1,846
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Platform Structures, Homing Preferences, and Homophilous Propensities in Online Social Networks

References

  • Aldrich, H.; Reese, P.R.; and Dubini, P. Women on the verge of a breakthrough: Networking among entrepreneurs in the United States and Italy. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 1, 4 (1989), 339–356.
  • Aral, S.; Muchnik, L.; and Sundararajan, A. Distinguishing influence-based contagion from homophily-driven diffusion in dynamic networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 51 (2009), 21544–21549.
  • Bakshy, E. Rethinking Information Diversity in Networks. Facebook, January 18, 2012. Available at: www.facebook.com/notes/facebook-data-team/rethinking-information-diversity-in-networks/10150503499618859 (accessed on September 24, 2017)
  • Bakshy, E.; Rosenn, I.; Marlow, C.; and Adamic, L. The role of social networks in information diffusion. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web. Lyon, France: ACM, 2012, pp. 519–528.
  • Blau, P.M. Inequality and Heterogeneity: A Primitive Theory of Social Structure. New York, NY: Free Press, 1977.
  • Caillaud, B., and Jullien, B. Chicken and egg: Competition among intermediation service providers. RAND Journal of Economics, 34, 2 (2003), 309–328.
  • Cameron, A.C., and Trivedi, P.K. Regression-based tests for overdispersion in the Poisson model. Journal of Econometrics, 46, 3 (1990), 347–364.
  • Cameron, A.C., and Trivedi, P.K. Regression Analysis of Count Data. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
  • Campbell, D.T., and Fiske, D.W. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 2 (1959), 81.
  • Chang, R.M.; Oh, W.; Pinsonneault, A.; and Kwon, D. A network perspective of digital competition in online advertising industries: A simulation-based approach. Information Systems Research, 21, 3 (2010), 571–593.
  • Christakis, N.A., and Fowler, J.H. The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years. New England Journal of Medicine, 357, 4 (2007), 370–379.
  • Clark, P. Tweets, likes, and shares don’t make us buy stuff, Americans say. Bloomberg Business, June 23, 2014. Available at: www.businessweek.com/articles/2014-06-23/americans-say-social-media-has-no-influence-on-purchasing-decisions (accessed on September 24, 2017)
  • Clemence, S. Teenagers unfriend Facebook as it ages. Deseret News, January 25, 2014. Available at: http://national.deseretnews.com/article/904/Teenagers-unfriend-Facebook-as-it-ages.html (accessed on September 24, 2017)
  • Cusumano, M.A. Platform wars come to social media. Communications of the ACM, 54, 4 (2011), 31–33.
  • Davis, J.P.; Eisenhardt, K.M.; and Bingham, C.B. Developing theory through simulation methods. Academy of Management Review, 32, 2 (2007), 480–499.
  • Dewan, S., and Ramaprasad, J. Social media, traditional media, and music sales. MIS Quarterly, 38, 1 (2014), 101–121.
  • DiMaggio, P., and Garip, F. Network effects and social inequality. Annual Review of Sociology, 38 (2012), 93–118.
  • Doganoglu, T., and Wright, J. Multihoming and compatibility. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 24, 1 (2006), 45–67.
  • Elliott, N. Facebook is still failing marketers. Forrester, March 17, 2014. Available at: https://go.forrester.com/blogs/14-03-17-facebook_is_still_failing_marketers (accessed on September 24, 2017)
  • Fiore, A.T., and Donath, J.S. Homophily in online dating: When do you like someone like yourself? CHI’05 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Portland, OR: ACM, 2005, pp. 1371–1374.
  • Fischer, C.S. To Dwell Among Friends: Personal NetworksiIn Town and City. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1982.
  • Flaxman, S.; Goel, S.; and Rao, J.M. Filter bubbles, echo chambers, and online news consumption. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80, S1 (2016), 298–320.
  • Freeman, H. Story of the blues. The Guardian, June 4, 2007. Available at: www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2007/jun/04/fashion.retail (accessed on September 24, 2017)
  • Friedkin, N.E. A Structural Theory of Social Influence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
  • Gilbert, E., and Karahalios, K. Predicting tie strength with social media. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Boston: ACM, 2009, pp. 211–220.
  • Goffman, E. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York, NY: Overlook Press, 1959.
  • Granovetter, M.S. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 6 (1973), 1360–1380.
  • Greene, W.H. Econometric Analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2011.
  • Grevet, C.; Terveen, L.G.; and Gilbert, E. Managing political differences in social media. Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. Baltimore: ACM, 2014, pp. 1400–1408.
  • Gu, B.; Konana, P.; Raghunathan, R.; and Chen, H.M. Research note—The allure of homophily in social media: Evidence from investor responses on virtual communities. Information Systems Research, 25, 3 (2014), 604–617.
  • Hampton, K.; Goulet, L.S.; Rainie, L.; and Purcell, K. Social networking sites and our lives. Pew Research Center, June 16, 2011. Available at: www.pewinternet.org/2011/06/16/social-networking-sites-and-our-lives (accessed on September 24, 2017)
  • Hausman, J. Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica, 46, 6 (1978), 1251–1271.
  • Hausman, J.; Hall, B.H.; and Grilichesi, Z. Econometric models for count data with an application to the patents–R&D relationship. Econometrica, 52, 4 (1984), 909–938.
  • Holland, J.H. Hidden Order: How Adaptation Builds Complexity. New York, NY: Basic Books, 1995.
  • Huckfeldt, R.R., and Sprague, J. Citizens, Politics, and Social Communication: Information and Influence in an Election Campaign. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
  • Ibarra, H. Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 3 (1992), 422–427.
  • Ji, Y.G.; Hwangbo, H.; Yi, J.S.; Rau, P.P.; Fang, X.; and Ling, C. The influence of cultural differences on the use of social network services and the formation of social capital. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 26, 11–12 (2010), 1100–1121.
  • Jick, T.D. Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 4 (1979), 602–611.
  • Jung, G., and Lee, B. Analysis on social network adoption according to the change of network topology: The impact of Open API to adoption of Facebook. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Electronic Commerce: Roadmap for the Future of Electronic Business. Honolulu, HI: ACM, 2010, pp. 23–32.
  • Kalleberg, A.L.; Knoke, D.; Marsden, P.V.; and Spaeth, J.L. Organizations in America: Analysing Their Structures and Human Resource Practices. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1996.
  • Karl, K.A., and Peluchette, J.V. “Friending” professors, parents and bosses: A Facebook connection conundrum. Journal of Education for Business, 86, 4 (2011), 214–222.
  • Katz, M.L., and Shapiro, C. Systems competition and network effects. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8, 2 (1994), 93–115.
  • Kelton, W.D., and Law, A.M. Simulation Modeling and Analysis. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill, 2000.
  • Kim, Y.; Sohn, D.; and Choi, S.M. Cultural difference in motivations for using social network sites: A comparative study of American and Korean college students. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 1 (2011), 365–372.
  • Kiss, J. Teenagers migrate from Facebook as parents send them friend requests. The Guardian, December 27, 2013. Available at: www.theguardian.com/technology/2013/dec/27/facebook-dead-and-buried-to-teens-research-finds (accessed on September 24, 2017)
  • Kleinbaum, A.M.; Stuart, T.E.; and Tushman, M.L. Discretion within constraint: Homophily and structure in a formal organization. Organization Science, 24, 5 (2013), 1316–1336.
  • Knoke, D., and Burt, R.S. Applied Network Analysis: A Methodological Introduction. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1983.
  • Kohli, M. Ageing as a challenge for sociological theory. Ageing and Society, 8, 4 (1988), 367–394.
  • Kossinets, G., and Watts, D.J. Origins of homophily in an evolving social network. American Journal of Sociology, 115, 2 (2009), 405–450.
  • Kwak, H.; Lee, C.; Park, H.; and Moon, S. What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web. Raleigh, NC: ACM, 2010, pp. 591–600.
  • Labianca, G., and Brass, D.J. Exploring the social ledger: Negative relationships and negative asymmetry in social networks in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 31, 3 (2006), 596–614.
  • Lazarsfeld, P.F., and Merton, R.K. Friendship as a social process: A substantive and methodological analysis. Freedom and Control in Modern Society, 18, 1 (1954), 18–66.
  • Ma, L.; Krishnan, R.; and Montgomery, A.L. Latent homophily or social influence? An empirical analysis of purchase within a social network. Management Science, 61, 2 (2014), 454–473.
  • Manski, C.F. Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. Review of Economic Studies, 60, 3 (1993), 531–542.
  • Mantena, R., and Saha, R.L. Co-opetition between differentiated platforms in two-sided markets. Journal of Management Information Systems, 29, 2 (2012), 109–140.
  • Marsden, P.V. Homogeneity in confiding relations. Social Networks, 10, 1 (1988), 57–76.
  • Matos, M.G.; Ferreira, P.; and Krackhardt, D. Peer influence in the diffusion of iPhone 3G over a large social network. MIS Quarterly, 38, 4 (2014), 1103–1134.
  • Mazer, J.P.; Murphy, R.E.; and Simonds, C.J. I’ll see you on “Facebook”: The effects of computer-mediated teacher self-disclosure on student motivation, affective learning, and classroom climate. Communication Education, 56, 1 (2007), 1–17.
  • McPherson, J.M., and Smith-Lovin, L. Homophily in voluntary organizations: Status distance and the composition of face-to-face groups. American Sociological Review, 52, 3 (1987), 370–379.
  • McPherson, M.; Smith-Lovin, L.; and Cook, J.M. Birds of a feather: Homophily. Annual Review of Sociology, 27 (2001), 415–444.
  • Mital, M., and Sarkar, S. Multihoming behavior of users in social networking web sites: A theoretical model. Information Technology and People, 24, 4 (2011), 378–392.
  • Nan, N. Capturing bottom-up information technology use processes: A complex adaptive systems model. MIS Quarterly, 35, 2 (2011), 505–532.
  • Park, S.-H.; Huh, S.-Y.; Oh, W.; and Han, S.P. A social network-based inference model for validating customer profile data. MIS Quarterly, 36, 4 (2012), 1217–1237.
  • Parker, G.G., and Van Alstyne, M.W. Two-sided network effects: A theory of information product design. Management Science, 51, 10 (2005), 1494–1504.
  • Porter, J. Relationship symmetry in social networks: Why Facebook will go fully asymmetric. Bokardo, March 29, 2009. Available at: http://bokardo.com/archives/relationship-symmetry-in-social-networks-why-facebook-will-go-fully-asymmetric/ (accessed on September 24, 2017)
  • Ren, Y., and Kraut, R.E. Agent-based modeling to inform online community design: Impact of topical breadth, message volume, and discussion moderation on member commitment and contribution. Human–Computer Interaction, 29, 4 (2014), 351–389.
  • Rochet, J.C., and Tirole, J. Platform competition in two‐sided markets. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1, 4 (2003), 990–1029.
  • Schelling, T.C. Dynamic models of segregation. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1, 2 (1971), 143–186.
  • Shalizi, C.R., and Thomas, A.C. Homophily and contagion are generically confounded in observational social network studies. Sociological Methods and Research, 40, 2 (2011), 211–239.
  • Shi, Z., and Whinston, A.B. Network structure and observational learning: Evidence from a location-based social network. Journal of Management Information Systems, 30, 2 (2013), 185–212.
  • Shrum, W.; Cheek, N.H. Jr.; and MacD, S. Friendship in school: Gender and racial homophily. Sociology of Education, 61, 4 (1988), 227–239.
  • Siegler, M.F. Facebook has quietly implemented a de-facto follow feature. TechCrunch, September 20, 2010. Available at: http://techcrunch.com/2010/09/20/facebook-not-now-follow (accessed on September 24, 2017)
  • Singla, P., and Richardson, M. Yes, there is a correlation: From social networks to personal behavior on the web. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on World Wide Web. New York, NY: ACM, 2008, pp. 655–664.
  • Smith, S.; Maas, I.; and van Tubergen, F. Ethnic ingroup friendships in schools: Testing the by-product hypothesis in England, Germany, The Netherlands and Sweden. Social Networks, 39 (2014), 33–45.
  • Stieglitz, S., and Dang-Xuan, L. Emotions and information diffusion in social media: Sentiment of microblogs and sharing behavior. Journal of Management Information Systems, 29, 4 (2013), 217–248.
  • Stross, R. Social networks, small and smaller. New York Times, April 14, 2012. Available at: www.nytimes.com/2012/04/15/business/path-familyleaf-and-pair-small-by-design-social-networks.html?_r=1 (accessed on September 24, 2017)
  • Thelwall, M. Homophily in Myspace. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60, 2 (2009), 219–231.
  • Torche, F. Educational assortative mating and economic inequality: A comparative analysis of three Latin American countries. Demography, 47, 2 (2010), 481–502.
  • Trusov, M.; Bodapati, A.V.; and Bucklin, R.E. Determining influential users in Internet social networks. Journal of Marketing Research, 47, 4 (2010), 643–658.
  • Tsai, W. Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 5 (2001), 996–1004.
  • Uhlenberg, P., and de Jong Gierveld, J. Age-segregation in later life: An examination of personal networks. Ageing and Society, 24, 01 (2004), 5–28.
  • Verbrugge, L.M. The structure of adult friendship choices. Social Forces, 56, 2 (1977), 576–597.
  • Wilensky, U. NetLogo. Evanston, IL.: Northwestern University, Center for Connected Learning and Computer Based Modeling, 1999. Available at: http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo (accessed on September 24, 2017)
  • Yan, L.; Peng, J.; and Tan, Y. Network dynamics: How can we find patients like us? MIS Quarterly, 26, 3 (2015), 496–512.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.