Learning with Digital Agents: An Analysis based on the Activity Theory

References

• Abraham, R.; Aier, S.; and Winter, R. Fail early, fail often: Towards coherent feedback loops in design science research evaluation. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems. Association for Information Sytems, 2014, pp. 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmadi, A.; Sahragard, R.; and Shalmani, H.B. Anthropomorphism – matters or not? On agent modality and its implications for teaching English idioms and design decisions. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30, 1–2 (2017), 149–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, D.K.; Brown, A.; Karanasios, S.; and Norman, A. How should technology-mediated organizational change be explained? A comparison of the contributions of critical realism and activity theory. MIS Quarterly, 37, 3 (2013), 835–854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anohina, A. Advances in intelligent tutoring systems: Problem-solving modes and model of hints. International Journal of Computers Communications & Control, 2, 1 (2007), 48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antos, D.; De Melo, C.; Gratch, J.; and Grosz, B.J. The influence of emotion expression on perceptions of trustworthiness in negotiation. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. AAAI Press, 2011, pp. 772–778.
   Google Scholar
• Atun, H. Intelligent tutoring systems (ITS) to improve reading comprehension: A systematic review. Journal of Teacher Education and Lifelong Learning, 2, 2 (2020), 77–89.
   Google Scholar
• Baylor, A.L. and Kim, S. Designing nonverbal communication for pedagogical agents: When less is more. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 2 (2009), 450–457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baylor, A.L. and Kim, Y. Simulating instructional roles through pedagogical agents. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 15, 2 (2005), 95–115.
   Google Scholar
• Belpaeme, T.; Kennedy, J.; Ramachandran, A.; Scassellati, B.; and Tanaka, F. Social robots for education: A review. Science Robotics, 3, 21 (2018), 1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bian, Y.; Yang, C.; Guan, D.; et al. Effects of Pedagogical agent’s personality and emotional feedback strategy on Chinese students’ learning experiences and performance: A study based on virtual Tai Chi training studio. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2016, pp. 433–444.
   Google Scholar
• Blayone, T.J.B. Theorising effective uses of digital technology with activity theory. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 28, 4 (2019), 447–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bødker, S. Through the interface - A human activity approach to user interface design. DAIMI Report Series, 224 (1987).
   Google Scholar
• Bostrom, R.; Gupta, S.; and Thomas, D. A meta-theory for understanding information systems within sociotechnical systems. Journal of Management Information Systems, 26, 1 (2009), 17–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brachten, F.; Brünker, F.; Frick, N.R.J.; Ross, B.; and Stieglitz, S. On the ability of virtual agents to decrease cognitive load: an experimental study. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 18, 2 (2020), 187–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briggs, R.O.; Nunamaker, J.F.; and Sprague, R.H. Special section: Social aspects of sociotechnical systems. Journal of Management Information Systems, 27, 1 (2010), 13–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• vom Brocke, J.; Maaß, W.; Buxmann, P.; Maedche, A.; Leimeister, J.M.; and Pecht, G. Future Work and enterprise systems. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 60, 4 (2018), 357–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• vom Brocke, J.; Simons, A.; Niehaves, B.; Reimer, K.; Plattfaut, R.; and Cleven, A. Reconstructing the giant: On the importance of rigour in documenting the literature search process. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Systems. Association for Information Systems, 2009, pp. 161.
   Google Scholar
• Brocke, J.; Winter, R.; Hevner, A.; and Maedche, A. Special issue editorial – Accumulation and evolution of design knowledge in design science research: A journey through time and space. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 21, 3 (2020), 520–544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brom, C.; Stárková, T.; and D’Mello, S.K. How effective is emotional design? A meta-analysis on facial anthropomorphisms and pleasant colors during multimedia learning. Educational Research Review, 25, (2018), 100–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broussard, M. 11 Third-Wave AI. In Artificial Unintelligence: How Computers Misunderstand the World. MIT Press, 2018, pp. 175–192.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S.; Dennis, A.; and Venkatesh, V. Predicting collaboration technology use: Integrating technology adoption and collaboration research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 27, 2 (2010), 9–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brust-Renck, P.G.; Reyna, V.F.; Wilhelms, E.A.; et al. Active engagement in a web-based tutorial to prevent obesity grounded in Fuzzy-Trace Theory predicts higher knowledge and gist comprehension. Behavior Research Methods, 49, 4 (2017), 1386–1398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buttussi, F. and Chittaro, L. Humor and fear appeals in animated pedagogical agents: An evaluation in aviation safety education. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 13, 1 (2020), 63–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlotto, T. and Jaques, P.A. The effects of animated pedagogical agents in an English-as-a-foreign-language learning environment. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 95, (2016), 15–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho, V.R. and Cohen, W.W. On the collective classification of email “speech acts.” In Proceedings of the International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. ACM Press, 2005, pp. 345–352.
   Google Scholar
• Castro, R. Blended learning in higher education: Trends and capabilities. Education and Information Technologies, 24, 4 (2019), 2523–2546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cecez-Kecmanovic, D.; Galliers, R.D.; Henfridsson, O.; Newell, S.; and Vidgen, R. The sociomateriality of information systems: Current status, future directions. MIS Quarterly, 38, 3 (2014), 809–830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, H.; Park, H.W.; and Breazeal, C. Teaching and learning with children: Impact of reciprocal peer learning with a social robot on children’s learning and emotive engagement. Computers & Education, 150, (2020), 103836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, R.; Sharman, R.; Rao, H.R.; and Upadhyaya, S.J. Data model development for fire related extreme events: An activity theory approach. MIS Quarterly, 37, 1 (2013), 125–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, S. and Clark, R.E. Cognitive and affective benefits of an animated pedagogical agent for learning English as a second language. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 34, 4 (2006), 441–466.
   Google Scholar
• Chung, C.-J.; Hwang, G.-J.; and Lai, C.-L. A review of experimental mobile learning research in 2010–2016 based on the activity theory framework. Computers & Education, 129, (2019), 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R.B. Influence: The psychology of persuasion. Collins, New York, NY, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Cominelli, L.; Mazzei, D.; and De Rossi, D.E. SEAI: Social emotional artificial intelligence based on Damasio’s Theory of Mind. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 5, (2018).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, S.W.; Friedman, H.S.; Duggan, K.A.; Cui, J.; and Popescu, V. Hand gesture and mathematics learning: Lessons from an avatar. Cognitive Science, 41, 2 (2017), 518–535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coppola, N.W.; Hiltz, S.R.; and Rotter, N.G. Becoming a virtual professor: Pedagogical roles and asynchronous learning networks. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18, 4 (2002), 169–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coronado, M.; Iglesias, C.A.; Carrera, Á.; and Mardomingo, A. A cognitive assistant for learning java featuring social dialogue. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 117, (2018), 55–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig, S.D.; Gholson, B.; and Driscoll, D.M. Animated pedagogical agents in multimedia educational environments: Effects of agent properties, picture features and redundancy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 2 (2002), 428–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig, S.D. and Schroeder, N.L. Reconsidering the voice effect when learning from a virtual human. Computers & Education, 114, (2017), 193–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuzzolin, F.; Morelli, A.; Cîrstea, B.; and Sahakian, B.J. Knowing me, knowing you: Theory of mind in AI. Psychological Medicine, 50, 7 (2020), 1057–1061.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daft, R.L. and Lengel, R.H. Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32, 5 (1986), 554–571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniels, H. Vygotsky and Pedagogy. 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, R.O. The impact of pedagogical agent gesturing in multimedia learning environments: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 24, (2018), 193–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dellermann, D.; Ebel, P.; Söllner, M.; and Leimeister, J.M. Hybrid INTELLIGENCE. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 61, 5 (2019), 637–643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, X. and Chi, L. Understanding postadoptive behaviors in information systems use: A longitudinal analysis of system use problems in the business intelligence context. Journal of Management Information Systems, 29, 3 (2012), 291–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennett, D. Intentional systems theory. The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Mind, (2009), 339-350.
   Google Scholar
• Dennett, D.C. The Intentional Stance. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Dennis, A.R.; Fuller, R.M.; and Valacich, J.S. Media, tasks, and communication processes: A theory of media synchronicity. MIS quarterly, 32, 3 (2008), 575–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennis, A.R. and Kinney, S.T. Testing media richness theory in the new media: The effects of cues, feedback, and task equivocality. Information Systems Research, 9, 3 (1998), 256–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennis, A.R.; Yuan, L.; Feng, X.; Webb, E.; and Hsieh, C.J. Digital nudging: Numeric and semantic priming in e-commerce. Journal of Management Information Systems, 37, 1 (2020), 39–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dermeval, D.; Paiva, R.; Bittencourt, I.I.; Vassileva, J.; and Borges, D. Authoring tools for designing intelligent tutoring systems: A systematic review of the literature. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 28, 3 (2018), 336–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeSanctis, G. and Poole, M.S. Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organization science, 5, 2 (1994), 121–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinçer, S. and Doğanay, A. The effects of multiple-pedagogical agents on learners’ academic success, motivation, and cognitive load. Computers & Education, 111, (2017), 74–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Mello, S.; Olney, A.; Williams, C.; and Hays, P. Gaze tutor: A gaze-reactive intelligent tutoring system. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 70, 5 (2012), 377–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Mello, S.K.; Graesser, A.; and King, B. Toward spoken human–computer tutorial dialogues. Human–Computer Interaction, 25, 4 (2010), 289–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolata, M.; Agotai, D.; Schubiger, S.; and Schwabe, G. Pen-and-paper rituals in service interaction: Combining high-touch and high-tech in financial advisory encounters. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 3, CSCW (2019), 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Dolata, M.; Comes, T.; Schenk, B.; and Schwabe, G. Persuasive practices: Learning from home security advisory services. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Persuasive Technology (PERSUASIVE). Springer, 2016, pp. 176–188.
   Google Scholar
• Dolata, M.; Feuerriegel, S.; and Schwabe, G. A sociotechnical view of algorithmic fairness. Information Systems Journal, 32, 4 (2022), 754–818.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolata, M.; Kilic, M.; and Schwabe, G. When a computer speaks institutional talk: Exploring challenges and potentials of virtual assistants in face-to-face advisory services. In Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. 2019, pp. 105–114.
   Google Scholar
• Dolata, M.; Schenk, B.; Fuhrer, J.; Marti, A.; and Schwabe, G. When the system does not fit: coping strategies of employment consultants. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 29, 6 (2020), 657–696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolata, M. and Schwabe, G. Involvement practices in persuasive service encounter: The case of home security advice. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Systems. Association for Information Systems, Guimaraes, Portugal, 2017, pp. 1869–1884.
   Google Scholar
• Dolata, M. and Schwabe, G. Paper practices in institutional talk: How financial advisors impress their clients. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), (2017), 769-805.
   Google Scholar
• Dolata, M. and Schwabe, G. Don’t be afraid! Persuasive practices in the wild. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 27, 1 (2018), 427–462.
   Google Scholar
• Dolata, M.; Steigler, S.; Nüesch, F.; et al. Welcome, computer! How do participants introduce a collaborative application during face-to-face interaction? In Proceedings of the International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Springer, Cham, 2019, pp. 600–621.
   Google Scholar
• Dourish, P. Where the Action Is: The Foundations of Embodied Interaction. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Duffy, M.C. and Azevedo, R. Motivation matters: Interactions between achievement goals and agent scaffolding for self-regulated learning within an intelligent tutoring system. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, (2015), 338–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, C.; Edwards, A.; Stoll, B.; Lin, X.; and Massey, N. Evaluations of an artificial intelligence instructor’s voice: Social Identity Theory in human-robot interactions. Computers in Human Behavior, 90, (2019), 357–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engeström, R. Who Is acting in an activity system? In Learning and Expanding with Activity Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2009, pp. 257–273.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. Learning by Expanding: An Activity-Theoretical Approach to Developmental Research. Orienta-Konsultit Oy, Helsinki, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. Expansive Learning at Work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14, 1 (2001), 133–156.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. Crossing boundaries in teacher teams. In From Teams to Knots: Activity-Theoretical Studies of Collaboration and Learning at Work. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2008, pp. 86–117.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. Expansive learning. In K. Illeris, ed., Contemporary Theories of Learning: Learning Theorists, in Their Own Words. Routledge, 2009, pp. 53–73.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. Studies in Expansive Learning: Learning What Is Not Yet There. Cambridge University Press, New York, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Fang, Y. and Neufeld, D. Understanding sustained participation in open source software projects. Journal of Management Information Systems, 25, 4 (2009), 9–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feine, J.; Gnewuch, U.; Morana, S.; and Maedche, A. A taxonomy of social cues for conversational agents. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 132, (2019), 138–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenwick, T. Sociomateriality and learning: A critical approach. The SAGE Handbook of Learning, 83, (2015), 93.
   Google Scholar
• Ferber, J. and Weiss, G. Multi-Agent Systems: An Introduction to Distributed Artificial Intelligence. Addison-Wesley Reading, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Feuerriegel, S.; Dolata, M.; and Schwabe, G. Fair AI. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 62, 4 (2020), 379–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forbes-Riley, K. and Litman, D. Benefits and challenges of real-time uncertainty detection and adaptation in a spoken dialogue computer tutor. Speech Communication, 53, 9 (2011), 1115–1136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franceschi, K.; Lee, R.; Zanakis, S.; and Hinds, D. Engaging group E-Learning in virtual Worlds. Journal of Management Information Systems, 26, 1 (2009), 73–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritz, T.; Huang, E.M.; Murphy, G.C.; and Zimmermann, T. Persuasive technology in the real world: A study of long-term use of activity sensing devices for fitness. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2014, pp. 487–496.
   Google Scholar
• Frohberg, D.; Göth, C.; and Schwabe, G. Mobile learning projects - A critical analysis of the state of the art: Mobile learning projects. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25, 4 (2009), 307–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gedera, D.S.P. and Williams, P.J. Activity Theory in Education Research and Practice. SensePublishers, Rotterdam, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Gnewuch, U.; Morana, S.; and Mädche, A. Towards designing cooperative and social conversational agents for customer service. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems, (2017), pp. 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Gunaratne, J.; Zalmanson, L.; and Nov, O. The persuasive power of algorithmic and crowdsourced advice. Journal of Management Information Systems, 35, 4 (2018), 1092–1120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, Y.R. and Goh, D.H.-L. Affect in embodied pedagogical agents: Meta-analytic review. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 53, 1 (2015), 124–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, R.M. Activity Theory. Theories and Methods of Writing Center Studies: A Practical Guide, (2019).
   Google Scholar
• Harley, J.M.; Taub, M.; Azevedo, R.; and Bouchet, F. Let’s set up some subgoals: understanding human-pedagogical agent collaborations and their implications for learning and prompt and feedback compliance. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 11, 1 (2018), 54–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobert, S. and Wolff, R.M. von. Say Hello to your new automated tutor – A structured literature review on pedagogical conversational agents. In Proceedings of the International Conference on ‘Wirtschaftsinformatik’. 2019, pp.301–314.
   Google Scholar
• Holt, G.R. and Morris, A.W. Activity heory and the analysis of organizations. Human Organization, 52, 1 (1993), 97–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooshyar, D.; Ahmad, R.B.; Yousefi, M.; Yusop, F.D.; and Horng, S.-J. A flowchart-based intelligent tutoring system for improving problem-solving skills of novice programmers. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31, 4 (2015), 345–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, C.; Jordan, P.; Di Eugenio, B.; and Katz, S. Shifting the load: A peer dialogue agent that encourages its human collaborator to contribute more to problem solving. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 27, 1 (2017), 101–129.
   Google Scholar
• Iivari, J.; Hansen, M.R.P.; and Haj-Bolouri, A. A framework for light reusability evaluation of design principles in design science research. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Design Science Research and Information Systems and Technology. 2018, pp. 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Iivari, J.; Hansen, M.R.P.; and Haj-Bolouri, A. A proposal for minimum reusability evaluation of design principles. European Journal of Information Systems, 30, 3 (2020), 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iivari, J.; Hirschheim, R.; and Klein, H.K. A dynamic framework for classifying information systems development methodologies and approaches. Journal of Management Information Systems, 17, 3 (2000), 179–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, A.M.; Ozogul, G.; Moreno, R.; and Reisslein, M. Pedagogical agent signaling of multiple visual engineering representations: The case of the young female agent. Journal of Engineering Education, 102, 2 (2013), 319–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, W.L. and Lester, J.C. Face-to-face interaction with pedagogical agents, twenty years later. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26, 1 (2016), 25–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johri, A. The socio-materiality of learning practices and implications for the field of learning technology. Research in Learning Technology, 19, 3 (2011), 207–217.
   Google Scholar
• Jonassen, D.H.Revisiting activity theory as a framework for designing student-centered learning environments. In Susan Land and D.H. Jonassen, eds., Theoretical Foundations of Learning Environments. Routledge, New York, US, 2000, pp. 89–121.
   Google Scholar
• Jonassen, D.H. and Rohrer-Murphy, L. Activity theory as a framework for designing constructivist learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47, 1 (1999), 61–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ju, W.; Nickell, S.; Eng, K.; and Nass, C. Influence of colearner agent gehavior on learner performance and attitudes. In Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2005, pp. 1509–1512.
   Google Scholar
• Kahai, S.S. and Cooper, R.B. Exploring the core concepts of media richness theory: The impact of cue multiplicity and feedback immediacy on decision quality. Journal of Management Information Systems, 20, 1 (2003), 263–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaptelinin, V. and Nardi, B. Activity Theory in HCI: Fundamentals and Reflections. Morgan & Claypool, San Rafael, Calif. 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Karanasios, S. Toward a unified view of technology and activity: The contribution of activity theory to information systems research. Information Technology & People, 31, 1 (2018), 134–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karasavvidis, I. Activity Theory as a conceptual framework for understanding teacher approaches to information and communication technologies. Computers & Education, 53, 2 (2009), 436–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kautzmann, T.R. and Jaques, P.A. Effects of adaptive training on metacognitive knowledge monitoring ability in computer-based learning. Computers & Education, 129, (2019), 92–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, T. and Brucker-Kley, E. Design hints for smart agents as teachers in virtual learning spaces. In Proceedings of the International Conference on e-Society. 2020, pp. 111–118.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, J.; Baxter, P.; and Belpaeme, T. The robot who tried too hard: social behaviour of a robot tutor can negatively affect child learning. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on on Human-Robot Interaction. 2015, pp. 67–74.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, K.; Boelling, L.; Haesler, S.; Bailenson, J.; Bruder, G.; and Welch, G.F. Does a digital assistant need a body? The influence of visual embodiment and social behavior on the perception of intelligent virtual agents in AR. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality. IEEE, 2018, pp. 105–114.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y.; Baylor, A.L.; and Shen, E. Pedagogical agents as learning companions: the impact of agent emotion and gender. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23, 3 (2007), 220–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konijn, E.A. and Hoorn, J.F. Robot tutor and pupils’ educational ability: Teaching the times tables. Computers & Education, 157, (2020), 103970.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kontolemakis, G.; Kanellis, P.; and Martakos, D. Software agents for electronic marketplaces: current and future research directions. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, 6, 1 (2004), 43–60.
   Google Scholar
• Krämer, N.C.; Karacora, B.; Lucas, G.; Dehghani, M.; Rüther, G.; and Gratch, J. Closing the gender gap in STEM with friendly male instructors? On the effects of rapport behavior and gender of a virtual agent in an instructional interaction. Computers & Education, 99, (2016), 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulik, J.A. and Fletcher, J.D. Effectiveness of intelligent tutoring systems: A meta-analytic review. Review of Educational Research, 86, 1 (2016), 42–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuutti, K. Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research. In B.A. Nardi, ed., Context and consciousness: Activity Theory and Human-Computer Interaction. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1996, pp. 17–44.
   Google Scholar
• Langford, P.E. Vygotsky’s Developmental and Educational Psychology. Psychology Press, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Latham, A.; Crockett, K.; and McLean, D. An adaptation algorithm for an intelligent natural language tutoring system. Computers & Education, 71, (2014), 97–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J.-E.R. and Nass, C.I. Trust in computers: The computers-are-social-actors (CASA) paradigm and trustworthiness perception in human-computer communication. In Trust and Technology in a Ubiquitous Modern Environment: Theoretical and Methodological Perspectives. 2010, pp. 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S.; Kuo, L.-J.; Xu, Z.; and Hu, X. The effects of technology-integrated classroom instruction on K-12 English language learners’ literacy development: A meta-analysis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, (2020), 1-32.
   Google Scholar
• Lektorsky, V.A. Mediation as a means of collective activity. In Learning and Expanding with Activity Theory. Cambridge University Press Cambridge, 2009, pp. 75–87.
   Google Scholar
• Leontyev, A.N. The Development of Mind: Selected Works. Marxists Internet Archive, Pacifica, CA, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, Y. and Ellis, T.J. A Systems approach to conduct an effective literature review in support of information systems research. Informing Science: the International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline, 9, (2006), 181.
   Google Scholar
• Leyzberg, D.; Spaulding, S.; and Scassellati, B. Personalizing robot tutors to individuals’ learning differences. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on on Human-Robot Interaction – HRI. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2014, pp. 423–430.
   Google Scholar
• Leyzberg, D.; Spaulding, S.; Toneva, M.; and Scassellati, B. The physical presence of a robot tutor increases cognitive learning gains. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. 2012, pp. 1882–1887.
   Google Scholar
• Liaw, S.-S.; Hatala, M.; and Huang, H.-M. Investigating acceptance toward mobile learning to assist individual knowledge management: Based on activity theory approach. Computers & Education, 54, 2 (2010), 446–454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liew, T.W.; Mat Zin, N.A.; and Sahari, N. Exploring the affective, motivational and cognitive effects of pedagogical agent enthusiasm in a multimedia learning environment. Human-centric Computing and Information Sciences, 7, 1 (2017), 9.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, L.; Atkinson, R.K.; Christopherson, R.M.; Joseph, S.S.; and Harrison, C.J. Animated agents and learning: Does the type of verbal feedback they provide matter? Computers & Education, 67, (2013), 239–249.
   Google Scholar
• Maedche, A.; Legner, C.; Benlian, A.; et al. AI-based digital assistants: Opportunities, threats, and research perspectives. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 61, 4 (2019), 535–544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchesi, S.; Ghiglino, D.; Ciardo, F.; Perez-Osorio, J.; Baykara, E.; and Wykowska, A. Do we adopt the intentional stance toward humanoid robots? Frontiers in Psychology, 10, (2019), 450.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R.E.; Dow, G.T.; and Mayer, S. Multimedia learning in an interactive self-explaining environment: what works in the design of agent-based microworlds? Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 4 (2003), 806–812.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaren, B.M.; DeLeeuw, K.E.; and Mayer, R.E. Polite web-based intelligent tutors: Can they improve learning in classrooms? Computers & Education, 56, 3 (2011), 574–584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Meij, H.; van der Meij, J.; and Harmsen, R. Animated pedagogical agents effects on enhancing student motivation and learning in a science inquiry learning environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63, 3 (2015), 381–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mifsud, L. Mobile learning and the socio-materiality of classroom practices. Learning, Media and Technology, 39, 1 (2014), 142–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milne-Ives, M.; Cock, C. de; Lim, E.; et al. The effectiveness of artificial intelligence conversational agents in health care: Systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22, 10 (2020), e20346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno, R. and Flowerday, T. Students’ choice of animated pedagogical agents in science learning: A test of the similarity-attraction hypothesis on gender and ethnicity. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31, 2 (2006), 186–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mou, Y. and Xu, K. The media inequality: Comparing the initial human-human and human-AI social interactions. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, (2017), 432–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moysan, Y. and Zeitoun, J. Chatbots as a lever to redefine customer experience in banking. Journal of Digital Banking, 3, 3 (2019), 242–249.
   Google Scholar
• Narendra, N.C. Design considerations for incorporating flexible workflow and multi-agentinteractions in agent societies. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 3, 1 (2002), 77–111.
   Google Scholar
• Nass, C.; Fogg, B.J.; and Moon, Y. Can computers be teammates? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 45, 6 (1996), 669–678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nass, C. and Moon, Y. Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 1 (2000), 81–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunamaker Jr, J.F.; Briggs, R.O.; Derrick, D.C.; and Schwabe, G. The last research mile: Achieving both rigor and relevance in information systems research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 32, 3 (2015), 10–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nye, B.D.; Graesser, A.C.; and Hu, X. AutoTutor and family: A review of 17 years of natural language tutoring. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 24, 4 (2014), 427–469.
   Google Scholar
• Oers, B. van; ed. The Transformation of Learning: Advances in Cultural-Historical Activity Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; New York, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Ohmoto, Y.; Ueno, S.; and Nishida, T. Effect of an agent’s contingent responses on maintaining an intentional stance. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Human Agent Interaction - HAI. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2017, pp. 277–285.
   Google Scholar
• Oinas-Kukkonen, H. and Chatterjee, S. Persuasive technology: Introduction to the special section. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 24, 1 (2009), 395–398.
   Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W.J. and Scott, S.V. 10 Sociomateriality: Challenging the separation of technology, work and organization. The Academy of Management Annals, 2, 1 (2008), 433–474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otrel-Cass, K.; Andreasen, K.E.; and Bang, L. The standard child: National testing made complex through the lens of cultural-historical activity theory. In Activity Theory in Education. Brill Sense, 2016, pp. 35–50.
   Google Scholar
• Ozogul, G.; Johnson, A.M.; Atkinson, R.K.; and Reisslein, M. Investigating the impact of pedagogical agent gender matching and learner choice on learning outcomes and perceptions. Computers & Education, 67, (2013), 36–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandey, A.K. and Gelin, R. Humanoid robots in education: A short review. In A. Goswami and P. Vadakkepat, eds., Humanoid Robotics: A Reference. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 2017, pp. 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Park, S. The effects of social cue principles on cognitive load, situational interest, motivation, and achievement in pedagogical agent multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18, 4 (2015), 211–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peffers, K.; Tuunanen, T.; Rothenberger, M.A.; and Chatterjee, S. A design science research methodology for information systems research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24, 3 (2007), 45–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng, G.; Dey, D.; and Lahiri, A. Healthcare IT adoption: An analysis of knowledge transfer in socioeconomic networks. Journal of Management Information Systems, 31, 3 (2014), 7–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perikos, I.; Grivokostopoulou, F.; and Hatzilygeroudis, I. Assistance and feedback mechanism in an intelligent tutoring system for teaching conversion of natural language into logic. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 27, 3 (2017), 475–514.
   Google Scholar
• Piirainen, K.; Gonzalez, R.A.; and Kolfschoten, G. Quo Vadis, Design science? – A survey of literature. In R. Winter; J.L. Zhao and S. Aier, eds., Global Perspectives on Design Science Research. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2010, pp. 93–108.
   Google Scholar
• Plakitsi, K. Activity Theory in Formal and Informal Science Education. 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Qiu, L. and Benbasat, I. Evaluating anthropomorphic product recommendation agents: A social relationship perspective to designing information systems. Journal of Management Information Systems, 25, 4 (2009), 145–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramachandran, A.; Huang, C.-M.; and Scassellati, B. Give me a break! Personalized timing strategies to promote learning in robot-child tutoring. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on on Human-Robot Interaction. ACM, New York, US, 2017, pp. 146–155.
   Google Scholar
• Reeves, B. and Nass, C. The Media Equation: How People Treat Computers, Television, and New Media Like Real People and Places. CSLI Publ, Stanford, CA, US, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Reicherts, L. and Rogers, Y. Do make me think! How CUIs can support cognitive processes. In Proceedings of the Conference on Conversational User Interfaces. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2020, pp. 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Rozendaal, M.C.; Boon, B.; and Kaptelinin, V. Objects with intent: Designing everyday things as collaborative partners. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 26, 4 (2019), 26:1–26: 33.
   Google Scholar
• Rückriem, G. Digital technology and mediation: A challenge to activity theory. In A. Sannino; H. Daniels and K.D. Gutierrez, eds., Learning and Expanding with Activity Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2009, pp. 88–111.
   Google Scholar
• Rudowsky, I. Intelligent agents. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 14, 1 (2004), 275–290.
   Google Scholar
• Sarker, S.; Chatterjee, S.; Xiao, X.; and Elbanna, A. The sociotechnical axis of cohesion for the is discipline: Its historical legacy and its continued relevance. MIS Quarterly, 43, 3 (2019), 695–719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scanlon, E. and Issroff, K. Activity theory and higher education: evaluating learning technologies: Activity theory and higher education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 6 (2005), 430–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schellen, E. and Wykowska, A. Intentional mindset toward robots—Open questions and methodological challenges. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 5, (2019), 139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder, N.L. and Adesope, O.O. Impacts of pedagogical agent gender in an accessible learning environment. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18, 4 (2015), 401–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder, N.L.; Adesope, O.O.; and Gilbert, R.B. How effective are pedagogical agents for learning? A meta-analytic review. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 49, 1 (2013), 1–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seeber, I.; Bittner, E.; Briggs, R.O.; et al. Machines as teammates: A research agenda on AI in team collaboration. Information & Management, 57, 2 (2020), 103174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seeber, I.; Waizenegger, L.; Seidel, S.; Morana, S.; Benbasat, I.; and Lowry, P.B. Collaborating with technology-based autonomous agents: Issues and research opportunities. Internet Research, 30, 1 (2020), 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seymour, M.; Yuan, L.; Dennis, A.; and Riemer, K. Have we crossed the uncanny valley? Understanding affinity, trustworthiness, and preference for realistic digital humans in immersive environments. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 22, 3 (2021), 591–617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharples, M.; Taylor, J.; and Vavoula, G. A theory of learning for the mobile age. In R. Andrews and C. Haythornthwaite, eds., The Sage Handbook of E-learning Research. Sage, London, UK, 2007, pp. 221–247.
   Google Scholar
• Sierhuis, M.; Clancey, W.J.; Chin Seah; Trimble, J.P.; and Sims, M.H. Modeling and simulation for mission operations work system design. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19, 4 (2003), 85–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smakman, M. and Konijn, E.A. Robot tutors: Welcome or ethically questionable? In Robotics in Education. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2020, pp. 376–386.
   Google Scholar
• Steffen, J.H.; Gaskin, J.E.; Meservy, T.O.; Jenkins, J.L.; and Wolman, I. Framework of affordances for virtual reality and augmented reality. Journal of Management Information Systems, 36, 3 (2019), 683–729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenson, I. Tool, tutor, environment or resource: Exploring metaphors for digital technology and pedagogy using activity theory. Computers & Education, 51, 2 (2008), 836–853.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart, K.; Willocks, K.; and Browning, R. Questioning personal tutoring in higher education: an activity theoretical action research study. Educational Action Research, 29, 1 (2019), 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarafdar, M.; Page, X.; and Marabelli, M. Algorithms as co-workers: A role perspective. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2020, 1 (2020), 14208.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, J.; Sharples, M.; O’Malley, C.; Vavoula, G.; and Waycott, J. Towards a task model for mobile learning: a dialectical approach. International Journal of Learning Technology, 2, 2/3 (2006), 138.
   Google Scholar
• Tusting, K. and Barton, D. Models of Adult Learning: A Literature Review. National Research & Development Centre for Adult Literacy and Numeracy, London, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• VanLehn, K.; Graesser, A.C.; Jackson, G.T.; Jordan, P.; Olney, A.; and Rosé, C.P. When are tutorial dialogues more effective than reading? Cognitive Science, 31, 1 (2007), 3–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venable, J.; Pries-Heje, J.; and Baskerville, R. FEDS: A framework for evaluation in design science research. European Journal of Information Systems, (2014), 77-89.
   Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V.; Morris, M.G.; Davis, G.B.; and Davis, F.D. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27, 3 (2003), 425–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V.; Thong, J.Y.; and Xu, X. Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, (2012), 157-178.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L.S. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L.S. Thought and Language. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Wambsganss, T.; Niklaus, C.; Cetto, M.; Söllner, M.; Handschuh, S.; and Leimeister, J.M. AL: An adaptive learning support system for argumentation skills. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, NY, USA, 2020, pp. 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Watkins, C. and Mortimore, P. Pedagogy: What do we know. Understanding pedagogy and its impact on learning, (1999), 1-19.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, J. and Watson, R.T. Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS Quarterly, (2002), xiii–xxiii.
   Google Scholar
• Weinmann, M.; Schneider, C.; and Brocke, J.vom. Digital nudging. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 58, 6 (2016), 433–436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wellnhammer, N.; Dolata, M.; Steigler, S.; and Schwabe, G. Studying with the help of digital tutors: Design aspects of conversational agents that influence the learning process. In Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. 2020, 146–155.
   Google Scholar
• Winkler, R.; Bittner, E.; and Söllner, M. Alexa, Can you help me solve that problem? – Understanding the value of smart personal assistants as tutors for complex problem tasks. In Proceedings of the International Conference ‘Wirtschaftsinformatik’. 2019, pp. 371–376.
   Google Scholar
• Winkler, R.; Büchi, C.; and Söllner, M. Improving problem-solving skills with smart personal assistants: Insights from a quasi field experiment. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems. 2019, pp. 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Winkler, R.; Elshan, E.; Söllner, M.; and Leimeister, J.M. SPAM - A process model for developing smart personal assistants. In Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. HICSS, Maui, Hawaii, USA, 2020, pp. 261–270.
   Google Scholar
• Winkler, R.; Hobert, S.; Salovaara, A.; Söllner, M.; and Leimeister, J.M. Sara, the lecturer: Improving learning in online education with a scaffolding-based conversational agent. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Honolulu HI USA, 2020, pp. 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Winkler, R. and Soellner, M. Unleashing the potential of chatbots in education: A state-of-the-art analysis. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2018, 1 (2018), 15903.
   Google Scholar
• Winkler, R. and Söllner, M. Towards empowering educators to create their own smart personal assistants. In Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. HICSS, Maui, Hawaii, USA, 2020, pp. 22–31.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, Z.; Wijekumar, K. (Kay); Ramirez, G.; Hu, X.; and Irey, R. The effectiveness of intelligent tutoring systems on K-12 students’ reading comprehension: A meta-analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50, 6 (2019), 3119–3137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, L. (Ivy) and Dennis, A.R. Acting like humans? Anthropomorphism and consumer’s willingness to pay in electronic commerce. Journal of Management Information Systems, 36, 2 (2019), 450–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yung, H.I. and Paas, F. Effects of cueing by a pedagogical agent in an instructional animation: A cognitive load approach. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18, 3 (2015), 153–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahedi, F.; Van Pelt, W.V.; and Srite, M. Web documents’ cultural masculinity and femininity. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23, 1 (2006), 87–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zawacki-Richter, O.; Marín, V.I.; Bond, M.; and Gouverneur, F. Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16, 1 (2019), 39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar