Impact of augmentative and alternative communication devices on families

References

• Allaire, J., Gressard, R., Blackman, J., & Hostler, S. (1991). Chil-dren with severe speech impairments: Caregiver survey of AAC use. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 7,248–255.
   Google Scholar
• Angelo, D. (1997). AAC in the family and home. In S. Glennen and D. DeCoste (Eds.), Handbook of augmentative and alternative communication (pp. 523–541). San Diego: Singular.
   Google Scholar
• Angelo, D., Jones, S., & Kokoska, S. (1995). A family perspective on augmentative and alternative communication: Families of young children. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 11, 193–201.
   Google Scholar
• Angelo, D., Kokoska, S., & Jones, S. (1996). A family perspective on augmentative and alternative communication: Families of adolescents and young adults. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 12, 13–20.
   Google Scholar
• Behrmann, M., Jones, J., & Wilds, M. (1989). Technology inter-vention for very young children with disabilities. Infants and Young Children, 1, 66–77.
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D., & Mirenda, P. (1998). Augmentative and alternative communication: Management of severe communication disor-ders in children and adults (2nd ed.). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Blackstone, S. (1993). Abandonment of assistive technology: What consumers need to know and professionals need to find out. Augmentative Communication News, 5(3), 2.
   Google Scholar
• Brofenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brotherson, M., & Goldstein, B. (1992). Time as a resource and constraint for parents of young children with disabilities: Impli-cations for early intervention services. Topics in Early Child-hood Special Education, 12, 508–527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryen, D., Slesaransky, G., & Baker, D. (1995). Augmentative communication and empowerment supports: A look at out-comes. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 11, 79–88.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, C. (1988). High tech tots: Technology for mobility, manip-ulation, communication, and learning in early childhood. Infants and Young Children, /, 66–73.
   Google Scholar
• Church, G., & Glennen, S. (1992). The handbook of assistive tech-nology. San Diego, CA: Singular.
   Google Scholar
• Cramer, S. (1992). Assistive technology training for special edu-cators. Technology and Disability 3,1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Donahue-Kilburg, G. (1992). Family-centered early intervention for communication disorders: Prevention and treatment. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen.
   Google Scholar
• Dunst, C., Trivette, C., & Deal, A. (1988). Enabling and empower-ing families: Principles and guidelines for practice. Cambridge, MA: Brookline.
   Google Scholar
• Fowler, F. (1993). Survey research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hetzroni, 0., & Harris, 0. (1996). Cultural aspects in the develop-ment of AAC users. Augmentative and Alternative Communi-cation, /2,52–58.
   Google Scholar
• Hofmann, A. (1988). Funding: How you can make it work. In C. A. Costor (Ed.), Planning and implementing augmentative com-munication services delivery (pp. 80–93). Washington, DC: RESNA Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huer, M., & Lloyd, L. (1990). AAC users' perspectives on aug-mentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 6,242–249.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, S., Angelo, D., & Kokoska, S. (1998). Stressors and family supports: Families with children using augmentative and alter- native communication technology. Journal of Children's Com-munication Development, 20(2), 37–44.
   Google Scholar
• Judd, C., Smith, E., & Kidder, L. (1991). Research methods in social relations (6th ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Judge, S. L. (1999). Providing access to assistive technology for young children and families. In S. L. Judge & H. P. Parette (Eds.), Assistive technology for young children with disabilities: A guide to providing family-centered services (pp. 233–252). Cambridge, MA: Brookline.
   Google Scholar
• Margalit, M. (1990). Effective technology integration for disabled children: The family perspective. New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Parette, H. P. (1993). High risk infant case management and assis-tive technology: Funding and family enabling perspectives. Maternal-Child Nursing Journal, 2/, 53–64.
   Google Scholar
• Parette, H. P., & Angelo, D. (1996). Augmentative and alternative communication impact on families: Trends and future directions. Journal of Special Education, 30(1), 77–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parette, H., & Angelo, D. (1998). Impact of assistive technology devices on families. In S. L. Judge & H. P. Parette (Eds.), Assis-tive technology for young children with disabilities: A guide to providing family-centered services (pp. 148–183). Cambridge, MA: Brookline.
   Google Scholar
• Parette, H. P., Hofmann, A., & VanBiervliet, A. (1994). The profes-sional's role in obtaining assistive technology for infants and tod-dlers with disabilities. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 26,22–28.
   Google Scholar
• Parette, H. P., & VanBiervliet, A. (1990a). Rehabilitation technol-ogy issues for infants and young children with disabilities: A pre-liminary examination. Journal of Rehabilitation, 57,27–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parette, H. P., & VanBiervliet, A. (1990b). A prospective inquiry of the technology needs and practices of school-aged children with disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 10, 198–206.
   Google Scholar
• Parette, H. P., VanBiervliet, A., Brotherson, M., Huer, M., Stuart, S., Hoge, D., Hostetler, S., Dunn, N., & Wommack, J. (1996, December). Family-centered augmentative and alternative com-munication issues: Implications across cultures. Paper pre-sented to the International Early Childhood Conferences on Children with Special Needs, Phoenix, AZ.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, B. (1991). Technology abandonment: From the consumer point of view. Washington, DC: Request Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, B., & Zhoa, H. (1993). Predictors of assistive technology abandonment. Assistive Technology, 5,36–45.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Silverman, F. (1995). Communication for the speechless (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Soto, G., Huer, M., & Taylor, 0. (1997). Multicultural issues. In L. Lloyd, D. Fuller, & H. Arvidson (Eds.), Augmentative and alter-native communication (pp. 406–413). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, 0. (1994). Communication and communication disorders in a multicultural society. In F. Minifie (Ed.), Introduction to com-munication sciences and disorders (pp. 43–76). San Diego: Sin-gular.
   Google Scholar
• Turnbull, A., & Turnbull, H. (1990). Families, professionals, and exceptionality: A special partnership (2nd ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• VanDyck, M., Allaire, J., & Gressard, R. (1990). AAC decision-making. Communication Outlook, 11(4), 12–14.
   Google Scholar
• Zangari, C., & Wasson, C. (1997). Service delivery and funding. In L. Lloyd, D. Fuller, & H. Arvidson (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication. A handbook of principles and prac-tices (pp. 389–405). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar