References
- Banajee, M., DiCarlo, C., & Buras-Stricklin, S.B. (2003). Core vocabulary determination for toddlers. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 19, 67–73. doi: https://doi.org/0.1080/0743461031000112034
- Beukelman, D.R., Jones, R., & Rowan, M. (1989). Frequency of word usage by nondisabled peers in integrated preschool classrooms. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 5, 243–248. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618912331275296
- Beukelman, D.R., & Mirenda, P. (2013). Augmentative and alternative communication: Management of severe communication disorders in children and adults (4th ed.). Baltimore, MD: Paul. H. Brookes.
- Boehm, A.E. (1986). Boehm Test of Basic Concepts-Revised. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
- Boehm, A.E. (2001). Boehm Test of Basic Concepts (3rd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
- Boehm, A.E. (2004). Assessment of basic relational concepts. In B. A. Bracken (Ed). The Psychoeducational Assessment of Preschool Children (3rd ed., pp. 186–203). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Boehm, A.E., Kaplan, C., & Preddy, D. (1990). How important are basic concepts to instruction: Validation of the Boehm Test of Basic Concepts. Unpublished paper. New York, NY: Teachers College, Columbia University.
- Boenisch, J., & Soto, G. (2015). The oral core vocabulary of typically developing English-speaking school-aged children: Implications for AAC practice. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 31, 77–84. doi: https://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2014.1001521
- Bracken, B.A. (1984). Bracken Basic Concept Scale examiner’s manual. New York, NY: Psychological Corporation.
- Bracken, B.A. (1998). Bracken Basic Concept Scale – Revised. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
- Bracken, B.A., & Cato, L.A. (1986). Rate of conceptual development among deaf preschool and primary children as compared to a matched group of nonhearing impaired children. Psychology in the Schools, 23, 95–99. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6807(198601)23:1 < 95::AID-PITS2310230115 > 3.0.CO;2-L
- Bracken, B.A., & Crawford, E. (2010). Basic concepts in early childhood educational standards: A 50-state review. Early Childhood Education Journal, 37, 421–430. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-009-0363-7
- Dennis, A., Erickson, K., & Hatch, P. (2013). The Dynamic Learning Maps core vocabulary: Overview [technical review]. Available at: http://www.med.unc.edu/ahs/clds/files/vocabulary-overview
- Dickinson, D., Cote, L., & Smith, M. (1993). Learning vocabulary in preschool: Social and discourse contexts affecting vocabulary growth. In C. Daiute (Ed.), The development of literacy through social interaction (pp. 67–78). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
- Duncan, G.J., Dowsett, C.J., Claessens, A., Magnuson, K., Huston, A.C., & Klebanov, P. (2007). School readiness and later achievement. Developmental Psychology, 43, 1428–1446. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1428
- Kaufman, A. (1978). The importance of basic concepts in the individual assessment of preschool children. Journal of School Psychology, 16, 208–211. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4405(78)90002-X
- Light, J. (1997). ‘‘Let’s go star fishing’’: Reflections on the contexts of language learning for children who use aided AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 13, 158–171. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/07434619712331277978
- Marvin, C.A., Beukelman, D.R., & Bilyeu, D. (1994). Vocabulary‐use patterns in preschool children: Effects of context and time sampling. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 10, 224–236. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/07434619412331276930
- McCarthy, J.H., Schwarz, I., & Menz, H. (2012). Frequency of basic concept words in classrooms: Influences on instruction. Poster session presented at the meeting of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Annual Convention, Atlanta, GA.
- Panter, J.E., & Bracken, B.A. (2009). Validity of the Bracken School Readiness Assessment for predicting first grade readiness. Psychology in the Schools, 46, 397–409. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20385
- Piersel, W., & McAndrews, T. (1982). Concept acquisition and school progress: An examination of the Boehm Test of Basic Concepts. Psychological Reports, 50, 783–786. doi: https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1982.50.3.783
- Putnam, L. (1992). Inner city kindergartners’ vocabulary development in three different early literacy programs. Paper presented at the 42nd Annual Meeting of the National Reading Conference, San Antonio, TX.
- Robillard, M., Mayer-Crittenden, C., Minor-Corriveau, M., & Belanger, M. (2014). Monolingual and bilingual children with and without language impairment: Core vocabulary comparison. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 30, 267–278. doi: https://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2014.921240
- Schwarz, I., & McCarthy, J.H. (2012). Basic concepts in the classroom: What vocabulary do you hear during a week of instruction? [Data file]. Unpublished dataset. Retrieved from http://www.uthsc.edu/health-professions/asp/research/l3/curren-studies.php
- Smith, M.M., & Grove, N.C. (2003). Asymmetry in input and output for individuals who use AAC. In: J. C. Light, D. R. Beukelman, & J. Reichle (Eds.), Communicative competence for individuals who use AAC: From research to effective practice (pp. 163–195). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
- Trembath, D., Balandin, S., & Togher, L. (2007). Vocabulary selection for Australian children who use augmentative and alternative communication. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 32, 291–301. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13668250701689298
- Wiig, E. (2004). Wiig Assessment of Basic Concepts. Greenville, SC: Super Duper Publications.
- Witkowski, D., & Baker, B. (2012). Addressing the content vocabulary with core: Theory and practice for nonliterate or emerging literate students. Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 21, 74–81. doi: https://doi.org/10.1044/aac21.3.74
- Yorkston, K., Dowden, P., Honsinger, M., Marriner, N., & Mith, K. (1988). A comparison of standard and user vocabulary lists. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 4, 189–210. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618812331274807