Performance of Typically Developing Four- and Five-Year-Old Children with AAC Systems using Different Language Organization Techniques

References

• Bauer, P. J., & Mandler, J. M. (1989). Taxonomies and triads: Conceptual organization in one- to two-year-olds. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 156–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beals, D. E. (1997). Sources of support for learning words in conversation: Evidence from mealtimes. Journal of Child Language, 24, 673–694.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beals, D. E., & Tabors, P. O. (1995). Arboretum, bureau-cratic, and carbohydrates: Preschoolers' exposure to rare vocabulary at home. First Language, 15, 57–76.
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D. (1991). Magic and cost of communicative competence. Augmentative and Alternative Communica-tion, 7, 2–10.
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D., & Mirenda, P. (1998). Augmentative and alternative communication: Management of severe com-munication disorders in children and adults (2nd edn). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Blackstone, S. (1993). Thinking a little harder about communication displays. Augmentative Communication News, 6(1), 1–3.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, F. (1991). DynaSyms. Unity, ME: Poppin and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Case, R. (1978). Piaget and beyond: Toward a developmen-tally based theory and technology of instruction. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 167–228). Hillsdale, Hi: Lawrence Erlbaum Associ-ates.
   Google Scholar
• DeGroot, A., & Keijzer, R. (2000). What is hard to learn is easy to forget: The roles of word concreteness, cognate status, and word frequency in foreign-language vocabulary learning and forgetting. Language Learning, 50,1–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drager, K., Light, J., Speltz, J., Fallon, K., & Jeffries, L. (2003). The performance of typically developing 21/2-year-olds on dynamic display AAC technologies with different system layouts and language organizations. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 46, 298–312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elder, P. (1987). Assessment for semantic compaction competency. Proceedings of the Third Annual Minspeak Conference. Wooster, OH: Prentke Romich Co.
   Google Scholar
• Fallon, K., Light, J., & Achenbach, A. (2003). The semantic organization patterns of young children: Implications for augmentative and alternative communication. Augmenta-tive and Alternative Communication, 19, 74–85.
   Google Scholar
• Glennen, S. (1997). Augmentative and alternative commu-nication assessment strategies. In S. Glennen & D. DeCoste (Eds.), Handbook of Augmentative and Alter-native Communication. (pp. 149-192). San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Goossens', C. (1989). Aided communication intervention before assessment: A case study of a child with cerebral palsy. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 5, 14–26.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Balti-more: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, D. J. (1995). Use of nondisabled subjects in AAC research: Confessions of a research infidel. Aug-mentative and Alternative Communication, 11, 2–5.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, M., Bransford, J., Nyberg, S., & Cleary, J. (1972). Comprehension factors in interpreting memory for abstract and concrete sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 451–454.
   Google Scholar
• Krackow, E., & Gordon, P. (1998). Are lions and tigers substitutes or associates? Evidence against slot-filler accounts of children's early categorizations. Child Devel-opment, 69, 347–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, J. (November, 1992). Cognitive science: Implications for clinical practice in augmentative and alternative communication. Mini-seminar presented at the American Speech Language Hearing Association annual conven-tion, San Antonio, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J. (1993). Teaching automatic linear scanning for computer access: A case study of a preschooler with severe physical and communication disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 12, 125–134.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J. (1997). "Communication is the essence of human life": Reflections on communicative competence. Aug-mentative and Alternative Communication, 13, 61–70.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J. (1999). Do augmentative and alternative commu-nication interventions really make a difference?: The challenges of efficacy research. Augmentative and Alter-native Communication, 15, 13–24.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., & Drager, K. (2002). Improving the design of augmentative and alternative communication technolo-gies for young children. Assistive Technology, 14( 1), 17–32.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Light, J., Drager, K., Baker, S., McCarthy, J., Rhoads, S., & Ward, M. (August 2000). The performance of typically-developing five-year-olds on AAC technologies. Poster presented at the biennial conference of the International Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communica-tion (ISAAC), Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., Drager, K., Carlson, R., D'Silva, K., & Mellott, S. (2002). A comparison of the performance of five-year-old children using iconic encoding in AAC systems with and without icon prediction. Manuscript in preparation.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., Drager, K., Curran, J., Fallon, K., & Zuskin, L. (August 2000). The performance of typically-developing two-year-olds on AAC technologies. Poster presented at the biennial conference of the International Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communication (ISAAC), Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., Drager, K., D'Silva, K., & Kent-Walsh, J. (2000). The performance of typically developing four-year-olds on an icon matching task. Unpublished manuscript, The Pennsylvania State University.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., Drager, K., Burki, B., D'Silva, K., Haley, A., Hartnett, R., Panek, E., Worah, S., & Hammer, C. (2003). Young children's graphic representations of early emerging language concepts: Implications for AAC. Manu-script in preparation.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., Drager, K., Larsson. B., Pitkin, L., & Stopper, G. (August 2000). The performance of typically-developing three-year-olds on AAC technologies. Poster presented at the biennial conference of the International Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communication (ISAAC), Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., Drager, K., Millar, D., Parrish, C., & Parsons, A. (August 2000). The performance of typically-developing four-year-olds on AAC technologies. Poster presented at the biennial conference of the International Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communication (ISAAC), Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J. & Lindsay, P. (1992). Message encoding techniques in augmentative communication systems: The recall performances of nonspeaking physically disabled adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 35, 853— 864.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., & Lindsay, P. (1991). Cognitive science and augmentative and alternative communication. Augmenta-tive and Alternative Communication, 7, 186–203.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., Lindsay, P., Siegel, L., & Parnes, P. (1990). The effects of message encoding techniques on recall by literate adults using augmentative communication sys-tems. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 6, 184–202.
   Google Scholar
• Lucariello, J. (1998). Together wherever we go: The ethnographic child and the developmentalist. Child Development, 69, 355 — 357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucariello, J., Kyratzis, A., & Nelson, K. (1992). Taxonomic knowledge: What kind and when? Child Development, 3, 978— 998.
   Google Scholar
• Lund, S., Millar, D., Herman, M., Hinds, A., & Light, J. (November, 1998). Children's pictorial representations of early emerging concepts: Implications for AAC. Poster presented at the American Speech Language Hearing Association Annual Convention, San Antonio, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Marschark, M., Richman, C., Yuille, J., & Hunt, R. (1987). The role of imagery in memory: On shared and distinctive information. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 28–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J.M. (1981). Assessing language production in children: Experimental procedures. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, K. (1996). Language in cognitive development: Emergence of the mediated mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oxley, J., & Norris, J. (2000). Children's use of memory strategies: Relevance to voice output communication aid use. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 16, 9–94.
   Google Scholar
• Prentke Romich Company. (1997). UNITYTm condensed version alphabetical vocabulary sort. Wooster, OH: Pre-ntke Romich Co.
   Google Scholar
• Reichle, J., Dettling, E. E., Drager, K. D. R., & Leiter, A. (2000). A comparison of correct responses and response latency for fixed and dynamic displays: Performance of a learner with severe developmental disabilities. Augmenta-tive and Alternative Communication, 16, 154 — 163.
   Google Scholar
• Reichle, J., York, J., & Sigafoos, J. (1991). Implementing augmentative and alternative communication: Strategies for learners with severe disabilities. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Valot, L. (1995). BUILLDTM ( Bringing UnityTM into language and learning development) curriculum guide. Wooster, OH: Prentke Romich Company.
   Google Scholar
• Vanderheiden, G., & Lloyd, L. (1986). Communication systems and their components. In S. Blackstone (Ed.), Augmentative communication: An introduction. (pp. 49 — 161). Rockville, MD: American Speech Language Hear-ing Association.
   Google Scholar
• Weizman, Z. O., & Snow, C. E. (2001). Lexical input as related to children's vocabulary acquisition: Effects of sophisticated exposure and support for meaning. Devel-opmental Psychology, 37, 265–279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar