1,464
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Intervention focus moderates the association between initial receptive language and language outcomes for toddlers with developmental delay

, , , , &
Pages 263-273 | Received 17 Nov 2018, Accepted 20 Jul 2019, Published online: 23 Dec 2019

References

  • Allen, A. A., Schlosser, R. W., Brock, K. L., & Shane, H. C. (2017). The effectiveness of aided augmented input techniques for persons with developmental disabilities: A systematic review. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 33(3), 149–159. doi:10.1080/07434618.2017.1338752
  • American Speech Language Hearing Association. (2004). Guidelines for the training, use, and supervision of speech-language pathology assistants. [Guidelines]. Retrieved from www.asha.org/policy
  • Barker, R. M., Akaba, S., Brady, N. C., & Thiemann-Bourque, K. S. (2013). Support for AAC use in preschool, and growth in language skills, for young children with developmental disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29(4), 334–346. doi:10.3109/07434618.2013.848933
  • Bates, E. (1979). The emergence of symbols: Cognition and communication in infancy. New York: Academic Press.
  • Benedict, H. (1979). Early lexical development: Comprehension and production. Journal of Child Language, 6(2), 183–200. doi:10.1017/S0305000900002245
  • Biggs, E. E., Carter, E. W., & Gilson, C. B. (2018). Systematic review of interventions involving aided AAC modeling for children with complex communication needs. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 123(5), 443–473. doi:10.1352/1944-7558-123.5.443
  • Binger, C., & Light, J. (2007). The effect of aided AAC modeling on the expression of multi-symbol messages by preschoolers who use AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23(1), 30–43. doi:10.1080/07434610600807470
  • Binger, C., Maguire-Marshall, M., & Kent-Walsh, J. (2011). Using aided AAC models, recasts, and contrastive targets to teach grammatical morphemes to children who use AAC. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 54(1), 160–176. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0163)
  • Blockberger, S., & Sutton, A. (2003). Toward linguistic competence: Language experiences and knowledge of children with extremely limited speech. In J. C. Light, D. R. Beukelman & J. Reichle (Eds.), Communicative competence for individuals who use AAC (pp. 63–106). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
  • Brady, N. C. (2000). Improved comprehension of object names following voice output communication aid use: Two case studies. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 16(3), 197–204. doi:10.1080/07434610012331279054
  • Brady, N. C., Anderson, C. J., Hahn, L. J., Obermeier, S. M., & Kapa, L. L. (2014). Eye tracking as a measure of receptive vocabulary in children with autism spectrum disorders. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 30(2), 147–159. doi:10.3109/07434618.2014.904923
  • Brady, N. C., Steeples, T., & Fleming, K. (2005). Effects of prelinguistic communication levels on initiation and repair of communication in children with disabilities. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 48(5), 1098–1113. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2005/076)
  • Brady, N. C., Storkel, H. L., Bushnell, P., Barker, R. M., Saunders, K., Daniels, D., & Fleming, K. (2015). Investigating a multimodal intervention for children with limited expressive vocabularies associated with autism. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 24(3), 438–459. doi:10.1044/2015_AJSLP-14-0093
  • Chapman, R. S., Seung, H.-K., Schwartz, S. E., & Kay-Raining Bird, E. (2000). Predicting language production in children and adolescents with Down syndrome: The role of comprehension. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43(2), 340–350. doi:10.1044/jslhr.4302.340
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Dada, S., & Alant, E. (2009). The effect of aided language stimulation on vocabulary acquisition in children with little or no functional speech. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 18(1), 50–64. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2008/07-0018)
  • DiCiccio, T. J., & Efron, B. (1996). Bootstrap confidence intervals. Statistical Science, 11, 189–212. doi:10.1214/ss/1032280214
  • Drager, K., Postal, V. J., Carrolus, L., Castellano, M., Gagliano, C., & Glynn, J. (2006). The effect of aided language modeling on symbol comprehension and production in 2 preschoolers with autism. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 15(2), 112–125. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2006/012)
  • Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1981). Peabody picture vocabulary test - revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
  • Fenson, L., Dale, P. S., Reznick, J. S., Bates, E., Thal, D. J., Pethick, S. J., … Stiles, J. (1994). Variability in early communicative development. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 59(5), 1–173. doi:10.1111/1540-5834.ep9502141733
  • Fisher, E. (2017). Emerging language comprehension in toddlers with significant developmental delays: An item response theory approach (Doctoral dissertation). Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA.
  • Goldin-Meadow, S., Seligman, M. E. P., & Gelman, R. (1976). Language in the two-year old. Cognition, 4(2), 189–202. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(76)90004-4
  • Goossens', C. (1989). Aided communication intervention before assessment: A case study of a child with cerebral palsy. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 5, 14–26. doi:10.1080/07434618912331274926
  • Gopnik, A., & Meltzoff, A. (1987). The development of categorization in the second year and its relation to other cognitive and linguistic developments. Child Development, 58(6), 1523–1531. doi:10.2307/1130692
  • Harris, M. D., & Reichle, J. (2004). The impact of aided language stimulation on symbol comprehension and production in children with moderate cognitive disabilities. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 13(2), 155–167. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2004/016)
  • Hedrick, D. L., Prather, E. M., & Tobin, A. R. (1984). Sequenced inventory of communication development (Revised). Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.
  • Kent-Walsh, J., & Binger, C. (2018). Methodological advances, opportunities, and challenges in AAC research. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 34(2), 93–103. doi:10.1080/07434618.2018.1456560
  • Mayer-Johnson Co. (1981). Picture communication symbols. Stillwater, MN: Author.
  • Miller, J. F., & Chapman, R. S. (1985). Systematic analysis of language transcripts. Madison: University of Wisconsin.
  • Mullen, E. M. (1995). Mullen scales of early learning. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
  • Rogers, S. J., Hepburn, S. L., Stackhouse, T., & Wehner, E. (2003). Imitation performance in toddlers with autism and those with other developmental disorders. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 44(5), 763–781. doi:10.1111/1469-7610.00162
  • Romski, M. A., & Cheslock, M. (2004). Parent-coached language intervention transcription and coding manual. Atlanta: Georgia State University.
  • Romski, M. A., & Sevcik, R. A. (1996). Breaking the speech barrier: Language development through augmented means. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
  • Romski, M. A., & Sevcik, R. A. (2003). Augmented input: Enhancing communication development. In J. C. Light, D. R. Beukelman, & J. Reichle (Eds.), Communicative competence for individuals who use AAC: From research to effective practice (pp. 147–162). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
  • Romski, M. A., Sevcik, R. A., Adamson, L. B., Barton-Hulsey, A., Smith, A. L., Barker, R. M., … Bakeman, R. (2019). Parent-coached early augmented language interventions for toddlers with developmental delays: A randomized comparison. Manuscript in preparation.
  • Romski, M. A., Sevcik, R. A., Adamson, L. B., Cheslock, M., & Smith, A. (2007). Parents can implement AAC interventions: Ratings of treatment implementation across early language interventions. Early Childhood Services, 1, 100–115.
  • Romski, M. A., Sevcik, R. A., Adamson, L. B., Cheslock, M., Smith, A., Barker, R. M., & Bakeman, R. (2010). Randomized comparison of augmented and non-augmented language interventions for toddlers with developmental delays and their parents. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53(2), 350–364. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2009/08-0156)
  • Romski, M. A., Sevcik, R. A., Cheslock, M. A., & Barton-Hulsey, A. (2017). The system for augmenting language: AAC and emerging language intervention. In R. J. McCauley, M. E. Fey, & R. B. Gillam (Eds.), Treatment of language disorders in children (2nd ed., pp. 155–186). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
  • Romski, M. A., Sevcik, R. A., Robinson, B. F., Mervis, C. B., & Bertrand, J. (1996). Mapping the meanings of novel visual symbols by youth with moderate or severe mental retardation. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 100(4), 391–402.
  • Schlosser, R. W. (2002). On the importance of being earnest about treatment integrity. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18(1), 36–44. doi:10.1080/aac.18.1.36.44
  • Schlosser, R. W., & Wendt, O. (2008). Effects of augmentative and alternative communication intervention on speech production in children with autism: A systematic review. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 17(3), 212–230. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2008/021)
  • Sennott, S. C., Light, J. C., & McNaughton, D. (2016). AAC modeling intervention research review. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 41(2), 101–115. doi:10.1177/1540796916638822
  • Sevcik, R. A. (2006). Comprehension: An overlooked component in augmented language development. Disability and Rehabilitation, 28(3), 159–167. doi:10.1080/09638280500077804
  • Sevcik, R. A., & Romski, M. A. (2002). The role of language comprehension in establishing early augmented conversations. In J. Reichle, D. R. Beukelman & J. C. Light (Eds.), Implementing an augmentative communication system: Exemplary practices for beginning communicators (pp. 453–474). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
  • Trudeau, N., Sutton, A., & Morford, J. P. (2014). An investigation of developmental changes in interpretation and construction of graphic AAC symbol sequences through systematic combination of input and output modalities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 30(3), 187–199. doi:10.3109/07434618.2014.940465

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.