1,948
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Strategic Visibility in Enterprise Social Media: Implications for Network Formation and Boundary Spanning

References

  • Adler, P., and Kwon, S. Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27, 1 (2002), 17–40.
  • Afuah, A., and Tucci, C.L. Crowdsourcing as a solution to distance search. Academy of Management Review, 37, 3 (2012), 355–375.
  • Ancona, D.G. Outward bound: Strategies for team survival in an organization. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 2 (1990), 334–365.
  • Ancona, D.G., and Caldwell, D.F. Beyond task and maintenance: Defining external functions in groups. Organization Studies, 13, 4 (1988), 468–494.
  • Ancona, D.G., and Caldwell, D.F. Beyond boundary spanning: Managing external dependence in product development teams. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 1, 2 (1990), 119–135.
  • Ancona, D.G., and Caldwell, D.F. Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 4 (1992), 634–665.
  • Argote, L. Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge. Boston: Kluwer Academic, 1999.
  • Argote, L.; Beckman, S.L.; and Epple, D. The persistence and transfer of learning in industrial settings. Management Science, 36, 2 (1990), 140–154.
  • Argote, L.; McEvily, B.; and Reagans, R. Managing knowledge in organizations: An integrative framework and review of emerging themes. Management Science, 49, 4 (2003), 571–582.
  • Baum, J.A.C., and Ingram, P. Survival-enhancing learning in the Manhattan hotel industry, 1898–1980. Management Science, 44, 7 (1998), 996–1016.
  • Bettencourt, L.A.; Brown, S.W.; and MacKenzie, S.B. Customer-oriented boundary-spanning behaviors: Test of a social exchange model of antecedents. Journal of Retailing, 81 (2005), 141–157.
  • Bieber, M.; Engelbart, D.; Furuta, R.; et al. Toward virtual community knowledge evolution. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18, 4 (2002), 11–35.
  • Birnholtz, J.; Dixon, G.; and Hancock, J. Distance, ambiguity and appropriation: Structures affording impression management in a collocated organization. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 3 (2012), 1028–1035.
  • Bittner, E.A.C., and Leimeister, J.M. Creating shared understanding in heterogeneous work groups: Why it matters and how to achieve it. Journal of Management Information Systems, 31, 1 (2014), 111–144.
  • Boland, R.J., and Tenkasi, R.V. Perspective making and perspective-taking in communities of knowing. Organization Science, 6, 4 (1995), 350–372.
  • Borgatti, S.P., and Cross, R. A relational view of information seeking and learning in social networks. Management Science, 49, 4 (2003), 432–445.
  • Boser, B.E.; Guyon, I.M.; and Vapnik, V.N. A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers. In Haussler, D. (ed.), Proceedings of the 5th Annual ACM Workshop on Computational Learning Theory, New York, NY, ACM Press; 1992, pp. 144–152.
  • Brzozowski, M.J. WaterCooler: Exploring an organization through enterprise social media. In Teasley, S., Havn, E., Prinz, W, and Lutters, W. (eds.), Proceedings of the ACM 2009 International Conference on Supporting Group Work. Group ’09. Sanibel Island, FL: ACM, 2009, pp. 219–228.
  • Bulgurcu, B.; Van Osch, W.; and Kane, G.C. The rise of the promoters: user classes and contribution patterns in enterprise social media. Journal of Management Information Systems, 35, 2 (Forthcoming).
  • Burt, R.S. The Network structure of social capital. Research in Organizational Behavior, 22, (2000), 345–423.
  • Burt, R.S. Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology, 110, 2 (2004), 349–399.
  • Cramton, C.D. The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences for dispersed collaboration. Organization Science, 12, 3 (2001), 346–371.
  • Dey, A.K., and De Guzman, E.S. From awareness to connectedness: The design and deployment of presence displays. In Grinter, R., Rodden, T., Aoki, P., Cutrell, E., Jeffries, R., Olson, G. (eds.), Proceedings of CHI 2006. New York, NY: ACM, 2006, pp. 899–908.
  • DiMicco, J.; Geyer, W.; Millen, D.; Dugan, C.; and Brownholtz, B. People sensemaking and relationship building on an enterprise social network site. In Sprague, R. (ed.), 42nd Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. Washington DC: IEEE, 2009, pp. 1–10.
  • DiMicco, J., and Millen, D. Identity management: multiple presentations of self in facebook. In Gross, T. and Inkpen, K. (eds.), Proceedings of the ACM 2007 International Conference on Supporting Group Work, Group ’07. Sanibel Island, FL: ACM, 2007, pp. 0–3.
  • Edmondson, A.C. Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 2 (1999), 350–383.
  • Edmondson, A.C. Managing the risk of learning: Psychological safety in work teams. In M.A. West, D. Tjosvold, and K.G. Smith (eds.), International Handbook of Organizational Teamwork and Cooperative Working. Chichester: Wiley, 2003, pp. 255–275.
  • Ellison, N.B.; Gibbs, J.L.; and Weber, M.S. The use of enterprise social network sites for knowledge sharing in distributed organizations: The role of organizational affordances. American Behavioral Scientist, 59, 1 (2015), 103–123.
  • Fleming, L., and Waguespack, D.M. Brokerage, boundary spanning, and leadership in open innovation communities. Organization Science, 18, 2 (2007), 165–180.
  • Freeman, L.C. Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1, 3 (1978), 215–239.
  • Gibbs, J.L.; Rozaidi, N.A.; and Eisenberg, J. Overcoming the “ideology of openness”: Probing the affordances of social media for organizational knowledge sharing. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19, 1 (2013), 102–120.
  • Gold, A.H.; Malhotra, A.; and Segars, A.H. Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18, 1 (2001), 185–214.
  • Grabher, G. Temporary architectures of learning: Knowledge governance in project ecologies. Organization Studies, 25, 9 (2004), 1491–1514.
  • Granovetter, M.S. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 6 (1973), 1360–1380.
  • Granovetter, M.S. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 3 (1985), 481–510.
  • Hampton, K.N.; Lee, C.-J.; and Her, E.J. How new media affords network diversity: Direct and mediated access to social capital through participation in local social settings. New Media and Society, 13, 7 (2011), 1031–1049.
  • Hansen, M.T. The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 1 (1999), 82–111.
  • Hansen, M.T., and Haas, M.R. Competing for attention in knowledge markets: Electronic document dissemination in a management consulting company. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 1 (2001), 1–28.
  • Hargadon, A.B. Firms as knowledge brokers: Lessons in pursuing continuous innovation. California Management Review, 40, 3 (1998), 209–227.
  • Harvey, S. Creative synthesis: Exploring the process of extraordinary group creativity. Academy of Management Review, 39, 3 (2014), 324–343.
  • Hinds, P.J., and Bailey, D.E. Out of sight, out of sync: Understanding conflict in distributed teams. Organization Science, 14, 6 (2003), 615–632.
  • IDRE/UCLA. Zero-inflated Poisson regression; STATA data analysis examples. Statistical Consulting Group. http://stats.idre.ucla.edu/stata/dae/zero-inflated-poisson-regression/.
  • Jang, C.-Y.; Steinfield, C.; and Pfaff, B. Virtual team awareness and groupware support: An evaluation of the TeamSCOPE system. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 56, 1 (2002), 109–126.
  • Joachims T. (1998). Text categorization with Support Vector Machines: Learning with many relevant features. In: Nédellec C., Rouveirol C. (eds), Machine Learning: ECML-98. ECML 1998. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence), vol. 1398. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp.137–142.
  • Kane, G.C. The evolutionary implications of social media for organizational knowledge management. Information and Organization, 27, 1 (2017), 37–46.
  • Kane, G.C.; Alavi, M.; Labianca, G.; and Borgatti, S.P. What’s different about social media networks? A framework and research agenda. MIS Quarterly, 38, 1 (2014), 274–304.
  • Kane, G.C., and Borgatti, S.P. Centrality-IS proficiency alignment and workgroup performance. MIS Quarterly, 35, 4 (2011), 1063–1078.
  • Keen, A. Digital Vertigo: How Today’s Online Social Revolution Is Dividing, Diminishing, and Disorienting Us. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 2012.
  • Kietzmann, J.H.; Hermkens, K.; McCarthy, I.P.; and Silvestre, B.S. Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media. Business Horizons, 54, 3 (2011), 241–251.
  • King, A., and Lakhani, K. Using open innovation to identify the best ideas. MIT Sloan Management Review, 55, 1 (2013), 41–48.
  • Kirkman, B.L., and Mathieu, J.E. The dimensions and antecedents of team virtuality. Journal of Management, 31, 5 (2005), 700–718.
  • Landis, J.R., and Koch, G.G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 1 (1977), 159–174.
  • Lapré, M.A., and Van Wassenhove, L.N. Creating and transferring knowledge for productivity improvement in factories. Management Science, 47, 10 (2001), 1311–1325.
  • Leonardi, P.M. Social media, knowledge sharing, and innovation: Toward a theory of communication visibility. Information Systems Research, 25, 4 (2014), 796–816.
  • Leonardi, P.M. Ambient awareness and knowledge acquisition: Using social media to learn “who knows what” and “who knows whom.” MIS Quarterly, 39, 4 (2015), 747–762.
  • Leonardi, P.M. The social media revolution: Sharing and learning in the age of leaky knowledge. Information and Organization, 27, 1 (2017), 47–59.
  • Leonardi, P.M.; Huysman, M.; and Steinfield, C. Enterprise social media: Definition, history, and prospects for the study of social technologies in organizations. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19, 1 (2013), 1–19.
  • Leonardi, P.M.; Vaast, E. Social Media and Their Affordances for Organizing: A Review and Agenda for Research. Academy of Management Annals, 11, 1 (2017), 150–188.
  • Leonardi, P.M., and Meyer, S.R. Social media as social lubricant: How ambient awareness eases knowledge transfer. American Behavioral Scientist, 59, 1 (2014), 10–34.
  • Levina, N., and Arriaga, M. Distinction and status production on user-generated content platforms: Using Bourdieu’s theory of cultural production to understand social dynamics in online fields. Information Systems Research, 25, 3 (2014), 468–488.
  • Long, J.S. Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables, Advanced Quantitative Methods in the Social Sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1997.
  • Lu, B.; Guo, X.; Luo, N.; and Chen, G. Corporate blogging and job performance: Effects of work-related and nonwork-related participation. Journal of Management Information Systems, 32, 4 (2015), 285–314.
  • March, J.G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2, 1 (1991), 71–87.
  • Marks, M.A.; Mathieu, J.E.; and Zaccaro, S.J. A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26, 3 (2001), 356–376.
  • Marrone, J.A. Team boundary spanning: A multilevel review of past research and proposals for the future. Journal of Management, 36, 4 (2010), 911–940.
  • Marrone, J.A.; Tesluk, P.E.; and Carson, J.B. A multilevel investigation of antecedents and consequences of team member boundary-spanning behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 6 (2007), 1423–1439.
  • McGrath, J.E. Groups: Interaction and Performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1984.
  • Mohrman, S.A.; Cohen, S.G.; and Mohrman, A.M. Designing Team-Based Organizations: New Forms for Knowledge Work. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1995.
  • Nahapiet, J., and Ghoshal, S. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23, 2 (1998), 242–266.
  • Nidumolu, S.R.; Subramani, M.; and Aldrich, A. Situated learning and the situated knowledge web: Exploring the ground beneath knowledge management. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18, 1 (2001), 115–150.
  • O’Sullivan, P.B. What you don’t know won’t hurt me: Impression management functions of communication channels in relationships. Human Communication Research, 26, 3 (2000), 403–431.
  • Oh, H.; Chung, M.H.O.; and Labianca, G. Group social capital and group effectiveness: The role of informal socializing ties. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 6 (2004), 860–875.
  • Olson, G.M., and Olson, J.S. Distance matters. Human-Computer Interaction, 15, 2 (2000), 139–178.
  • Podolny, J.M., and Baron, J.N. Relationships and resources: Social networks and mobility in the workplace. American Sociological Review, 62, 5 (1997), 673–693.
  • Putnam, R.D. Bowling Alone. New York: Simon and Schuster, 2000.
  • Reagans, R., and McEvily, B. Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 2 (2003), 240–267.
  • Rosenkopf, L., and Nerkar, A. Beyond local search: Boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 4 (2001), 287–306.
  • Schein, E.H. Process Consultation: Its Role in Organizational Development. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1969.
  • Steinfield, C.; DiMicco, J.; Ellison, N.B.; and Lampe, C. Bowling online: Social networking and social capital within the organization. In C&T ’09 Proceedings of the fourth international conference on Communities and technologies. New York, ACM, 2009, pp. 245–254.
  • Stenmark, D. Leveraging tacit organization knowledge. Journal of Management Information Systems, 17, 3 (2000), 9–24.
  • Stieglitz, S., and Dang-Xuan, L. Emotions and information diffusion in social media: sentiment of microblogs and sharing behavior. Journal of Management Information Systems, 29, 4 (2013), 217–248.
  • Swap, W.; Leonard, D.; Shields, M.; and Abrams, L. Using mentoring and storytelling to transfer knowledge in the workplace. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18, 1 (2001), 95–114.
  • Szulanski, G. Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 1 (1996), 27–43.
  • Tortoriello, M.; Reagans, R.; and McEvily, B. Bridging the knowledge gap: The influence of strong ties, network cohesion, and network range on the transfer of knowledge between organizational units. Organization Science, 23, 4 (2012), 1024–1039.
  • Treem, J.W., and Leonardi, P.M. Social media use in organizations: Exploring the affordances of visibility, editability, persistence, and association. Annals of the International Communication Association, 36 (2012), 143–189.
  • Tsai, W., and Goshal, S. Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 4 (1998), 464–476.
  • Tushman, M.L., and Scanlan, T.J. Boundary spanning individuals: Their role in information transfer and their antecedents. Academy of Management Journal, 24, 2 (1981), 289–305.
  • Uzzi, B. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42 (March 1997), 35–67.
  • VanOsch, W., and Steinfield, C. Team boundary spanning: Strategic implications for the implementation and use of enterprise social media. Journal of Information Technology, 31, 2 (2016), 207–225.
  • VanOsch, W.; Steinfield, C.; and Balogh, B.A. Enterprise social media: Challenges and opportunities for organizational communication and collaboration. In Proceedings of the 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE Computer Society Press, 2015, pp. 763–772.
  • VanOsch, W.; Steinfield, C.; and Zhao, Y. Team boundary spanning through enterprise social media: Exploring the effects of group-level diversity using a data science approach. In Proceedings of the 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS). IEEE, 2016, pp. 2176–2185.
  • Walther, J.B. Selective self-presentation in computer-mediated communication: Hyperpersonal dimensions of technology, language, and cognition. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 5 (2007), 2538–2557.
  • Wasserman, S., and Faust, K. Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Methods and Applications, (1994), 825.
  • Whelan, E.; Golden, W.; and Donnellan, B. Digitising the R&D social network: Revisiting the technological gatekeeper. Information Systems Journal, 23, 3 (2013), 197–218.
  • Whelan, E., and Teigland, R. Transactive memory systems as a collective filter for mitigating information overload in digitally enabled organizational groups. Information and Organization, 23, 3 (2013), 177–197.
  • Whelan, E.; Teigland, R.; Donnellan, B.; and Golden, W. How Internet technologies impact information flows in R&D: Reconsidering the technological gatekeeper. R&D Management, 40, 4 (2010), 400–413.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.