The Swedish speech interpretation service: An exploratory study of a new communication support provided to people with aphasia

References

• Ahlsén E. Conversational principles and aphasic communication. Journal of Pragmatics 1993; 19: 57–70
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croteau C., Vychytil A. M., Larfeuil C., Le Dorze G. “Speaking for” behaviours in spouses of people with aphasia: A descriptive study of six couples in an interview situation. Aphasiology 2004; 18: 291–312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Depoy E., Gitlin L. N. Introduction to research. Understanding and applying multiple strategies. Mosby, St. Louis, MO 1998
   Google Scholar
• Garrett K. L. Adults with severe aphasia. Augmentative and alternative communication: Management of severe communication disorders in children and adults, D. R. Beukelman, P. Mirenda. Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore, MD 1998; 465–499
   Google Scholar
• Garrett K. L., Beukelman D. L. Augmentative communication approaches for persons with severe aphasia. Augmentative communication in the medical setting, K. M. Yorkston. Communication Skill Builders, Tucson, AZ 1992; 245–337
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin C. Co-constructing meaning in conversations with an aphasic man. Research on Language and Social Interaction 1995; 28(3)233–260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafsteinsdóttir T. B., Grypdonck M. Being a stroke patient: A review of the literature. Journal of Advanced Nursing 1997; 26: 580–588
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handikappinstitutet [The Swedish Institute for Disabled Persons]. Project Taltjänst [The Swedish Speech Interpretation Project]. Handikappinstitutet, Bromma 1989
   Google Scholar
• Hilari K., Wiggins R. D., Roy P., Byng S., Smith S. Predictors of health-related quality of life (HRQL) in people with chronic aphasia. Aphasiology 2003; 17: 365–381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kagan A. Revealing the competence of aphasic adults through conversation: A challenge to health professionals. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 1995; 2(1)15–28
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kagan A. Supported conversation for adults with aphasia: methods and resources for training conversation partners. Aphasiology 1998; 12: 816–830
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kearns K. P. Qualitative research methods in aphasia: a welcome addition. Aphasiology 1999; 13: 649–650
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraat A. Augmentative and alternative communication: does it have a future in aphasia rehabilitation?. Aphasiology 1990; 4: 321–338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kielhofner G. Model of human occupation (3rd ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA 2002
   Google Scholar
• Kvale S. InterViews. Sage Publications, London 1996
   Google Scholar
• Lasker J. P., Bedrosian J. L. Acceptance of AAC by adults with acquired disorders. Augmentative and alternative communication for adults with acquired neurologic disorders, D. R. Beukelman, K. M. Yorkston, J. Reichle. Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore, MD 2000
   Google Scholar
• Lasker J. P., Bedrosian J. L. Promoting acceptance of augmentative and alternative communication by adults with acquired communication disorders. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 2001; 17: 141–153
   Google Scholar
• Le Dorze G., Brassard C. A description of the consequences of aphasia on aphasic persons and their relatives and friends, based on the WHO model of chronic diseases. Aphasiology 1995; 9: 239–255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln Y. S., Guba E. G. Naturalistic inquiry. Sage, Newbury Park, CA 1985
   Google Scholar
• Malterud K. Kvalitativa metoder i medicinsk forskning. [Qualitative methods in medical research.]. Studentlitteratur, Lund 1998
   Google Scholar
• Malterud K. Qualitative research: Standards, challenges, and guidelines. Lancet 2001; 358: 483–488
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross K. B., Wertz R. T. Relationships between language-based disability and quality of life in chronically aphasic adults. Aphasiology 2002; 16: 791–800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross K. B., Wertz R. T. Quality of life with and without aphasia. Aphasiology 2003; 17: 355–364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Sandt-Koenderman M. High-tech AAC and aphasia: Widening horizons?. Aphasiology 2004; 18: 245–263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons-Mackie N. Social approaches to aphasia intervention. Language intervention strategies in aphasia and related neurogenic disorders, R. Chapey. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA 2001; 246–267, 4th ed
   Google Scholar
• Simmons-Mackie N., Kagan A. Communication strategies used by ‘good’ versus ‘poor’ speaking partners of individuals with aphasia. Aphasiology 1999; 13: 807–820
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons-Mackie N., Kingston D., Schultz M. “Speaking for another”: The management of participant frames in aphasia. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 2004; 13: 114–127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss A., Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA 1998
   Google Scholar
• Sundin K., Jansson L., Norberg A. Understanding between care providers and patients with stroke and aphasia: A phenomenological hermeneutic inquiry. Nursing Inquiry 2002; 9(2)93–103
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Worral L. E., Holland A. Editorial: Quality of life in aphasia. Aphasiology 2003; 17(4)329–332
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health ICF. WHO, Geneva 2001
   Google Scholar