Regulating Cryptocurrencies: A Supervised Machine Learning Approach to De-Anonymizing the Bitcoin Blockchain

References

• Abbasi, A.; Albrecht, C.; Vance, A.; and Hansen, J. Metafraud: A meta-learning framework for detecting financial fraud. MIS Quarterly, 36, 4 (2012), 1293–1327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbasi, A.; Chen, H.; and Nunamaker, J.F. Stylometric identification in electronic markets: Scalability and robustness. Journal of Management Information Systems, 25, 1 (2008), 49–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbasi, A.; Zahedi, F.M.; Zeng, D.; Chen, Y.; Chen, H.; and Nunamaker Jr, J.F. Enhancing predictive analytics for anti-phishing by exploiting website genre information. Journal of Management Information Systems, 31, 4 (2015), 109–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbasi, A.; Zhang, Z.; Zimbra, D.; Chen, H.; and Nunamaker Jr, J.F. Detecting fake websites: The contribution of statistical learning theory. MIS Quarterly, 34, 3 (2010), 435–461.
   Google Scholar
• Ajello, N.J. Fitting a square peg in a round hole: Bitcoin, money laundering, and the fifth amendment privilege against self-incrimination. Brooklyn Law Review, 80, 2 (2014), 435–461.
   Google Scholar
• Ali, S.T.; Clarke, D.; and McCorry, P. Bitcoin: Perils of an unregulated global p2p currency. In B. Christianson, P. Švenda, V. Matyáš, J. Malcolm, F. Stajano, and J. Anderson (eds.), Security Protocols XXIII. Security Protocols 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 9379. Cham: Springer, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Androulaki, E.; Karame, G.O.; Roeschlin, M.; Scherer, T.; and Capkun, S. Evaluating user privacy in Bitcoin. In A.R. Sadeghi (ed.), Financial Cryptography and Data Security. FC 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 7859. Berlin: Springer, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Aral, S.; Dellarocas, C.; and Godes, D. Introduction to the special issue-social media and business transformation: A framework for research. Information Systems Research, 24, 1 (2013), 3–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arruñada, B. Blockchain’s struggle to deliver impersonal exchange. Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology, 19, 1 (2018), 55–105.
   Google Scholar
• Atzori, M. (2016). Blockchain technology and decentralized governance: Is the state still necessary? Social Science Research Network Working Paper Series, 2015. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2709713
   Google Scholar
• Ba, S.; Stallaert, J.; Whinston, A.B.; and Zhang, H. Choice of transaction channels: The effects of product characteristics on market evolution. Journal of Management Information Systems, 21, 4 (2005), 173–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Back, A. Hashcash-a denial of service counter-measure, 2002. http://www.hashcash. org/papers/hashcash.pdf. (accessed on January 24, 2019)
   Google Scholar
• Baesens, B. Analytics in a Big Data World: The Essential Guide to Data Science and its Applications. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Barber, S.; Boyen, X.; Shi, E.; and Uzun, E. Bitter to better — How to make Bitcoin a better currency. In A.D. Keromytis (ed.), Financial Cryptography and Data Security. FC 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 7397. Berlin: Springer, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, R. Beyond bitcoin: The rise of blockchain world. Computer, 51, 2 (2018), 54–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, R.; Czepluch, J.S.; Lollike, N.; and Malone, S. Blockchain-the gateway to trust-free cryptographic transactions. In Proceedings of ECIS, ResearchPaper153. İstanbul,Turkey: Springer Publishing Company, 2016, pp. 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, R.; Müller-Bloch, C.; and King, J.L. Governance in the blockchain economy: A framework and research agenda. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 19, 10 (2018), pp. 1020–1034.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, V.; Zhang, B.; Nunamaker Jr, J.F.; and Chen, H. Examining hacker participation length in cybercriminal internet-relay-chat communities. Journal of Management Information Systems, 33, 2 (2016), 482–510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergstra, J.; and Bengio, Y. Random search for hyper-parameter optimization. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 13, Feb (2012), 281–305.
   Google Scholar
• Bitcoin.org. Protect your privacy. 2018. https://bitcoin.org/en/protect-your-privacy. (accessed on January 24, 2019)
   Google Scholar
• BitFury Group. On blockchain auditability. 2016. http://bitfury. com/content/5-white-papers-research/bitfury_white_paper_on_blockchain_ auditability.pdf. (accessed on January 24, 2019)
   Google Scholar
• BitFury Group. Proof of stake versus proof of work. 2015. http://bitfury.com/content/5-white-papers-research/pos-vs-pow-1.0.2.pdf. (accessed on January 24, 2019)
   Google Scholar
• Blundell-Wignall, A. The bitcoin question: Currency versus trust-less transfer technology. OECD Working Papers on Finance, Insurance and Private Pensions, 37, 1 (2014), pp. 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Böhme, R.; Christin, N.; Edelman, B.; and Moore, T. Bitcoin: Economics, technology, and governance. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29, 2 (2015), 213–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonneau, J.; Narayanan, A.; Miller, A.; Clark, J.; Kroll, J.A.; and Felten, E.W. Mixcoin: anonymity for Bitcoin with accountable mixes. In N. Christin, and R. Safavi-Naini (eds.), Financial Cryptography and Data Security. FC 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 8437. Berlin: Springer, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Brazier, F.; Oskamp, A.; Prins, C.; Schellekens, M.; and Wijngaards, N. Anonymity and software agents: An interdisciplinary challenge. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 12, 1–2 (2004), 37–157.
   Google Scholar
• Bryans, D. Bitcoin and money laundering: Mining for an effective solution. Indiana Law Journal, 89, 1 (2014), 441–472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chainanalysis. Protecting the Integrity of Digital Assets, 2017. https://www.chainalysis. com/. (accessed on January 24, 2019)
   Google Scholar
• Chainanalysis. The Changing Nature of Cryptocrime, 2018. https://www.chainalysis.com/static/Cryptocrime_Report_V2.pdf. (accessed on January 24, 2019)
   Google Scholar
• Chawla, N.V.; Bowyer, K.W.; Hall, L.O.; and Kegelmeyer, W.P. Smote: Synthetic minority over-sampling technique. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 16(2002), 321–357.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, P., Jiang, B., and Wang, C. Blockchain-based payment collection supervision system using pervasive Bitcoin digital wallet. In Proceedings of the IEEE 13th International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications (WiMob), Rome, (2017), 139–146. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/WiMOB.2017.8115844
   Google Scholar
• Christin, N. Traveling the Silk Road: A measurement analysis of a large anonymous online marketplace. In Proceedings of the 22Nd International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW ’13), (2013), 213–224.
   Google Scholar
• Christopher, C.M. The bridging model: Exploring the roles of trust and enforcement in banking, bitcoin, and the blockchain. Nevada Law Journal, 17(2016), 139–180.
   Google Scholar
• CoinMarketCap. Cryptocurrency market capitalizations, 2018. https://coinmarketcap.com/. (accessed on January 24, 2019)
   Google Scholar
• Colombo, R.J. Bitcoin: Hype or harbinger. Journal of International Business and Law, 16, 1 (2016),1–5. http://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/jibl/vol16/iss1/3. (accessed on January 24, 2019)
   Google Scholar
• DeLong, J.B.; and Froomkin, A.M. Speculative microeconomics for tomorrow’s economy. In B. Kahin, and H. Varian (eds.), Internet Publishing and Beyond: The Economics of Digital Information and Intellectual Property. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2000, pp. 6–44.
   Google Scholar
• Fleder, M.; Kester, M.S.; and Pillai, S. Bitcoin transaction graph analysis. arXiv preprint arXiv:1502.01657, 2015. https://arxiv.org/abs/1502.01657 (accessed on January 24, 2019)
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, J.; Hastie, T.; and Tibshirani, R. The elements of statistical learning, vol. 1. Springer Series in Statistics. Berlin: Springer, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, J.H. Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine. The Annals of Statistics, 29, 5 (2001), 1189–1232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Froomkin, A.M. Anonymity and its enmities. Journal of Online Law, art. 4, (1995). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2715621. (accessed on January 24, 2019)
   Google Scholar
• Froomkin, A.M. Flood control on the information ocean: Living with anonymity, digital cash, and distributed databases. Journal of Law and Commerce, 15 (1996), 395–507.
   Google Scholar
• Froomkin, A.M. Legal issues in anonymity and pseudonymity. The Information Society, 15, 2 (1999), 113–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Froomkin, A. M. From anonymity to identification. Journal of Self-Regulation and Regulation, 1, (2015), 120–138.
   Google Scholar
• Gabison, G. Policy considerations for the blockchain technology public and private applications. Science and Technology Law Review, 19, (2016), 327–350.
   Google Scholar
• Geurts, P.; Ernst, D.; and Wehenkel, L. Extremely randomized trees. Machine learning, 63, 1 (2006), 3–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, F. Pervasive decentralisation of digital infrastructures: A framework for blockchain enabled system and use case analysis. In Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Honolulu: Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), 2017, pp. 1543–1552.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, F.; and Bezzenberger, L. Beyond cryptocurrencies - a taxonomy of decen- tralized consensus systems. In Proceedings of the 23rd European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2015). Atlanta: Association for Information Systems, 2015, pp. 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, F.; Zimmermann, K.; Haferkorn, M.; Weber, M.; and Siering, M. Bitcoin- asset or currency? Revealing users’ hidden intentions. In Twenty Second European Conference on Information Systems. Atlanta: Association for Information Systems, 2014, pp. 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Godsiff, P. Bitcoin: Bubble or blockchain. Agent and Multi-Agent Systems: Technologies and Applications, 38 (2015), 191–203.
   Google Scholar
• Goldfeder, S.; Kalodner, H.; Reisman, D.; and Narayanan, A. When the cookie meets the blockchain: Privacy risks of web payments via cryptocurrencies. arXiv preprint arXiv:1708.04748, (2017). https://arxiv.org/pdf/1708.04748.pdf. (accessed on January 24, 2019)
   Google Scholar
• Guo, A. Blockchain receipts: Patentability and admissibility in court. Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property, 16, 2 (2017), 440–452.
   Google Scholar
• Harlev, M.A.; Sun Yin, H.; Langenheldt, K.C.; Mukkamala, R.; and Vatrapu, R. Breaking bad: De-anonymising entity types on the bitcoin blockchain using supervised ma- chine learning. In Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Honolulu: Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS),  2018, pp. 3497–3506.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, T.K. The random subspace method for constructing decision forests. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 20, 8 (1998), 832–844.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hout, M.C.V.; and Bingham, T. Silk Road, the virtual drug marketplace: A single case study of user experiences. International Journal of Drug Policy, 24, 5 (2013), 385–391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hui, K.-L.; Kim, S.H.; and Wang, Q.-H. Cybercrime deterrence and international legislation: Evidence from distributed denial of service attacks. MIS Quarterly, 41, 2 (2017), 497–523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyvärinen, H.; Risius, M.; and Friis, G. A blockchain-based approach towards overcoming financial fraud in public sector services. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 59, 6 (2017), 441–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Investinblockchain. Bitcoin estimated transaction volume usd. 32, (2018). https://www.investinblockchain.com/category/bitcoin/. (accessed on January 24, 2019)
   Google Scholar
• James, G.; Witten, D.; Hastie, T.; and Tibshirani, R. An Introduction to Statistical Learning. New York: Springer, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Karlstrøm, H. Do libertarians dream of electric coins? the material embeddedness of bitcoin. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, 15,1(2014), 23–36.
   Google Scholar
• Karwatzki, S.; Dytynko, O.; Trenz, M.; and Veit, D. Beyond the personalization– privacy paradox: Privacy valuation, transparency features, and service personalization. Journal of Management Information Systems, 34, 2 (2017), 369–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, P. A Guide to Econometrics. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Kiviat, T.I. Beyond bitcoin: Issues in regulating blockchain transactions. Duke Law Journal, 65, (2015), 569–608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleiman, J.A. Beyond the silk road: Unregulated decentralized virtual currencies continue to endanger us national security and welfare. American University National Security Law Brief, 4, 1 (2013), 59–78.
   Google Scholar
• Koshy, P.; Koshy, D.; and McDaniel, P. An analysis of anonymity in bitcoin using p2p network traffic. International Conference on Financial Cryptography and Data Security, 8437 (2014), pp. 469–485.
   Google Scholar
• Lamport, L.; Shostak, R.; and Pease, M. The Byzantine Generals problem. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems (TOPLAS), 4, 3 (1982), 382–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LBBW. Daimler and LBBW: Successful with Blockchain, 2018. https://www.lbbw.de/articlepage/experience-banking/pilot-project-blockchain-daimler-lbbw_661e61yw9_e.html. (accessed on January 24, 2019)
   Google Scholar
• Lee, L. New kids on the blockchain: How bitcoin’s technology could reinvent the stock market. Hastings Business Law Journal, 12, 2 (2016), 81–132.
   Google Scholar
• Levmore, S. The internet’s anonymity problem. In S. Lemore and M. Nussbaum (eds.), The offensive Internet: Speech, Privacy, and Reputation. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Li, W.; Chen, H.; and Nunamaker Jr, J.F. Identifying and profiling key sellers in cyber carding community: A secure text mining system. Journal of Management Information Systems, 33, 4 (2016), 1059–1086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, X.; Sun, S.X.; Chen, K.; Fung, T.; and Wang, H. Design theory for market surveillance systems. Journal of Management Information Systems, 32, 2 (2015), 278–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, T.C. Compliance, technology, and modern finance. Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law, 11, 1 (2016), 159–182.
   Google Scholar
• Mai, F.; Shan, Z.; Bai, Q.; Wang, X.; and Chiang, R.H. How does social media impact bitcoin value? A test of the silent majority hypothesis. Journal of Management Information Systems, 35, 1 (2018), 19–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mamoshina, P.; Ojomoko, L.; Yanovich, Y.; Ostrovski, A.; Botezatu, A.; Prikhodko, P.; Izumchenko, E.; Aliper, A.; Romantsov, K.; Zhebrak, A.; Ogu, I.A.; and Zhavoronkov, A. Converging blockchain and next-generation artificial intelligence technologies to decentralize and accelerate biomedical research and healthcare. Oncotarget, 9, 5 (2018), 5665–5690.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Martin, J. Drugs on the Dark net: How Cryptomarkets are Transforming the Global Trade in Illicit Drugs. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. Lost on the Silk Road: Online drug distribution and the cryptomarket. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 14, 3 (2014), 351–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod, P. Taxing and regulating bitcoin: The government’s game of catch up. CommLaw Conspectus: Journal of Communications Law and Technology Policy, 22, (2013), 379–406.
   Google Scholar
• Meiklejohn, S.; and Orlandi, C. Privacy-enhancing overlays in bitcoin. In International Conference on Financial Cryptography and Data Security. Berlin: Springer, 2015, pp. 27–141.
   Google Scholar
• Meiklejohn, S.; Pomarole, M.; Jordan, G.; Levchenko, K.; McCoy, D.; Voelker, G.M.; and Savage, S. A fistful of bitcoins: Characterizing payments among men with no names. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Internet Measurement Conference. New York: ACM, 2013, pp. 127–140.
   Google Scholar
• Merkle, R. C. Protocols for public key cryptosystems. In The 1980 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy. New York: IEEE, 1980, pp. 122–134.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, J.S. What I learned trading cryptocurrencies while studying the law. University of Miami International and Comparative Law Review, 25, (2018), 159–226.
   Google Scholar
• Moser, M.; Bohme, R.; and Breuker, D. An inquiry into money laundering tools in the bitcoin ecosystem. eCrime Researchers Summit (eCRS), 2013, 1–14. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6805780. (accessed on January 24, 2019)
   Google Scholar
• Naerland, K.; Müller-Bloch, C.; Beck, R.; and Palmund, S. Blockchain to rule the waves nascent design principles for reducing risk and uncertainty in decentralized environments. In Proceedings International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS). Atlanta: Association for Information Systems, 2017, pp. 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Nakamoto, S. Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system, 2008. https://bitcoin.org/en/bitcoin-paper. (accessed on January 24, 2019)
   Google Scholar
• Narayanan, A.; Bonneau, J.; Felten, E.; Miller, A.; and Goldfeder, S. Bitcoin and Cryptocurrency Technologies: A Comprehensive Introduction. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Nofer, M.; Gomber, P.; Hinz, O.; and Schiereck, D. Blockchain. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 59, 3 (2017), 183–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Notheisen, B.; Hawlitschek, F.; and Weinhardt, C. Breaking down the blockchain hype towards a blockchain market engineering approach. In Proceedings of the 25th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS). Atlanta: Association for Information Systems, 2017, pp. 1062–1080.
   Google Scholar
• Otjacques, B.; Hitzelberger, P.; and Feltz, F. Interoperability of e-government information systems: Issues of identification and data sharing. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23, 4 (2007), 29–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedregosa, F.; Varoquaux, G.; Gramfort, A.; Michel, V.; Thirion, B.; Grisel, O.; Blondel, M.; Prettenhofer, P.; Weiss, R.; Dubourg, V.; Vanderplas, J.; Passos, A.; Cournapeau, D.; Brucher, M.; Perrot, M.; and Duchesnay, E. Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12, (2011), 2825–2830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfitzmann, A.; and Köhntopp, M. Anonymity, unobservability, and pseudonymity- a proposal for terminology. Designing Privacy Enhancing Technologies, 2009 (2001), 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Pinsonneault, A.; and Heppel, N. Anonymity in group support systems research: A new conceptualization, measure, and contingency framework. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14, 3 (1997), 89–108.
   Google Scholar
• Raileanu, L. E.; and Stoffel, K. Theoretical comparison between the Gini index and information gain criteria. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 41, 1 (2004), 77–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid, F.; and Harrigan, M. An analysis of anonymity in the bitcoin system. Security and Privacy in Social Networks, (2013), 197–223. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4614-4139-7_10. (accessed on January 24, 2019)
   Google Scholar
• Reyes, C.L. Conceptualizing cryptolaw. Nebraska Law Review, 96, 2 (2017), 384–445.
   Google Scholar
• Risius, M.; and Spohrer, K. A blockchain research framework. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 59, 6 (2017), 385–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ron, D.; and Shamir, A. Quantitative analysis of the full bitcoin transaction graph. International Conference on Financial Cryptography and Data Security, 7859 (2013), 6–24.
   Google Scholar
• Rosner, M.T.; and Kang, A. Understanding and regulating twenty-first century payment systems: The ripple case study. Michigan Law Review, 114, 4 (2016), 649–681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, E.S. Nobody puts blockchain in a corner: The disruptive role of blockchain technology in the financial services industry and current regulatory issues. Catholic University Journal of Law and Technology, 25, 2 (2017), 353–386.
   Google Scholar
• Samtani, S.; Chinn, R.; Chen, H.; and Nunamaker Jr, J.F. Exploring emerging hacker assets and key hackers for proactive cyber threat intelligence. Journal of Management Information Systems, 34, 4 (2017), 1023–1053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sasson, E.B.; Chiesa, A.; Garman, C.; Green, M.; Miers, I.; Tromer, E.; and Virza, M. Zerocash: Decentralized anonymous payments from bitcoin. In 2014 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy. New York: IEEE, 2014, pp. 459–474.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, S.V.; and Orlikowski, W.J. Entanglements in practice: performing anonymity through social media. MIS Quarterly, 38, 3 (2014), 873–893.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shackelford, S.J.; and Myers, S. Block-by-block: Leveraging the power of blockchain technology to build trust and promote cyber peace. Yale Journal of Law and Technology, 19, 1 (2017), 334–338.
   Google Scholar
• Sklaroff, J.M. Smart contracts and the cost of inflexibility. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 166(2018), 263–303.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A.; and Weismann, M.F. Are you ready for digital currency? Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance, 26, 1 (2014), 17–21.
   Google Scholar
• Sonderegger, D. A regulatory and economic perplexity: Bitcoin needs just a bit of regulation. Washington University Journal of Law & Policy, 47, (2015), 175–216.
   Google Scholar
• Spagnuolo, M.; Maggi, F.; and Zanero, S. Bitiodine: Extracting intelligence from the bitcoin network. International Conference on Financial Cryptography and Data Security, 8437 (2014), 457–468.
   Google Scholar
• Surujnath, R. Off the chain: A guide to blockchain derivatives markets and the implications on systemic risk. Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law, 22, 2 (2017), 257–304.
   Google Scholar
• Tsukerman, M. The block is hot: A survey of the state of bitcoin regulation and suggestions for the future. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 30, 4 (2015), 1127–1169.
   Google Scholar
• Turpin, J.B. Bitcoin: The economic case for a global, virtual currency operating in an unexplored legal framework. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 21, 1 (2014), 335–368.
   Google Scholar
• Twyman, N.W.; Lowry, P.B.; Burgoon, J.K.; and Nunamaker Jr, J.F. Autonomous scientifically controlled screening systems for detecting information purposely concealed by individuals. Journal of Management Information Systems, 31, 3 (2014), 106–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Hout, M.C.; and Bingham, T. Responsible vendors, intelligent consumers :Silk road, the online revolution in drug trading.International Journal of Drug Policy, 25, 2 (2014), 183–189.
   Google Scholar
• Wolpert, D.H.; and Macready, W.G. Coevolutionary free lunches. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 9, 6 (2005), 721–735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, A.; and De Filippi, P. Decentralized blockchain technology and the rise of lex cryptographia. SSRN, (2015). https://ssrn.com/abstract=2580664. (accessed on January 24, 2019)
   Google Scholar
• Xu, L. Highly available distributed storage systems. PhD thesis, California Institute of Technology, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, H.S.; and Vatrapu, R. A first estimation of the proportion of cybercriminal entities in the bitcoin ecosystem using Supervised Machine Learning. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Big Data. New York: IEEE, 2017, pp. 3690–3699.
   Google Scholar
• Young, S. Enforcing constitutional rights through computer code. Catholic University Journal of Law and Technology, 26, 1 (2018), 1–20.
   Google Scholar