2013), 169–180.
  • Kumar J. Gamification at work: Designing engaging business software. In A. Marcus (ed.) Design, User Experience, and Usability: Health, Learning, Playing, Cultural, and Cross-Cultural User Experience. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2013, pp. 528–537.
  • Laurel B. Computers as Theatre, New York, NY: Addison-Wesley, 1993.
  • Lee, C.L., and Yang, H.J. Organization structure, competition and performance measurement systems and their joint effects on performance. Management Accounting Research, 22, 2 (2011), 84–104.
  • Leonardi, P.M. When flexible routines meet flexible technologies: Affordance, constraint, and the imbrication of human and material agencies. MIS Quarterly, 35, 1 (2011), 147–167.
  • Li, I.; Dey, A.K.; and Forlizzi, J. Understanding my data, myself: Supporting self-reflection with UbiComp technologies. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing. Beijing, China, September 17–21, 2011, pp. 405–414.
  • Liang, H.; Saraf, N.; Qing, H.; and Yajitong, X. Assimilation of enterprise systems: The effect of institutional pressures and the mediating role of top management. MIS Quarterly, 31, 1 (2007), 59–87.
  • Little, B.R. Personal project pursuit: Dimensions and dynamics of personal meaning. In P.T.P. Wong and P.S. Fry (eds.), The Human Question for Meaning: A Handbook of Psychological Research and Clinical Applications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1998, pp. 193–212.
  • Little, B.R.; Salemla-Aro, K.; and Phillips, S.D., (eds.). Personal Project Pursuit: Goals, Action and Human Flourishing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2007.
  • Liu, D.; Li, X.; and Santhanam, R. Digital games and beyond: What happens when players compete. MIS Quarterly, 37, 1 (2013), 111–124.
  • Lowry, P.B.; Gaskin, J.; Twyman, N.; Hammer, B.; and Roberts, T. Taking “fun and games” seriously: Proposing the hedonic-motivation system adoption model (HMSAM). Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 14, 11 (2012), 617–671.
  • Ma, M., and Agarwal, R. Through a glass darkly: Information technology design, identity verification, and knowledge contribution in online communities. Information Systems Research, 18, 1 (2007), 42–67.
  • Magni, M.; Taylor, M.S.; and Venkatesh, V. “To play or not to play”: A cross-temporal investigation using hedonic and instrumental perspectives to explain user intentions to explore a technology. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 68, 9 (2010), 572–588.
  • Mahnke, R.; Benlian, A.; and Hess, T. Flow experience in information systems research: Revisiting its conceptualization, conditions, and effects. Proceedings of International Conference on Information Systems, Auckland, New Zealand, December 14–17, 2014, pp. 1–22.
  • Mattingly, B.A., and Lewandowski, G.W., Jr. The power of one: Benefits of individual self-expansion. Journal of Positive Psychology, 8, 1 (2013), 12–22.
  • McCarthy, J., and Wright, P. Technology as Experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2004.
  • McGonigal, J. Reality Is Broken: Why Games Make Us Better and How They Can Change the World. New York, NY: Penguin, 2011.
  • McGregor, I., and Little, B.R. Personal projects, happiness, and meaning: On doing well and being yourself. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 2 (1998), 494–512.
  • McGrenere, J., and Ho, W. Affordances: Clarifying and evolving a concept. Proceedings of Graphics Interface, 2000, Montreal, Canada, May 15–17, 2000, pp. 179–186.
  • Mehra, A.; Kilduff, M.; and Brass, D.J. The social networks of high and low self-monitors: Implications for workplace performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 1 (2001), 121–146.
  • Mekler, E.D.; Brühlmann, F.; Opwis, K.; and Tuch, A.N. Disassembling gamification: The effects of points and meaning on user motivation and performance. Proceedings of CHI’13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Paris, France, April 27–May 2, 2013, pp. 1137–1142.
  • Nardi, B. My Life as a Night Elf Priest: An Anthropological Account of World of Warcraft. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2010.
  • Nicholson, S. Two paths to motivation through game design elements: Reward-based gamification and meaningful gamification. Proceedings of iConference, Fort Worth, TX, February 12–15, 2013, pp. 671–672.
  • Nicholson, S. A recipe for meaningful gamification. In T. Reiners and L.C. Wood (eds.), Gamification: Education and Business. New York, NY: Springer, 2015, pp. 1–20.
  • Norman, D.A. The Invisible Computer. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1998,
  • Nuttavuthisit, K. How consumers as aesthetic subjects co-create the aesthetic experience of the retail environment. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 21, 4, (2014), 432–437.
  • Patel, M.S.; Asch, D.A.; and Volpp, K.G. Wearable devices as facilitators, not drivers, of health behavior change. JAMA, 313, 5 (2015), 459–460.
  • Podsakoff, P.M., and Organ, D.W. Self reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12, 4 (1986), 531–544.
  • Przybylski, A.K.; Rigby, C.S.; and Ryan, R.M. A motivational model of video game engagement. Review of General Psychology, 14, 2 (2010), 154–166.
  • Rapp, A., and Cena, F. Self-monitoring and technology: Challenges and open issues in personal informatics. In C. Stephanidis, and M. Antona (eds.), Universal Access in Human–Computer Interaction: Design for All and Accessibility Practice. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2014. pp. 613–622.
  • Richter, G.; Raban, D.R.; and Rafaeli, S. Studying gamification: The effect of rewards and incentives on motivation. In T. Reiners, and L.C. Wood (eds.), Gamification in Education and Business. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2015, pp. 21–46.
  • Ryan, R.M., and Deci, E.L. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 1 (2000), 54–67.
  • Sandelancls, L.E., and Buckner, G.C. Of art and work: Aesthetic experience and the psychology of work feelings. Research in Organizational Behavior, 11 (1989), l05–l3l.
  • Santhanam, R.; Liu, D.; and Shen, W.C.M. Research Note—Gamification of technology-mediated training: Not all competitions are the same. Information Systems Research, 27, 2 (2016), 453–465.
  • Stanculescu, L.C.; Bozzon, A.; Sips, R.J.; and Houben, G.J. Work and play: An experiment in enterprise gamification. Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW’16), San Francisco, CA, February 27–March 2, 2016, pp. 346–358.
  • Suh, A. Applying design elements in the workplace. In International Conference on Information Systems. Fort Worth, TX, December 13–16, 2015, pp. 1–11.
  • Suh, A.; Wagner, C.; and Liu, L. The effects of game dynamics on user engagement in gamified systems. Proceedings of the 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Kauai, HI, January 5–8, 2015, pp. 672–681.
  • Taylor, S.S. Overcoming aesthetic muteness: Researching organizational members’ aesthetic experience. Human Relations, 55, 7 (2002), 821–840.
  • Thiebes, S.; Lins, S.; and Basten, D. Gamifying information systems: Synthesis of gamification mechanics and dynamics. Proceedings of European Conference on Information Systems, Tel Aviv, Israel, June 9–11, 2014.
  • Todd, P., and Benbasat, I. An experimental investigation of the impact of computer based decision aids on decision making strategies. Information Systems Research, 2, 2 (1991). 87–115.
  • Vance, A.; Elie-Dit-Cosaque, C.; and Straub, D.W. Examining trust in information technology artifacts: The effects of system quality and culture. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24, 4 (2008), 73–100.
  • Van Vugt, H.C.; Hoorn, J.F.; Konijn, E.A.; and de Bie Dimitriadou, A. Affective affordances: Improving interface character engagement through interaction. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64, 9, (2006), 874–888.
  • Visinescu, L.L.; Sidorova, A.; Jones, M.C.; and Prybutok, V.R. The influence of website dimensionality on customer experiences, perceptions and behavioral intentions: An exploration of 2D vs. 3D web design. Information and Management, 52, 1, (2015), 1–17.
  • Wang, Y., and Fesenmaier, D.R. Assessing motivation of contribution in online communities: An empirical investigation of an online travel community. Electronic Markets, 13, 1 (2003), 33–45.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.