Rethinking Project Escalation: An Institutional Perspective on the Persistence of Failing Large-Scale Information System Projects

References

• Addo, A., and Avgerou, C. Information technology and government corruption in developing countries: Evidence from Ghana customs. MIS Quarterly, 45, 4 (2021), 1833–1862.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, S. This was meant to be the year the NHS went digital. What happened. Wired Magazine, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Avgerou, C., and McGrath, K. Power, rationality, and the art of living through socio-technical change. MIS Quarterly, 31, 2 (2007), 295–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baghizadeh, Z., Cecez-Kecmanovic, D., and Schlagwein, D. Review and critique of the information systems development project failure literature: An argument for exploring information systems development project distress. Journal of Information Technology, 35, 2 (2020), 123–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagnall, J. Believe it or not, Phoenix Pay is finally working. Now what?: Ottawa Citizen, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Bartis, E., and Mitev, N.N. A multiple narrative approach to information systems failure: A successful system that failed. European Journal of Information Systems, 17, 2 (2008), 112–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beiden, J. MillerCoors Files $100M Suit Against HCL for Flawed SAP Implementation. UpperEdge, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Berente, N., Lyytinen, K., Yoo, Y., and Maurer, C. Institutional logics and pluralistic responses to enterprise system implementation: a qualitative meta-analysis. MIS Quarterly, 43, 3 (2019), 873–902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berente, N., and Yoo, Y. Institutional Contradictions and Loose Coupling: Post-Implementation of NASA’s Enterprise Information System. Information Systems Research, 23, 2 (2012), 376–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boland, R.J., and Pondy, L.R. Accounting in organizations: A union of natural and rational perspectives. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 2, 3 (1983), 223–234.
   Google Scholar
• Bowen, M.G. The escalation phenomenon reconsidered: Decision dilemmas or decision errors? Academy of Management Review, 12, 1 (1987), 52–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brockner, J. The escalation of commitment to a failing course of action: Toward theoretical progress. Academy of Management Review, 17, 1 (1992), 39–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brockner, J., Rubin, J.Z., and Lang, E. Face-saving and entrapment. Journal of Applied Experimental Psychology, 17, 1 (1981), 68–79.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, T., and Stalker, G.M. The Management of Innovation. Oxford University Press, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Caldwell, D.F., and O’Reilly, C.A. Responses to failure: The effects of choice and responsibility on impression management. Academy of Management Journal, 25, 1 (1982), 121–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campanelli, A.S., Camilo, R.D., and Parreiras, F.S. The impact of tailoring criteria on agile practices adoption: A survey with novice agile practitioners in Brazil. Journal of Systems and Software, 137 (2018), 366–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, L., Mohan, K., Peng, X., and Ramesh, B. A framework for adapting agile development methodologies. European Journal of Information Systems, 18, 4 (2009), 332–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler, A.D. The visible hand: the managerial revolution in American business. Belknap Press, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Chiquillo, J. Texas County Pushes Pause on Troubled Court Software Project. The Dallas Morning News, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Clegg, S., Courpasson, D., and Phillips, N. Power and organizations. SAGE, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Conlon, D.E., and Garland, H. The role of project completion information in resource allocation decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 2 (1993), 402–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornelio, J.R.J., Sainati, T., and Locatelli, G. What does it take to kill a megaproject? The reverse escalation of commitment. International Journal of Project Management, 39, 7 (2021), 774–787.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danziger, J.N. Computers and politics: High technology in American local governments. Columbia University Press, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, M.A., and Bobko, P. Contextual effects on escalation processes in public sector decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37, 1 (1986), 121–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denyer, D., and Tranfield, D. Using qualitative research synthesis to build an actionable knowledge base. Management Decision, 44 (2006), 213–226.
   Google Scholar
• Dille, T., and Soderlund, J. Managing Inter-Institutional Projects: The Significance of Isochronism, Timing Norms, and Temporal Misfits. International Journal of Project Management, 29, 4 (2011), 480–490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P.J., and Powell, W.W. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 2 (1983), 147–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolfing, H. Case Study 10: LeasePlan Paid $100 Million for a SAP System That Never Went Live. The Project Success Model, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Drummond, H. Is escalation always irrational? Organization Studies, 19, 6 (1998), 911–929.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dybå, T.D.T., and Moe, N.B. Agile project management. In, Ruhe, G., and Wohlin, C., (eds.), Software Project Management in a Changing World, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2014, pp. 277–300.
   Google Scholar
• Flynn, D.and D.Y. A case study of the legitimation process undertaken to gain support for an information system in a Chinese university. European Journal of Information Systems, 21 (2012), 212–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. Top Ten Behavioral Biases in Project Management: An Overview. Project Management Journal, 52, 6 (2021), 531–546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forrest, V., and Hasseldine Ph, D. Escalating Commitment: Business Investments and CSR. Accounting and Finance: University of New Hampshire, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, F.V., and Staw, B.M. The trapped administrator: Effects of job insecurity and policy resistance upon commitment to a course of action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 3 (1979), 449–471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedland, R., and Alford, R. Bringing Society Back In: Symbols, Practices, and Institutional Contradictions. In, Powell, W.W., and DiMaggio, P.J., (eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991, pp. 232–263.
   Google Scholar
• Garland, H. Throwing good money after bad: The effect of sunk costs on the decision to escalation commitment to an ongoing project. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 6 (1990), 728–731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garland, H., and Conlon, D.E. Too close to quit: The role of project completion in maintaining commitment. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 22 (1998), 2025–2048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gouldner, A.W. Patterns of industrial bureaucracy. Free Press, 1954.
   Google Scholar
• Guler, I. Throwing good money after bad? Political and institutional influences on sequential decision making in the venture capital industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52, 2 (2007), 248–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutierrez, E., and Magnusson, M. Dealing with Legitimacy: A Key Challenge for Project Portfolio Management Decision Makers. International Journal of Project Management 32, 1 (2014), 30–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, S., and Baroody, A.J. Electronic Health Records and the Logics of Care: Complementarity and Conflict in the US Healthcare System. Information Systems Research, 31, 1 (2020), 57–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrell, A., and Harrison, P. An incentive to shirk, privately held information, and managers’ project evaluation decisions. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 19, 7 (1994), 569–577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, P.D., and Harrell, A. Impact of “adverse selection” on managers’ project evaluation decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 3 (1993), 635–643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendry, J. Home Affairs spend $92 million on failed visa platform outsourcing. IT News, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Hinings, B., Gegenhuber, T., and Greenwood, R. Digital innovation and transformation: An institutional perspective. Information and Organization, 28, 1 (2018), 52–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmstrom, B. Agency costs and innovation. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 12, 3 (1989), 305–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoon, C. Organizational Research Methods. Organizational Research Methods, 16 (2013), 522–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, J.E., and Schmidt, F.L. Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Iivari, J., and Iivari, N. The relationship between organizational culture and the deployment of agile methods. Information and Software Technology, 53, 5 (2011), 509–520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keil, M. Pulling the plug: Software project management and the problem of project escalation. MIS Quarterly, 19, 4 (1995), 421–447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keil, M., and Flatto, J. Information systems project escalation: A reinterpretation based on options theory. Accounting, Management and Information Technologies, 9, 2 (1999), 115–139.
   Google Scholar
• Keil, M., and Mähring, M. Is Your Project Turning into a Black Hole? California Management Review, 53, 1 (2010), 6–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keil, M., Mann, J., and Rai, A. Why software projects escalate: An empirical analysis and test of four theoretical models. MIS Quarterly, 24, 4 (2000), 631–664.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keil, M., Mixon, R., Saarinen, T., and Tuunainen, V. Understanding runaway information technology projects: Results from an international research program based on escalation theory. Journal of Management Information Systems, 11, 3 (1995), 67–87.
   Google Scholar
• Keil, M., and Robey, D. Turning around Troubled Software Projects: An Exploratory Study of the Deescalation of Commitment to Failing Courses of Action. Journal of Management Information Systems, 15, 4 (1999), 63–87.
   Google Scholar
• Keil, M., Tan, B.C., Wei, K.K., Saarinen, T., Tuunainen, V., and Wassenaar, A. A cross-cultural study on escalation of commitment behavior in software projects. MIS Quarterly, 24, 2 (2000), 299–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khurana, V., and Fouracre, A. Digital Transformation and the New Wave of Troubled Outsourcing Projects. Outsourcing Focus: Society for Computers and Law, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Klingebiel, R., and Esser, P. Stage-gate escalation. Strategy Science, 5, 4 (2020), 311–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovasznai, D., and Willcocks, L. Escalation in global outsourcing projects: The XperTrans, C.&C. BPO case. Journal of Information Technology Teaching Cases, 2, 1 (2012), 10–16.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, P.R., and Lorsch, J.W. Organization and Environment-Managing Differentiation and Integration. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, H.K., Lee, J.S., and Keil, M. Using Perspective-Taking to De-escalate Launch Date Commitment for Products with Known Software Defects. Journal of Management Information Systems, 35, 4 (2018), 1251–1276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J.S., Keil, M., and Kasi, V. The effect of an initial budget and schedule goal on software project escalation. Journal of Management Information Systems, 29, 1 (2012), 53–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J.S., Keil, M., and Park, S.C. The role of evaluability bias and the fairness effect in the escalation of commitment to troubled software product development projects. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 20, 12 (2019), 1774–1793.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J.S., Keil, M., and Shalev, E. Seeing the trees or the forest? The effect of IT project managers’ mental construal on IT project risk management activities. Information Systems Research, 30, 3 (2019), 1051–1072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J.S., Keil, M., and Wong, K.F.E. When a growth mindset can backfire and cause escalation of commitment to a troubled information technology project. Information Systems Journal, 31, 1 (2021), 7–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leidner, D.E., and Kayworth, T. A review of culture in information systems research: Toward a theory of information technology culture conflict. MIS Quarterly, 30, 2 (2006), 357–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, W.K., Sia, S.K., and Yeow, A. Escalation in global outsourcing projects: the XperTrans-C&C BPO case. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 6, 12 (2011), 414–440.
   Google Scholar
• Mähring, M., and Keil, M. Information technology project escalation: A process model. Decision Sciences, 39, 2 (2008), 239–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mähring, M., Keil, M., Mathiassen, L., and Pries-Heje, J. Making IT project de-escalation happen: An exploration into key roles Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 9, 8 (2008), 462–496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montealegre, R., and Keil, M. De-escalating information technology projects: Lessons from the Denver International Airport. MIS Quarterly, 24, 3 (2000), 417–447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mors, L., and Waguespack, D.M. Dispersed Teams Succeed Fast, Fail Slow. Harvard Business Review (2021), 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, R.R., and Winter, S.G. An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, M., and Sabherwal, R. Determinants of commitment to information systems development: A longitudinal investigation. MIS Quarterly, 20, 1 (1996), 23–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J.A., Mathiassen, L., and Newell, S. Theorization and translation in information technology institutionalization: Evidence from Danish home care. MIS Quarterly, 38, 1 (2014), 165–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noblitt, G., and Hare, R. Meta-Ethnography: Synthesizing Qualitative Studies. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, C. The antecedents of deinstitutionalization. Organization Studies, 13, 4 (1992), 563–588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan, G. Information systems project abandonment: a stakeholder analysis. International Journal of Information Management, 2, 25 (2005), 173–184.
   Google Scholar
• Pan, G., Pan, S.L., and Newman, M. Managing Information Technology Project Escalation and De-Escalation: An Approach-Avoidance Perspective. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 1, 56 (2009), 76–94.
   Google Scholar
• Pan, G., Pan, S.L., Newman, M., and Flynn, D. Escalation and de‐escalation of commitment: A commitment transformation analysis of an e‐government project. Information Systems Journal, 16, 1 (2006), 3–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pang, M.S. Politics and Information Technology Investments in the US Federal Government in 2003-2016. Information Systems Research, 28, 1 (2016), 33–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Point, S., Fendt, J., and Jonsen, K. Qualitative inquiry in management: Methodological dilemmas and concerns in meta‐analysis. European Management Review, 14, 2 (2017), 185–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiu, Y., Gopal, A., and Hann, I.H. Logic Pluralism in Mobile Platform Ecosystems: A Study of Indie App Developers on the iOS App Store. Information Systems Research, 28, 2 (2017), 225–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramasubbu, N., and Bardhan, I. Reconfiguring for Agility: Examining the Performance Implications of Project Team Autonomy through an Organizational Policy Experiment. MIS Quarterly, 45, 4 (2021), 2261–2280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rigby, D., Elk, S., and Berez, S. Start Stopping Faster. Harvard Business Review (2020), 2–6.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, J., and Staw, B.M. Expo86: an escalation prototype. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 2 (1986), 274–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, J., and Staw, B.M. Organizational escalation and exit: lessons from the Shoreham nuclear power plant. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 4 (1993), 701–732.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabella, G. Florida School District Reassesses Troubled ERP Project. The Brandenton Herald, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Sabherwal, R., and Newman, M. Persistence and change in system development: a dialectical view. Journal of Information Technology, 18, 2 (2003), 69–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabherwal, R., Sein, M.K., and Marakas, G.M. Escalating commitment to information system projects: findings from two simulated experiments. Information & Management, 40, 8 (2003), 781–798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schofield, J. Increasing the generalizability of qualitative research. In, Huberman, A., and Miles, M., (eds.), The Qualitative Researcher’s Companion, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2002, pp. 171–203.
   Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J.A. The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1934.
   Google Scholar
• Selznick, P. Leadership in administration. New York: Harper & Row, 1957.
   Google Scholar
• Seo, M.G., and Creed, W.D. Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change: A dialectical perspective. Academy of Management Review, 27, 2 (2002), 222–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, H. The Sciences of the Artificial, Third Edition. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H.A. Administrative Behavior: A study of decision-making processes in adminstrative organization. Macmillon, 1957.
   Google Scholar
• Sleesman, D.J. Pushing through the tension while stuck in the mud: Paradox mindset and escalation of commitment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 155 (2019), 83–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sleesman, D.J., Conlon, D.E., McNamara, G., and Miles, J.E. Cleaning up the bigmuddy: A meta-analytic review of the determinants of escalation of commitment. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 3 (2012), 541–562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sleesman, D.J., Lennard, A.C., McNamara, G., and Conlon, D.E. Putting escalation of commitment in context: A multilevel review and analysis. Academy of Management Annals, 12, 1 (2018), 178–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soderlund, J., and Sydow, J. Projects and Institutions: Towards Understanding their Mutual Constitution and Dynamics. International Journal of Project Management, 37, 2 (2019), 259–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staw, B.M. The escalation of commitment to a course of action. Academy of Management Review, 6, 4 (1981), 577–587.
   Google Scholar
• Staw, B.M. Escalation of commitment: An update and appraisal. In, Shapira, Z., (ed.), Organizational Decision Making, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1997, pp. 191–215.
   Google Scholar
• Staw, B.M. Knee-deep in the big muddy: A study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 1 (1976), 27–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staw, B.M., and Fox, F.V. Escalation: The determinants of commitment to a chosen course of action. Human Relations, 30, 5 (1977), 431–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staw, B.M., and Ross, J. Understanding escalation situations: Antecedents, prototypes, and solutions. Research in organizational behavior, 9 (1987), 39–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stray, V.G., Moe, N.B., and Dybå, T. Escalation of commitment: A longitudinal case study of daily meetings. In, Wohlin, C., (ed.), Agile Processes in Software Engineering and Extreme Programming, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2012, pp. 153–167.
   Google Scholar
• Strong, D.M., and Volkoff, O. Understanding Organization-Enterprise System Fit: A Path to Theorizing the Information Technology Artifact. MIS Quarterly, 34, 4 (2010), 731–756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suddaby, R., Bitektine, A., and Haack, P. Legitimacy. Academy of Management Annals, 11, 1 (2017), 451–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tahir, D. VA pushes on with troubled health data transformation. Politico, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, P.H., and Ocasio, W. Institutional Logics. London: Sage, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, P.H., Ocasio, W., and Lounsbury, M. The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure and process. Cambridge: Oxford University Press, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Tillquist, J. Institutional Bridging: How Conceptions of IT-Enabled Change Shape the Planning Process. Journal of Management Information Systems, 17, 2 (2000), 115–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiwana, A., Keil, M., and Fichman, R.G. Information systems project continuation in escalation situations: A real options model. Decision Sciences, 37, 3 (2006), 357–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townley, B. Reason’s neglect: Rationality and organizing. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 4481 (1981), 453–458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urquhart, C. Meta-Synthesis of Research on Information Seeking Behaviour. Information Research, 16, 1 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Pas, M., and Van der Pas, N. Escalation of commitment in NPD and cost saving IT projects. International Conference on Information Systems Post-Implementation & Change Management (2019), 276–280.
   Google Scholar
• Vermeulen, F., and Sivanathan, N. Stop doubling down on your failing strategy. Harvard Business Review, 95, 6 (2017), 110–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, M. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, J., and Watson, R.T. Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS Quarterly, 26, 2 (2002), xiii–xxiii.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weeth, A., Prigge, J.K., and Homburg, C. The role of departmental thought worlds in shaping escalation of commitment in new product development projects. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 37, 1 (2020), 48–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wessel, L., Baiyere, A., Ologeanu-Taddei, R., Cha, J., and Blegind-Jensen, T. Unpacking the difference between digital transformation and IT-enabled organizational transformation. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 22, 1 (2021), 102–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whyte, G. Escalating commitment to a course of action: A reinterpretation. Academy of Management Review, 11, 2 (1986), 311–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wieber, A. Timeline: How the price of Anchorage’s software suite skyrocketed. Anchorage Daily News, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Woodard, C. System failure: Inside Maine’s $35 million human resources software meltdown. Press Herald, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Zorina, A., and Dutton, W.H. Theorizing actor interactions shaping innovation in digital infrastructures: The case of residential internet development in Belarus. Organization Science, 32, 1 (2021), 156–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar