Brevity and speed of message delivery trade-offs in augmentative and alternative communication

References

• Alm N., Morrison A., Arnott L. A communication system based on scripts, plans and goals for enabling nonspeaking people to conduct telephone conversations. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Vancouver, BCCanada, October, 1995; 2408–2412
   Google Scholar
• The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language. 2000, American Heritage Dictionaries. Retrieved June 14, 2006, from http://www.bartleby.com/61/
   Google Scholar
• Beck A. R., Bock S., Thompson J. R., Kosuwan K. Influence of communicative competence and augmentative and alternative communication technique on children's attitudes toward a peer who uses AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 2002; 18: 217–227
   Google Scholar
• Bedrosian J., Hoag L., McCoy K. Relevance and speed of message delivery trade-offs in augmentative and alternative communication. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 2003; 46: 800–817
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blockberger S., Armstrong R., O'Connor A., Freeman R. Children's attitudes toward a nonspeaking child using various augmentative and alternative communication techniques. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1993; 9: 243–250
   Google Scholar
• Foulds R. Communication rates of nonspeech expression as a function in manual tasks and linguistic constraints. Proceedings of the International Conference on Rehabilitation Engineering. RESNA Press, Toronto 1980; 83–87
   Google Scholar
• Goldman-Eisler F. Psycholinguistics: Experiments in spontaneous speech. Academic Press, New York 1968
   Google Scholar
• Grice H. P. Logic and conversation. Syntax and semantics: speech acts, P. Cole, J. Morgan. Academic Press, New York 1975; 3: 41–58
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham D. J., Wilkins D. P. Slipping through the timestream: Social issues of time and timing in augmented interactions. Constructing (in) competence: Disabling evaluations in clinical and social interaction, D. Kovarsky, J. Duchan, M. Maxwell. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, Mahwah, New Jersey 1999
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham D. J., Moulton B. J., Lesher G. W., Wilkins D. P., Cornish J. Frametalker: Development of a frame-based communication system. Proceedings of the California State University Northridge Technology and Persons with Disability Conference. California State University, Northridge 2000, Retrieved June 17, 2006, from http://www.csun.edu/cod/conf/2000/proceedings/0156Higginbotham.htm
   Google Scholar
• Hoag L., Bedrosian J., McCoy K., Johnson D. Informativeness and speed of message delivery trade-offs in augmentative and alternative communication. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 2004; 47: 1270–1285
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holtgraves T. M., Grayer A. I am not a crook: Effects of denials on perceptions of a defendant's guilt, personality and motives. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 1994; 24: 2132–2150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell D. C. Statistical methods for psychology (5th edn.). Duxbury Press, Belmont, CA 2002
   Google Scholar
• Hulley S. B., Cummings S. R. Designing clinical research. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, MD 1988
   Google Scholar
• Johnston S., Reichle J., Evans J. Supporting augmentative and alternative communication use by beginning communicators with severe disabilities. American Journal of Speech Language Pathology 2004; 13(1)20–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons J. Semantics Volume 1. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1977
   Google Scholar
• Matarazzo J. D., Weins A. N. Interview influence on the duration of interviewee silence. Journal of Experimental Research in Personality 1967; 2: 56–69
   Google Scholar
• Mayer R. E., Moreno R. Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist 2003; 38: 43–52
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin M., Cody M. Awkward silences: Behavioral antecedents and consequences of conversational lapse. Human Computer Research 1982; 8: 299–316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merritt M. Repetition in situated discourse—Exploringits form and functions. Repetition in discourse: Interdisciplinary perspectives, B. Johnstone. Ablix Publishing Corporation, Norwood, NJ 1994; 1: 23–36
   Google Scholar
• Milliken G. A., Johnson D. E. Analysis of messy data, volume I: Designed experiments. Chapman Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL 1993
   Google Scholar
• Mooney D. Generating high level structure for extended explanations. University of Delaware, (1993). Unpublished doctoral dissertation
   Google Scholar
• Murphy K., Myors B. Statistical power analysis: A simple and general model for traditional and modern hypothesis tests. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ 1998
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom T. M. The relationship between the affective, behavioral, and cognitive components of attitude. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1969; 5: 12–30
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichman R. Conversational Coherency. Cognitive Science 1978; 2: 1978
   Google Scholar
• Reiter E. The computational complexity of avoiding conversational implicatures. Proceedings of the 28th annual meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics. 1990; 97–104, (ACL-1990)
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser R. W. The efficacy of augmentative and alternative communication: Toward evidence-based practice. Academic Press, New York, London 2003
   Google Scholar
• Shakespeare P. Aspects of confused speech. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 1998
   Google Scholar
• Shimanoff S. B. Communication rules: Theory and research. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA 1980
   Google Scholar
• Sidak Z. Rectangular confidence regions for the means of multivariate normal distributions. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1967; 62: 626–633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sperber D., Wilson D. Relevance. Basil Blackwell Ltd., OxfordUK 1986
   Google Scholar
• Tannen D. Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1989
   Google Scholar
• Todman J., Alm N. TALK Boards for social conversation. Communication Matters 1997; 11: 13–15
   Google Scholar
• Vanderheyden P. B. An augmentative communication interface based on conversational schemata. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence 1995 Workshop on Developing AI Applications for Disabled People. 1995; 203–212
   Google Scholar
• Wiemann J. M. Explication and test of a model of communicative competence. Human Communication Research 1977; 3: 195–213
   Google Scholar
• Wong J. Repetition in conversation: A look at “first and second sayings”. Research on Language and Social Interaction 2000; 33: 407–424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar