90
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Competition and Cognition in the Market for Online News

ORCID Icon, &

References

  • Abrardi, L.; Cambini, C.; and Rondi, L. Artificial intelligence, firms and consumer behavior: A survey. Journal of Economic Surveys, 36, 4 (2022), 969–991.
  • Athey, S.C.; Bryan, K.A., and Gans, J.S. The allocation of decision authority to human and artificial intelligence. In AEA Papers and Proceedings. Nashville: American Economic Association, 2020, pp. 80–84.
  • Bai, H.; Voelkel, J.; Eichstaedt, J.; and Willer, R. Artificial intelligence can persuade humans on political issues. In OSF Preprints, 2023. DOI ht tps://do i.org/10.31219/osf.io/stakv (accessed December 15, 2023).
  • Bain, R. Are our brains Bayesian? Significance, 13, 4 (2016), 14–19.
  • Bernhardt, D.; Krasa, S.; and Polborn, M. Political polarization and the electoral effects of media bias. Journal of Public Economics, 92, 6 (2008), 1092–1104.
  • Bjarnøe, C. Conflict framing in the news media and political discussion. Scandinavian Political Studies, 45, 2 (2022), 156–177.
  • Blasi, V. Holmes and the marketplace of ideas. The Supreme Court Review, 2, 1 (2005), 1–46.
  • Braw, E. The United States Needs a BBC. In Foreign Policy, 2021. https://foreignpolicy.com/2021/01/28/bbc-partisan-news-united-states-polarization (accessed November 15, 2023).
  • Brekke, K.R.; Nuscheler, R.; and Straume, O.R. Quality and location choices under price regulation. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 15, 1 (2006), 207–227.
  • Brosius, H.B.; and Kepplinger, H. M. The agenda-setting function of television news: Static and dynamic views. Communication Research, 17, 2 (1990), 183–211.
  • Bullard, G. Smart ways journalists can exploit artificial intelligence. In Nieman Reports, 2023. https://niemanreports.org/articles/artificial-intelligence-newsrooms (accessed December 12, 2023).
  • Campante, F.; Durante, R.; and Tesei, A. Media and social capital. Annual Review of Economics, 14 (2022), 69–91.
  • Canella, G. Journalistic power: Constructing the “truth” and the economics of objectivity. Journalism Practice, 17, 2 (2021), 209–225.
  • Carlson, M. News algorithms, photojournalism and the assumption of mechanical objectivity in journalism. Digital Journalism, 7, 8 (2019), 1117–1133.
  • Carlson, M.; Robinson, S.; and Lewis S.C. News after Trump: Journalism’s Crisis of Relevance in a Changed Media Culture. New York: Oxford University Press, 2021.
  • Chandra, S.; Shirish, A.; and Srivastava, S.C. To be or not to be … human? Theorizing the role of human-like competencies in conversational artificial intelligence agents. Journal of Management Information Systems, 39, 4 (2022), 969–1005.
  • Coibion, O.; Einav, L.; and Hallak, J.C. Equilibrium demand elasticities across quality segments. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 25, 1 (2007), 13–30.
  • Conroy-Krutz, J.; and Moehler, D. C. Moderation from bias: A field experiment on partisan media in a new democracy. The Journal of Politics, 77, 2 (2015), 575–587.
  • Cormack, L. Democrats love Vox, Republicans love Fox. In Medium, 2021. https://medium.com/3streams/the-news-congress-pushes-to-constituents-30a84e5de639 (accessed November 17, 2023).
  • Dalal, S.; Adlim, B.; and Lesk, M. How to measure relative bias in media coverage? Significance, 16, 5 (2019), 18–23.
  • Das, N. The value of biased information. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 74, 1 (2020), 1–40.
  • De Vreese, C.H. News framing: Theory and typology. Information Design Journal + Document Design, 13, 1 (2005), 51–62.
  • De Vreese, C.H. Mediatization of news: The role of journalistic framing. In Esser, F. and Strömbäck, J. (eds.) Mediatization of Politics: Understanding the Transformation of Western Democracies, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014, pp. 137–155.
  • Del Vicario, M.; Scala, A.; Caldarelli, G.; Stanley, H. E.; and Quattrociocchi, W. Modeling confirmation bias and polarization. Scientific Reports, 7, 1 (2017), 1–9.
  • Deng, J.; Ghasemkhani, H.; Tan, Y.; and Tripathi, A.K. Actions speak louder than words: Imputing users’ reputation from transaction history. Production and Operations Management, 32, 4 (2023), 1096–1111.
  • Dennis, A.R.; Yuan, L.; Feng, X.; Webb, E.; and Hsieh, C.J. Digital nudging: Numeric and semantic priming in e-commerce. Journal of Management Information Systems, 37, 1 (2020), 39–65.
  • Dennis, A.R.; Galletta, D.F.; and Webster, J. Fake news on the internet. Journal of Management Information Systems, 38, 4 (2021), 893–897.
  • Diakopoulos, N. Automating the News: How Algorithms are Rewriting the Media. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2019.
  • Dourish, P.; and Gómez Cruz, E. Datafication and data fiction: Narrating data and narrating with data. Big Data & Society, 5, 2 (2018), 20–35.
  • Druckman, J.N.; Klar, S.; Krupnikov, Y.; Levendusky, M.; and Ryan, J.B. Affective polarization, local contexts and public opinion in America. Nature Human Behavior, 5, 1 (2021), 28–38.
  • Drutman, L. The Moderate Middle Is a Myth. In FiveThirtyEight, 2019. https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-moderate-middle-is-a-myth (accessed December 17, 2023).
  • Duggan, J.; and Martinelli, C. A spatial theory of media slant and voter choice. The Review of Economic Studies, 78, 2 (2011), 640–666.
  • The Economist. Artificial intelligence is remixing journalism into a “soup” of language. In The Economist, 2023. https://www.economist.com/business/2023/05/04/artificial-intelligence-is-remixing-journalism-into-a-soup-of-language (accessed December 15, 2023).
  • Elofson, G.; and Konsynski, B. Delegation technologies: Environmental scanning with intelligent agents. Journal of Management Information Systems, 8, 1 (1991), 37–62.
  • Entman, R.M. Framing bias: Media in the distribution of power. Journal of Communication, 57, 1 (2007), 163–173.
  • Entman, R.M. Media framing biases and political power: Explaining slant in news of campaign 2008. Journalism, 11, 4 (2010), 389–408.
  • Fischer, S. U.S. digital newspaper ad revenue expected to surpass print by 2026. In Axios, 2022. https://www.axios.com/2022/06/21/digital-newspaper-ad-revenue-print (accessed December 15, 2023).
  • Fjelstad, O., and Konsynski, B. The role of cognitive apportionment in information systems. In ICIS 1986 Proceedings, San Diego: Association of Information Systems, 1986, 84–98.
  • Foundation, K. American Views 2022: Part 2 Trust, Media and Democracy, 2022. https://knightfoundation.org/reports/american-views-2023-part-2/. (accessed November 11, 2023).
  • Fowler, A.; Hill, S.J.; Lewis, J.B.; Tausanovitch, C.; Vavreck, L.; and Warshaw, C. Moderates. American Political Science Review, 117, 2 (2023), 643–660.
  • Foxman, E.R.; Berger, P.W.; and Cote, J.A. Consumer brand confusion: A conceptual framework. Psychology & Marketing, 9, 2 (1992), 123–141.
  • Garimella, K.; Smith, T.; Weiss, R., and West, R. Political polarization in online news consumption. In ”Virtual” since this was during COVID when no travel was allowed, 2021, pp. 152–162. Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence.
  • Gentzkow, M.; and Shapiro, J. M. Media bias and reputation. Journal of Political Economy, 114, 2 (2006), 280–316.
  • Gentzkow, M.; Shapiro, J.M.; and Stone, D.F. Media bias in the marketplace: Theory. In S.P. Anderson, J. Waldfogel, and D. Strömberg (eds.), Handbook of Media Economics vol. I. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2015, pp. 623–645.
  • Ghosh, S.P.; Jain, N.; Martinelli, C.; and Roy, J. Responsive democracy and commercial media. Economics Letters, 22, 2 (2023), 11–19.
  • Green, D.P.; and Blair, I.V. Framing and the price elasticity of private and public goods. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 4, 1 (1995), 1–32.
  • Guess, A.M. (Almost) everything in moderation: New evidence on Americans’ online media diets. American Journal of Political Science, 65, 4 (2021), 1007–1022.
  • Guess, A.M.; Barberá, P.; Munzert, S.; and Yang, J. The consequences of online partisan media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118, 14 (2021), 1–8.
  • Han, J.; and Federico, C. M. Conflict-framed news, self-categorization, and partisan polarization. Mass Communication and Society, 20, 4 (2017), 455–480.
  • Harrison, K.L. The forgotten center: An analysis into the disappearing moderate in a climate of increasing political polarization. Inquiries Journal, 12, 09 (2020), 12–24.
  • Hart, P.S.; Chinn, S.; and Soroka, S. Politicization and polarization in COVID-19 news coverage. Science Communication, 42, 5 (2020), 679–697.
  • Hill, J.L. The Political Centrist. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press, 2009.
  • Hirshleifer, D. Presidential address: Social transmission bias in economics and finance. The Journal of Finance, 75, 4 (2020), 1779–1831.
  • Holzman, P.S.; and Klein, G.S. Cognitive system-principles of leveling and sharpening: Individual differences in assimilation effects in visual time-error. The Journal of Psychology, 37, 1 (1954), 105–122.
  • Hong, W.; Thong, J.Y.; and Tam, K.Y. The effects of information format and shopping task on consumers’ online shopping behavior: A cognitive fit perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 21, 3 (2004), 149–184.
  • Horne, B.D.; Nørregaard, J., and Adali, S. Different spirals of sameness: A study of content sharing in mainstream and alternative media. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, Munich, 2019, pp. 257–266. Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence.
  • Iyengar, S.; Sood, G.; and Lelkes, Y. Affect, not ideology: A social identity perspective on polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76, 3 (2012), 405–431.
  • Jacobs, R.N. Journalism After Trump. In Mast, J and Alexander, J. (eds.) Politics of Meaning/Meaning of Politics: Cultural Sociology of the 2016 US Presidential Election, Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019, pp. 75–93.
  • Jiang, Y.; Ho, Y.-C.; Yan, X.; and Tan, Y. Investor platform choice: Herding, platform attributes, and regulations. Journal of Management Information Systems, 35, 1 (2018), 86–116.
  • Jingnan, H. AI-generated text is hard to spot. It could play a big role in the 2024 campaign. In NPR, 2023. https://www.mprnews.org/story/2023/06/29/npr-ai-generated-text-is-hard-to-spot-it-could-play-a-big-role-in-the-2024-campaign (accessed August 7, 2023).
  • Johansson, J.H. Machine learning & AI as tools for polarization. 2023. https://medium.com/@jens.h.johansson/machine-learning-ai-as-tools-for-polarization-783cde061e43 (accessed January 4, 2023).
  • Johnson, J.P.; and Myatt, D.P. On the simple economics of advertising, marketing, and product design. American Economic Review, 96, 3 (2006), 756–784.
  • Jost, J.T.; Baldassarri, D.S.; and Druckman, J.N. Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts. Nature Reviews Psychology, 1, 10 (2022), 560–576.
  • Karhade, P.; Kathuria, A.; Malik, O.; and Konsynski, B. Digital platforms and infobesity: A research agenda. In A. Garimella, P. Karhade, A. Kathuria, X. Liu, J. Xu, and K. Zhao (eds.), The Role of e-Business During the Time of Grand Challenges. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021, pp. 67–74.
  • Karimi, J.; and Walter, Z. The role of dynamic capabilities in responding to digital disruption: A factor-based study of the newspaper industry. Journal of Management Information Systems, 32, 1 (2015), 39–81.
  • Kathuria, A.; Karhade, P.P.; and Konsynski, B.R. In the realm of hungry ghosts: Multi-level theory for supplier participation on digital platforms. Journal of Management Information Systems, 37, 2 (2020), 396–430.
  • Kim, A.; Moravec, P.L.; and Dennis, A.R. Combating fake news on social media with source ratings: The effects of user and expert reputation ratings. Journal of Management Information Systems, 36, 3 (2019), 931–968.
  • Kim, B.; Broussard, R.; and Barnidge, M. Testing political knowledge as a mediator of the relationship between news use and affective polarization. The Social Science Journal, 60, 4 (2020), 1–13.
  • Konsynski, B.; and Tiwana, A. The improvisation-efficiency paradox in inter-firm electronic networks: Governance and architecture considerations. Journal of Information Technology, 19, 4 (2004), 234–243.
  • Konsynski, B.R., and Sviokla, J. J. Cognitive reapportionment: Rethinking the location of judgement in managerial decision making. In A. Donnellon and C.C. Heckscher (eds.), The Post-Bureaucratic Organization: New Perspectives on Organizational Change. Sage Publications, 1994, pp. 91–107. University of Michigan, USA.
  • Kormelink, T.G.; and Meijer, I.C. A user perspective on time spent: Temporal experiences of everyday news use. Journalism Studies, 21, 2 (2020), 271–286.
  • Kreps, S.; McCain, R.M.; and Brundage, M. All the news that’s fit to fabricate: AI-generated text as a tool of media misinformation. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 9, 1 (2022), 104–117.
  • Latzer, M.; and Just, N. Governance by and of algorithms on the internet: Impact and consequences. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020.
  • Lauter, D. Political moderates are having their moment. In LA Times, 2022. https://www.latimes.com/politics/newsletter/2022-09-09/moderates-matter-essential-politics. (accessed November 14, 2023).
  • Levy, R. Social media, news consumption, and polarization: Evidence from a field experiment. American Economic Review, 111, 3 (2021), 831–870.
  • Li, T.; Tang, Z.; Lu, T.; and Zhang, X.M. ‘Propose and review’: Interactive bias mitigation for machine classifiers. Working Paper. SSRN, 2022.
  • Longoni, C.; Fradkin, A.; Cian, L., and Pennycook, G. News from generative artificial intelligence is believed less. In 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. Seoul, 2022, pp. 97–106. Association for Computing Machinery.
  • McCombs, M.E.; and Shaw, D.L. The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36, 2 (1972), 176–187.
  • McConnell, C.; Margalit, Y.; Malhotra, N.; and Levendusky, M. The economic consequences of partisanship in a polarized era. American Journal of Political Science, 62, 1 (2018), 5–18.
  • McCoy, J.; and Somer, M. Overcoming polarization. Journal of Democracy, 32, 1 (2021), 6–21.
  • McKnight, D.H.; Liu, P.; and Pentland, B.T. Trust change in information technology products. Journal of Management Information Systems, 37, 4 (2020), 1015–1046.
  • Milligan, A. The Truth About Online Media Bias and Accuracy. In Fractl, 2022. https://www.frac.tl/online-media-bias-and-accuracy/ (accessed September 23, 2023).
  • Minas, R.K.; and Dennis, A.R. Visual background music: Creativity support systems with priming. Journal of Management Information Systems, 36, 1 (2019), 230–258.
  • Modgil, S.; Singh, R.K.; Gupta, S.; and Dennehy, D. A confirmation bias view on social media induced polarization during COVID-19. Information Systems Frontiers, 23, 6 (2021), 1–25.
  • Mont’Alverne, C.; Badrinathan, S.; Arguedas, A.R.; Toff, B.; Fletcher, R.; and Nielsen, R. Fair and balanced: What news audiences in four countries mean when they say they prefer impartial news. Journalism Studies, 24, 9 (2023), 1131–1148.
  • Morstatter, F.; Wu, L.; Yavanoglu, U.; Corman, S.R.; and Liu, H. Identifying framing bias in online news. ACM Transactions on Social Computing, 1, 2 (2018), 1–18.
  • Mosleh, M.; Pennycook, G.; and Rand, D.G. Self-reported willingness to share political news articles in online surveys correlates with actual sharing on Twitter. PLOS ONE, 15, 2 (2020), 1–9.
  • Muise, D.; Hosseinmardi, H.; Howland, B.; Mobius, M.; Rothschild, D.; and Watts, D.J. Quantifying partisan news diets in web and TV audiences. Science Advances, 8, 28 (2022), 1–11.
  • Mullainathan, S.; and Shleifer, A. The market for news. American Economic Review, 95, 4 (2005), 1031–1053.
  • Napoli, P.M. Back from the dead (again): The specter of the fairness doctrine and its lesson for social media regulation. Policy & Internet, 13, 2 (2021), 300–314.
  • Nelson, T.E. Emphasis framing and political decision making. In Oxford Encyclopedia of Political Decision-making, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.
  • Ng, K.C.; Tang, J.; and Lee, D. The effect of platform intervention policies on fake news dissemination and survival: An empirical examination. Journal of Management Information Systems, 38, 4 (2021), 898–930.
  • Ning, X.; Khuntia, J.; Kathuria, A.; and Konsynski, B.R. Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Cognitive Apportionment for Service Flexibility. In J.J. Xu, B. Zhu, X. Liu, M.J. Shaw, H. Zhang, and M. Fan (eds.), The Ecosystem of e-Business: Technologies, Stakeholders, and Connections, Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019, pp. 182–189.
  • Nisbet, E.C.; and Kamenchuk, O. Russian news media, digital media, informational learned helplessness, and belief in COVID-19 misinformation. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 33, 3 (2021), 571–590.
  • Ojala, M. Is the age of impartial journalism over? The neutrality principle and audience (dis) trust in mainstream news. Journalism Studies, 22, 15 (2021), 2042–2060.
  • Pan, Z.; and Kosicki, G. M. Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse. Political Communication, 10, 1 (1993), 55–75.
  • Ramshaw, G. PBS, NPR are dedicated to in-depth, unbiased reporting. In EU Daily, 2017. https://eu.dailycommercial.com/story/opinion/columns/2017/05/22/another-opinion-pbs-npr-are-dedicated-to-in-depth-unbiased-reporting/20822774007 (accessed December 1, 2023).
  • Raziuddin, A. A chatbot is secretly doing my job: On creating serviceable copy using ChatGPT. In The Atlantic, 2023. https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2023/02/use-openai-chatgpt-playground-at-work/673195 (accessed December 1, 2023).
  • Reuters, T. Reuters ranked as second most trusted news brand in Global Web Index report. In Reuters, 2022. https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSKCN1U62DU/ (accessed September 13, 2022).
  • Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. In Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2022, University of Oxford, UK, 2022.
  • Rinehart, A.; and Kung, E. K. Artificial intelligence in local news: A survey of us newsrooms’ AI readiness. In The Associated Press, 2022.
  • Scheufele, D.A.; and Tewksbury, D. Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication, 57, 1 (2007), 9–20.
  • Schoenmueller, V.; Netzer, O.; and Stahl, F. Frontiers: Polarized America: From political polarization to preference polarization. Marketing Science, 42, 1 (2023), 48–60.
  • Schumacher, G.M.; Scott, B.T.; Klare, G.R.; Cronin, F.C.; and Lambert, D.A. Cognitive processes in journalistic genres: Extending writing models. Written Communication, 6, 3 (1989), 390–407.
  • Shearer, E.; and Mitchell, A. Broad agreement in U.S. – even among partisans – on which news outlets are part of the ‘mainstream media’ In Pew Research Reports, 2021. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2021/05/07/broad-agreement-in-u-s-even-among-partisans-on-which-news-outlets-are-part-of-the-mainstream-media (accessed December 2, 2022).
  • Snyder, T. The American Abyss. In The New York Times, 2021. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/09/magazine/trump-coup.html (accessed January 13, 2023).
  • Suk, J.; Coppini, D.; Muñiz, C.; and Rojas, H. The more you know, the less you like: A comparative study of how news and political conversation shape political knowledge and affective polarization. Communication and the Public, 7, 1 (2022), 40–56.
  • Tappin, B.M.; Pennycook, G.; and Rand, D.G. Bayesian or biased? Analytic thinking and political belief updating. Cognition, 20, 4 (2020), 10–37.
  • Tsang, S.J. Cognitive discrepancy, dissonance, and selective exposure. Media Psychology, 22, 3 (2019), 394–417.
  • Turel, O.; and Osatuyi, B. Biased credibility and sharing of fake news on social media: Considering peer context and self-objectivity state. Journal of Management Information Systems, 38, 4 (2021), 931–958.
  • Wai, J.; and Perina, K. Expertise in journalism: Factors shaping a cognitive and culturally elite profession. Journal of Expertise, 1, 1 (2018), 57–78.
  • Yang, S. Media bias with asymmetric media quality. Applied Economics Letters, 29, 19 (2022), 1810–1814.
  • Young, B.M. Misperception and cognition in markets. Games, 13, 6 (2022), 71.
  • Westerwick, A.; Johnson, B.K.; and Knobloch-Westerwick, S. Confirmation biases in selective exposure to political online information: Source bias vs. content bias. Communication Monographs, 84, 3 (2017), 343–364.
  • Wichowsky, A.; and Condon, M. The effects of partisan framing on COVID-19 attitudes: Experimental evidence from early and late pandemic. Research & Politics, 9, 2 (2022), 1–4.
  • Ye, J., and Skiena, S. Mediarank: Computational ranking of online news sources. In A. Teredesai, and V. Kumar (eds.), Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. Anchorage, 2019, pp. 2469–2477. Association for Computing Machinery.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.