A Risk Mitigation Framework for Information Technology Projects: A Cultural Contingency Perspective

REFERENCES

• Aiken, L.S.; West, S.G.; and Reno, R.R. Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. London, UK: Sage, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Barki, H.; Rivard, S.; and Talbot, J. An integrative contingency model of software project risk management. Journal of Management Information Systems, 17, 4 (2001), 37–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry, B., and Stewart, G.L. Composition, process, and performance in self-managed groups: The role of personality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 1 (1997), 62–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry, E.J.; Kemerer, C.F.; and Slaughter, S.A. Environmental volatility, development decisions, and software volatility: A longitudinal analysis. Management Science, 52, 3 (2006), 448–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D.R., and Mirenda, P. Augmentative and Alternative Communication. Baltimore, MD: Paul H, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Bliese, P.D. Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In, Klein, K.J., and Kozlowski S.W.J., (eds.), Multi-level Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2000, pp. 349–381.
   Google Scholar
• Boughzala, I., and De Vreede, G.J. Evaluating team collaboration quality: The development and field application of a collaboration maturity model. Journal of Management Information Systems, 32, 3 (2015), 129–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborty, S.; Sarker, S.; and Sarker, S. An exploration into the process of requirements elicitation: A grounded approach. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 11, 4 (2010), 212–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, X.; Fu, S.; and Druckenmiller, D. Trust development in globally distributed collaboration: A case of U.S. and Chinese mixed teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 33, 4 (2016), 978–1007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colazo, J., and Fang, Y. Following the sun: Temporal dispersion and performance in open source software project teams. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 11, 11 (2010), 684–707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamantopoulos, A., and Winklhofer, H. Index construction with formative indicators: An alternative to scale development. Journal of Marketing Research, 38, 2 (2001), 269–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earley, P.C. East meets west meets mideast: Further explorations of collectivistic and individualistic work groups. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 2, (1993), 319–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eby, L., and Dobbins, G. Collectivistic orientation in teams: An individual and group-level analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 3 (1997), 275–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espinosa, J.A.; Cummings, J.N.; and Pickering, C. Times, separation, coordination and performance in technical teams. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 59, 1 (2012), 91–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espinosa, J.A.; Slaughter, S.A.; Kraut, R.E.; and Herbsleb, J.D. Familiarity, complexity, and team performance in geographically distributed software development. Organization Science, 18, 4 (2007), 613–630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faraj, S., and Sproull, L. Coordinating expertise in software development teams. Management Science, 46, 12 (2000), 1554–1568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., and Larcker, D.F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 1 (1981), 39–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gartner. Gartner says worldwide IT spending forecast to grow 2.7 percent in 2017, January 12, 2017. Available at http://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/3568917 (accssed on February 7, 2018)
   Google Scholar
• Gopal, A., and Gosain, S. The role of organizational controls and boundary spanning in software development outsourcing: Implications for project performance. Information Systems Research, 21, 4 (2010), 960–982.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76, 4 (2009), 408–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, J., and King, W.R. The role of user participation in information systems development: Implications from a meta-analysis. Journal of Management Information Systems, 25, 1 (2008), 301–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoehle, H.; Zhang, X.; and Venkatesh, V. An espoused cultural perspective to understand continued intention to use mobile applications: A four-country study of mobile social media application usability. European Journal of Information Systems, 24, 3 (2015), 337–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work Related Values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Hong, W.; Thong, J.Y.L.; Chasalow, L.; and Dhillon, G. User acceptance of agile information systems: A model and empirical test. Journal of Management Information Systems, 28, 1 (2011), 235–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• House, R.J.; Hanges, P.J.; Javidan, M.; Dorfman, P.; and Gupta, V. Culture, Leadership and Organizations: The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Hu L., and Bentler, P.M. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Model, 6, 1 (1999), 1–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, L.R.; Demaree, R.G.; and Wolf, G. Estimating within group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 1 (1984), 85–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayanth, R.; Jacob, V.S.; and Radhakrishnan, S. Vendor and client interaction for requirements assessment in software development: Implications for feedback process. Information Systems Research, 22, 2 (2011), 289–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kankanhalli, A.; Tan, B.C.Y.; Wei, K.K.; and Holmes, M.C. Cross-cultural differences and information systems developer values. Decision Support Systems, 38, 2 (2004), 183–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ke, W., and Zhang, P. Effects of empowerment on performance in open-source software projects. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 58, 2 (2011), 334–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keil, M.; Rai, A.; and Liu, S. How user risk and requirements risk moderate the effects of formal and informal control on the process performance of IT projects. European Journal of Information Systems, 22, 6 (2013), 650–672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keil, M.; Tan, B.C.Y.; Wei, K.K.; Saarinen, T.; Tuunainen, V.; and Wassenaar, A. A cross-cultural study on escalation of commitment behavior in software projects. MIS Quarterly, 24, 2 (2000), 299–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerzner, H. Project Management: A systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkman, B.L.; Lowe, K.B.; and Gibson, C.B. A quarter century of culture’s consequences: A review of empirical research incorporating Hofstede’s cultural value framework. Journal of International Business Studies, 37, 3 (2006), 285–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkman, B.L., and Shapiro, D.L. The impact of team members’ cultural values on productivity, cooperation, and empowerment in self-managing work teams. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 32, 5 (2001), 597–617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirsch, L.J.; Sambamurthy, V.; Ko, D.G.; and Purvis, R.L. Controlling information systems development projects: The view from the client. Management Science, 48, 4 (2002), 484–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, K.J., and Kozlowski, S.W.J. From micro to meso: Critical steps in conceptualizing and conducting multilevel research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 3 (2000), 211–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishna, S.; Sahay, S.; and Walsham, G. Managing cross-cultural issues in global software outsourcing. Communications of the ACM, 47, 4 (2004), 62–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kudaravalli, S.; Faraj, S.; and Johnson, S.L. A configural approach to coordinating expertise in software development teams. MIS Quarterly, 41, 1 (2017), 43–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, G., and Xia, W. Toward agile: An integrated analysis of quantitative and qualitative field data on software development agility. MIS Quarterly, 34, 1 (2010), 87–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leidner, D.E., and Kayworth, T. A review of culture in information systems research: Toward a theory of information technology culture conflict. MIS Quarterly, 30, 2 (2006), 357–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, J.; Meng, F.; and Fellows, R. An exploratory study of understanding project risk management from the perspective of national culture. International Journal of Project Management, 33, 3 (2015), 564–575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyytinen, K.; Mathiassen, L.; and Ropponen, J. A framework for software risk management. Journal of Information Technology, 11, 4 (1996), 275–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacCormack, A.; Verganti, R.; and Iansiti, M. Developing products on “Internet Time”: The anatomy of a flexible development process. Management Science, 47, 1 (2001), 133–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magni, M.; Ahuja, M.K.; and Maruping, L.M. Distant but fair: Intrateam justice climate and performance in dispersed teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 35,4, (2018), 1031–1059.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maruping, L.M., and Magni, M. What’s the weather like? The effect of team learning climate, empowerment climate, and gender on individuals’ technology exploration and use. Journal of Management Information Systems, 29, 1 (2012), 79–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maruping, L.M.; Venkatesh, V.; and Agarwal, R. A control theory perspective on agile methodology use and changing user requirements. Information Systems Research, 20, 3, (2009), 377–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maruping, L.M.; Venkatesh, V.; Thatcher, S.M.B.; and Patel, P.C. Folding under pressure or rising to the occasion? Perceived time pressure and the moderating role of team temporal leadership. Academy of Management Journal, 58, 5 (2015), 1313–1333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maruping, L.M.; Zhang, X.; and Venkatesh, V. Role of collective ownership and coding standards in coordinating expertise in software project teams. European Journal of Information Systems, 18, 4 (2009), 355–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mastrogiacomo, S.; Missonier, S.; and Bonazzi, R. Talk before it’s too late: Reconsidering the role of conversation in information systems project management. Journal of Management Information Systems, 31, 1 (2014), 44–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathieu, J.E.; Gilson, L.L.; and Ruddy, T.M. Empowerment and team effectiveness: An empirical test of an integrated model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1 (2006), 97–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matook, S., and Maruping, L.M. (2014) A competency model for customer representatives in agile software development projects. MIS Quarterly Executive, 13, 2 (2006), 77–95.
   Google Scholar
• Miron-Spektor, E.; Erez, M.; and Naveh, E. The effect of conformists and attentive-to-detail members on team innovation: Reconciling the innovation paradox. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 4 (2011), 740–760.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nambisan, S.; Lyytinen, K.; Majchrzak, A.; and Song, M. Digital innovation management: Reinventing innovation management research in a digital world. MIS Quarterly, 41, 1 (2017), 223–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Napier, N.P.; Keil, M.; and Tan, F.B. IT project managers’ construction of successful project management practice: A repertory grid investigation. Information Systems Journal, 19, 3 (2009), 255–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, K.L., and Nollen, S.D. Culture and congruence: The fit between management practices and national culture. Journal of International. Business Studies, 27, 4 (1996), 753–780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nidumolu, S.R. The effect of coordination and uncertainty on software project performance: Residual performance risk as an intervening variable. Information Systems Research, 6, 3 (1995), 191–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nidumolu, S.R., and Subramani, M. The matrix of control: Combining process and structure approaches to managing software development. Journal of Management Information Systems, 20, 3 (2003), 159–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozer, M., and Vogel D. Contextualized relationship between knowledge sharing and performance in software development. Journal of Management Information Systems, 32, 2 (2015), 134–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petter, S.; Straub, D.W.; and Rai, A. Specifying formative constructs in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 31, 4 (2007), 623–656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preacher, K.J., and Hayes, A. Asymptotic resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 3 (2008), 879–891.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rai, A.; Maruping, L.M.; and Venkatesh, V. Offshore information system project success: The role of social embeddedness and cultural characteristics. MIS Quarterly, 33, 3 (2009), 617–641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rai, A., and Tang, X. Leveraging IT capabilities and competitive process capabilities for the management of interorganizational relationship portfolios. Information Systems Research, 21, 3 (2010), 516–542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinecke, K., and Bernstein, A. Knowing what a user likes: A design science approach to interfaces that automatically adapt to culture. MIS Quarterly, 37, 2 (2013), 427–453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarker, S., and Sarker, S. Exploring agility in distributed software development teams. Information Systems Research, 20, 3 (2009), 440–461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarker, S., and Valacich, J.S. An alternative to methodological individualism: A non-reductionist approach to studying technology adoption by groups. MIS Quarterly, 34, 4 (2010), 779–808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauer, C.; Gemino, A.; and Reich, B.H. The impact of size and volatility on IT project performance: Studying the factors influencing project risk. Communications of the ACM, 50, 11 (2007), 79–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R.; Lyytinen, K.; Keil, M.; and Cule, P. Identifying software project risks: An international Delphi study. Journal of Management Information Systems, 17, 4 (2001), 5–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, S., and DeMeyer, A. Interpreting and responding to strategic issues: The impact of national culture. Strategic Management Journal, 12, 4 (1991), 307–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrout, P.E., and Bolger, N. Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 4 (2002), 422–445.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srite, M., and Karahanna, E. The role of espoused national cultural values in technology acceptance. MIS Quarterly, 30, 3 (2006), 679–704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanriverdi, H., Uysal, V.B. Cross-business information technology integration and acquirer value creation in corporate mergers and acquisitions. Information Systems Research, 22, 4 (2011), 703–720.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiwana, A., and Keil, M. Control in internal and outsourced software projects. Journal of Management Information Systems, 26, 3 (2010), 9–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tung, R.L. The cross-cultural research imperative: The need to balance cross-national and intra-national diversity. Journal of International Business Studies, 39, 1 (2008), 41–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V.; Rai, A.; and Maruping, L.M. Information systems projects and individual developer outcomes: Role of project managers and process control. Information Systems Research, 29, 1 (2018), 127–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, L.; Keil, M.; and Rai, A. How software project risk affects project performance: An investigation of the dimensions of risk and an exploratory model. Decision Sciences, 35, 2 (2004), 289–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiener, M.; Mähring, M.; Remus, U.; and Saunders, C. Control configuration and control enactment in information systems projects: Review and expanded theoretical framework. MIS Quarterly, 40, 3 (2016), 741–774.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Windeler, J. B.; Maruping, L.; and Venkatesh, V. Technical systems development risk factors: The role of empowering leadership in lowering developers’ stress. Information Systems Research, 28, 4 (2017), 775–796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, D.; Lowry, P.B.; Zhou, L.; and Fu, X. The impact of individualism—collectivism, social presence, and group diversity on group decision making under majority influence. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23, 4 (2007), 53–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, X., and Maruping, L.M. Household technology adoption in a global marketplace: Incorporating the role of espoused cultural values. Information Systems Frontiers, 10, 4 (2008), 403–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar