1,936
Views
16
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Diffusion on Social Media Platforms: A Point Process Model for Interaction among Similar Content

References

  • Aral, S.; and Walker, D. Creating social contagion through viral product design: A randomized trial of peer influence in networks. Management Science, 57, 9 (August 2011), 1623–1639.
  • Asur, S.; Huberman, B.A.; Szabo, G.; and Wang, C. Trends in social media: Persistence and decay. In Proc. Fifth Intl. AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. Barcelona, Spain: The AAAI Press, 2011, pp. 434–437.
  • Bacry, E.; and Muzy, J.-F. Hawkes model for price and trades high-frequency dynamics. Quantitative Finance, 14, 7 (July 2014), 1147–1166.
  • Bakshy, E.; Hofman, J.M.; Mason, W.A.; and Watts, D.J. Everyone’s an influencer: Quantifying influence on Twitter. In Proc. Fourth ACM Intl. Con. on Web Search and Data Mining. Hong Kong: Association for Computing Machinery, 2011, pp. 65–74.
  • Berger, J.; and Milkman, K.L. What makes online content viral? Journal of Marketing Research, 49, 2 (April 2012), 192–205.
  • Bowsher, C.G. Modelling security market events in continuous time: Intensity based, multivariate point process models. Journal of Econometrics, 141, 2 (December 2007), 876–912.
  • Bremaud, P.; and Massoulie, L. Stability of nonlinear Hawkes processes. The Annals of Probability, 24, 3 (July 1996), 1563–1588.
  • Byrd, R.; Schnabel, R.; and Shultz, G. A trust region algorithm for nonlinearly constrained optimization. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 24, 5 (October 1987), 1152–1170.
  • Centola, D. The spread of behavior in an online social network experiment. Science, 329, 5996 (September 2010), 1194–1197.
  • Centola, D.; and Macy, M. Complex contagions and the weakness of long ties. American Journal of Sociology, 113, 3 (November 2007), 702–734.
  • Chan, N.H.; Li, Z.R.; and Yau, C.Y. Forecasting online auctions via self-exciting point processes. Journal of Forecasting, 33, 7 (November 2014), 501–514.
  • Chang, R.M.; Kauffman, R.J.; and Kwon, Y. Understanding the paradigm shift to computational social science in the presence of big data. Decision Support Systems, 63, (July 2014), 67–80.
  • Charikar, M.S. Similarity estimation techniques from rounding algorithms. In Proc. Thirty-fourth ACM Symp. on Theory of Computing. Montreal: Association for Computing Machinery, 2002, pp. 380–388.
  • Ciampaglia, G.L.; Flammini, A.; and Menczer, F. The production of information in the attention economy. Scientific Reports, 5, (May 2015), 9452.
  • Coscia, M. Average is boring: How similarity kills a meme’s success. Scientific Reports, 4, (September 2014), 6477.
  • Coscia, M. Popularity spikes hurt future chances for viral propagation of protomemes. Communications of the ACM, 61, 1 (January 2018), 70–77.
  • Crane, R.; and Sornette, D. Robust dynamic classes revealed by measuring the response function of a social system. Proc. of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 41 (October 2008), 15649–15653.
  • Daley, D.J.; and Vere-Jones, D. An Introduction to the Theory of Point Processes: Volume I: Elementary Theory and Methods. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2003.
  • Davidov, D.; Tsur, O.; and Rappoport, A. Enhanced sentiment learning using Twitter hashtags and smileys. In Proc. 23rd Intl. Con. on Computational Linguistics: Posters. Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2010, pp. 241–249.
  • Dellarocas, C. The digitization of word of mouth: Promise and challenges of online feedback mechanisms. Management Science, 49, 10 (October 2003), 1407–1424.
  • Dellarocas, C.; Sutanto, J.; Calin, M.; and Palme, E. Attention allocation in information-rich environments: The case of news aggregators. Management Science, 62, 9 (September 2015), 2543–2562.
  • Dumais, S.T. Latent semantic analysis. Annual Rev. Info. Sci. Tech., 38, 1 (September 2004), 188–230.
  • Falkinger, J. Attention economies. Journal of Economic Theory, 133, 1 (March 2007), 266–294.
  • Goel, S.; Anderson, A.; Hofman, J.; and Watts, D.J. The structural virality of online diffusion. Management Science, 62, 1 (January 2016), 180–196.
  • Goes, P.B.; Lin, M.; and Au Yeung, C. “Popularity effect” in user-generated content: Evidence from online product reviews. Information Systems Research, 25, 2 (January 2014), 222–238.
  • Haas, M.R.; Criscuolo, P.; and George, G. Which problems to solve? Online knowledge sharing and attention allocation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 58, 3 (June 2015), 680–711.
  • Hansen, M.T.; and Haas, M.R. Competing for attention in knowledge markets: Electronic document dissemination in a management consulting company. Admin. Sci. Qtrly., 46, 1 (March 2001), 1–28.
  • Hastie, T.; Tibshirani, R.; and Friedman, J. The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction. New York: Springer Science & Business Media, 2009.
  • Hawkes, A.G. Spectra of some self-exciting and mutually exciting point processes. Biometrika, 58, 1 (September 1971), 83–90.
  • Hawkes, A.G.; and Oakes, D. A cluster process representation of a self-exciting process. Journal of Applied Probability, 11, 3 (September 1974), 493–503.
  • Hodas, N.O.; and Lerman, K. The simple rules of social contagion. Scientific Reports, 4, (March 2014), 4343.
  • Huang, N.; Burtch, G.; Gu, B.; Hong, Y.; Liang, C.; Wang, K.; Fu, D.; and Yang, B. Motivating user-generated content with performance feedback: Evidence from randomized field experiments. Management Science, 65, 1 (February 2018), 327–345.
  • Iyer, G.; and Katona, Z. Competing for attention in social communication markets. Management Science, 62, 8 (May 2015), 2304–2320.
  • Johnson, P.C.D. Extension of Nakagawa & Schielzeth’s R2GLMM to random slopes models. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 5, 9 (September 2014), 944–946.
  • Kajiwara, T.; Bollegala, D.; Yoshida, Y.; and Kawarabayashi, K. An iterative approach for the global estimation of sentence similarity. PLOS One, 12, 9 (September 2017), e0180885.
  • Kryvasheyeu, Y.; Chen, H.; Obradovich, N.; Moro, E.; Van Hentenryck, P.; Fowler, J.; and Cebrian, M. Rapid assessment of disaster damage using social media activity. Science Advances, 2, 3 (March 2016), e1500779.
  • Lallouache, M.; and Challet, D. The limits of statistical significance of Hawkes processes fitted to financial data. Quantitative Finance, 16, 1 (January 2016), 1–11.
  • Lee, D.; Hosanagar, K.; and Nair, H.S. Advertising content and consumer engagement on social media: Evidence from Facebook. Management Science, 64, 11 (January 2018), 5105–5131.
  • Lerman, K.; and Ghosh, R. Information contagion: An empirical study of the spread of news on Digg and Twitter social networks. In Proceedings of the Fourth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. Washington, DC: The AAAI Press, 2010, pp. 90–97.
  • Luo, X.; Gu, B.; Zhang, J.; and Phang, C.W. Expert blogs and consumer perceptions of competing brands. MIS Quarterly, 41, 2 (June 2017), 371–395.
  • Luo, X.; and Zhang, J. How do consumer buzz and traffic in social media marketing predict the value of the firm? Journal of Management Information Systems, 30, 2 ( Fall 2013), 213–238.
  • Manku, G.S.; Jain, A.; and Das Sarma, A. Detecting near-duplicates for web crawling. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on World Wide Web. Banff, Canada: Assoc. for Computing Machinery, 2007, pp. 141–150.
  • Mayzlin, D.; and Yoganarasimhan, H. Link to success: How blogs build an audience by promoting rivals. Management Science, 58, 9 (July 2012), 1651–1668.
  • Mei, H.; and Eisner, J.M. The neural Hawkes process: A neurally self-modulating multivariate point process. In Advances in Neural Info. Processing Systems 30. Long Beach, CA: 2017, pp. 6754–6764.
  • Meier, P. Digital Humanitarians: How Big Data Is Changing the Face of Humanitarian Response. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2015.
  • Mohler, G.O.; Short, M.B.; Brantingham, P.J.; Schoenberg, F.P.; and Tita, G.E. Self-exciting point process modeling of crime. Journal of the American Stat. Assoc., 106, 493 (March 2011), 100–108.
  • Myers, S.A.; and Leskovec, J. Clash of the contagions: Cooperation and competition in information diffusion. In Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE 12th International Conference on Data Mining. Brussels: IEEE, 2012, pp. 539–548.
  • Nakagawa, S.; and Schielzeth, H. A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 4, 2 (February 2013), 133–142.
  • Nan, N.; and Lu, Y. Harnessing the power of self-organization in an online community during organizational crisis. MIS Quarterly, 38, 4 (December 2014), 1135–1157.
  • Ogata, Y. Statistical models for earthquake occurrences and residual analysis for point processes. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83, 401 (March 1988), 9–27.
  • Oh, O.; Agrawal, M.; and Rao, H.R. Community intelligence and social media services: A rumor theoretic analysis of tweets during social crises. MIS Quarterly, 37, 2 (June 2013), 407–426.
  • Olteanu, A.; Vieweg, S.; and Castillo, C. What to expect when the unexpected happens: Social media communications across crises. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. Vancouver, Canada: Association for Computing Machinery, 2015, pp. 994–1009.
  • Phan, T.Q.; and Airoldi, E.M. A natural experiment of social network formation and dynamics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112, 21 (May 2015), 6595–6600.
  • Phang, D.C.W.; Wang, K.; Wang, Q.; Kauffman, R.J.; and Naldi, M. How to derive causal insights for digital commerce in China? A research commentary on Computational Social Science methods. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 33 (January-February 2019), 100837.
  • Pi, B.; Fu, S.; Wang, W.; and Han, S. SimHash-based effective and efficient detecting of near-duplicate short messages. In Proceedings of the Second Symposium International Computer Science and Computational Technology. Huangshan China: Academy Publisher, 2009, pp. 20–25.
  • Qiu, L.; Tang, Q.; and Whinston, A.B. Two formulas for success in social media: Learning and network effects. Journal of Management Information Systems, 32, 4 ( Fall 2015), 78–108.
  • Reynaud-Bouret, P.; and Schbath, S. Adaptive estimation for Hawkes processes: Application to genome analysis. The Annals of Statistics, 38, 5 (October 2010), 2781–2822.
  • Rishika, R.; Kumar, A.; Janakiraman, R.; and Bezawada, R. The effect of customers’ social media participation on customer visit frequency and profitability: An empirical investigation. Information Systems Research, 24, 1 (December 2012), 108–127.
  • Romero, D.M.; Galuba, W.; Asur, S.; and Huberman, B.A. Influence and passivity in social media. In D. Gunopulos; T. Hofmann; D. Malerba; and M. Vazirgiannis (eds.), Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2011, pp. 18–33.
  • Romero, D.M.; Meeder, B.; and Kleinberg, J. Differences in the mechanics of information diffusion across topics: Idioms, political hashtags, and complex contagion on Twitter. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on World Wide Web. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery, 2011, pp. 695–704.
  • Sabnis, G.; and Grewal, R. Cable news wars on the internet: Competition and user-generated content. Information Systems Research, 26, 2 (June 2015), 301–319.
  • Saichev, A.; Maillart, T.; and Sornette, D. Hierarchy of temporal responses of multivariate self-excited epidemic processes. The European Physical Journal B, 86, 4 (April 2013), 124.
  • Shen, W.; Hu, Y.J.; and Rees Ulmer, J. Competing for attention: An empirical study of online reviewers’ strategic behavior. MIS Quarterly, 39, 3 (September 2015), 683–696.
  • Shore, J.; Baek, J.; and Dellarocas, C. Network structure and patterns of information diversity on Twitter. MIS Quarterly, 42, 3 (September 2018), 849–872.
  • Stieglitz, S.; and Dang-Xuan, L. Emotions and information diffusion in social media—Sentiment of microblogs and sharing behavior. Journal of Management Information Systems, 29, 4 ( Spring 2013), 217–248.
  • Stratton, S.J.; and Tyler, R.D. Characteristics of medical surge capacity demand for sudden-impact disasters. Academic Emergency Medicine, 13, 11 (November 2006), 1193–1197.
  • Susarla, A.; Oh, J.H.; and Tan, Y. Social networks and the diffusion of user-generated content: Evidence from YouTube. Information Systems Research, 23, 1 (April 2011), 23–41.
  • Tang, Q.; Gu, B.; and Whinston, A.B. Content contribution for revenue sharing and reputation in social media: Dynamic structural model. Journal of Management Information Systems, 29, 2 ( Fall 2012), 41–76.
  • Vieweg, S.; Hughes, A.L.; Starbird, K.; and Palen, L. Microblogging during two natural hazards events: What Twitter may contribute to situational awareness. In Proc. SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Atlanta, GA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2010, pp. 1079–1088.
  • Vosoughi, S.; Roy, D.; and Aral, S. The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359, 6380 (March 2018), 1146–1151.
  • Wang, Q.; Li, B.; and Singh, P.V. Copycats vs. original mobile apps: A machine learning copycat-detection method and empirical analysis. Information Systems Research, 29, 2 (April 2018), 273–291.
  • Wang, Y.; Wu, C.; Zheng, K.; and Wang, X. Social bot detection using tweets similarity. In R. Beyah; B. Chang; Y. Li; and S. Zhu (eds.), Security and Privacy in Communication Networks. Singapore: Springer International Publishing, 2018, pp. 63–78.
  • Weng, L.; Flammini, A.; Vespignani, A.; and Menczer, F. Competition among memes in a world with limited attention. Scientific Reports, 2, (March 2012), 335.
  • Wu, F.; and Huberman, B.A. Novelty and collective attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 45 (November 2007), 17599–17601.
  • Xu, L.; Duan, J.A.; and Whinston, A.B. Path to purchase: A mutually exciting point process model for online advertising and conversion. Management Science, 60, 6 (April 2014), 1392–1412.
  • Yan, L.; and Pedraza-Martinez, A.J. Social media for disaster management: Operational value of the social conversation. Production and Operations Management, Forthcoming (2019).
  • Yoganarasimhan, H. Impact of social network structure on content propagation: A study using YouTube data. Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 10, 1 (March 2012), 111–150.
  • Yoo, E.; Rand, W.; Eftekhar, M.; and Rabinovich, E. Evaluating information diffusion speed and its determinants in social media networks during humanitarian crises. J. Ops. Mgmt., 45, (July 2016), 123–133.
  • Zhao, Q.; Erdogdu, M.A.; He, H.Y.; Rajaraman, A.; and Leskovec, J. SEISMIC: A self-exciting point process model for predicting tweet popularity. In Proc. 21th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. ACM, Sydney, Australia, 2015, pp. 1513–1522.
  • Zheng, Z.; Pavlou, P.A.; and Gu, B. Latent growth modeling for information systems: Theoretical extensions and practical applications. Information Systems Research, 25, 3 (August 2014), 547–568.
  • Zhu, X.; Huang, J.; Zhou, B.; Li, A.; and Jia, Y. Real-time personalized Twitter search based on semantic expansion and quality model. Neurocomputing, 254, (September 2017), 13–21.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.