Influence of Media Capabilities on Trust in the Sharing Economy

References

• Akrout, H.; and Diallo, M.F. Fundamental transformations of trust and its drivers: A multi-stage approach of business-to-business relationships. Industrial Marketing Management, 66 (2017), 159–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amin, R.; Islam, S.K.; Biswas, G.P.; Khan, M.K.; and Kumar, N. An efficient and practical smart card based anonymity preserving user authentication scheme for TMIS using elliptic curve cryptography. Journal of Medical Systems, 39, 11 (2015), 1–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, R.M.; and Kenny, D.A. The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 6 (1986), 1173–1182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacherjee, A. Individual trust in online firms: Scale development and initial test. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19, 1 (2002), 211–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breuer, C.; Hüffmeier, J.; and Hertel, G. Does trust matter more in virtual teams? A meta-analysis of trust and team effectiveness considering virtuality and documentation as moderators. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101, 8 (2016), 1151–1177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calabro, A.; Nisar, T.M.; Torchia, M., and Tseng, H.T. Establishing trust in the sharing economy: An analysis of organizational, systems and interpersonal level trust. Information Technology & People (2022), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-04-2022-0313
   Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, S.; Sarker, S.; and Valacich, J.S. The behavioral roots of information systems security: Exploring key factors related to unethical IT use. Journal of Management Information Systems, 31, 4 (2015), 49–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J.; Zhang, C.; and Xu, Y. The role of mutual trust in building members’ loyalty to a C2C platform provider. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 14, 1 (2009), 147–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, X.; Fu, S.; Sun, J.; Zuo, M.; and Meng, X. Trust in online ride-sharing transactions: Impacts of heterogeneous order features. Journal of Management Information Systems, 40, 1 (2023), 183–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheshire, C. Online trust, trustworthiness, or assurance? Daedalus, 140, 4 (2011), 49–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CoinMarketCap.com (2022, July 9). Today’s Cryptocurrency Prices by Market Cap. CoinMarket Cap. https://coinmarketcap.com/
   Google Scholar
• Daries, J.P.; Reich, J.; Waldo, J.; Young, E.M.; Whittinghill, J.; Ho, A.D.; Seaton, D.T.; and Chuang, I. Privacy, anonymity, and big data in the social sciences. Communications of the ACM, 57, 9 (2014), 56–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darlington, R.B., and Hayes, A.F. Regression Analysis and Linear Models: Concepts, Applications, and Implementation. New York, NY: Guilford Publications, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Davenport, D. Anonymity on the internet: Why the price may be too high. Communications of the ACM, 45, 4 (2002), 33–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennis, A.R.; Fuller, R.M.; and Valacich, J.S. Media, tasks, and communication processes: A theory of media synchronicity. MIS Quarterly, 32, 3 (2008), 575–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennis, A.R.; and Valacich, J.S. Rethinking media richness: Towards a theory of media synchronicity. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences, 1999, pp. 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Drouin, M.; Miller, D.; Wehle, S.M.; and Hernandez, E. Why do people lie online?“Because everyone lies on the internet”. Computers in Human Behavior, 64 (2016), 134–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyer, J.H.; and Chu, W. The role of trustworthiness in reducing transaction costs and improving performance: Empirical evidence from the United States, Japan, and Korea. Organization Science, 14, 1 (2003), 57–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everard, A.; and Galletta, D.F. How presentation flaws affect perceived site quality, trust, and intention to purchase from an online store. Journal of Management Information Systems, 22, 3 (2005), 56–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, H.; and Lederman, R. Online health communities: How do community members build the trust required to adopt information and form close relationships? European Journal of Information Systems, 27, 1 (2018), 62–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, J.M.; Shao, P.J.; and Lan, G. Effects of innovativeness and trust on web survey participation. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 1 (2009), 144–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, B.; Khan Jr, P.H.; and Howe, D.C. Trust online. Communications of the ACM, 43, 12 (2000), 34–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller, M.A., and Mayer, R.C. Media and familiarity effects on assessing trustworthiness:“What did they mean by that?” In L.L. Brennan and V.E. Johnson (eds.), Computer-mediated Relationships and Trust: Managerial and Organizational Effects. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 2008, pp. 56–74.
   Google Scholar
• Gefen, D.; Benbasat, I.; and Pavlou, P. A research agenda for trust in online environments. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24, 4 (2008), 275–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, J.F.; Carlson, J.R.; and Valacich, J.S. Media selection as a strategic component of communication. MIS Quarterly, 37, 4 (2013), 1233–1251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, J.F.; Gupta, M.; Giordano, G.; Mills, A.M.; Tennant, V.M.; and Lewis, C.C. The effects of communication media and culture on deception detection accuracy. MIS Quarterly, 42, 2 (2018), 551–575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gopal, R.D.; Sanders, G.L.; Bhattacharjee, S.; Agrawal, M.; and Wagner, S.C. A behavioral model of digital music piracy. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 14, 2 (2004), 89–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood, B.N.; and Wattal, S. Show me the way to go home: An empirical investigation of ride-sharing and alcohol related motor vehicle fatalities. MIS Quaterly, 41, 1 (2017), 163–187.
   Google Scholar
• Griffith, T.L.; and Northcraft, G.B. Distinguishing between the forest and the trees: Media, features, and methodology in electronic communication research. Organization Science, 5, 2 (1994), 272–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimsley, M.; and Meehan, A. e-Government information systems: Evaluation-led design for public value and client trust. European Journal of Information Systems, 16, 2 (2017), 134–148.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J.F.; Ringle, C.M.; and Sarstedt, M. PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19, 2 (2011), 139–152.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J.F.; Sarstedt, M.; and Ringle, C.M. Rethinking some of the rethinking of partial least squares. European Journal of Marketing, 53, 4 (2019), 566–584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hampton-Sosa, W.; and Koufaris, M. The effect of web site perceptions on initial trust in the owner company. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 10, 1 (2005), 55–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, A. The effects of media capabilities on the rationalization of online consumer fraud. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 19, 5 (2018), 408–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, A.; and Windeler, J.B. Framing Communication: How agenda alignment and media capabilities shape partially cooperative communication. MIS Quarterly, 44, 2 (2020), 771–807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawlitschek, F. In blockchain we trust: Consumer trust relationships in the sharing economy 2.0. In, D. Wruk, A. Oberg, and I. Maurer, (eds.), Perspectives on the Sharing Economy. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2019, pp. 148–155.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A.F. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis Second Edition: A Regression-Based Approach. New York: The Guilford Press, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Hemingway, E. Selected Letters 1917-1961. New York, NY: Scribner, 2003, p. 805.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, T.J.; Fuller, M.; and Campbell, D.E. Designing interfaces with social presence: Using vividness and extraversion to create social recommendation agents. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 10, 12 (2009), 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess, T.J.; Fuller, M.; and Campbell, D.E. Designing interfaces with social presence: Using vividness and extraversion to create social recommendation agents. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 10, 12 (2009), 889–919.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Höddinghaus, M., and Hertel, G. Trust and leadership: Implications of digitization, In, Blöbaum, B. (ed.), Trust and Communication: Findings and Implications of Trust Research. Cham, CH: Springer, 2021, pp. 185–203.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L.T.; and Bentler, P.M. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling-a Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1 (1999), 1–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilk, N.; Shang, G.; Fan, S.; and Zhao, J.L. Stability of transaction fees in Bitcoin: A supply and demand perspective. MIS Quarterly, 45, 2 (2021), 563–592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvenpaa, S.L. and Leidner, D.E. Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organization Science, 10, 6 (1999), 791–815.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, K.; and Leonard, L.N. Trust in consumer-to-consumer electronic commerce. Information & Management, 45, 2 (2008), 88–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kewell, B.; Adams, R.; and Parry, G. Blockchain for good? Strategic Change, 26, 5 (2017), 429–437.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, D.; and Benbasat, I. Trust-assuring arguments in B2C e-commerce: Impact of content, source, and price on trust. Journal of Management Information Systems, 26, 3 (2009), 175–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, H.-W.; Xu, Y.; and Koh, J. A comparison of online trust building factors between potential customers and repeat customers. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 5, 10 (2004), 392–420.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y.H.; Kim, D.J.; and Hwang, Y. Exploring online transaction self-efficacy in trust building in B2C e-commerce. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing (JOEUC), 21, 1 (2009), 37–59.
   Google Scholar
• Ko, G.; Amankwah-Amoah, J.; Appiah, G.; and Larimo, J. Non-market strategies and building digital trust in sharing economy platforms. Journal of International Management, 28, 1 (2022), 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lankton, N.K.; McKnight, D.H.; and Tripp, J. Technology, humanness, and trust: Rethinking trust in technology. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 16, 10 (2015), 880–918.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewicki, R.J.; and Wiethoff, C. Trust, trust development, and trust repair. In E.C. Marcus, M. Deutsch, and P.T. Coleman, (eds.), The Handbook of Conflict Resolution: Theory and Practice, 2000, pp. 86–107.
   Google Scholar
• Li, H.; Jiang, J.H.; and Wu, M.J. The effects of trust assurances on consumers’ initial online trust: A two-stage decision-making process perspective. International Journal of Information Management, 34, 3 (2014), 395–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindell, M.K.; and Whitney, D.J. Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 1 (2001), 114–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, D.; Brass, D.J.; Lu, Y.; and Chen, D. Friendships in online peer-to-peer lending: pipes, prisms, and relational herding. MIS Quaterly, 39, 3 (2015), 729–742.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, B.Z.; Wang, Z.; and Zhang, S. Platform-based mechanisms, institutional trust, and continuous use intention: The moderating role of perceived effectiveness of sharing economy institutional mechanisms. Information & Management, 58, 7 (2021), 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, L.; Cai, R.Y.; and King, C. Building trust through a personal touch: Consumer response to service failure and recovery of home-sharing. Journal of Business Research, 117 (2020), 99–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R.C.; Davis, J.H.; and Schoorman, F.D. An Integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 3 (1995), 709–734.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzella, F.; Sundararajan, A.; d’Espous, V.B.; and Möhlmann, M. How digital trust powers the sharing economy. IESE Business Review, 26, 5 (2016), 24–31.
   Google Scholar
• Mcknight, D.H.; Carter, M.; Thatcher, J.B.; and Clay, P.F. Trust in a specific technology: An investigation of its components and measures. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems (TMIS), 2, 2 (2011), 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• McKnight, D.H.; and Chervany, N.L. What trust means in e-commerce customer relationships: An interdisciplinary conceptual typology. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 6, 2 (2001), 35–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKnight, D.H.; Choudhury, V.; and Kacmar, C. Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: An integrative typology. Information Systems Research, 13, 3 (2002), 334–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKnight, D.H.; Choudhury, V.; and Kacmar, C. Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: An integrative typology. Information Systems Research, 13, 3 (2002), 334–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehrwald, P.; Treffers, T.; Titze, M.; and Welpe, I.M. Application of blockchain technology in the sharing economy: A model of trust and intermediation. Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2019, pp. 4585–4594.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, R. (2022, June 6). Bitcoin leads crypto fraud as FTC confirms $1 billion milestone. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/rosemariemiller/2022/06/06/bitcoin-leads-crypto-fraud-as-ftc-confirms-1-billion-milestone/?sh=2cb2a88f35d2
   Google Scholar
• Mirsadikov, A.; Harrison, A.; and Mennecke, B. Tales from the wheel: An IT-fueled ride as an UBER driver. AMCIS 2016 Proceedings, 2016, pp. 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Mittendorf, C. What Trust means in the Sharing Economy: A provider perspective on Airbnb.com. AMCIS 2016 Proceedings, 2016, pp. 1-10.
   Google Scholar
• Mittendorf, C. The implications of trust in the sharing economy–an empirical analysis of Uber. Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. 2017, pp. 5838–5846.
   Google Scholar
• Mittendorf, C. Collaborative consumption: The role of familiarity and trust among millennials. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 35, 4 (2018), 377–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mittendorf, C.; Berente, N.; and Holten, R. Trust in sharing encounters among millennials. Information Systems Journal, 29, 5 (2019), 1083–1119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Möhlmann, M.; and Geissinger, A. Trust in the sharing economy: Platform-mediated peer trust. In J.J. Infranca; M. Finck; and N.M. Davidson (eds.), Cambridge Handbook of the Law of the Sharing Economy, 2018, pp. 27–37.
   Google Scholar
• Moody, G.D.; Galletta, D.F.; and Dunn, B.K. Which phish get caught? An exploratory study of individuals′ susceptibility to phishing. European Journal of Information Systems, 26, 6 (2017), 564–584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, R.M.; and Hunt, S.D. The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58, 3 (1994), 20–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NHTSA (2021, June 3). 2020 fatality data show increased traffic fatalities during pandemic. NHTSA. https://www.nhtsa.gov/press-releases/2020-fatality-data-show-increased-traffic-fatalities-during-pandemic
   Google Scholar
• Nian, T.; Zhu, A.; and Gurbaxani, V. The impact of the sharing economy on household bankruptcy. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 45, 3a (2020), 1213–1248.
   Google Scholar
• Nie, C.; Zheng, Z.E.; and Sarkar, S. Competing with the sharing economy: Incumbents’ reaction on review manipulation. MIS Quarterly, 46, 3 (2022), 1573–1602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nissenbaum, H. Will security enhance trust online, or supplant it? In, E.R. Kramer and C. K., (eds.), Trust and Distrust Within Organizations: Emerging Perspectives, Enduring Questions, Russell Sage Publications, 2004, pp. 155–188.
   Google Scholar
• Noonan, R.J. The psychology of sex: A mirror from the Internet. In, Gackenbach J., (ed.), Psychology and the Internet: Intrapersonal, Interpersonal, and Transpersonal Implications. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 1998, pp. 93–139.
   Google Scholar
• Nunamaker, J.F.; Dennis, A.R.; Valacich, J.S.; Vogel, D.; and George, J.F. Electronic meeting systems. Communications of the ACM, 34, 7 (1991), 40–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavlou, P.A. Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: Integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 7, 3 (2003), 101–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavlou, P.A.; and Gefen, D. Building effective online marketplaces with institution-based trust. Information Systems Research, 15, 1 (2004), 37–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrin, A. (2022, July 8). 16% of Americans say they have ever invested in, traded or used cryptocurrency. Pew Research Center. https://pewrsr.ch/3quL14Y
   Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P.M.; MacKenzie, S.B.; and Podsakoff, N.P. Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 1 (2012), 539–569.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Postmes, T.; Spears, R.; Sakhel, K.; and De Groot, D. Social influence in computer-mediated communication: The effects of anonymity on group behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 10 (2001), 1243–1254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rege, A. What’s love got to do with it? Exploring online dating scams and identity fraud. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 3, 2 (2009), 494–512.
   Google Scholar
• Robert, L.P.; Denis, A.R.; and Hung, Y.-T.C. Individual swift trust and knowledge-based trust in face-to-face and virtual team members. Journal of Management Information Systems, 26, 2 (2009), 241–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarker, S.; Sarker, S.; Chatterjee, S.; and Valacich, J.S. Media effects on group collaboration: An empirical examination in an ethical decision‐making context. Decision Sciences, 41, 4 (2010), 887–931.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlichter, B.R.; and Rose, J. Trust dynamics in a large system implementation: Six theoretical propositions. European Journal of Information Systems, 22, 4 (2013), 455–474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Southall, A. (2021, July 25). 5 Dead in Hamptons crash that is blamed on speeding. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/07/25/nyregion/hamptons-crash-five-dead.html
   Google Scholar
• Salas E.B. (2022, April 11). Uber’s user distribution in the U.S. by age 2017. Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/822833/us-ride-sharing-uber-users-age/
   Google Scholar
• Steelman, Z.R.; Hammer, B.I.; and Limayem, M. Data collection in the digital age innovative alternatives to student samples. MIS Quarterly, 38, 2 (2014), 355–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, H. Sellers’ trust and continued use of online marketplaces. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 11, 4 (2010), 183–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tripathi, A.K.; Lee, Y.-J.; and Basu, A. Analyzing the impact of public buyer–seller engagement during online auctions. Information Systems Research, 33, 4 (2022), 1264–1286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tripp, J.; McKnight, D.H., and Lankton, N. What most influences consumers’ intention to use? different motivation and trust stories for Uber, Airbnb, and Taskrabbit. European Journal of Information Systems (2022), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2022.2062469
   Google Scholar
• Turel, O.; Yuan, Y.; and Connelly, C.E. In Justice We Trust: Predicting user acceptance of e-customer services. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24, 4 (2008), 123–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UBER (2022, June 30). Uber’s US Safety Report. Uber Technologies Inc. https://www.uber.com/us/en/about/reports/us-safety-report/
   Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V.; Thong, J.Y.; Chan, F.K.; and Hu, P.J. Managing citizens’ uncertainty in e-government services: The mediating and moderating roles of transparency and trust. Information Systems Research, 27, 1 (2016), 87–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, H.; and Lu, X.-A. Cyberdating: Misinformation and (dis)trust in online interaction. Informing Science, 10 (2007), 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Waytz, A.; Heafner, J.; and Epley, N. The mind in the machine: Anthropomorphism increases trust in an autonomous vehicle. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 52 (2014), 113–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, R.Y.M.; Cheung, C.M.; Xiao, B.; and Thatcher, J.B. Standing up or standing by: Understanding bystanders’ proactive reporting responses to social media harassment. Information Systems Research, 32, 2 (2021), 561–581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolthuis, R.K.; Hillebrand, B.; and Nooteboom, B. Trust, contract and relationship development. Organization Studies, 26, 6 (2005), 813–840.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao, B.; and Benbasat, I. E-commerce product recommendation agents: Use, characteristics, and impact. MIS Quarterly, 31, 1 (2007), 137–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xin, L.; and Neng, W. Design improvement for tor against low-cost traffic attack and low-resource routing attack. 2009 WRI International Conference on Communications and Mobile Computing, 2009, pp. 549–554.
   Google Scholar
• Ye, H.J.; and Kankanhalli, A. Solvers’ participation in crowdsourcing platforms: Examining the impacts of trust, and benefit and cost factors. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 26, 2 (2017), 101–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar