Acting Like Humans? Anthropomorphism and Consumer’s Willingness to Pay in Electronic Commerce

References

• Aggarwal, P.; and McGill, A.L. Is that car smiling at me? Schema congruity as a basis for evaluating anthropomorphized products. Journal of Consumer Research, 34, 4 (2007), 468–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aharoni, E.; and Fridlund, A.J. Social reactions toward people vs. computers: How mere labels shape interactions. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 5 (2007), 2175–2189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmadi, A.; Sahragard, R.; and Babaie Shalmani, H. Anthropomorphism–matters or not? On agent modality and its implications for teaching English idioms and design decisions. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30, 1–2 (2017), 149–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J.C.; and Gerbing, D.W. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 3 (1988), 411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ariely, D.; and Jones, S. Predictably irrational. New York: HarperCollins, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A.D. Human memory: Theory and practice. London: Psychology Press, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Bakamitsos, G.A. A cue alone or a probe to think? The dual role of affect in product evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research, 33, 3 (2006), 403–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, W.L.; Lin, E.; Marn, M.V.; and Zawada, C.C. Getting prices right on the web. The McKinsey Quarterly, 2 (2001), 54–63.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, A.D.; and Tasaki, L.H. The role and measurement of attachment in consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 1, 2 (1992), 155–172.
   Google Scholar
• Bargh, J.A.; and Thein, R.D. Individual construct accessibility, person memory, and the recall-judgment link: The case of information overload. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 5 (1985), 1129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belk, R.W. Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 2 (1988), 139–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bynion, T.-M.; and Feldner, M.T. Self-assessment manikin. In V. Zeigler-Hill and T.K. Shackelford (eds.), Encyclopedia of personality and individual differences. New York: Springer, 2017, pp.1–3.
   Google Scholar
• Caporael, L.R.; and Heyes, C.M. Why anthropomorphize? Folk psychology and other stories. Anthropomorphism, Anecdotes, and Animals, New York: SUNY Press, 1st edition (November 14, 1996), 1997, 59-73.
   Google Scholar
• Cassidy, J. The nature of the child’s ties. In J. Cassidy and P. R. Shaver (eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications, New York: Guilford Press, 1999, pp. 3–20.
   Google Scholar
• Chartrand, T.L.; Fitzsimons, G.M.; and Fitzsimons, G.J. Automatic effects of anthropomorphized objects on behavior. Social Cognition, 26, 2 (2008), 198–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, F.; Sengupta, J.; and Adaval, R. Does endowing a product with life make one Feel more alive? The effect of product anthropomorphism on consumer vitality. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 3,4(2018),503–513.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, M.; and Bargh, J.A. Consequences of automatic evaluation: Immediate behavioral predispositions to approach or avoid the stimulus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 2 (1999), 215–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clemons, E.K.; Wilson, J.; Matt, C.; Hess, T.; Ren, F.; Jin, F.; and Koh, N.S. Global Differences in online shopping behavior: Understanding factors leading to trust. Journal of Management Information Systems, 33, 4 (2016), 1117–1148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, J.S.; and Fararo, T.J. Rational choice theory. Key issues in sociological theory. Newbury Park: SAGE, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Compeau, D.; Marcolin, B.; Kelley, H.; and Higgins, C. Generalizability of information systems research using student subjects - a reflection on our practices and recommendations for future research. Information Systems Research, 23, 4 (2012), 1093–1109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coursey, D.L.; Hovis, J.L.; and Schulze, W.D. The disparity between willingness to accept and willingness to pay measures of value. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 102, 3 (1987), 679–690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Culley, K.E.; and Madhavan, P. A note of caution regarding anthropomorphism in HCI agents. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 3 (2013), 577–579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dane, E.; and Pratt, M.G. Exploring intuition and its role in managerial decision making. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1 (2007), 33–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Visser, E.J.; Monfort, S.S.; Goodyear, K.; Lu, L.; O’Hara, M.; Lee, M.R.; Parasuraman, R.; and Krueger, F. A little anthropomorphism goes a long way: Effects of oxytocin on trust, compliance, and team performance with automated agents. Human Factors, 59, 1 (2017), 116–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffy, B.R. Anthropomorphism and the social robot. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42, 3 (2003), 177–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easley, R.F.; Wood, C.A.; and Barkataki, S. Bidding patterns, experience, and avoiding the winner‘s curse in online auctions. Journal of Management Information Systems, 27, 3 (2010), 241–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekman, P. An argument for basic emotions. Cognition & Emotion, 6, 3–4 (1992), 169–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekman, P. Darwin and facial expression: A century of research in review. San Jose: ISHK, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Ekman, P. Universals and cultural differences in facial expressions of emotion. Omaha: University of Nebraska Press, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Epley, N.; Waytz, A.; and Cacioppo, J.T. On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological Review, 114, 4 (2007), 864.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fedorikhin, A.; and Patrick, V.M. Positive mood and resistance to temptation: The interfering influence of elevated arousal. Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 4 (2010), 698–711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredrickson, B.L. The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. The American Psychologist, 56, 3 (2001), 218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredrickson, B.L. What good are positive emotions? Review of General Psychology: Journal of Division 1, of the American Psychological Association, 2, 3 (1998), 300.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Frijda, N.H. The nature of emotions: Fundamental questions. New York: Oxford University Press, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Fujita, K.; Trope, Y.; Liberman, N.; and Levin-Sagi, M. Construal levels and self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 3 (2006), 351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fussell, S.R.; Kiesler, S.; Setlock, L.D.; and Yew, V. How people anthropomorphize robots. Human-Robert Interaction (HRI), 2008 3^rd ACM/IEEE International Conference, 3, 12 (2008), 145–152.
   Google Scholar
• Gong, L. How social is social responses to computers? The function of the degree of anthropomorphism in computer representations. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 4 (2008), 1494–1509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong, L.; and Nass, C. When a talking‐face computer agent is half‐human and half‐humanoid: Human identity and consistency preference. Human Communication Research, 33, 2 (2007), 163–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruber, D.; Aune, A.; and Koutstall, W. Can semi-anthropomorphism influence trust and compliance?: Exploring image use in app interfaces. In Proceedings of the Technology, Mind, And Society, 2018, 13. ACM:TechMindSociety '18 Proceedings of the Technology, Mind, and Society, Washington, DC, USA
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie, S. Faces in the clouds. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, P.M.; Jones, S.R.; and Royne, M.B. The human lens: How anthropomorphic reasoning varies by product complexity and enhances personal value. Journal of Marketing Management, 29, 1–2 (2013), 105–121.
   Google Scholar
• Hatano, G.; and Inagaki, K. Young children‘s naive theory of biology. Cognition, 50, 1 (1994), 171–188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatfield, E.; Cacioppo, J.T.; and Rapson, R.L. Emotional contagion. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2, 3 (1993), 96–99.
   Google Scholar
• Hazan, C.; and Shaver, P.R. Love and work: An attachment-theoretical perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 2 (1990), 270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heider, F.; and Simmel, M. An experimental study of apparent behavior. The American Journal of Psychology, 57, 2 (1944), 243–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinz, O.; Hann, I.-H.; and Spann, M. Price discrimination in E-commerce? an examination of dynamic pricing in name-your-own price markets. MIS Quarterly, 35, 1 (2011), 81–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holtgraves, T.; Ross, S.J.; Weywadt, C.R.; and Han, T.L. Perceiving artificial social agents. Computers In Human Behavior, 23, 5 (2007), 2163–2174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, W.; Thong, J.Y.; and Tam, K.Y. The effects of information format and shopping task on consumers‘ online shopping behavior: A cognitive fit perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 21, 3 (2004), 149–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosany, S.; and Prayag, G. Patterns of tourists‘ emotional responses, satisfaction, and intention to recommend. Journal of Business Research, 66, 6 (2013), 730–737.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hur, J.D.; Koo, M.; and Hofmann, W. When temptations come alive: How anthropomorphism undermines self-control. Journal of Consumer Research, 42, 2 (2015), 340–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inagaki, K.; and Sugiyama, K. Attributing human characteristics: Developmental changes in over-and underattribution. Cognitive Development, 3, 1 (1988), 55–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, J.E.; and Powell, P.L. Decision making, risk and gender: Are managers different? British Journal of Management, 5, 2 (1994), 123–138.
   Google Scholar
• Khan, R.F.; and Sutcliffe, A. Attractive agents are more persuasive. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 30, 2 (2014), 142–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleine, S.S.; Kleine III, R.E.; and Allen, C.T. How is a possession “me” or “not me”? Characterizing types and an antecedent of material possession attachment. Journal of Consumer Research, 22, 3 (1995), 327–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landwehr, J.R.; McGill, A.L.; and Herrmann, A. It‘s got the look: The effect of friendly and aggressive “facial” expressions on product liking and sales. Journal of Marketing, 75, 3 (2011), 132–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanier Jr, C.D.; Rader, C.S.; and Fowler III, A.R. Anthropomorphism, marketing relationships, and consumption worth in the Toy Story trilogy1. Journal of Marketing Management, 29, 1–2 (2013), 26–47.
   Google Scholar
• Liberman, N.; and Trope, Y. The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1 (1998), 5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lukyanenko, R.; Evermann, J.; and Parsons, J. Guidelines for establishing instantiation validity in IT artifacts: A survey of IS research. In International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems, 2015, 430-438. Springer, Cham: Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015.
   Google Scholar
• McClelland, D.C. Personality. New York: William Sloane Association, 1951.
   Google Scholar
• McConnell, A.R.; Brown, C.M.; Shoda, T.M.; Stayton, L.E.; and Martin, C.E. Friends with benefits: on the positive consequences of pet ownership. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 6 (2011), 1239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mithen, S.; and Boyer, P. Anthropomorphism and the evolution of cognition. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 2, 4 (1996), 717–721.
   Google Scholar
• Morewedge, C.K.; Preston, J.; and Wegner, D.M. Timescale bias in the attribution of mind. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 1 (2007), 1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mugge, R.; Schifferstein, H.N.; and Schoormans, J.P. Product attachment and product lifetime: The role of personality congruity and fashion. ACR European Advances, 7 (2005), 460–467.
   Google Scholar
• Mugge, R.; Schifferstein, H.N.; and Schoormans, J.P. Product attachment and satisfaction: understanding consumers‘ post-purchase behavior. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 27, 3 (2010), 271–282.
   Google Scholar
• Nowak, K.L.; Hamilton, M.A.; and Hammond, C.C. The effect of image features on judgments of homophily, credibility, and intention to use as avatars in future interactions. Media Psychology, 12, 1 (20091), 50–76.
   Google Scholar
• Page, T. Product attachment and replacement: implications for sustainable design. International Journal of Sustainable Design, 2, 3 (2014), 265–282.
   Google Scholar
• Pandolph, S. The retail price wars are intensifying, Business Insider, 2018, Insider Inc., New York City. https://www.businessinsider.com/the-retail-price-wars-are-intensifying-2018-4
   Google Scholar
• Parboteeah, D.V.; Valacich, J.S.; and Wells, J.D. The influence of website characteristics on a consumer‘s urge to buy impulsively. Information Systems Research, 20, 1 (2009), 60–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, C.W.; Jaworski, B.J.; and Maclnnis, D.J. Strategic brand concept-image management. The Journal of Marketing, 40, 4 (1986), 135–145.
   Google Scholar
• Peter, J.P.; Olson, J.C.; and Grunert, K.G. Consumer Behavior and Marketing Strategy. London: McGraw-Hill London, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Plaks, J.E.; Stroessner, S.J.; Dweck, C.S.; and Sherman, J.W. Person theories and attention allocation: preferences for stereotypic versus counterstereotypic information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 6 (2001), 876.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posner, J.; Russell, J.A.; and Peterson, B.S. The circumplex model of affect: An integrative approach to affective neuroscience, cognitive development, and psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 17, 3 (2005), 715–734.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prior, V.; and Glaser, D. Understanding attachment and attachment disorders: Theory, evidence and practice. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Qiu, C.; and Yeung, C.W. Mood and comparative judgment: Does mood influence everything and finally nothing? Journal of Consumer Research, 34, 5 (2008), 657–669.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeves, B.; and Nass, C. The media equation: How people treat computers, television? New media like real people? Places. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 33, 5 (1997), 128–128.
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, S. Hedonic prices and implicit markets: Product differentiation in pure competition. Journal of Political Economy, 82, 1 (1974), 34–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schifferstein, H.N.; and Zwartkruis-Pelgrim, E.P. Consumer-product attachment: Measurement and design implications. International Journal of Design, 2, 3 (2008), 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlosberg, H. Three dimensions of emotion. Psychological Review, 61, 2 (1954) 81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoenewolf, G. Emotional contagion: Behavioral induction in individuals and groups. Modern Psychoanalysis, 15, 1 (1990), 49–61.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, S.E.; Kleine, R.E.; and Kernan, J.B. ‘These are a few of my favorite things’: Toward an explication of attachment as a consumer behavior construct. Advances in Consumer Research, 16, 1 (1989), 359–366.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, N.; and Clore, G.L. Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 3 (1983), 513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, J. Rational choice theory, in understanding contemporary society: Theories of the present. Newbury Park: SAGE, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Severson, R.L.; and Lemm, K.M. Kids see human too: Adapting an individual differences measure of anthropomorphism for a child sample. Journal of Cognition and Development, 17, 1 (2016), 122–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheth, J.N.; and Parvatlyar, A. Relationship marketing in consumer markets: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of The Academy of Marketing Science, 23, 4 (1995), 255–271.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, C.W. Auctions: The social construction of value. University of California Press, 1990. Free Press, New York, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J.B.; and Colgate, M. Customer value creation: A practical framework. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 15, 1 (2007), 7–23.
   Google Scholar
• Solomon, M.R.; Dahl, D.W.; White, K.; Zaichkowsky, J.L.; and Polegato, R. Consumer behavior: Buying, having, and being. Boston: Pearson, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Sweeney, J.C.; and Soutar, G.N. Consumer perceived value: The development of a multiple item scale. Journal of Retailing, 77, 2 (2001), 203–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweller, J. Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12, 2 (1988), 257–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, S.E.; and Fiske, S.T. Advances in experimental social psychology. Cambridge: Academic Press, 1978
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, M.; MacInnis, D.J.; and Park, C.W. The ties that bind: Measuring the strength of consumers’ emotional attachments to brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15, 1 (2005), 77–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tremoulet, P.D.; and Feldman, J. Perception of animacy from the motion of a single object. Perception, 29, 8 (2000), 943–952.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turban, E. Auctions and bidding on the Internet: An assessment. Electronic Markets, 7, 4 (1997), 7–11.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, J.C.; Hogg, M.A.; Oakes, P.J.; Reicher, S.D.; and Wetherell, M.S. Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Cambridge: Basil Blackwell, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Uzawa, H. Preference and rational choice in the theory of consumption. Standford: Stanford University Press, 1960.
   Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V.; Morris, M.G.; and Ackerman, P.L. A longitudinal field investigation of gender differences in individual technology adoption decision-making processes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 83, 1 (2000), 33–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vishwanath, A. An empirical investigation into the use of heuristics and information cues by bidders in online auctions. Electronic Markets, 14, 3 (2004), 178–185.
   Google Scholar
• Vugt, H.C.V.; Bailenson, J.N.; Hoorn, J.F.; and Konijin, E.A. Effects of facial similarity on user responses to embodied agents. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 17, 2 (2010), 7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vuilleumier, P.; Armony, J.L.; Driver, J.; and Dolan, R.J. Effects of attention and emotion on face processing in the human brain: An event-related fMRI study. Neuron, 30, 3 (2001), 829–841.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, L.C.; Baker, J.; Wagner, J.A.; and Wakefield, K. Can a retail web site be social? Journal of Marketing, 71, 3 (2007), 143–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waytz, A.; Heafner, J.; and Epley, N. The mind in the machine: Anthropomorphism increases trust in an autonomous vehicle. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 52 (2014), 113–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wertenbroch, K.; and Skiera, B. Measuring consumers’ willingness to pay at the point of purchase. Journal of Marketing Research, 39, 2 (2002), 228–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodall, T. Conceptualising ‘value for the customer’: An attributional, structural and dispositional analysis. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 12, 1 (2003), 1–42.
   Google Scholar
• Yuan, L.I.; and Dennis, A.R. The happiness premium: The impact of emotion on individuals‘ willingness to pay in online auctions. AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction, 8, 3 (2016), 74–87.
   Google Scholar
• Zeithaml, V.A. Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. The Journal of Marketing, 52, 3 (1988), 2–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar