Explaining the Outcomes of Social Gamification: A Longitudinal Field Experiment

References

• Adie, JW; Duda, JL; and Ntoumanis, N. Achievement goals, competition appraisals, and the psychological and emotional welfare of sport participants. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 30, 3 (2008), 302–322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anschütz, C; Ebner, K, and Smolnik, S. Free ride in rush-hour traffic–Designing gamified smart mobility systems for sustainable use. In Proceedings of the 43th International Conference on Information Systems, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Asimakopoulos, S.; and Dix, A. Walking: a grounded theory of social engagement and experience. Interacting with Computers, 29, 6 (2017), 824–844.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barak, A.; Boniel-Nissim, M.; and Suler, J. Fostering empowerment in online support groups. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 5 (2008), 1867–1883.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baruch, Y.; and Lin, C-P. All for one, one for all: Coopetition and virtual team performance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79, 6 (2012), 1155–1168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertucci, A.; Conte, S.; Johnson, D.W.; and Johnson, R.T. The impact of size of cooperative group on achievement, social support, and self-esteem. Journal of General Psychology: Experimental, Psychological, and Comparative Psychology, 137, 3 (2010), 256–272.
   Google Scholar
• Bhattacharyya, S; Banerjee, S; Bose, I; and Kankanhalli, A. Temporal effects of repeated recognition and lack of recognition on online community contributions. Journal of Management Information Systems, 37, 2 (2020), 536–562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blacker, A. Health & Fitness app performance January ‘21: Device-connected apps see revenue grow. Apptopia, (2021), Date last accessed: September 7, 2022, https://blog.apptopia.com/health-fitness-app-performance-january-21-device-connected-apps-see-revenue-grow
   Google Scholar
• Bornstein, G. Intergroup conflict: Individual, group, and collective interests. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 2 (2003), 129–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buunk, B.P. Social comparison processes under stress: Towards an integration of classic and recent perspectives. European Review of Social Psychology, 5, 1 (1994), 211–241.
   Google Scholar
• Cabrera, E.F. and Cabrera, A. Fostering knowledge sharing through people management practices. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16, 5 (2005), 720–735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, D.J. Determinants of choice of goal difficulty level: A review of situational and personality influences. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 55, 2 (1982), 79–95.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, D.J.; and Furrer, D.M. Goal setting and competition as determinants of task performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16, 4 (1995), 377–389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castillo, R.P. Exploring the differential effects of social and individualistic gameplay motivations on bridging social capital for users of a massively multiplayer online game. Computers in Human Behavior, 91, February (2019), 263–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caton, H., and Greenhill, D. The effects of gamification on student attendance and team performance in a third-year undergraduate game production module. Reading: Academic Conferences International Limited, 2013, pp. 88–96.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, L.; Baird, A.; and Straub, D. The impact of hierarchical privilege levels and non-hierarchical incentives on continued contribution in online Q&A communities: A motivational model of gamification goals. Decision Support Systems, 153, (2022), Article: 113667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheshire, C., and Antin, J. None of us is as lazy as all of us: Social Intelligence and Loafing in Information Pools. Information, Communication & Society, 13, 4 (2010), 537–555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, L.G. How interdependence in team task structure impacts evaluations of members’ work contributions: Examining resource versus process interdependence. Sociological Quarterly, 59, 2 (2018), 250–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui, T.; Tong, Y.; Teo, H-H.; and Li, J. Managing knowledge distance: IT-enabled inter-firm knowledge capabilities in collaborative innovation. Journal of Management Information Systems, 37, 1 (2020), 217–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dincelli, E., and Chengalur-Smith, I. Choose your own training adventure: designing a gamified SETA artefact for improving information security and privacy through interactive storytelling. European Journal of Information Systems, 29, 6 (2020), 669–687.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domínguez, A.; Saenz-de-Navarrete, J.; de-Marcos, L.; Fernández-Sanz, L.; Pagés, C.; and Martínez-Herráiz, J-J. Gamifying learning experiences: Practical implications and outcomes. Computers & Education, 63, April (2013), 380–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliot, A.J., and Thrash, T.M. Approach and avoidance temperament as basic dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality, 78, 3 (2010), 865–906.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, B; Zheng, Z; Ye, Q; and Goes, P.B. Social influence and monetization of freemium social games. Journal of Management Information Systems, 36, 3 (2019), 730–754.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Featherstone, M., and Habgood, J. UniCraft: Exploring the impact of asynchronous multiplayer game elements in gamification. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 127, July (2019), 150–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng, W; Tu, R; and Hsieh, P. Can gamification increases consumers’ engagement in fitness apps? The moderating role of commensurability of the game elements. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 57, November (2020), Article: 102229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber, D.E.; Reimer, T.; Williams, E.L.; Gill, M.; Loudat Priddy, L.; Bergestuen, D.; Schiller, J.H.; Kirkpatrick, H.; and Craddock Lee, S.J. Resolving rivalries and realigning goals: Challenges of clinical and research multiteam systems. Journal of Oncology Practice, 12, 11 (2016), 1020–1028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddens, L.; Leidner, D., and Gonzalez, E. The role of Fitbits in corporate wellness programs: Does step count matter? In Proceedings of 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Waikoloa, HI, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Green, M.C., and Jenkins, K.M. Interactive narratives: Processes and outcomes in user-directed stories. Journal of Communication, 64, 3 (2014), 479–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, Y.; Logan, H.L.; Glueck, D.H.; and Muller, K.E. Selecting a sample size for studies with repeated measures. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 13, 1 (2013), 1–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hamari, J., and Koivisto, J. ‘Working out for likes’: An empirical study on social influence in exercise gamification. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, September (2015), 333–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamari, J.; Koivisto, J., and Sarsa, H. Does gamification work?–a literature review of empirical studies on gamification. In Proceedings of the 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Waikoloa, HI, 2014, pp. 3025–3034.
   Google Scholar
• Hamari, J.; Shernoff, D.J.; Rowe, E.; Coller, B.; Asbell-Clarke, J.; and Edwards, T. Challenging games help students learn: An empirical study on engagement, flow and immersion in game-based learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, January (2016), 170–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanton, S.; Neil, R.; and Mellalieu, S.D. Recent developments in competitive anxiety direction and competition stress research. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 1, 1 (2008), 45–57.
   Google Scholar
• Hanus, M.D., and Fox, J. Assessing the effects of gamification in the classroom: A longitudinal study on intrinsic motivation, social comparison, satisfaction, effort, and academic performance. Computers & Education, 80, January (2015), 152–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogg, M.A., and Hains, S.C. Friendship and group identification: A new look at the role of cohesiveness in groupthink. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 3 (1998), 323–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, S.H.; Wen, M-H.; and Wu, M-C. Exploring user experiences as predictors of MMORPG addiction. Computers & Education, 53, 3 (2009), 990–999.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, J., and Zhou, L. Social gamification affordances in the green IT services: perspectives from recognition and social overload. Internet Research, 31, 2 (2021), 737–761.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huguet, P.; Dumas, F.; Monteil, J.M.; and Genestoux, N. Social comparison choices in the classroom: Further evidence for students’ upward comparison tendency and its beneficial impact on performance. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 5 (2001), 557–578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hull, D.M.; Lowry, P.B.; Gaskin, J.E.; and Mirkovski, K. A storyteller’s guide to problem‐based learning for information systems management education. Information Systems Journal 29, 5 (2019), 1040–1057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, T.L.; Wallace, L.; and Deane, J.K. Using organismic integration theory to explore the associations between users’ exercise motivations and fitness technology feature set use. MIS Quarterly, 43, 1 (2019), 287–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, M.L.; Wright, R.T.; Durcikova, A; and Karumbaiah, S. Improving phishing reporting using security gamification. Journal of Management Information Systems, 39, 3 (2022), 793–823.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D.W. Social interdependence: Interrelationships among theory, research, and practice. American Psychologist, 58, 11 (2003), 934–945.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D.W., and Johnson, R.T. Student motivation in co-operative groups: Social interdependence theory. In R. Gillies, A. Falmer, and F. Ashman (eds.), Cooperative Learning. London, UK: Routledge, 2003, pp. 136–176.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D.W., and Johnson, R.T. New developments in social interdependence theory. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 131, 4 (2005), 285–358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D.W., and Johnson, R.T. Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning: The teacher’s role. In R.M. Gillies, A.F. Ashman, and J. Terwel (eds.), The Teacher’s Role in Implementing Cooperative Learning in the Classroom: An Introduction. New York, NY: Springer, 2007, pp. 9–37.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D.W., and Johnson, R.T. An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher, 38, 5 (2009), 365–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D.W., and Johnson, R.T. Social interdependence theory. In D.J. Christie (ed.), Encyclopedia of Peace Psychology, Oxford, UK: Blackwell, 2011, pp. 1028–1032.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D.W.; Johnson, R.T.; Buckman, L.A.; and Richards, P.S. The effect of prolonged implementation of cooperative learning on social support within the classroom. Journal of Psychology, 119, 5 (1985), 405–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D.W.; Maruyama, G.; Johnson, R.; Nelson, D.; and Skon, L. Effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures on achievement: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 1 (1981), 47–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D.W.; and Norem-Hebeisen, A.A. A measure of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic attitudes. Journal of Social Psychology, 109, 2 (1979), 253–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kameda, T.; Stasson, M.F.; Davis, J.H.; Parks, C.D.; and Zimmerman, S.K. Social dilemmas, subgroups, and motivation loss in task-oriented groups: In search of an “optimal” team size in division of work. Social Psychology Quarterly, 55, 1 (1992), 47–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kangas, E.; and Kinnunen, T. Applying user-centered design to mobile application development. Communications of the ACM, 48, 7 (2005), 55–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karau, S.J.; and Williams, K.D. Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 4 (1993), 681–706.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, D.; Greaves, F.; Exeter, C.; and Darzi, A. “Gamification”: Influencing Health Behaviours with Games. London: Sage, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Kravitz, D.A.; and Martin, B. Ringelmann rediscovered: The original article. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 5 (1986), 936–941.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuem, J.; Khansa, L.; and Kim, S.S. Prominence and engagement: Different mechanisms regulating continuance and contribution in online communities. Journal of Management Information Systems, 37, 1 (2020), 162–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laricchia, F. Fitness trackers - Statistics & Facts. Aug 29, 2022 (2022). https://www.statista.com/topics/4393/fitness-and-activity-tracker/#topicHeader__wrapper (accessed on September 6, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Lascaux, A. Coopetition and trust: What we know, where to go next. Industrial Marketing Management, 84, January (2020), 2–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauring, J., and Selmer, J. Multicultural organizations: Common language and group cohesiveness. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 10, 3 (2010), 267–284.
   Google Scholar
• Leclercq, T.; Hammedi, W.; and Poncin, I. The boundaries of gamification for engaging customers: Effects of losing a contest in online co-creation communities. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 44, 1 (2018), 82–101.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, P.T.Y.; Chau, M.; and Lui, R.W.C. The role of attitude toward challenge in serious game design. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 61, 4 (2021), 383–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung, A.C.M.; Santhanam, R.; Kwok, R.C.-W., and Yue, W.T. Could gamification designs enhance online learning through personalization? Lessons from a field experiment. Information Systems Research, 34, 1 , (2023). 27–49
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, X. Factors influencing the willingness to contribute information to online communities. New Media & Society, 13, 2 (2011), 279–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, J.J.; Mamykina, L.; Lindtner, S.; Delajoux, G.; and Strub, H.B. Fish ’n’ Steps: Encouraging physical activity with an interactive computer game. In International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, 2006, pp. 261–278.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, D., Li, X.; and Santhanam, R. Digital games and beyond: What happens when players compete. MIS Quarterly, 37, 1 (2013), 111–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, D.; Santhanam, R.; and Webster, J. Toward meaningful engagement: A framework for design and research of gamified information systems. MIS Quarterly, 41, 4 (2017), 1011–1034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowry, P.B.; Cao, J.; and Everard, A. Privacy concerns versus desire for interpersonal awareness in driving the use of self-disclosure technologies: The case of instant messaging in two cultures. Journal of Management Information Systems, 27, 4 (2011), 163–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowry, P.B.; Petter, S.; and Leimeister, J.M. Desperately seeking the artefacts and the foundations of native theory in gamification research: Why information systems researchers can play a legitimate role in this discourse and how they can better contribute. European Journal of Information Systems, 29, 6 (2020), 609–620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majchrzak, A.; Beath, C.M.; Lim, R.A.; and Chin, W.W. Managing client dialogues during information systems design to facilitate client learning. MIS Quarterly, 29, 4 (2005), 653–672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markets and Markets. Gamification market by component (solution and services), deployment (cloud and on-premises), organization size (SMEs and large enterprises), application, end-user (enterprise-driven and consumer-driven), vertical, and region - Global forecast to 2025. (2020). https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/requestsampleNew.asp?id=991 (accessed on August 29, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Marques, J.; Abrams, D.; and Serôdio, R.G. Being better by being right: Subjective group dynamics and derogation of in-group deviants when generic norms are undermined. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 3 (2001), 436–447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H.W.; Richards, G.E.; Johnson, S.; and Roche, L. Physical self-description questionnaire: Psychometric properties and a multitrait-multimethod analysis of relations to existing instruments. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 16, 3 (1994), 270–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsui, T.; Kakuyama, T.; and Onglatco, M.U. Effects of goals and feedback on performance in groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 3 (1987), 407–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMillan, S.J. Exploring models of interactivity from multiple research traditions: Users, documents, and systems. In L.A. Lievrouw, and S.M. Livingstone (eds.), Handbook of New Media, 2. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2002, pp. 163–182.
   Google Scholar
• Mirkovski, K; Gaskin, J.E.; Hull, D.M.; and Lowry, P.B. Visual storytelling for improving the comprehension and utility in disseminating information systems research: Evidence from a quasi‐experiment. Information Systems Journal, 29, 6 (2019), 1153–1177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morschheuser, B.; Hamari, J.; and Maedche, A. Cooperation or competition–When do people contribute more? A field experiment on gamification of crowdsourcing. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 127, July (2019), 7–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morschheuser, B.; Maedche, A., and Walter, D. Designing cooperative gamification: Conceptualization and prototypical implementation. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW ‘17), Portland, OR, 2017, pp. 2410–2421.
   Google Scholar
• Morschheuser, B.; Riar, M.; Hamari, J.; and Maedche, A. How games induce cooperation? A study on the relationship between game features and we-intentions in an augmented reality game. Computers in Human Behavior, 77, December (2017), 169–183.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, H.L.; Cairns, P.; and Hall, M. A practical approach to measuring user engagement with the refined user engagement scale (UES) and new UES short form. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 112, (2018), 28–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orji, R.; Mandryk, R.L.; and Vassileva, J. Improving the efficacy of games for change using personalization models. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 24, 5 (2017), 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özhan, Ş.Ç., and Kocadere, S.A. The effects of flow, emotional engagement, and motivation on success in a gamified online learning environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57, 8 (2020), 2006–2031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearsall, M.J.; Christian, M.S.; and Ellis, A.P.J. Motivating interdependent teams: Individual rewards, shared rewards, or something in between? Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 1 (2010), 183–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pee, L.G.; Kankanhalli, A.; and Kim, H-W. Knowledge sharing in information systems development: a social interdependence perspective. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 11, 10 (2010), 550–575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petter, S. More than child’s play: Embracing the study of online gaming in information systems research. ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, 48, 4 (2017), 9–13.
   Google Scholar
• Prestopnik, N.R., and Tang, J. Points, stories, worlds, and diegesis: Comparing player experiences in two citizen science games. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, November (2015), 492–506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren, Y., and Kraut, R.E. Agent-based modeling to inform online community design: Impact of topical breadth, message volume, and discussion moderation on member commitment and contribution. Human–Computer Interaction, 29, 4 (2014), 351–389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhea, M.R.; Landers, D.M.; Alvar, B.A.; and Arent, S.M. The effects of competition and the presence of an audience on weight lifting performance. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 17, 2 (2003), 303–306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riar, M.; Morschheuser, B.; Zarnekow, R.; and Hamari, J. Gamification of cooperation: A framework, literature review and future research agenda. International Journal of Information Management, 67, (2022), Article: 102549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romero, M. Learner engagement in the use of individual and collaborative serious games. In C. Wankel, and P. Blessinger (eds.), Increasing Student Engagement and Retention Using Immersive Interfaces: Virtual Worlds, Gaming, and Simulation: Volume 6 Part C, Cutting-Edge Technologies in Higher Education. Bingley, WA: Emerald Publishing Limited, 2012, pp. 15–24.
   Google Scholar
• Romero, M.; Usart, M.; Ott, M.; Earp, J.; de Freitas, S., and Arnab, S. Learning through playing for or against each other? Promoting collaborative learning in digital game based learning. In Proceedings of the 20th European Conference on Information Systems, Barcelona, Spain, 2012. 2410–242.
   Google Scholar
• Rosendahl Huber, L.; Sloof, R.; and Van Praag, M. The effect of early entrepreneurship education: Evidence from a randomized field experiment. European Economic Review, 72, (2014), 76–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roseth, C.J.; Johnson, D.W.; and Johnson, R.T. Promoting early adolescents’ achievement and peer relationships: The effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 2 (2008), 223–246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sailer, M.; and Homner, L. The gamification of learning: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 32, 1 (2020), 77–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santhanam, R.; Liu, D.; and Shen, W-C.M. Research Note—Gamification of technology-mediated training: Not all competitions are the same. Information Systems Research, 27, 2 (2016), 453–465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarzer, R. Modeling health behavior change: How to predict and modify the adoption and maintenance of health behaviors. Applied Psychology, 57, 1 (2008), 1–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheridan, S.; and Williams, P. Developing individual goals, shared goals, and the goals of others: Dimensions of constructive competition in learning contexts. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 55, 2 (2011), 145–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silic, M.; and Lowry, PB. Using design-science based gamification to improve organizational security training and compliance. Journal of Management Information Systems, 37, 1 (2020), 129–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silic, M.; Marzi, G.; Caputo, A.; and Bal, P.M. The effects of a gamified human resource management system on job satisfaction and engagement. Human Resource Management Journal, 30, 2 (2020), 260–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simões, J.; Redondo, R.D.; and Vilas, A.F. A social gamification framework for a K-6 learning platform. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 2 (2013), 345–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, L. Does who you know in the positional hierarchy protect or hurt? Social capital, comparative reference group, and depression in two societies. Social Science & Medicine, 136-137, July (2015), 117–127.
   Google Scholar
• Spohrer, K.; Fallon, M.; Hoehle, H.; and Heinzl, A. Designing effective mobile health apps: Does combining behavior change techniques really create synergies? Journal of Management Information Systems, 38, 2 (2021), 517–545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srite, M.; and Karahanna, E. The role of espoused national cultural values in technology acceptance. MIS Quarterly, 30, 3 (2006), 679–704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanne, M.B.; Johnson, D.W.; and Johnson, R.T. Does competition enhance or inhibit motor performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 1 (1999), 133–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su, C.H.; and Cheng, C.H. A mobile gamification learning system for improving the learning motivation and achievements. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31, 3 (2015), 268–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suh, A.; Cheung, C.M.; Ahuja, M.; and Wagner, C. Gamification in the workplace: The central role of the aesthetic experience. Journal of Management Information Systems, 34, 1 (2017), 268–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, S.E.; Neter, E.; and Wayment, H.A. Self-evaluation processes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 12 (1995), 1278–1287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomala, L.L. Number of monthly active users (MAU) of the leading sports apps in China as of December 2021. (2022). https://www.statista.com/statistics/1043804/china-leading-sports-apps-monthly-active-users/ (accessed on August 29, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Tjosvold, D.; Johnson, D.W.; Johnson, R.T.; and Sun, H. Can interpersonal competition be constructive within organizations? Journal of Psychology, 137, 1 (2003), 63–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tjosvold, D.; Johnson, D.W.; Johnson, R.T.; and Sun, H. Competitive motives and strategies: Understanding constructive competition. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 10, 2 (2006), 87–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treiblmaier, H.; Putz, L-M.; and Lowry, P.B. Setting a definition, context, and research agenda for the gamification of non-gaming systems. AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction 10, 3 (2018), 129–163.
   Google Scholar
• Van Der Vegt, G.S.; Emans, B.J.; and Van De Vliert, E. Patterns of interdependence in work teams: A two‐level investigation of the relations with job and team satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 54, 1 (2001), 51–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weldon, E.; and Mustari, E.L. Felt dispensability in groups of coactors: The effects of shared responsibility and explicit anonymity on cognitive effort. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 41, 3 (1988), 330–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiethof, C.; Tavanapour, N.; and Bittner, E. Designing and evaluating a collaborative writing process with gamification elements: Toward a framework for gamifying collaboration processes. AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction, 13, 1 (2021), 38–61.
   Google Scholar
• Willer, R. Groups reward individual sacrifice: The status solution to the collective action problem. American Sociological Review, 74, 1 (2009), 23–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, P.; and Sheridan, S. Conditions for collaborative learning and constructive competition in school. Educational Research, 52, 4 (2010), 335–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittchen, M.; Dick, R.; and Hertel, G. Motivated information processing during intergroup competition: A model of intergroup competition effects on individual effort. Organizational Psychology Review, 1, 3 (2011), 257–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, C-H.; Kuo, C-L.; and Yu, C-S. Do communication and coopetition matter? A study on the effects of mobile features on collaborative learning. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 11, 4 (2017), 340–359.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, Y.; Kankanhalli, A., and Huang, K.W. Gamification in fitness apps: How do leaderboards influence exercise? In Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Information Systems, Fort Worth, TX, 2015, pp. 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, J.; Brackbill, D.; Yang, S.; Becker, J,; Herbert, N,; and Centola, D. Support or competition? How online social networks increase physical activity: A randomized controlled trial. Preventive Medicine Reports, 4, December (2016), 453–458.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhong, Z-J. The effects of collective MMORPG (massively multiplayer online role-playing games) play on gamers’ online and offline social capital. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 6 (2011), 2352–2363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, Y.; Dailey, S.L.; Kreitzberg, D.; and Bernhardt, J. “Social networkout”: Connecting social features of wearable fitness trackers with physical exercise. Journal of Health Communication, 22, 12 (2017), 974–980.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar