Effect of Crowd Voting on Participation in Crowdsourcing Contests

References

• Adamczyk, S.; Bullinger, A.C.; and Möslein, K.M. Innovation contests: a review, classification and outlook. Creativity and Innovation Management, 21, 4 (2012), 335–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aiken, L.S.; West, S.G.; and Reno, R.R. Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Alexy, O.; Criscuolo, P.; and Salter, A. Managing unsolicited ideas for R&D. California Management Review, 54, 3 (2012), 116–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allison, P.D.; and Waterman, R.P. 7. Fixed-effects negative binomial regression models. Sociological Methodology, 32, 1 (2002), 247–265.
   Google Scholar
• Archak, N.; and Ghose, A. Learning-by-doing and project choice: a dynamic structural model of crowdsourcing. International Conference on Information Systems 2010 Proceedings, St. Louis, MO, USA, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Banerjee, A.V. A simple model of herd behavior. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107, 3 (1992), 797–817.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bapna, R.; Gupta, A.; Ray, G.; and Singh, S. IT outsourcing and the impact of advisors on clients and vendors. Information Systems Research, 27, 3 (2016), 636–647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, M.L.; Jermier, J.M.; and Lafferty, B.A. Corporate reputation: thedefinitional landscape. Corporate Reputation Review, 9, 1 (2006), 26–38.
   Google Scholar
• Belenzon, S.; and Schankerman, M. Motivation and sorting of human capital in open innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 36, 6 (2015), 795–820.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bikhchandani, S.; Hirshleifer, D.; and Welch, I. A theory of fads, fashion, custom, and cultural change as informational cascades. Journal of Political Economy, 100, 5 (1992), 992–1026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blohm, I.; Riedl, C.; Füller, J.; and Leimeister, J.M. Rate or trade? Identifying winning ideas in open idea sourcing. Information Systems Research, 27, 1 (2016), 27–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bockstedt, J.; Mishra, A.; and Druehl, C. Do participation strategy and experience impact the likelihood of winning in unblind innovation contests? Available at SSRN 1961244 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Boudreau, K.J.; Lacetera, N.; and Lakhani, K.R. Incentives and problem uncertainty in innovation contests: an empirical analysis. Management Science, 57, 5 (2011), 843–863.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boudreau, K.J.; and Lakhani, K.R. Field experimental evidence on sorting, incentives and creative worker performance. Harvard Business School (2011), 1–48.
   Google Scholar
• Brabham, D.C. Crowdsourcing the public participation process for planning projects. Planning Theory, 8, 3 (2009), 242–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brabham, D.C. Moving the crowd at Threadless: motivations for participation in a crowdsourcing application. Information, Communication & Society, 13, 8 (2010), 1122–1145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, J.; Broderick, A.J.; and Lee, N. Word of mouth communication within online communities: conceptualizing the online social network. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 21, 3 (2007), 2–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budescu, D.V.; and Chen, E. Identifying expertise to extract the wisdom of crowds. Management Science, 61, 2 (2014), 267–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, L.; Huang, Z.; and Liu, D. Pure and hybrid crowds in crowdfunding markets. Financial Innovation, 2, 1 (2016), 19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, L.; Marsden, J.R.; and Zhang, Z. Theory and analysis of company-sponsored value co-creation. Journal of Management Information Systems, 29, 2 (2012), 141–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, P.-Y.; Pavlou, P.A.; and Yang, Y. Determinants of open contest participation in online labor markets. Fox School of Business Research Paper No. 15-074. (2014).
   Google Scholar
• Connelly, B.L.; Tihanyi, L.; Crook, T.R.; and Gangloff, K.A. Tournament theory: thirty years of contests and competitions. Journal of Management, 40, 1 (2014), 16–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiPalantino, D.; and Vojnovic, M. Crowdsourcing and all-pay auctions. Proceedings of the 10th ACM conference on Electronic Commerce, Stanford, CA, USA: ACM, 2009, pp. 119–128.
   Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K.A. Expertise in interpreting: an expert-performance perspective. Interpreting, 5, 2 (2000), 187–220.
   Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K.A.; and Smith, J. Toward a general theory of expertise: prospects and limits. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Faraj, S.; Jarvenpaa, S.L.; and Majchrzak, A. Knowledge collaboration in online communities. Organization Science, 22, 5 (2011), 1224–1239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fershtman, C.; Murphy, K.M.; and Weiss, Y. Social status, education, and growth. Journal of Political Economy, 104, 1 (1996), 108–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franke, N.; Lettl, C.; Roiser, S.; and Tuertscher, P. “Does God Play Dice?”-Randomness vs. Deterministic Explanations of Crowdsourcing Success. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, C.; Prandelli, E.; and Schreier, M. The psychological effects of empowerment strategies on consumers’ product demand. Journal of Marketing, 74, 1 (2010), 65–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Füller, J.; Matzler, K.; and Hoppe, M. Brand community members as a source of innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25, 6 (2008), 608–619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girotra, K.; Terwiesch, C.; and Ulrich, K.T. Idea generation and the quality of the best idea. Management Science, 56, 4 (2010), 591–605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haan, M.A.; Dijkstra, S.G.; and Dijkstra, P.T. Expert judgment versus public opinion–evidence from the Eurovision Song Contest. Journal of Cultural Economics, 29, 1 (2005), 59–78.
   Google Scholar
• Hausman, J.A.; Hall, B.H.; and Griliches, Z. Econometric models for count data with an application to the patents-R&D relationship. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, D.E.; Imai, K.; King, G.; and Stuart, E.A. Matching as nonparametric preprocessing for reducing model dependence in parametric causal inference. Political Analysis, 15, 3 (2007), 199–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holbrook, M.B. Popular appeal versus expert judgments of motion pictures. Journal of Consumer Research, 26, 2 (1999), 144–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holbrook, M.B.; and Addis, M. Taste versus the market: an extension of research on the consumption of popular culture. Journal of Consumer Research, 34, 3 (2007), 415–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe, J. Crowdsourcing: How the Power of the Crowd is Driving the Future of Business. New York: Random House, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Hutter, K.; Füller, J.; Hautz, J.; Bilgram, V.; and Matzler, K. Machiavellianism or morality: which behavior pays off in online innovation contests? Journal of Management Information Systems, 32, 3 (2015), 197–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iacus, S.M.; King, G.; and Porro, G. Multivariate matching methods that are monotonic imbalance bounding. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 106, 493 (2011), 345–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iacus, S.M.; King, G.; and Porro, G. Causal inference without balance checking: coarsened exact matching. Political Analysis, 20, 1 (2012), 1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iacus, S.M.; and Porro, G. Invariant and metric free proximities for data matching: an R package. Journal of Statistical Software, 25, 11 (2008), 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, P. Whence democracy? A review and critique of the conceptual dimensions and implications of the business case for organizational democracy. Organization, 13, 2 (2006), 245–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalra, A.; and Shi, M. Designing optimal sales contests: a theoretical perspective. Marketing Science, 20, 2 (2001), 170–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karelaia, N.; and Hogarth, R.M. The attraction of uncertainty: Interactions between skill and levels of uncertainty in market-entry games. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 41, 2 (2010), 141–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, A.; Moravec, P.L.; and Dennis, A.R. Combating fake news on social media with source ratings: the effects of user and expert reputation ratings. Journal of Management Information Systems, 36, 3 (2019), 931–968.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, A.; and Lakhani, K.R. Using open innovation to identify the best ideas. MIT Sloan Management Review, 55, 1 (2013), 41–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakhani, K.R.; and Panetta, J.A. The principles of distributed innovation. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 2, 3 (2007), 97–112.
   Google Scholar
• Lawler, E.E.; and Porter, L.W. The effect of performance on job satisfaction. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 7, 1 (1967), 20–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, D.; and Hu, L. Exploring the effects of reward and competition intensity on participation in crowdsourcing contests. Electronic Markets, 29, 3 (2017), 199–210.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, D.; Geng, X.; and Whinston, A.B. Optimal design of consumer contests. Journal of Marketing, 71, 4 (2007), 140–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, T.X.; Yang, J.; Adamic, L.A.; and Chen, Y. Crowdsourcing with all-pay auctions: a field experiment on taskcn. Management Science, 60, 8 (2014), 2020–2037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magallanes, Y.; Sánchez, J.A.; Cervantes, O.; and Wan, W. A pattern-based approach for developing creativity applications supported by surface computing. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 110(2018), 134–154.
   Google Scholar
• Majchrzak, A.; and Malhotra, A. Towards an information systems perspective and research agenda on crowdsourcing for innovation. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 22, 4 (2013), 257–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malaga, R.A. Web-based reputation management systems: problems and suggested solutions. Electronic Commerce Research, 1, 4 (2001), 403–417.
   Google Scholar
• Malone, T.W.; Laubacher, R.; and Dellarocas, C. Harnessing crowds: mapping the genome of collective intelligence. MIT Sloan Research Paper, 2009. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1381502.
   Google Scholar
• Martínez-Torres, M.R. Analysis of open innovation communities from the perspective of social network analysis. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 26, 4 (2014), 435–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matyas, L.; and Sevestre, P. Fixed effect models and fixed coefficient models. In L. Mátyás; and P. Sevestre (eds.), The Econometrics of Panel Data: A Handbook of Theory with Applications, 2nd Ed. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1996, pp. 34-49.
   Google Scholar
• McFadden, D. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In P. Zarembka (ed.), Frontiers in Econometrics. New York: Academic Press, 1974, pp. 105–142.
   Google Scholar
• Mollick, E.; and Nanda, R. Wisdom or madness? comparing crowds with expert evaluation in funding the arts. Management Science, 62, 6 (2015), 1533–1553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piezunka, H.; and Dahlander, L. Distant search, narrow attention: how crowding alters organizations’ filtering of suggestions in crowdsourcing. Academy of Management Journal, 58, 3 (2015), 856–880.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollock, T.G.; Lee, P.M.; Jin, K.; and Lashley, K. (Un) tangled: exploring the asymmetric coevolution of new venture capital firms’ reputation and status. Administrative Science Quarterly, 60, 3 (2015), 482–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riedl, C.; and Seidel, V.P. Learning from mixed signals in online innovation communities. Organization Science, 29, 6 (2018), 1010–1032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salganik, M.J.; Dodds, P.S.; and Watts, D.J. Experimental study of inequality and unpredictability in an artificial cultural market. Science, 311, 5762 (2006), 854–856.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauder, M.; Lynn, F.; and Podolny, J.M. Status: Insights from organizational sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 38(2012), 267–283.
   Google Scholar
• Shanteau, J.; Weiss, D.J.; Thomas, R.P.; and Pounds, J.C. Performance-based assessment of expertise: how to decide if someone is an expert or not. European Journal of Operational Research, 136, 2 (2002), 253–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spence, M.T.; and Brucks, M. The moderating effects of problem characteristics on experts’ and novices’ judgments. Journal of marketing Research, 34, 2 (1997), 233–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Standifird, S.S. Reputation and e-commerce: eBay auctions and the asymmetrical impact of positive and negative ratings. Journal of Management, 27, 3 (2001), 279–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, K.J.; Ammeter, A.P.; and Maruping, L.M. Impacts of license choice and organizational sponsorship on user interest and development activity in open source software projects. Information Systems Research, 17, 2 (2006), 126–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, K.J.; and Gosain, S. The impact of ideology on effectiveness in open source software development teams. MIS Quarterly (2006), 291–314.
   Google Scholar
• Surowiecki, J. The Wisdom of Crowds: Why the Many are Smarter than the Few and How Collective Wisdom Shapes Business, Economies, Societies and Nations. New York: Little Brown Press, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Terwiesch, C.; and Ulrich, K.T. Innovation Tournaments: Creating and Selecting Exceptional Opportunities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Terwiesch, C.; and Yi, X. Innovation contests, open innovation, and multiagent problem solving. Management Science, 54, 9 (2008), 1529–1543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toubia, O.; and Florès, L. Adaptive idea screening using consumers. Marketing Science, 26, 3 (2007), 342–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velichety, S.; Ram, S.; and Bockstedt, J. Quality assessment of peer-produced content in knowledge repositories using development and coordination activities. Journal of Management Information Systems, 36, 2 (2019), 478–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vroom, V.H. Work and Motivation. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1964.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, J.; and Cole, C.A. The effects of age and expertise on product evaluations: does the type of information matter? Management Science, 62, 7 (2015), 2039–2053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Washington, M.; and Zajac, E.J. Status evolution and competition: theory and evidence. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 2 (2005), 282–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, W.G.; Unterrainer, C.; and Schmid, B.E. The influence of organizational democracy on employees’ socio‐moral climate and prosocial behavioral orientations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 8 (2009), 1127–1149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen, Z.; and Lin, L. Optimal fee structures of crowdsourcing platforms. Decision Sciences, 47, 5 (2016), 820–850.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, R. Interaction effects between continuous variables. University of Notre Dame (2015). https://www3.nd.edu/~rwilliam/stats2/l55.pdf (accessed on February 26, 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Wolfers, J.; and Zitzewitz, E. Prediction markets. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18, 2 (2004), 107–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Y.; Chen, P.-Y.; and Banker, R. Winner determination of open innovation contests in online markets. International Conference on Information Systems 2011 Proceedings (ICIS2011), Shanghai, China, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Ye, H.J.; and Kankanhalli, A. Solvers’ participation in crowdsourcing platforms: examining the impacts of trust, and benefit and cost factors. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 26, 2 (2017), 101.-117.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng, H.; Li, D.; and Hou, W. Task design, motivation, and participation in crowdsourcing contests. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 15, 4 (2011), 57–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar