Accessible Reading Intervention: A Work in Progress

References

• Aaron, P. (1997). The impending demise of the discrepancy formula. Review of Educational Research, 67, 461 —502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aaron, P., & Joshi, R. (1992). Reading problems: Consulta-tion and remediation. New York: The Guildford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, E., & Blachman, B. (1991). Does phoneme awareness training in kindergarten make a difference in early word recognition and developmental spelling? Reading Re-search Quarterly, 26, 49–66.
   Google Scholar
• Berninger, V., & Gans, B. (1986). Language profiles in nonspeaking individuals of normal intelligence with severe cerebral palsy. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 2, 45— 50.
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D., & Mirenda, P. (1998). Augmentative and alternative communication: Management of severe com-munication disorders in children and adults. (2nd edn.). Baltimore: Paul H. Brooks.
   Google Scholar
• Bird, J., & Bishop, D. (1992). Perception and awareness of phonemes in phonologically impaired children. European Journal of Disorders of Communication, 27, 289–311.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bird, J., Bishop, D., & Freeman, N. (1995). Phonological awareness and literacy development in children with expressive phonological impairments. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38, 446–462.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bus, A., van Ijzendoorn, M., & Pellegrini, A. (1995). Joint book reading makes success in learning to read: A meta-analysis on intergenerational transmission of literacy. Review of Educational Research, 65, 1 — 21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, B., & Fielding-Barnsley, R. (1993). Recognition of phoneme invariance by beginning readers. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15, 315–324.
   Google Scholar
• Castles, A., & Coltheart, M. (1993). Varieties of develop-mental dyslexia. Cognition, 47, 149–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catts, H. (1993). The relationship between speech-language impairments and reading disabilities. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 948–958.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Catts, H., & Kamhi, A. (1999). Causes of reading disabilities. In H. Catts & A. Kamhi (Eds.), Language and reading disabilities (pp. 95–127). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Center, Y., & Ward, J. (1984). Integration of mildly handicapped cerebral palsied children into regular schools. Exceptional Children, 31, 104–113.
   Google Scholar
• Clay, M. (1987). Learning to be learning disabled. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 22, 155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P., & Haller, M. (1993). Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. Psychological Review, 100, 589–608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cupples, L. (2002, July). Assessment and rernediation of reading: Theory and practice. Paper presented at the Australian Linguistics Institute, Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Cupples, L., & Iacono, T. (2002). The efficacy of 'whole word' versus 'analytic' reading instruction for children with Down syndrome. Reading and Writing: An Inter-disciplinary Journal, 15, 549–574.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlgren Sandberg, A. (2001). Reading and spelling, phonological awareness, and working memory in children with severe speech impairments: A longitudinal study. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 17,11–26.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlgren Sandberg, A., & Hjelmquist, E. (1996). A comparative, descriptive study of reading and writing skills among non-speaking children: a preliminary study. European Journal of Disorders of Communication, 31, 289–308.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dunn, L., & Dunn, L. (1997). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test: Third Edition. Circle Pines, MN: American Gui-dance Service.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, K., & Hanser, G. (2002, August). The adolescent literacy learning link: An alternative teaching model. Workshop presented at the 10th biennial conference of the International Society for Augmentative and Alter-native Communication (ISAAC), Odense, Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, K. A., Koppenhaver, D. A., & Yoder, D. E. (1994). Literacy and adults with developmental disabilities. National Center on Adult Literacy Technical Report TR94-15, Philadelphia, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Flesch, R. (1948). A new readability yardstick. Journal of Applied Psychology, 32, 221–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foley, B., & Staples, A. (2003). Developing augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) and literacy interventions for adults with autism in a supported employment setting. Topics in Language Disorder, 23, 325–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gough, P., & Tunmer, W. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 6–10.
   Google Scholar
• Grove, N., Dockerell, J., & Woll, B. (1996). The two-word stage in manual signs: Language development in signers with intellectual disability. In S. von Tetzchner & M. Jensen (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communica-tion: European perspectives (pp. 101–118). London: Whurr.
   Google Scholar
• Iacono, T., Balandin, S., & Cupples, L. (2001). Focus group discussions of literacy assessments and web-based reading interventions. Augmentative and Alternative Communica-tion, 17, 27–36.
   Google Scholar
• Iacono, T., & Cupples, L. (2002, August). Language bases in literacy development: The challenge for people who use AAC. Paper presented at the ISAAC Research Sympo-sium, Odense, Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Iacono, T., & Cupples, L. (in press). Assessment of phonemic awareness and word reading skills in adults with complex communication needs. Journal of Speech-Language Hear-ing Research, in press
   Google Scholar
• Iacono, T., Cupples, L., Balandin, S., & Cassidy, S. (2001). Website access for literacy development in individuals with disability (Final Report). Canberra: Department of Communications Information Technology and the Arts.
   Google Scholar
• Iacono, T., Cupples, L., Balandin, S., & Cassidy, S. (n.d.). Website access for literacy development in individuals with disability. Retrieved 30 August, 2003 from http:// cddh.med.monash.edu.au/ (link - AccessAbility).
   Google Scholar
• Iacono, T., Cupples, L., Balandin, S., & Johnson, H. (2002). Enhancing intemet activities and reading skills of indivi-duals with disability (Final Report). Canberra: Depart-ment of Communications Information Technology and the Arts.
   Google Scholar
• Iacono, T., Cupples, L., Balandin, S., & Johnson, H. (n.d.). Enhancing intemet activities and reading skills of indivi-duals with disability. Retrieved 30 August, 2003 from http://cddh.med.monash.edu.au/ (link - AccessAbility).
   Google Scholar
• Kamhi, A., & Catts, H. (1999). Reading development. In H. Catts & A. Kamhi (Eds.), Language and reading disabilities (pp. 25–49). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Koppenhaver, D., Evans, D., & Yoder, D. (1991). Child-hood reading and writing experiences of literate adults with severe speech and motor impairments. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 7, 20–33.
   Google Scholar
• Koppenhaver, D., Pierce, P., Steelman, J., & Yoder, D. (1995). Contexts of early literacy intervention for children with developmental disabilities. In M. Fey, J. Windsor & S. Warren (Eds.), Language intervention: Preschool through the elementary years (pp. 241–274). Baltimore: Paul H. Brooks.
   Google Scholar
• Koppenhaver, D., & Yoder, D. (1993). Classroom literacy instruction for children with severe speech impairment (SSPI). What is and what might be. Topics in Language Disorders, 13, 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liberman, I., Shankweiler, D., & Liberman, A. (1992). The alphabet principle and learning to read. In D. Shankwei-ler & L. Liberman (Eds.), Phonology and reading disability: Solving the reading puzzle (pp. 1–33). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J. (1997). "Let's go star fishing": Reflections on the contexts of language learning for children who use aided AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 13, 158–171.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., Binger, C., & Kelford Smith, A. (1994). Story reading interactions between preschoolers who use AAC and their mothers. Augmentative and Alternative Commu-nication, 10, 255–268.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., & Kelford Smith, A. (1993). Home literacy experiences of preschoolers who use AAC systems and of their nondisabled peers. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 9, 10–25.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., & McNaughton, D. (1993). Literacy and augmen-tative and alternative communication (AAC): The ex-pectations and priorities of parents and teachers. Topics in Language Disorders, 13, 33–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinsen, H., & von Tetzchner, S. (1996). Situating augmentative and alternative communication interven-tion. In S. von Tetzchner & M. Hygum-Jensen (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication: European perspectives (pp. 49–64). London: Whurr.
   Google Scholar
• Morais, J., Crary, L., Alegria, J., & Bertelson, P. (1979). Does awareness of speech as a sequence of phones arise spontaneously? Cognition, 7, 323–331.
   Google Scholar
• Musselwhite, C., & King DeBaun, P. (1997). Emergent literacy success: Merging technology and whole language for students with disabilities. Park City, UT: Creative Communicating.
   Google Scholar
• National Reading Panel(2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research litera-ture on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Retrieved August 30, 2003 from http://www.nichd.nih. gov/publications/nrp/smallbook.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Nunes, L., Tubagi, S., Rodrigues, R., & Almeida, F. (2002, August). Developing literacy skills in AAC users in Brazil. Poster presented at the 10th biennial conference of the International Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communication, Odense, Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Scarborough, H., & Dobrich, W. (1994). On the efficacy of reading to preschoolers. Developmental Review, 14, 245–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, R. (2002, August). Changing views about AAC users: Poor speller' to 'creative composer' Paper presented at the 10th biennial conference of the International Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communication, Odense, Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, L. (1998). The discrepancy formula: Its use and abuse. In B. Shapiro, P. Accardo & A. Capute (Eds.), Specific reading disability: A view of the whole spectrum (pp. 123–135). Timonium, MD: York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. (1989). Reading without speech: A study of children with cerebral palsy. The Irish Journal of Psychology, 10, 601–614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M. (1992). Reading abilities of nonspeaking students: Two case studies. Augmentative and Alternative Commu-nication, 8, 57–66.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, C., Burns, S., & Griffin, P. (Eds.). (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. (1991). Discrepancy definitions of reading disability: Has intelligence led us astray? Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 7–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K., & Siegel, L. (1994). Phenotypic performance profiles of children with reading disabilities: A regression-based test of the phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 24–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton, A., Soto, G., & Blockberger, S. (2002). Grammatical issues in graphic symbol communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18, 192–204.
   Google Scholar
• Torgesen, J. (1998). Instructional interventions for children with reading disabilities. In B. Shapiro, P. Accardo & A. Capute (Eds.), Specific reading disability: A view of the whole spectrum (pp. 197–220). Timonium, MD: York Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Balkom, H., & Welle Donker-Gimbrere, M. (1996). A psycholinguistic approach to graphic language use. In S. von Tetzchner & M. Jensen (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication: European perspectives. (pp. 153–170). London: Whurr.
   Google Scholar
• Vandervelden, M., & Siegel, L. (1999). Phonological proces-sing and literacy in AAC users and students with motor speech impairments. Augmentative and Alternative Com-munication, 15, 191–211.
   Google Scholar
• Vandervelden, M., & Siegel, L. (2001). Phonological proces-sing in written word learning: Assessment for children who use augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 17, 37–51.
   Google Scholar
• Vellutino, F., Scanlon, S., Sipay, E., Small, S., Chen, R., Pratt, A., & Denckla, M. (1996). Cognitive profiles of difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor read-ers: Early intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as basic causes of specific reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 601–638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, R., & Torgeson, J. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 192–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, M. (1981). Introduction. In C. Nolan, Darn-burst of dreams. London: Pan Books.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, M. (1994). Literacy: The key to freedom. Alter-natively Speaking, 1(2), 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• World Wide Web Consortium (n.d.). W3C World Wide Web Consortium. Retrieved April 22 2003 from http:// www.w3.org/.
   Google Scholar