AI Agents as Team Members: Effects on Satisfaction, Conflict, Trustworthiness, and Willingness to Work With

References

• Aggarwal, A.; Vogel, D.; and Murayama, Y. Introduction to the minitrack on emerging issues in e-collaboration distributed group decision-making: Opportunities and challenges. In Proceedings of the 54th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2021, p. 523.
   Google Scholar
• Aguinis, H.; and Bradley, K.J. Best practice recommendations for designing and implementing experimental vignette methodology studies. Organizational Research Methods, 17, 4 (2014), 351–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amershi, S.; Weld, D.; Vorvoreanu, M.; Fourney, A.; Nushi, B.; Collisson, P.; Suh, J.; Iqbal, S.; Bennett, P.N.; Inkpen, K.; Teevan, J.; Kikin-Gil, R.; and Horvitz, E. Guidelines for human-ai interaction. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Glasgow, Scotland Uk: Association for Computing Machinery, 2019, pp. Paper 3.
   Google Scholar
• Avula, S.; Chadwick, G.; Arguello, J.; and Capra, R. Searchbots: User engagement with chatbots during collaborative search. In Proceedings of the 2018 conference on human information interaction & retrieval (2018), pp. 52–61.
   Google Scholar
• Azhar, M.Q.; and Sklar, E.I. A study measuring the impact of shared decision making in a human-robot team. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 36, 5–7 (2017), 461–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahrammirzaee, A. A comparative survey of artificial intelligence applications in finance: Artificial neural networks, expert system and hybrid intelligent systems. Neural Computing and Applications, 19, 8 (2010), 1165–1195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baird, A.; and Maruping, L.M. The next generation of research on is use: A theoretical framework of delegation to and from agentic is artifacts. MIS Quarterly, 45, 1 (2021), 315–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barata, J.; da Cunha, P.R., and de Figueiredo, A.D. Implications for futures: The missing section in sustainable information systems research. In ICIS 2019 Proceedings. 2019, pp. 10. https://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2019/research_methods/research_methods/10
   Google Scholar
• Bawack, R.; Fosso Wamba, S., and Carillo, K. Where information systems research meets artificial intelligence practice: Towards the development of an ai capability framework. In DIGIT 2019 Proceedings, 2019, pp. 5.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, G.S. Altruism in the family and selfishness in the market place. Economica, 48, 189 (1981), 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benrazavi, S.R.; and Silong, A.D. Employees’ job satisfaction and its influence on willingness to work in teams. Journal of Management Policy and Practice, 14, 1 (2013), 127–140.
   Google Scholar
• Bogert, E.; Schecter, A.; and Watson, R.T. Humans rely more on algorithms than social influence as a task becomes more difficult. Scientific Reports, 11, 1 (2021), 8028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyce, M.W.; Chen, J.Y.; Selkowitz, A.R.; and Lakhmani, S.G. Effects of agent transparency on operator trust. In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction Extended Abstracts, 2015, pp. 179–180.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, R.; Reinig, B., and de Vreede, G.-J. The yield shift theory of satisfaction and its application to the is/it domain. Journal of the AIS, 9, (2008), 267–93.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, R.O.; Reinig, B.A.; and de Vreede, G.-J. The yield shift theory of satisfaction and its application to the is/it domain. In Y.K. Dwivedi, M.R. Wade, and S.L. Schneberger (eds.), Information Systems Theory: Explaining and Predicting Our Digital Society, vol. 2. New York: Springer, 2012, pp. 185–217.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, T. Use ai to enhance human intelligence, not eliminate it. Journal of Financial Planning, 32, 1 (2019), 26–27.
   Google Scholar
• Burton, J.W.; Stein, M.K.; and Jensen, T.B. A systematic review of algorithm aversion in augmented decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 33, 2 (2020), 220–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, C.J.; Winter, S.; Steiner, D.; Wilcox, L.; and Terry, M. “Hello ai”: Uncovering the onboarding needs of medical practitioners for human-ai collaborative decision-making. In Proceedings ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact., 3, CSCW (2019), Article 104.
   Google Scholar
• Cao, J.; and Yao, J. Linking different artificial intelligence functions to employees’ psychological appraisals and work. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1 (2020), 19876.
   Google Scholar
• Castelvecchi, D. Can we open the black box of ai? Nature News, 538, 7623 (2016), 20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, S.; Moody, G.; Lowry, P.B.; Chakraborty, S.; and Hardin, A. Strategic relevance of organizational virtues enabled by information technology in organizational innovation. Journal of Management Information Systems, 32, 3 (2015), 158–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, S.; Moody, G.; Lowry, P.B.; Chakraborty, S.; and Hardin, A. Information technology and organizational innovation: Harmonious information technology affordance and courage-based actualization. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 29, 1 (2020), 101596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, S.; D Moody, G.; Lowry, P.B.; Chakraborty, S.; and Hardin, A. The nonlinear influence of harmonious information technology affordance on organisational innovation. Information Systems Journal, 31, 2 (2021), 294–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J.Y.; Barnes, M.J.; Selkowitz, A.R.; Stowers, K.; Lakhmani, S.G.; and Kasdaglis, N. Human-autonomy teaming and agent transparency. In Companion Publication of the 21st International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, 2016, pp. 28–31.
   Google Scholar
• Chiasson, M.; Davidson, E.; and Winter, J. Philosophical foundations for informing the future(s) through is research. European Journal of Information Systems, 27, 3 (2018), 367–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiasson, M., and Henfridsson, O. Researching the future: The information systems discipline’s futures infrastructure. In Researching the Future in Information Systems: IFIP WG 8.2 Working Conference, Turku, Finland, June 6–8, 2011. Proceedings. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011, pp. 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Chien, S.-Y.; Lewis, M.; Sycara, K.; Liu, J.-S.; and Kumru, A. Influence of cultural factors in dynamic trust in automation. In 2016 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC): IEEE, 2016, pp. 002884–002889.
   Google Scholar
• Chiou, E.K.; and Lee, J.D. Cooperation in human-agent systems to support resilience: A microworld experiment. Human Factors, 58, 6 (2016), 846–863.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Colquitt, J.A.; and Jackson, C.L. Justice in teams: The context sensitivity of justice rules across individual and team contexts 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 4 (2006), 868–899.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Compeau, D.; Marcolin, B.; Kelley, H.; and Higgins, C. Generalizability of information systems research using students—a reflection on our practices and recommendations for future research. Information Systems Research, 23, 4 (2012), 1093–1109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Constantinides, P. How human-ai hybrids will change work forever. Warwick Business School. https://www.wbs.ac.uk/news/how-human-ai-hybrids-willchange-work-forever (accessed on December 03, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Costa, A.C. Work team trust and effectiveness. Personnel Review, 32, 5 (2003), 605–622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cram, A.W.; D’Arcy, J.; and Proudfoot, J.G. Seeing the forest and the trees: A meta-analysis of the antecedents to information security polict compliance. MIS Quarterly, 43, 2 (2019), 525–554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crosman, P. A virtual assistant that serves lenders’ employees: Capacity, formerly jane.Ai, originally designed its chatbot to answer consumers’ questions, but when employees started using it, that gave the startup an idea for a new business line. National Mortgage News, 44, 2 (2019), N.PAG–N.PAG.
   Google Scholar
• Cruz, C.C.; Gómez-Mejia, L.R.; and Becerra, M. Perceptions of benevolence and the design of agency contracts: Ceo-tmt relationships in family firms. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 1 (2010), 69–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummings, J.; and Dennis, A.R. Virtual first impressions matter: The effect of enterprise social networking sites on impression formation in virtual teams. MIS Quarterly, 42, 3 (2018), 697–718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawes, R.M.; Faust, D.; and Meehl, P.E. Clinical versus actuarial judgment. Science, 243, 4899 (1989), 1668–1674.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Dreu, C.K.; and Van Vianen, A.E. Managing relationship conflict and the effectiveness of organizational teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 22, 3 (2001), 309–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Dreu, C.K.W.; and Weingart, L.R. Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta- analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 4 (2003), 741–749.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jong, B.A.; and Elfring, T. How does trust affect the performance of ongoing teams? The mediating role of reflexivity, monitoring, and effort. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 3 (2010), 535–549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Visser, E.J.; Pak, R.; and Shaw, T.H. From ‘automation’to ‘autonomy’: The importance of trust repair in human–machine interaction. Ergonomics, 61, 10 (2018), 1409–1427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vreede, G.J.; and Briggs, R.O. A program of collaboration engineering research and practice: Contributions, insights, and future directions. Journal of Management Information Systems 36, 1 (2019), 74–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Wit, F.R.; Greer, L.L.; and Jehn, K.A. The paradox of intragroup conflict: A meta-analysis. Information systems researchJournal of Applied Psychology, 97, 2 (2012), 360.
   Google Scholar
• DeChurch, L.A.; Mesmer-Magnus, J.R.; and Doty, D. Moving beyond relationship and task conflict: Toward a process-state perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98, 4 (2013), 559.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennis, A.R.; and Reinicke, B. Beta vs. Vhs and the acceptance of electronic brainstorming technology. MIS Quarterly, 28, 1 (2004), 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennis, A.R.; Robert Jr, L.P.; Curtis, A.M.; Kowalczyk, S.T.; and Hasty, B.K. Research note—trust is in the eye of the beholder: A vignette study of postevent behavioral controls’ effects on individual trust in virtual teams. Information Systems Research, 23, 2 (2012), 546–558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennis, A.R.; and Wixom, B.H. Investigating the moderators of the group support systems use with meta-analysis. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18, 3 (2002), 235–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennis, A.R.; Wixom, B.H.; and Vandenberg, R.J. Understanding fit and appropriation effects in group support systems via meta-analysis. MIS Quarterly, 25, 2 (2001), 167–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeRosa, D.M.; Hantula, D.A.; Kock, N.; and D’Arcy, J. Trust and leadership in virtual teamwork: A media naturalness perspective. Human Resource Management Review, 43, 2–3 (2004), 219–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeSanctis, G.; and Gallupe, R.B. A foundation for the study of group decision support systems. Management Science, 33, 5 (1987), 589–609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diederich, S.; Brendel, A.B., and Kolbe, L.M. Towards a taxonomy of platforms for conversational agent design. In 14th International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik, February 24–27. Siegen, Germany: Association for Information Systems, 2019, pp. 1100–1114.
   Google Scholar
• Dietvorst, B.J.; Simmons, J.P.; and Massey, C. Algorithm aversion: People erroneously avoid algorithms after seeing them err. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144, 1 (2015), 114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietvorst, B.J.; Simmons, J.P.; and Massey, C. Overcoming algorithm aversion: People will use imperfect algorithms if they can (even slightly) modify them. Management Science, 64, 3 (2018), 1155–1170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duhon, J.H.; and Hoch, J.E. Virtual teams in organization. Human Resource Management Review, 27, 4 (2017), 569–574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earley, P.C. Trust, perceived importance of praise and criticism, and work performance: An examination of feedback in the united states and england. Journal of Management, 12, 4 (1986), 457–473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K.M. Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14, 1 (1989), 57–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsbach, K.D.; and Elofson, G. How the packaging of decision explanations affects perceptions of trustworthiness. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 1 (2000), 80–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elshan, E.; Zierau, N.; Engel, C.; Janson, A., and Leimeister, J.M. Understanding the design elements affecting user acceptance of intelligent agents: Past, present and future. Information Systems Frontiers, 24, 3 (2022), 699–730.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endsley, M.R. Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors, 37, 1 (1995), 32–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endsley, M.R. From here to autonomy: Lessons learned from human–automation research. Human Factors, 59, 1 (2017), 5–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J.S.B. Bias in Human Reasoning: Causes and Consequences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Faul, F.; Erdfelder, E.; Lang, A.G.; Buchner, A. G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, b., and bio. G*power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39 (2007), 175–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fetzer, J.H. Artificial Intelligence: Its Scope and Limits. Amsterdam: Springer Netherlands, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Fjermestad, J.; and Hiltz, S.R. Group support systems: A descriptive evaluation of case and field studies. Journal of Management Information Systems, 17, 3 (2000-2001), 115–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornell, C.; and Larcker, D.F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 1 (1981), 39–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller, M.A.; Hardin, A.M.; and Davison, R.M. Efficacy in technology-mediated distributed teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23, 3 (2006), 209–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, J.; Galley, M., and Li, L. Neural approaches to conversational AI. In Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Tutorial Abstracts. Melbourne, Australia: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2018, pp. 2–7.
   Google Scholar
• Gefen, D.; and Straub, D.W. Consumer trust in b2c e-commerce and the importance of social presence: Experiments in e-products and e-services. Omega, 32, 6 (2004), 407–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glikson, E.; and Woolley, A.W. Human trust in artificial intelligence: Review of empirical research. Academy of Management Annals, 14, 2 (2020), 627–660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg, J.; and Eskew, D.E. The role of role playing in organizational research. Journal of Management, 19, 2 (1993), 221–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimm, D.A.; Demir, M.; Gorman, J.C.; and Cooke, N.J. Team situation awareness in human-autonomy teaming: A systems level approach. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting: SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 2018, pp. 149–149.
   Google Scholar
• Grove, W.M.; Zald, D.H.; Lebow, B.S.; Snitz, B.E.; and Nelson, C. Clinical versus mechanical prediction: A meta-analysis. Psychological assessment, 12, 1 (2000), 19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafizoglu, F.M., and Sen, S. Reputation based trust in human-agent teamwork without explicit coordination. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery, 2018, pp. 238–245.
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, P.A. Imposing limits on autonomous systems. Ergonomics, 60, 2 (2017), 284–291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanna, N., and Richards, D. The impact of communication on a human-agent shared mental model and team performance. In Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems. Paris, France: International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (IFAAMAS), 2014, pp. 1485–1486.
   Google Scholar
• Hanna, N., and Richards, D. The impact of virtual agent personality on a shared mental model with humans during collaboration. In R. Bordini, E. Elkind, G. Weiss, and P. Yolum (eds.), Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2015), May, 4–8. Paris, France: International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (IFAAMAS) Publication, 2015, pp. 1777–1778.
   Google Scholar
• Hanson III, C.W.; and Marshall, B.E. Artificial intelligence applications in the intensive care unit. Critical Care Medicine, 29, 2 (2001), 427–435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A.F. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis. New York: Guilford Press, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Hinds, P., and McGrath, C. Structures that work: Social structure, work structure and coordination ease in geographically distributed teams. In Proceedings of the 20th Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Banff, Alberta, Canada: Association for Computing Machinery Publication, 2006, pp. 343–352.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, M.; Kahn, L.B.; and Li, D. Discretion in hiring. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 133, 2 (2018), 765–800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, R. Vignettes. In L.M. Given (ed.), The Sage Encyclopedia of Qualitative Methods. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications, 2008, pp. 918–920.
   Google Scholar
• Janboecke, S.; Loeffler, D.; and Hassenzahl, M. Using experimental vignettes to study early-stage automation adoption. arXiv.org, arXiv:2004.07032 (2020).
   Google Scholar
• Jarrahi, M.H. Artificial intelligence and the future of work: Human-ai symbiosis in organizational decision making. Business Horizons, 61, 4 (2018), 577–586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvenpaa, S.L.; Knoll, K.; and Leidner, D.E. Is anybody out there? Antecedents of trust in global virtual teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14, 4 (1998), 29–64.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvenpaa, S.L.; and Leidner, D.E. Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organization Science, 10, 6 (1999), 791–815.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvenpaa, S.L.; and Staples, D.S. The use of collaborative electronic media for information sharing: An exploratory study of determinants. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 9, 2–3 (2000), 129–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jehn, K.A. Aqualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 3 (1997), 530–557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jehn, K.A.; and Mannix, E.A. The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 2 (2001), 238–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, G.R.; and George, J.M. The experience and evolution of trust: Implications for cooperation and teamwork. Academy of Management Review, 23, 3 (1998), 531–546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D.; and Miller, D.T. Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review, 93, 2 (1986), 136–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, A.; and Haenlein, M. Siri, siri, in my hand: Who’s the fairest in the land? On the interpretations, illustrations, and implications of artificial intelligence. Business Horizons, 62, 1 (2019), 15–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komiak, S.Y., and Benbasat, I. The effects of personalization and familiarity on trust and adoption of recommendation agents. MIS Quarterly, 30, 4 (2006), 941–960.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer, R.M., and Tyler, T.R. Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Larson, L.; and DeChurch, L.A. Leading teams in the digital age: Four perspectives on technology and what they mean for leading teams. Leadership Quarterly, 31, 1 (2020), N.PAG–N.PAG.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawless, W.F. Quantum-like interdependence theory advances autonomous human–machine teams (a-hmts). Entropy, 22, 11 (2020), 1227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lebeuf, C.; Storey, M.-A.; and Zagalsky, A. Software bots. IEEE Software, 35, 1 (2018), 18–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung, M.Y.; Ng, S.T.; and Cheung, S.O. Measuring construction project participant satisfaction. Construction Management and Economics, 22, 3 (2004), 319–331.
   Google Scholar
• Locke, E.A.; Smith, K.G.; Erez, M.; Chah, D.-O.; and Schaffer, A. The effects of intra-individual goal conflict on performance. Journal of Management, 20, 1 (1994), 67–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logg, J.M.; Minson, J.A.; and Moore, D.A. Algorithm appreciation: People prefer algorithmic to human judgment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 151 (2019), 90–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, X.; Qin, M.S.; Fang, Z.; and Qu, Z. Artificial intelligence coaches for sales agents: Caveats and solutions. Journal of Marketing, 85, 2 (2021), 14–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, X.; F.Z.; Peng, H. When artificial intelligence backfires: The effects of dual ai-human supervision on employee performance. MIS Quarterly, Forthcoming (2022).
   Google Scholar
• Lyons, J.B.; Sycara, K.; Lewis, M.; and Capiola, A. Human–autonomy teaming: Definitions, debates, and directions. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1932 (2021).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons, J.B.; Wynne, K.T.; Mahoney, S., and Roebke, M.A. Trust and human-machine teaming: A qualitative study. In W. Lawless, R. Mittu, D. Sofge, I. Moskowitz, and S. Russell (eds.), Artificial Intelligence for the Internet of Everything, Elsevier, (2019), 101–116.
   Google Scholar
• Marks, M.A.; Mathieu, J.E.; and Zaccaro, S.J. A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. The Academy of Management Review, 26, 3 (2001), 356–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez-Moreno, E.; González-Navarro, P.; Zornoza, A., and Ripoll, P. Relationship, task and process conflicts on team performance: The moderating role of communication media. International Journal of Conflict Management, 20, (2009), 251–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R.C.; Davis, J.H.; and Schoorman, F.D. An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 3 (1995), 709–734.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrath, J.E. Time, interaction, and performance (tip): A theory of groups. Small Group Research, 22, 2 (1991), 147–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mennecke, B.E.; and Valacich, J.S. Information is what you make of it: The influence of group history and computer support on information sharing, decision quality and member perceptions. Journal of Management Information Systems, 15, 2 (1988), 173–197.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, A.M., and Liu, L.F. Trust in digital humans. In ACIS 2020 Proceedings, 2020, pp. 96.
   Google Scholar
• Monod, E.; Sarker, S.; Hevner, A.; Gupta, A.; Barrett, M.; Venkatesh, V.; Lyytinen, K., and Boland, R. Are design sciences, economics and behavioral sciences critical enough on ai? A debate between three voices within the is discipline. In ICIS 2019 Proceedings, 2019, pp. 1.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, A.; Rhymer, J.; and Sirmon, D.G. Humans and technology: Forms of conjoined agency in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 46, 3 (2020), 552–571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakayachi, K.; and Watabe, M. Restoring trustworthiness after adverse events: The signaling effects of voluntary “hostage posting” on trust. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97, 1 (2005), 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman, D. Design, business models, and human-technology teamwork: As automation and artificial intelligence technologies develop, we need to think less about human-machine interfaces and more about human-machine teamwork. Research-Technology Management, 60, 1 (2017), 26–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nørskov, S.; Damholdt, M.F.; Ulhøi, J.P.; Jensen, M.B.; Ess, C., and Seibt, J. Applicant fairness perceptions of a robot-mediated job interview: A video vignette-based experimental survey. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 7, (2020), 586263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunamaker, J.F.; Dennis, A.R.; Valacich, J.S.; Vogel, D.; and George, J.F. Electronic meeting systems. Communications of the ACM, 34, 7 (1991), 40–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neill, T.; McNeese, N.; Barron, A.; and Schelble, B. Human–autonomy teaming: A review and analysis of the empirical literature. Human Factors, 64 (2022), 904–938.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul, S.; He, F., and Dennis, A.R. Group atmosphere, shared understanding, and team conflict in short duration virtual teams. In Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 2018. Hawaii: Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2018, pp. 361–370.
   Google Scholar
• Pelled, L.H.; Eisenhardt, K.M., and Xin, K.R. Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 1 (1999), 1–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pondy, L.R. Organizational conflict: Concepts and models. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12, 2 (1967), 296–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raghuram, S.; Hill, N.S.; Gibbs, J.L.; and Maruping, L.M. Virtual work: Bridging research clusters. Academy of Management Annals, 13, 1 (2019), 308–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahwan, I.; Cebrian, M.; Obradovich, N.; Bongard, J.; Bonnefon, J.-F.; Breazeal, C.; Crandall, J.W.; Christakis, N.A.; Couzin, I.D.; and Jackson, M.O. Machine behaviour. Nature, 568, 7753 (2019), 477–486.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rai, A.; Constantinides, P.; and Sarker, S. Next-generation digital platforms: Toward human–ai hybrids. MIS Quarterly, 43, 1 (2019), iii–ix.
   Google Scholar
• Reinholt, M.; Pedersen, T.; and Foss, N.J. Why a central network position isn’t enough: The role of motivation and ability for knowledge sharing in employee networks. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 6 (2011), 1277–1297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinig, B.A. Towards an understanding of satisfaction with the process and outcomes of teamwork. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19, 4 (2003), 65–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robert, L.P.; Denis, A.R.; and Hung, Y.-T.C. Individual swift trust and knowledge-based trust in face-to-face and virtual team members. Journal of Management Information Systems, 26, 2 (2009), 241–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, R.J.; Keltner, D.; Ward, A.; and Ross, L. Actual versus assumed differences in construal: “I realism” in intergroup perception and conflict. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 68, 3 (1995), 404–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotter, J.B. Social learning and Clinical Psychology. New York: Prentice-Hall, 1954.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, S., and Norvig, P. Artificial Intelligence: A modern Approach. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall Press, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Schoorman, F.D. Escalation bias in performance appraisals: An unintended consequence of supervisor participation in hiring decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 1 (1988), 58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoorman, F.D.; Mayer, R.C.; and Davis, J.H. An integrative model of organizational trust: Past, present, and future. Academy of Management Review, 32, 2 (2007), 344–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuetz, S., and Venkatesh, V. Research perspectives: The rise of human machines: How cognitive computing systems challenge assumptions of user-system interaction. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 21, 2 (2020), 460–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, N.; and Bless, H. Mental construal processes: The inclusion/exclusion model. In, Stapel, D.A., and Suls, J., (eds.), Assimilation and Contrast in Social Psychology, Philadelphia: Psychology Press, 2007, pp. 119–141.
   Google Scholar
• Seeber, I.; Bittner, E.; Briggs, R.O.; de Vreede, T.; de Vreede, G.-J.; Elkins, A.; Maier, R.; Merz, A.B.; Oeste-Reiß, S.; Randrup, N.; Schwabe, G.; and Söllner, M. Machines as teammates: A research agenda on ai in team collaboration. Information & Management, 57, 2 (2020), 103–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, J.C.; Wild, R.E.; and Colquitt, J.A. To justify or excuse? A meta-analysis of the effects of explanations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 3 (2003), 444–458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, E.S.; and Bonetti, F. Digital humans in fashion: Will consumers interact? Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 60, 102430 (2021).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simons, T.; and Peterson, R. Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams: The pivotal role of intragroup trust. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 1 (2000), 102–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spector, P. Behavior in organizations as a function of employee’s locus of control. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 3 (1982), 482–497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stark, E.M.; and Bierly III, P.E. An analysis of predictors of team satisfaction in product development teams with differing levels of virtualness. R&D Management, 39, 5 (2009), 461–472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steina, J.-P.; Appela, M.; Jostb, A., and Ohlerb, P. Matter over mind? How the acceptance of digital entities depends on their appearance, mental prowess, and the interaction between both. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 142, (2020), 102463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stout, N.; Dennis, A.R.; and Wells, T.M. The buck stops there: The impact of perceived accountability and control on the intention to delegate to software agents. AIS Transactions on Human Computer Interaction, 61, 1 (2014), 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Tong, S.; Jia, N.; Luo, X., and Fang, Z. The janus face of artificial intelligence feedback: Deployment versus disclosure effects on employee performance. Strategic Management Journal, 42, 9 (2021), 1600–1631 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong, S.; Jia, N.; Luo, X.; and Fang, Z. The janus face of artificial intelligence feedback: Deployment versus disclosure effects on employee performance. Strategic Management Journal, 42, 9 (2021), 1600–1631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vance, A.; Elie-Dit-Cosaque, C.; and Straub, D.W. Examining trust in information technology artifacts: The effects of system quality and culture. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24, 4 (2008), 73–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vlahos, J. Talk to Me: Amazon, Google, Apple and the Race for Voice-Controlled AI. New York: Random House, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Wakunuma, K.J.; and Stahl, B.C. Tomorrow’s ethics and today’s response: An investigation into the ways information systems professionals perceive and address emerging ethical issues. Information Systems Frontiers, 16 (2014), 383–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walliser, J.C.; de Visser, E.J.; Wiese, E.; and Shaw, T.H. Team structure and team building improve human–machine teaming with autonomous agents. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 13, 4 (2019), 258–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webber, S.S.; Detjen, J.; MacLean, T.L.; and Thomas, D. Team challenges: Is artificial intelligence the solution? Business Horizons, 62, 6 (2019), 741–750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, D. Chatbots and beyond: Six AI trends reshaping the workplace. Forbes (2020).
   Google Scholar
• Wynne, K.T.; and Lyons, J.B. An integrative model of autonomous agent teammate-likeness. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 19, 3 (2018), 353–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, L.; Paul, S.; Demirkan, H.; Yuan, L.; Spohrer, J.; Zhou, M.; and Basu, J. Intelligence augmentation: Towards building human-machine symbiotic relationship. AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction, 13, 2 (2021), 243–264.
   Google Scholar
• Zou, J.; and Schiebinger, L. Design AI so that it’s fair. Nature, 559, 12 July (2018), 324–326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar