The Use Of Blockchain As A Resource For Combating Corruption In Global Shipping: An Interpretive Case Study

References

• Addo, A.A.; and Avgerou, C. Information technology and government corruption in developing countries: Evidence from Ghana customs. MIS Quarterly (forthcoming).
   Google Scholar
• Agbo, C.C.; Mahmoud, Q.H.; and Eklund, J.M. Blockchain technology in healthcare: A systematic review. Healthcare, 7, 56 (2019), 1–30.
   Google Scholar
• Alzahrani, N.; and Bulusu, N. Block-supply chain: A new anti-counterfeiting supply chain using NFC and blockchain. In, Ferretti, S., and D’Angelo, G., (eds.), CryBlock’18: Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Cryptocurrencies and Blockchains for Distributed Systems, Munich, Germany: Association for Computing Machinery, 2018, pp. 30–35.
   Google Scholar
• Anand, V.; Ashforth, B.E.; and Joshi, M. Business as usual: The acceptance and perpetuation of corruption in organizations. Academy of Management Perspectives, 18, 2 (2004), 39–53.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, J.V.; and Bogusz, C.I. Self-organizing in blockchain Infrastructures: Generativity through shifting objectives and forking. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 20, 9 (2019), 1242–1273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, T.B. E-Government as an anti-corruption strategy. Information Economics and Policy, 21, 3 (2009), 201–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arayankalam, J.; Khan, A.; and Krishnan, S. How to deal with corruption? Examining the roles of e-government maturity, government administrative effectiveness, and virtual social networks diffusion. International Journal of Information Management (2020), 102203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashforth, B.E.; and Anand, V. The normalization of corruption in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25(2003), 1–52.
   Google Scholar
• Avgerou, C. Explaining trust in IT-mediated elections: A case study of e-voting in Brazil. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 14, 8 (2013), 420–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avgerou, C.; and Bonina, C. Ideologies implicated in IT innovation in government: A critical discourse analysis of Mexico’s international trade administration. Information Systems Journal, 30, 1 (2020), 70–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahoo, S.; Alon, I.; and Paltrinieri, A. Corruption in international business: A review and research agenda. International Business Review, 29, 4 (2020), 101660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai, C.; and Sarkis, J. A supply chain transparency and sustainability technology appraisal model for blockchain technology. International Journal of Production Research (2020), 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, D.; Faraj, S.; Hinds, P.; von Krogh, G.; and Leonardi, P. Special issue of organization science: emerging technologies and organizing. Organization Science, 30, 3 (2019), 642–646.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, M.; Heracleous, L.; and Walsham, G. A rhetorical approach to IT diffusion: Reconceptualizing the ideology-framing relationship in computerization movements. MIS Quarterly, 37, 1 (2013), 201–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartelt, V.L.; Urbaczewski, A.; Mueller, A.G.; and Sarker, S. Enabling collaboration and innovation in Denver’s smart city through a living lab: A social capital perspective. European Journal of Information Systems (2020), 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, R.; Avital, M.; Rossi, M.; and Thatcher, J.B. Blockchain technology in business and information systems research. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 59(2017), 381–384.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, R.; Müller-Bloch, C.; and King, J.L. Governance in the blockchain economy: A framework and research agenda. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 19, 10(2018), Article 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, E.S. Making transparency transparent: The evolution of observation in management theory. Academy of Management Annals, 11, 1 (2017), 217–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertot, J.C.; Jaeger, P.T.; and Grimes, J.M. Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Government Information Quarterly, 27, 3 (2010), 264–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bray, J. Facing up to Corruption 2007: A Practical Business Guide. London: Control Risks, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Breit, E.; Lennerfors, T.T.; and Olaison, L. Critiquing corruption: A turn to theory. Ephemera: Theory and Politics in Organization, 15, 2 (2015), 319–336.
   Google Scholar
• Castro, A.; Phillips, N.; and Ansari, S. Corporate corruption: A review and an agenda for future research. Academy of Management Annals, 14, 2 (2020), 935–968.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chanson, M.; Bogner, A.; Bilgeri, D.; Fleisch, E.; and Wortmann, F. Blockchain for the IoT: Privacy-preserving protection of sensor data. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 20, 9 (2019), 1274–1309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charoensukmongkol, P.; and Moqbel, M. Does investment in ICT curb or create more corruption? A cross-country analysis. Public Organization Review, 14, 1 (2014), 51–63.
   Google Scholar
• Cho, Y.H.; and Choi, B.D. E-government to combat corruption: The case of Seoul metropolitan government. International Journal of Public Administration, 27, 10 (2004), 719–735.
   Google Scholar
• Dawes, S.S. Stewardship and usefulness: Policy principles for information-based transparency. Government Information Quarterly, 27, 4 (2010), 377–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong, W.; Liao, S.; and Zhang, Z. Leveraging financial social media data for corporate fraud detection. Journal of Management Information Systems, 35, 2 (2018), 461–487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drescher, D. Blockchain Basics: A Non-Technical Introduction in 25 Steps. Berkeley, CA: Apress, 2017
   Google Scholar
• Fedotov, Y. Remarks at the Twenty-First session of the Commission on Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice. https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/speeches/2012/remarks-at-21stccpcj.html, 2012
   Google Scholar
• Felin, T.; and Lakhani, K. What problems will you solve with blockchain? MIT Sloan Management Review, 60, 1 (2018), 32–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Murillo, M. Does a government web presence reduce perceptions of corruption? Information Technology for Development, 19, 2 (2013), 151–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garud, R.; Hardy, C.; and Maguire, S. Institutional entrepreneurship as embedded agency: An introduction to the special issue. Organzation Studies, 28, 7 (2007), 957–969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, F. Pervasive decentralisation of digital infrastructures: A framework for blockchain enabled system and use case analysis. In T. Bui, and R. Sprague (eds.), Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences Hilton Waikoloa Village, Hawaii, USA, 2017, pp. 1543–1552.
   Google Scholar
• Hahn, E.D.; Doh, J.P.; and Bunyaratavej, K. The evolution of risk in information systems offshoring: The impact of home country risk, firm learning, and competitive dynamics. MIS Quarterly, 33, 3 (2009), 597–616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hastig, G.; and Sodhi, M.S. Blockchain for supply chaintraceability: Business requirements and critical success factors. Production and Operations Management, 29, 4 (2020), 935–954.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haveman, H.A.; and Rao, H. Structuring a theory of moral sentiments: Institutional and organizational coevolution in the early thrift industry. American Journal of Sociology, 102, 6 (1997), 1606-1651.
   Google Scholar
• Hileman, G.; and Rauchs, M. Global cryptocurrency benchmarking study. Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance, 33 (2017).
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C.; and Heald, D. Transparency: The Key to Better Governance? Oxford University Press for The British Academy, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Jabbar, K.; and Bjørn, P. Permeability, interoperability, and velocity: Entangled dimensions of infrastructural grind at the intersection of blockchain and shipping. ACM Transactions on Social Computing, 1, 3 (2018), 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Jain, A.K. Corruption: A review. Journal of Economic Surveys, 15, 1 (2001), 71–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, T.; Hedman, J.; and Henningsson, S. How TradeLens delivers business value with blockchain technology. MIS Quarterly Executive, 18, 4 (2019), 221–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, D. Governance Matters VI: Aggregate and Individual Governance Indicators, 1996–2006. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications, 2007
   Google Scholar
• Kim, C.K. Anti-corruption initiatives and e-government: A cross-national study. Public Organization Review, 14, 3 (2014), 385–396.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S.; Kim, H.; and Lee, H. An institutional analysis of an e-government system for anti-corruption: The case of OPEN. Government Information Quarterly, 26, 1 (2009), 42–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kock, N.; and Gaskins, L. The mediating role of voice and accountability in the relationship between internet diffusion and government corruption in Latin America and Sub-Saharan Africa. Information Technology for Development, 20, 1 (2014), 23–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köhler, S.; and Pizzol, M. Technology assessment of blockchain-based technologies in the food supply chain. Journal of Cleaner Production, 229 (2020), 122193
   Google Scholar
• Krastev, I. Shifting Obsessions: Three Essays on the Politics of Anticorruption. Budapest, Hungary: Central European University Press, 2004
   Google Scholar
• Lacity, M.C. Addressing key challenges to making enterprise blockchain applications a reality. MIS Quarterly Executive, 17, 3 (2018), 201–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lange, D. A multidimensional conceptualization of organizational corruption control. Academy of Management Review, 33, 3 (2008), 710–729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leng, K.; Bi, Y.; Jing, L.; Fu, H.-C.; and Van Nieuwenhuyse, I. Research on agricultural supply chain system with double chain architecture based on blockchain technology. Future Generation Computer Systems, 86(2018), 641–649.
   Google Scholar
• Lennerfors, T.T. The transformation of transparency–on the act on public procurement and the right to appeal in the context of the war on corruption. Journal of Business Ethics, 73, 4 (2007), 381–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, K. Beating the box: Surveillance and resistance in the US trucking industry. Rochester, NY: Rochester Institute of Technology, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, K.E. The contexts of control: Information, power, and truck-driving work. The Information Society, 31, 2 (2015), 160–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, D.D.; Feng, J.; and Jiang, H. Institutional entrepreneurs. American Economic Review, 96, 2 (2006), 358–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lio, M.C.; Liu, M.C.; and Ou, Y.P. Can the internet reduce corruption? A cross-country study based on dynamic panel data models. Government Information Quarterly, 28, 1 (2011), 47–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loklindt, C.; Moeller, M.-P.; and Kinra, A. How blockchain could be implemented for exchanging documentation in the shipping industry. In M. Freitag, H.-D. Haasis, H. Kotzab, and J. Pannek (eds.), International Conference on Dynamics in Logistics. Bremen, Germany: Springer, 2018, pp. 194–198.
   Google Scholar
• Longo, F.; Nicoletti, L.; Padovano, A.d; Atri, G.; and Forte, M. Blockchain-enabled supply chain: An experimental study. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 136(2019), 57–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackey, T.K.; and Cuomo, R.E. An interdisciplinary review of digital technologies to facilitate anti-corruption, transparency and accountability in medicines procurement. Global Health Action, 13, sup1 (2020), 1695241.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Malaurent, J.; and Avison, D. Reconciling global and local needs: A canonical action research project to deal with workarounds. Information Systems Journal, 26, 3 (2016), 227–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinsons, M.G. Relationship‐based e‐commerce: theory and evidence from China. Information Systems Journal, 18, 4 (2008), 331–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Min, H. Blockchain technology for enhancing supply chain resilience. Business Horizons, 62, 1 (2019), 35–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misangyi, V.F.; Weaver, G.R.; and Elms, H. Ending corruption: The interplay among institutional logics, resources, and institutional entrepreneurs. Academy of Management Review, 33, 3 (2008), 750–770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mistry, J.J. The role of eGovernance in mitigating corruption. Accounting and the Public Interest, 12, 1 (2012), 137–159.
   Google Scholar
• Montecchi, M.; Plangger, K.; and Etter, M. It’s real, trust me! establishing supply chain provenance using blockchain. Business Horizons, 62, 3 (2019), 283–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montiel, I.; and Husted, B.W. The adoption of voluntary environmental management programs in Mexico: First movers as institutional entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Ethics, 88, 2 (2009), 349–363.
   Google Scholar
• Nærland, K.; Müller-Bloch, C.; Beck, R.; and Palmund, S. Blockchain to rule the wavesnascent design principles for reducing risk and uncertainty in decentralized environments. In Y.J. Kim, R. Agarwal, and J.K. Lee (eds.), International Conference on Information Systems, Seoul, Korea, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Narayanan, A.; Bonneau, J.; Felten, E.; Miller, A.; and Goldfeder, S. Bitcoin and Cryptocurrency Technologies: A Comprehensive Introduction. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• O’Higgins, E.R. Corruption, underdevelopment, and extractive resource industries: Addressing the vicious cycle. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16, 2 (2006), 235–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. Business approaches to combating corrupt practices. OECD Publishing, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Perboli, G.; Musso, S.; and Rosano, M. Blockchain in logistics and supply chain: A lean approach for designing real-world use cases. IEEE Access, 6(2018), 62018–62028.
   Google Scholar
• Pierce, L.; Snow, D.C.; and McAfee, A. Cleaning house: The impact of information technology monitoring on employee theft and productivity. Management Science, 61, 10 (2015), 2299–2319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pu, S.; and Lam, J.S.L. Blockchain adoptions in the maritime industry: A conceptual framework. Maritime Policy & Management (2020), 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Raghupathi, W.; and Wu, S.J. The relationship between information and communication technologies and country governance : An exploratory study. Communication of the Association for Information Systems 28, 12 (2011), 181–198.
   Google Scholar
• Rossi, M.; Mueller-Bloch, C.; Thatcher, J.B.; and Beck, R. Blockchain research in information systems: current trends and an inclusive future research agenda. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 20, 9 (2019), 1390–1405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousseau, J.-J. The Social Contract and other Later Political Writings. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, [1762] 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Saberi, S.; Kouhizadeh, M.; Sarkis, J.; and Shen, L. Blockchain technology and its relationships to sustainable supply chain management. International Journal of Production Research, 57, 7 (2019), 2117–2135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santiso, C. Will blockchain disrupt government corruption. Stanford Social Innovation Review. Retrieved April 10, 2019, from Stanford Social Innovation Review: https://ssir. org/articles/entry/will_blockchain_disrupt_government_corruption
   Google Scholar
• Sarker, S.; and Sarker, S. Exploring agility in distributed information systems development teams: An interpretive study in an offshoring context. Information Systems Research, 20, 3 (2009), 440–461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarker, S.; Chatterjee, S.; Xiao, X.; and Elbanna, A. The sociotechnical axis of cohesion for the IS discipline: Its historical legacy and its continued relevance. MIS Quarterly, 43, 3 (2019), 695–720.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, A.; Balthrop, A.; and Miller, J.W. Unintended responses to IT‐enabled monitoring: The case of the electronic logging device mandate. Journal of Operations Management (2020).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senior, I. Corruption, the Goverment and the private sector: Why IT matters and what can be done. Economic Affairs, 24, 2 (2004), 22–29.
   Google Scholar
• Silva, L.; and Hirschheim, R. Fighting against windmills: Strategic information systems and organizational deep structures. MIS Quarterly, 31, 2 (2007), 327–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, G.; Pathak, R.D.; Naz, R.; and Belwal, R. E-governance for improved public sector service delivery in India, Ethiopia and Fiji. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 23, 3 (2010), 254–275.
   Google Scholar
• Srivastava, S.C.; Teo, T.S.; and Devaraj, S. You can’t bribe a computer: dealing with the societal challenge of corruption through ICT. MIS Quarterly, 40, 2 (2016), 511–526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, C.; and Burger, E. E-residency and blockchain. Computer Law & Security Review, 33, 4 (2017), 470–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun Yin, H.H.; Langenheldt, K.; Harlev, M.; Mukkamala, R.R.; and Vatrapu, R. Regulating cryptocurrencies: A supervised machine learning approach to de-anonymizing the bitcoin blockchain. Journal of Management Information Systems, 36, 1 (2019), 37–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Transparency-International. 2009. Retrieved January 20, 2020 from https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2009
   Google Scholar
• Vogl, F. Waging War on Corruption: Inside the Movement Fighting the Abuse of Power. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2012
   Google Scholar
• Walsham, G. Interpretive case studies in IS research: Nature and method. European Journal of Information Systems, 4, 2 (1995), 74–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsham, G. Doing interpretive research. European Journal of Information Systems, 15, 3 (2006), 320–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, L.; Luo, X.R.; and Jurkat, M.P. Understanding inconsistent corruption control through e-government participation: Updated evidence from a cross-country investigation. Electronic Commerce Research (2020), 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, S.; and Qu, X. Blockchain applications in shipping, transportation, logistics, and supply chain. In Smart Transportation Systems 2019: Springer, 2019, pp. 225–231.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfensohn, J. A back-to-basics anti-corruption strategy: Economic perspectives. Electronic Journals of the United States Information Agency, 3, 5 (1998), 17–19.
   Google Scholar
• WorldBank. The World Bank Annual Report 2012. The World Bank, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, C.-S. Maritime shipping digitalization: Blockchain-based technology applications, future improvements, and intention to use. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 131(2019), 108–117.
   Google Scholar
• Zammuto, R.F.; Griffith, T.L.; Majchrzak, A.; Dougherty, D.J., and Faraj, S. Information technology and the changing fabric of organization. Organization Science, 18, 5 (2007), 749–762.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziolkowski, R.; Miscione, G.; and Schwabe, G. Decision problems in blockchain governance: Old wine in new bottles or walking in someone else’s shoes? Journal of Management Information Systems, 37, 2 (2020), 316–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar