1,257
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Experiences from a support group for families of preschool children in the expressive AAC user group

Pages 3-13 | Received 30 Sep 2016, Accepted 21 Dec 2016, Published online: 25 Jan 2017

References

  • Anderson, K.L., Balandin, S., & Stancliffe, R.J. (2015). Alternative service delivery models for families with a new speech-generating device: Perspectives of parents and therapists. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 17, 185–195. doi:10.3109/17549507.2014.979876
  • Askestad, A., & Berntsen, S.S. (2015). Episode eight. In J. S. Høiden (Ed.), Barneavdelingen [Children’s Ward]. Norway: ITV Studios.
  • Baxter, S., Enderby, P., Evans, P., & Judge, S. (2012). Barriers and facilitators to the use of high‐technology augmentative and alternative communication devices: A systematic review and qualitative synthesis. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 47, 115–129. doi:10.1111/j.1460-6984.2011.00090.x
  • Beukelman, D.R., & Mirenda, P. (2013). Augmentative and alternative communication: Supporting children and adults with complex communication needs (4th ed.). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
  • Binger, C., & Light, J. (2007). The effect of aided AAC modeling on the expression of multi-symbol messages by preschoolers who use AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23, 30–43. doi:10.1080/07434610600807470
  • Black, R., Waller, A., Turner, R., & Reiter, E. (2012). Supporting personal narrative for children with complex communication needs. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 19, 15:1–35. doi:10.1145/2240156.2240163
  • Bliss, C. (1965). Semantography (Blissymbolics). Sydney: Semantography Publications.
  • Broberg, M., Ferm, U., & Thunberg, G. (2012). Measuring responsive style in parents who use AAC with their children: Development and evaluation of a new instrument. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 28, 243–253. doi:10.3109/07434618.2012.740686
  • Bruner, J. (1983). Child’s talk. New York, NY: Norton.
  • Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Bøttcher, L., Stadskleiv, K., Berntsen, T., Christensen, K., Korsfelt, Å., Kihlgren, M., & Ôdman, P. (2016). Systematic cognitive monitoring of children with cerebral palsy: The development of an assessment and follow-up protocol. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 18, 304–315. doi:10.1080/15017419.2015.1091035
  • Clendon, S., & Anderson, K. (2016). Syntax and morphology in aided language development. In M. Smith & J. Murray (Eds.), The silent partner? Language interaction and aided communication (pp. 119–140). Guildford, UK: J&R Press.
  • Cockerill, H., Elbourne, D., Allen, E., Scrutton, D., Will, E., McNee, A., … Baird, G. (2014). Speech, communication and use of augmentative communication in young people with cerebral palsy: The SH&PE population study. Child: Care, Health and Development, 40, 149–157. doi:10.1111/cch.12066
  • DeWalt, K.M., & DeWalt, B.K. (2011). Participant observation: A guide for fieldworkers. (2nd ed.). Plymouth, UK: AltaMira Press.
  • Ferm, U., Andersson, M., Broberg, M., Liljegren, T., & Thunberg, G. (2011). Parents and course leaders’ experiences of the ComAlong augmentative and alternative communication. Disability Studies Quarterly, 31, doi:10.18061/dsq.v31i4.
  • Goldbart, J., & Marshall, J. (2004). “Pushes and Pulls” on the parents of children who use AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 20, 194–208. doi:10.1080/07434610400010960
  • Heggheim Nesse, S.A., Aven Lillehaug, H., Seeland, L., Stadskleiv, K. (2014). En god idé! … samling for fem barn som bruker øyestyring en lørdag i oktober. [A good idea! A gathering for five children using eye gaze a Saturday in October.]. Dialog, 2, 22–23.
  • Heggheim Nesse, S.A., & Stadskleiv, K. (2015). Erfaringer fra en barnesamling med ASK og øyestyring. [Experiences from a children’s gathering on AAC and eye gaze control]. Paper presented at the 12th National Conference of ISAAC Norway.
  • Higginbotham, D.J., Shane, H., Russell, S., & Caves, K. (2007). Access to AAC: Present, past, and future. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23, 243–257. doi:10.1080/07434610701571058
  • Hochstein, D.D., McDaniel, M.A., & Nettleton, S. (2004). Recognition of vocabulary in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy: A comparison of two speech coding schemes. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 20, 45–62. doi:10.1080/07434610410001699708
  • Iacono, T., & Cameron, M. (2009). Australian speech-language pathologists’ perceptions and experiences of augmentative and alternative communication in early childhood intervention. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 25, 236–249. doi:10.3109/07434610903322151
  • Karlsson, E., & Melltorp, M. (2006). Utvärdering av AKKTIV – Tidig intervention till föräldrar som har barn med omfattande kommunikationssvårigheter. [Evaluation of AKKTIV – Early intervention to parents who have children with comprehensive communicative challenges.] Opublicerad logopedexamensuppsats, [Unpublished masters thesis in speech language pathology]. Gothenburg University: Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Gothenburg.
  • Kent-Walsh, J., Binger, C., & Hasham, Z. (2010). Effects of parent instruction on the symbolic communication of children using augmentative and alternative communication during storybook reading. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 19, 97–107. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2010/09-0014)
  • Kent-Walsh, J., & McNaughton, D. (2005). Communication partner instruction in AAC: Present practices and future directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 21, 195–204. doi:10.1080/07434610400006646
  • Law of Education (1998). The Law of Education from November 27, 1998. Oslo: Ministry of Education.
  • Law of Social Security (1997). The Law of Social Security from May 1, 1997. Oslo: Ministry of Work and Social Welfare.
  • Lewin, M. (1987). Understanding psychological research. Malabar, FL.: Robert E. Krieger Publishing Company.
  • Liboiron, N., & Soto, G. (2006). Shared storybook reading with a student who uses alternative and augmentative communication: A description of scaffolding practices. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 22, 69–95. doi:10.1191/0265659006ct298oa
  • Light, J. (1997). “Let’s go star fishing”: Reflections on the contexts of language learning for children who use aided AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 13, 158–171. doi:10.1080/07434619712331277978
  • Light, J., & McNaughton, D. (2012). Supporting the communication, language, and literacy development of children with complex communication needs: State of the science and future research priorities. Assistive Technology, 24, 34–44. doi:10.1080/10400435.2011.648717
  • McNaughton, D., Rackensperger, T., Benedek-Wood, E., Krezman, C., Williams, M.B., & Light, J. (2008). “A child needs to be given a chance to succeed”: Parents of individuals who use AAC describe the benefits and challenges of learning AAC technologies. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24, 43–55. doi:10.1080/07434610701421007
  • Murray, J., & Goldbart, J. (2009). Augmentative and alternative communication: A review of current issues. Paediatrics and Child Health, 19, 464–468. doi:10.1016/j.paed.2009.05.003
  • Newton, C., Clarke, M., Donlan, C., Wright, J.A., Lister, C., & Cherguit, J. (2007). Parents’ expectations and perceptions concerning the provision of communication aids by the Communication Aids Project (CAP). Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 23, 47–65. doi:10.1177/0265659007072144
  • Pennington, L. (2009). Effects of it takes two to talk: The Hanen Program for parents of preschool children with cerebral palsy: Findings from an exploratory study. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 52, 1121–1138. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2009/07-0187)
  • Pepper, J., & Weitzman, E. (2004). It takes two to talk: A practical guide for parents of children with language delays. Toronto, Canada: The Hanen Center.
  • Skogdal, S. (2015). Læring gjennom samhandling. [Learning through cooperation.]. Paper presented at the 12th National Conference of ISAAC Norway.
  • Soto, G., Müller, E., Hunt, P., & Goetz, L. (2001). Critical issues in the inclusion of students who use augmentative and alternative communication: An educational team perspective. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 17, 62–72. doi:10.1080/aac.17.2.62.72
  • Stadskleiv, K. (2014). Assessment of cognitive processes in aided communicators. In S. von Tetzchner & J. Oxley (Eds.), Processes of aided language development in cognitively high-functioning children and adolescents. The twelfth Biennial Research Symposium of the International Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communication, Lisbon, Portugal.
  • Stadskleiv, K., Vik, T., Andersen, G.L., & Lien, E. (2015). Is cognition assessed appropriately in children with cerebral palsy? Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 57, 23. doi:10.1111/dmcn.12778_52
  • Stadskleiv, K., & von Tetzchner, S. (2016). Right versus reality: The use of aided communication. Paper presented at International Society on Early Intervention Conference, Stockholm, June 8–10, 2016.
  • Stadskleiv, K., von Tetzchner, S., Batorowicz, B., van Balkom, H., Dahlgren-Sandberg, A., & Renner, G. (2014). Investigating executive functions in children with severe speech and movement disorders using structured tasks. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–14. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00992
  • von Tetzchner, S. (2015). The semiotics of aided language development. Cognitive Development, 36, 180–190. doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2015.09.009
  • von Tetzchner, S., & Martinsen, H. (2000). Introduction to augmentative and alternative communication: Sign teaching and the use of communication aids for children, adolescents and adults with developmental disorders. London: Whurr/Wiley.
  • von Tetzchner, S., & Stadskleiv, K. (2016). Constructing a language in alternative forms. In M. Smith & J. Murray (Eds.), The silent partner? Language interaction and aided communication (pp. 17–34). Guildford, UK: J&R Press.
  • Wendelborg, C., & Tøssebro, J. (2010). Marginalisation processes in inclusive education in Norway: A longitudinal study of classroom participation. Disability and Society, 25, 701–714. doi:10.1080/09687599.2010.505744

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.