1,780
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Effects of Online Crowds on Self-Disclosure Behaviors in Online Reviews: A Multidimensional Examination

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , &

References

  • Abrams, D.; Wetherell, M.; Cochrane, S.; Hogg, M.A.; and Turner, J.C. Knowing what to think by knowing who you are: Self‐categorization and the nature of norm formation, conformity and group polarization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 2 (1990), 97–119.
  • Acquisti, A.; Brandimarte, L.; and Loewenstein, G. Privacy and human behavior in the age of information. Science, 347, 6221 (2015), 509–514.
  • Acquisti, A.; and Grossklags, J. Uncertainty, ambiguity and privacy. in Proceedings of the Workshop on Economics and Information Security, 2005.
  • Acquisti, A.; John, L.K.; and Loewenstein, G. The impact of relative standards on the propensity to disclose. Journal of Marketing Research, 49, 2 (2012), 160–174.
  • Agarwal, R., and Karahanna, E. Time flies when you’re having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quarterly, 24 (2), (2000), 665–694.
  • Andel, S.A.; de Vreede, T.; Spector, P.E.; Padmanabhan, B.; Singh, V.K.; and De Vreede, G.-J. Do social features help in video-centric online learning platforms? A social presence perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 113 (2020), 106505.
  • Asch, S.E. Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological monographs: General and applied, 70, 9 (1956), 1–70.
  • Awad, N.F.; and Krishnan, M.S. The personalization privacy paradox: an empirical evaluation of information transparency and the willingness to be profiled online for personalization. MIS Quarterly, 30, 1 (2006), 13–28.
  • Baek, Y.M.; Kim, E.-M.; and Bae, Y. My privacy is okay, but theirs is endangered: Why comparative optimism matters in online privacy concerns. Computers in Human Behavior, 31 (2014), 48–56.
  • Banerjee, A.V. A simple model of herd behavior. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107, 3 (1992), 797–817.
  • Barasch, A.; and Berger, J. Broadcasting and narrowcasting: How audience size affects what people share. Journal of Marketing Research, 51, 3 (2014), 286–299.
  • Benlian, A.; Titah; R., and Hess, T. Differential effects of provider recommendations and consumer reviews in e-commerce transactions: An experimental study. Journal of Management Information Systems, 29, 1 (2012), 237–272.
  • Bhattacharyya, S.; Banerjee, S.; Bose, I.; and Kankanhalli, A. Temporal effects of repeated recognition and lack of recognition on online community contributions. Journal of Management Information Systems, 37, 2 (2020), 536–562.
  • Bhattacherjee, A.; and Sanford, C. Influence processes for information technology acceptance: An elaboration likelihood model. MIS Quarterly, 30, 4 (2006), 805–825.
  • Bickart, B.; and Schindler, R.M. Internet forums as influential sources of consumer information. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 15, 3 (2001), 31–40.
  • Bikhchandani, S.; Hirshleifer, D.; and Welch, I. Learning from the behavior of others: Conformity, fads, and informational cascades. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12, 3 (1998), 151–170.
  • Burnkrant, R.E.; and Cousineau, A. Informational and normative social influence in buyer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 2, 3 (1975), 206–215.
  • Burtch, G.; Hong, Y.; Bapna, R.; and Griskevicius, V. Stimulating online reviews by combining financial incentives and social norms. Management Science, 64, 5 (2017), 2065–2082.
  • Campbell, P. Rent the Runway Price Page Teardown: How Their Business Model Maximizes Profit. Price Intelligently , 2020. Retrieved fromhttps://www.priceintelligently.com/blog/rent#the#runway#pricing#teardown
  • Chai, S.; Das, S.; and Rao, H.R. Factors affecting bloggers’ knowledge sharing: An investigation across gender. Journal of Management Information Systems, 28, 3 (2011), 309–342.
  • Chaiken, S. Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 5 (1980), 752–766.
  • Chaiken, S.; and Baldwin, M.W. Affective-cognitive consistency and the effect of salient behavioral information on the self-perception of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 1 (1981), 1–12.
  • Chaiken, S.; and Maheswaran, D. Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 3 (1994), 460–473.
  • Chartrand, T.L.; and Bargh, J.A. The chameleon effect: the perception–behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 6 (1999), 893–910.
  • Chen, Y.; Harper, F.M.; Konstan, J.; and Li, S.X. Social comparisons and contributions to online communities: A field experiment on movielens. American Economic Review, 100, 4 (2010), 1358–1398.
  • Chen, Y.; and Xie, J. Online consumer review: Word-of-mouth as a new element of marketing communication mix. Management Science, 54, 3 (2008), 477–491.
  • Cho, H.; Lee, J.-S.; and Chung, S. Optimistic bias about online privacy risks: Testing the moderating effects of perceived controllability and prior experience. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 5 (2010), 987–995.
  • Cialdini, R.B.; and Goldstein, N.J. Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55 (2004), 591–621.
  • Cialdini, R.B.; and Trost, M.R. Social influence: Social norms, conformity and compliance. In D.T. Gilbert, S.T., Fiske, and G. Lindzey (eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1998, pp. 151–192.
  • Cohen, S.; and Sherrod, D.R. When density matters: Environmental control as a determinant of crowding effects in laboratory and residential settings. Journal of Population, 1, 3 (1978), 189–202.
  • Consiglio, I.; De Angelis, M.; Costabile, M.; Fischer, E.; and Argo, J. The effect of social density on word of mouth. Journal of Consumer Research, 45, 3 (2018), 511–528.
  • Cozby, P.C. Self-disclosure: A literature review. Psychological Bulletin, 79, 2 (1973), 73.
  • Dalal, R.S.; Meyer, R.D.; Bradshaw, R.P.; Green, J.P.; Kelly, E.D.; and Zhu, M. Personality strength and situational influences on behavior: A conceptual review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 41, 1 (2015), 261–287.
  • Deutsch, M.; and Gerard, H.B. A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 3 (1955), 629–636.
  • Dinev, T.; McConnell, A.R.; and Smith, H.J. Research commentary—informing privacy research through information systems, psychology, and behavioral economics: Thinking outside the “APCO” box. Information Systems Research, 26, 4 (2015), 639–655.
  • Duan, W.; Gu, B.; and Whinston, A.B. Do online reviews matter?—An empirical investigation of panel data. Decision Support Systems, 45, 4 (2008), 1007–1016.
  • Ellison, N.; Heino, R.; and Gibbs, J. Managing impressions online: Self-presentation processes in the online dating environment. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11, 2 (2006), 415–441.
  • Feldman, D.C. The development and enforcement of group norms. Academy of Management Review, 9, 1 (1984), 47–53.
  • Fennis, B.M.; and Aarts, H. Revisiting the agentic shift: Weakening personal control increases susceptibility to social influence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 7 (2012), 824–831.
  • Forman, C.; Ghose, A.; and Wiesenfeld, B. Examining the relationship between reviews and sales: The role of reviewer identity disclosure in electronic markets. Information Systems Research, 19, 3 (2008), 291–313.
  • Furse, D.H.; Punj, G.N.; and Stewart, D.W. A typology of individual search strategies among purchasers of new automobiles. Journal of Consumer Research, 10, 4 (1984), 417–431.
  • Ghose, A.; and Ipeirotis, P.G. Estimating the helpfulness and economic impact of product reviews: Mining text and reviewer characteristics. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 23, 10 (2010), 1498–1512.
  • Gimpel, H.; Heger, S.; Olenberger, C.; and Utz, L. The effectiveness of social norms in fighting fake news on social media. Journal of Management Information Systems, 38, 1 (2021), 196–221.
  • Gormley, F.P.; and Aiello, J.R. Social Density, Interpersonal Relationships, and Residential Crowding Stress 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 12, 3 (1982), 222–236.
  • Griffit, W.; and Veitch, R. Hot and crowded: Influence of population density and temperature on interpersonal affective behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 17, 1 (1971), 92–98.
  • Häubl, G.; and Trifts, V. Consumer decision making in online shopping environments: The effects of interactive decision aids. Marketing Science, 19, 1 (2000), 4–21.
  • Hajli, N.; and Lin, X. Exploring the security of information sharing on social networking sites: The role of perceived control of information. Journal of Business Ethics, 133, 1 (2016), 111–123.
  • Hansen, F. Psychological theories of consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 3, 3(1976), 117–142.
  • Hartwick, J.; and Barki, H. Explaining the role of user participation in information system use. Management Science, 40, 4 (1994), 440–465.
  • Hausman, J.A. Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica, 46, 6 (1978), 1251–1271.
  • Hong, S.; Kim, J.; and Lee, H. Antecedents of use-continuance in information systems: Toward an inegrative view. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 48, 3 (2008), 61–73.
  • Huang, J.; Boh, W.F.; and Goh, K.H. A temporal study of the effects of online opinions: Information sources matter. Journal of Management Information Systems, 34, 4 (2017), 1169–1202.
  • Huang, N.; Hong, Y.K.; and Burtch, G. Social network integration and user content generation: Evidence from natural experiments. MIS Quarterly, 41, 4 (2017), 1035–1058.
  • Huang, X.; Huang, Z.; and Wyer Jr, R.S. The Influence of social crowding on brand attachment. Journal of Consumer Research, 44, 5 (2017), 1068–1084.
  • Jaccard, J.; and Wood, G. The effects of incomplete information on the formation of attitudes toward behavioral alternatives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 4 (1988), 580–591.
  • Jarvenpaa, S.L.; Tractinsky, N.; and Vitale, M. Consumer trust in an Internet store. Information Technology and Management, 1, 1–2 (2000), 45–71.
  • Jiang, Z.; Heng, C.S.; and Choi, B.C. Research note—privacy concerns and privacy-protective behavior in synchronous online social interactions. Information Systems Research, 24, 3 (2013), 579–595.
  • John, L.K.; Acquisti, A.; and Loewenstein, G. Strangers on a plane: Context-dependent willingness to divulge sensitive information. Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 5 (2011), 858–873.
  • Joinson, A.N., Self-disclosure in computer-mediated communication: The role of self-awareness and visual anonymity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 2 (2001), 177–192.
  • Kim, D.; and Benbasat, I. Trust-related arguments in internet stores: A framework for evaluation. J. Electronic Commerce Research, 4, 2 (2003), 49–64.
  • Klein, L.R.; and Ford, G.T. Consumer search for information in the digital age: An empirical study of prepurchase search for automobiles. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 17, 3 (2003), 29–49.
  • Kuan, K.K.; Zhong, Y.; and Chau, P.Y. Informational and normative social influence in group-buying: Evidence from self-reported and EEG data. Journal of Management Information Systems, 30, 4 (2014), 151–178.
  • Kumar, N.; and Benbasat, I. Research note: The influence of recommendations and consumer reviews on evaluations of websites. Information Systems Research, 17, 4 (2006), 425–439.
  • Latané, B. The psychology of social impact. American Psychologist, 36, 4 (1981), 343–356.
  • Laurenceau, J.-P.; Barrett, L.F.; and Pietromonaco, P.R. Intimacy as an interpersonal process: The importance of self-disclosure, partner disclosure, and perceived partner responsiveness in interpersonal exchanges. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 5 (1998), 1238–1251.
  • Lee, Y.-J.; Hosanagar, K.; and Tan, Y. Do I follow my friends or the crowd? Information cascades in online movie ratings. Management Science, 61, 9 (2015), 2241–2258.
  • Li, M.; Tan, C.-H.; Wei, K.-K.; and Wang, K. Sequentiality of product review information provision: An information foraging perspective. MIS Quarterly, 41, 3 (2017), 867–892.
  • Liu, Y. Word of mouth for movies: Its dynamics and impact on box office revenue. Journal of Marketing, 70, 3 (2006), 74–89.
  • Louis, M.R.; and Sutton, R.I. Switching cognitive gears: From habits of mind to active thinking. Human Relations, 44, 1 (1991), 55–76.
  • Ma, X.; Khansa, L.; Deng, Y.; and Kim, S.S. Impact of prior reviews on the subsequent review process in reputation systems. Journal of Management Information Systems, 30, 3 (2013), 279–310.
  • Maeng, A.; Tanner, R.J.; and Soman, D. Conservative when crowded: Social crowding and consumer choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 50, 6 (2013), 739–752.
  • Mesch, G.S. Is online trust and trust in social institutions associated with online disclosure of identifiable information online? Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 4 (2012), 1471–1477.
  • Moe, W.W.; and Schweidel, D.A. Online product opinions: Incidence, evaluation, and evolution. Marketing Science, 31, 3 (2012), 372–386.
  • Morton, T.L. Intimacy and reciprocity of exchange: A comparison of spouses and strangers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1 (1978), 72–81.
  • Murray, K.B. A test of services marketing theory: Consumer information acquisition activities. Journal of Marketing, 55, 1 (1991), 10–25.
  • Ozdemir, Z.D.; Smith, H.J.; and Benamati, J.H. Antecedents and outcomes of information privacy concerns in a peer context: An exploratory study. European Journal of Information Systems, 26, 6 (2017), 642–660.
  • Parkinson, B.; Millard, D.E.; O’Hara, K.; and Giordano, R. The digitally extended self: A lexicological analysis of personal data. Journal of Information Science, 44, 4 (2018), 552–565.
  • Payne, J.W.; Bettman, J.R., and Johnson, E.J. The Adaptive Decision Maker. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
  • Petronio, S. Boundaries of Privacy: Dialectics of Disclosure. Albany: Suny Press, 2002.
  • Petty, R.E., and Cacioppo, J.T. The elaboration likelihood modelof persuasion. Advances in experimental social psychology,19, (1986), 123–205.
  • Petty, R.E.; Cacioppo, J.T.; and Schumann, D. Central and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness: The moderating role of involvement. Journal of Consumer Research, 10, 2 (1983), 135–146.
  • Posey, C.; Lowry, P.B.; Roberts, T.L.; and Ellis, T.S. Proposing the online community self-disclosure model: The case of working professionals in France and the UK who use online communities. European Journal of Information Systems, 19, 2 (2010), 181–195.
  • Qahri-Saremi, H.; and Montazemi, A.R. Factors affecting the adoption of an electronic word of mouth message: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management Information Systems, 36, 3 (2019), 969–1001.
  • Qian, H.; and Scott, C.R. Anonymity and self-disclosure on weblogs. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 4 (2007), 1428–1451.
  • Qiao, D.; Lee, S.-Y.; Whinston, A.B.; and Wei, Q. Mitigating the adverse effect of monetary incentives on voluntary contributions online. Journal of Management Information Systems, 38, 1 (2021), 82–107.
  • Qiu, L.; Chhikara, A., and Vakharia, A. Multidimensional observational learning in social networks: Theory and experimental evidence. Information Systems Research, 32, 3 (2021).876–894.
  • Schlosser, A.E. Posting versus lurking: Communicating in a multiple audience context. Journal of Consumer Research, 32, 2 (2005), 260–265.
  • Schuetzler, R.M.; Grimes, G.M.; and Scott Giboney, J. The impact of chatbot conversational skill on engagement and perceived humanness. Journal of Management Information Systems, 37, 3 (2020), 875–900.
  • Shen, W.; Hu, Y.J.; and Ulmer, J.R. Competing for attention: An empirical study of online reviewers’ strategic behavior. MIS Quarterly, 39, 3 (2015), 683–696.
  • Sherif, M. The Psychology of Social Norms. NY: Harper, 1936.
  • Shi, P.; Xu, H.; and Chen, Y. Using contextual integrity to examine interpersonal information boundary on social network sites. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Paris, France, 2013. pp. 35–38.
  • Simon, H.A. A behavioral model of rational choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69, 1 (1955), 99–118.
  • Snyder, M. Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 4 (1974), 526–537.
  • Sprecher, S.; and Hendrick, S.S. Self-disclosure in intimate relationships: Associations with individual and relationship characteristics over time. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23, 6 (2004), 857–877.
  • Stock, J.H., and Yogo, M. Testing for weak instruments in linear IV regression. In D.W.K. Andrews, and J.H. Stock (eds.), Identification and Inference for Econometric Models: A Festschrift in Honor of Thomas J. Rothenberg. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2005, pp.80–108.
  • Stutzman, F.; and Kramer-Duffield, J. Friends only: examining a privacy-enhancing behavior in facebook. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2010.
  • Sun, M. How does the variance of product ratings matter? Management Science, 58, 4 (2012), 696–707.
  • Taddei, S.; and Contena, B. Privacy, trust and control: Which relationships with online self-disclosure? Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 3 (2013), 821–826.
  • Tam, K.Y.; and Ho, S.Y., Web personalization as a persuasion strategy: An elaboration likelihood model perspective. Information Systems Research, 16, 3 (2005), 271–291.
  • Taylor, S.; and Todd, P. Assessing IT usage: The role of prior experience. MIS Quarterly, 19, 4 (1995), 561–570.
  • Terry, D.J.; and Hogg, M.A. Group norms and the attitude-behavior relationship: A role for group identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 8 (1996), 776–793.
  • Thompson, R.L.; Higgins, C.A.; and Howell, J.M. Personal computing: Toward a conceptual model of utilization. MIS Quarterly, 15, 1 (1991), 125–143.
  • Turow, J.; and Hennessy, M. Internet privacy and institutional trust: Insights from a national survey. New Media & Society, 9, 2 (2007), 300–318.
  • Uski, S.; and Lampinen, A. Social norms and self-presentation on social network sites: Profile work in action. New Media & Society, 18, 3 (2016), 447–464.
  • Vana, P., and Lambrecht, A. The effect of individual online reviews on purchase likelihood. Marketing Science, 40, 4 (2021), 708–730.
  • Venkatesh, V.; and Morris, M.G. Why don’t men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. MIS Quarterly, 24, 1 (2000), 115–139.
  • Venkatesh, V.; Thong, J.Y.; Chan, F.K.; and Hu, P.J. Managing citizens’ uncertainty in E-government services: The mediating and moderating roles of transparency and trust. Information Systems Research, 27, 1 (2016), 87–111.
  • Wang, E.S.-T. The effects of browsing frequency and gender on the relationship between perceived control and patronage intentions in e-tail. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 14, 3 (2010), 129–144.
  • Weisberg, J.; Te’eni, D.; and Arman, L. Past purchase and intention to purchase in e-commerce: The mediation of social presence and trust. Internet Research, 21, 1 (2011), 82–96.
  • Wheeless, L.R.; and Grotz, J. Conceptualization and measurement of reported self-disclosure. Human Communication Research, 2, 4 (1976), 338–346.
  • Wood, W.; Tam, L.; and Witt, M.G. Changing circumstances, disrupting habits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 6 (2005), 918–913.
  • Wooten, D.B.; and Reed II, A. Informational influence and the ambiguity of product experience: Order effects on the weighting of evidence. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 7, 1 (1998), 79–99.
  • Yu, J.; Hu, P.J.-H.; and Cheng, T.-H. Role of affect in self-disclosure on social network websites: A test of two competing models. Journal of Management Information Systems, 32, 2 (2015), 239–277.
  • Zhang, D.; Lowry, P.B.; Zhou, L.; and Fu, X. The impact of individualism—collectivism, social presence, and group diversity on group decision making under majority influence. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23, 4 (2007), 53–80.
  • Zhang, D.; Zhou, L.; Kehoe, J.L.; and Kilic, I.Y. What online reviewer behaviors really matter? Effects of verbal and nonverbal behaviors on detection of fake online reviews. Journal of Management Information Systems, 33, 2 (2016), 456–481.
  • Zhang, H.; Liang, X.; and Qi, C. Investigating the impact of interpersonal closeness and social status on electronic word-of-mouth effectiveness. Journal of Business Research, 130 (2021), 453–461.
  • Zhao, X.; Tian, J.; and Xue, L. Herding and software adoption: A re-examination based on post-adoption software discontinuance. Journal of Management Information Systems, 37, 2 (2020), 484–509.
  • Zhu, F.; and Zhang, X. Impact of online consumer reviews on sales: The moderating role of product and consumer characteristics. Journal of M arketing, 74, 2 (2010), 133–148.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.