Augmentative and Alternative Communication use and acceptance by adults with Traumatic Brain Injury

References

• Ball L., Beukelman D., Pattee G. Acceptance of augmentative and alternative communication technology by persons with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 2004; 20: 113–122
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman D., Burke R., Yorkston K. Dysarthria and brain injury. Assisting survivors of traumatic brain injury: The role of speech-language-pathologists, K. Hux. Pro-ed, Austin, TX 2003; 135–168
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman D., Fager S., Ullman C., Hanson E., Logemann J. The impact of speech supplementation and clear speech on the intelligibility and speaking rate of people with traumatic brain injury. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology 2002; 10: 237–242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beukelman D., Mirenda P. Augmentative and alternative communication: Management of severe communication disorders in children and adults(2nd ed.). Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore, MD 1998
   Google Scholar
• Bruno J. Customizing a minspeak system for a preliterate child: A case example. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1989; 5: 89–100
   Google Scholar
• DeRuyter F., Becker M. R. Augmentative communication: Assessment, system selection, and usage. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1988; 3(2)35–44
   Google Scholar
• DeRuyter F., Donoghue K. Communication and traumatic brain injury: A case study. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1989; 5: 49–54
   Google Scholar
• DeRuyter F., Kennedy M. R. T. Augmentative communication following traumatic brain injury. Communication disorders following traumatic brain injury, D. R. Beukelman, K. M. Yorkston. Pro-ed, Austin, TX 1991
   Google Scholar
• DeRuyter F., Lafontaine L. The nonspeaking brain injured: A clinical and demographic database report. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1987; 3: 18–25
   Google Scholar
• Dongilli P. A., Hakel M. E., Beukelman D. R. Recovery of functional speech following traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1992; 7(2)91–101
   Google Scholar
• Doyle M., Kennedy M. R. T., Jausalaitis G., Phillips B. AAC and traumatic brain injury. Augmentative and alternative communication for adults with acquired neurologic disorders, D. R. Beukelman, K. M. Yorkston, J. Reichle. Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore, MD 2000; 271–304
   Google Scholar
• Enderby P., Crow E. Long-term recovery patterns of severe dysarthria following head injury. British Journal of Disordered Communication 1990; 23: 341–354
   Google Scholar
• Fager S. Paper presented at the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association's annual convention. Transitional Issues in TBI. Chicago, IL 2003
   Google Scholar
• Fried-Oken M., Doyle M. Language representation for the augmentative and alternative communication of adults with traumatic brain injury. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1992; 7(3)59–69
   Google Scholar
• Hagen C. Language-cognitive disorganization following closed head injury: A conceptualization. Cognitive rehabilitation: Conceptualization and intervention, L. E. Trexler. Plenum, New York 1982; 131–151
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh M., Luo C. Morse code typing training of an adolescent with cerebral palsy using microcomputer technology: Case study. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1999; 15: 216–221
   Google Scholar
• Hux K., Gutmann M. Augmentative and alternative communication and assistive technology: Bridging cognitive and communication gaps for survivors of TBI. Assisting survivors of traumatic brain injury: The role of speech-language pathologists, K. Hux. Pro-ed, Austin, TX 2003; 169–199
   Google Scholar
• Hux K., Manasse N. Assessment and treatment of cognitive-communication impairments. Assisting survivors of traumatic brain injury: The role of speech-language pathologists, K. Hux. Pro-ed, Austin, TX 2003; 93–133
   Google Scholar
• Hux K., Burke R., Elliot J., Ross R., Hrnicek T. Communication interaction differences between natural speakers and AAC users with traumatic brain injury. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology 2001; 9: 71–86
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordon F., Murdoch B. Unexpected recovery of functional communication following a prolonged period of mutism post-head injury. Brain Injury 1990; 4: 101–110
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jordon F., Ozanne A., Murdoch B. Long term speech and language disorders subsequent to closed head injury in children. Brain Injury 1988; 2: 179–185
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Keenan J., Barnhart K. Development of yes/no systems in individuals with severe traumatic brain injuries. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1993; 9: 184–190
   Google Scholar
• Keetley A., Wirtz S. Is 20 years too long? Improving intelligibility in long-standing dysarthria—a single case treatment study. European Journal of Disordered Communication 1994; 29(2)183–201
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ladtkow M., Culp D. Augmentative communication with the traumatically brain injured population. Augmentative communication in the medical setting, K. Yorkston. Communication Skill Builders, Tucson, AZ 1992; 139–243
   Google Scholar
• Lafontaine L. M., DeRuyter F. The nonspeaking cerebral palsied: A clinical and demographic database report. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1987; 3: 153–162
   Google Scholar
• Lasker J. Effects of storytelling mode on partners' communicative ratings of an adult with aphasia. 1997, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Nebraska-Lincoln
   Google Scholar
• Levine S. P., Horstmann H. M., Kirsch N. L. Performance considerations for people with cognitive impairment in accessing assistive technologies. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1992; 7(3)46–58
   Google Scholar
• Light J., Beesley M., Collier B. Transition through multiple augmentative and alternative communication systems: A three-year case study of a head-injured adolescent. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1988; 4: 2–14
   Google Scholar
• Light J., Lindsay P., Siegel L., Parnes P. The effects of message encoding techniques on recall by literate adults using AAC systems. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1990; 6: 184–201
   Google Scholar
• Mathy P., Yorkston K., Gutmann M. AAC for individuals with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Augmentative and Alternative Communication for Adults with Acquired Neurologic Disorders, D. Beukelman, K. Yorkston, J. Reichle. Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore, MD 2000; 183–229
   Google Scholar
• Murphy J., Markova I., Moodie E., Scott J., Boa S. Augmentative and alternative communication systems used by people with cerebral palsy in Scotland: Demographic survey. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1995; 11: 26–36
   Google Scholar
• Sbordone R. J. Assessment and treatment of cognitive-communicative impairments in the closed-head-injury patient: A neurobehavioral-systems approach. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1988; 3(2)55–62
   Google Scholar
• Smith M., Ford A. A user's perspective on augmentative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1987; 3: 12–17
   Google Scholar
• Trefler E., Crislip D. No aid, an Etran, a Minspeak: A comparison of efficiency and effectiveness during structured use. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1985; 1: 151–155
   Google Scholar
• Workinger M., Netsell R. Restoration of intelligible speech 13 years post head injury. Brain Injury 1992; 6: 183–187
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ylvisaker M. Language and communication disorders following pediatric head injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1986; 1: 48–56
   Google Scholar