A comparison of differing organizational formats for teaching requesting skills to children with autism

References

• Abbot, M. A., & McBride, D. (2014). AAC decision-making and mobile technology: Points to ponder. Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23(2), 104–111. https://doi.org/10.1044/aac23.2.104
   Google Scholar
• Agius, M. M., & Vance, M. (2016). A comparison of PECS and iPad to teach requesting to preschoolers with autistic spectrum disorders. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 32(1), 58–68. https://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2015.1108363
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aydin, O., & Diken, I. H. (2020). Studies comparing augmentative and alternative communication systems (AAC) applications for individuals with autism spectrum disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 55(2), 119–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayres, K., & Ledford, J. (2014). Dependent measures and measurement systems. In D. L. Gast & J. R. Ledford (Eds.), Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences. (pp.124–153). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Blackstone, S., Light, J., Beukelman, D., & Shane, H. (2004). Visual scene displays. Augmentative Communication News, 16(2), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Caron, J., & Holyfield, C. (2019). High-tech aided AAC for individuals with autism spectrum disorder and complex communication needs. In J. B. Ganz & R. L. Simpson (Eds.), Interventions for individuals with autism spectrum disorder and complex communication needs. (pp. 103–128). Paul Brookes Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Carnett, A., Martin, C., & Gevarter, C. (2021). Evaluating augmentative and alternative communication modalities for individuals with developmental disabilities: A brief review of the last 5 years. Current Developmental Disorders Reports, 8(2), 133–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40474-021-00226-0
   Google Scholar
• Drager, K. D., Light, J. C., Carlson, R., D'Silva, K., Larsson, B., Pitkin, L., & Stopper, G. (2004). Learning of dynamic display AAC technologies by typically developing 3-year-olds. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47(5), 1133–1148. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2004/084)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drager, K., Light, J., Currall, J., Muttiah, N., Smith, V., Kreis, D., Nilam-Hall, A., Parratt, D., Schuessler, K., Shermetta, K., & Wiscount, J. (2019). AAC technologies with visual scene displays and ‘Just in Time’ programming and symbolic communication turns expressed by students with severe disability. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 44(3), 321–336. https://doi.org/10.3109/13668250.2017.1326585
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, J. I., Cassidy, M., Liu, Y., Kirby, A. V., Wallace, M. T., & Woynaroski, T. G. (2020). Relations between sensory responsiveness and features of autism in children. Brain Sciences, 10(11), 775. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10110775
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenson, L., Bates, E., Dale, P. S., Marchman, V. A., Reznick, J. S., & Thal, D. J. (2007). MacArthur-Bates communicative development inventories. Paul H. Brookes Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Ganz, J. B., Earles-Vollrath, T. L., Heath, A. K., Parker, R. I., Rispoli, M. J., & Duran, J. B. (2012). A meta-analysis of single case research studies on aided augmentative and alternative communication systems with individuals with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42(1), 60–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-011-1212-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganz, J. B., Earles-Vollrath, T. L., Mason, R. A., Rispoli, M. J., Heath, A. K., & Parker, R. I. (2011). An aggregate study of single-case research involving aided AAC: Participant characteristics of individuals with autism spectrum disorders. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 5(4), 1500–1509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2011.02.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gast, D. L., Lloyd, B. P., & Ledford, J. R. (2014). Multiple baseline and multiple probe designs. In J. R. Ledford and D. L. Gast (Eds.), Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences. (pp.251–296). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Gevarter, C., Horan, K., & Sigafoos, J. (2020). Teaching preschoolers with autism to use different speech-generating device display formats during play: Intervention and secondary factors. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 51(3), 821–838. https://doi.org/10.1044/2020_LSHSS-19-00092
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gevarter, C., O’Reilly, M. F., Kuhn, M., Watkins, L., Ferguson, R., Sammarco, N., Rojeski, L., & Sigafoos, J. (2017). Assessing the acquisition of requesting a variety of preferred items using different speech generating device formats for children with autism spectrum disorder. Assistive Technology, 29(3), 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2016.1143411
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gevarter, C., O’Reilly, M. F., Rojeski, L., Sammarco, N., Sigafoos, J., Lancioni, G. E., & Lang, R. (2014). Comparing acquisition of AAC-based mands in three young children with autism spectrum disorder using iPad® applications with different display and design elements. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 44(10), 2464–2474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-014-2115-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gevarter, C., O'Reilly, M. F., Sammarco, N., Ferguson, R., Watkins, L., Kuhn, M., & Sigafoos, J. (2018). Comparison of schematic and taxonomic speech generating devices for children with ASD. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 53(2), 222–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, V. A., Sigafoos, J., Didden, R., Lancioni, G. E., Ollington, N., & Payne, D. (2008). Validity of a structured interview protocol for assessing children’s preferences. In P. Grotewell & Y. Burton (Eds.), Early childhood education: Issues and developments. (pp.87–103). Nova Science Publishers Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Halle, J. W. (1982). Teaching functional language to the handicapped: An integrative model of natural environment teaching techniques. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 7(4), 29–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/154079698200700404
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, D. J., Shane, H., Russell, S., & Caves, K. (2007). Access to AAC: Present, past, and future. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23(3), 243–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434610701571058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holyfield, C., Caron, J., & Light, J. (2019). Programing AAC just-in-time for beginning communicators: The process. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 35(4), 309–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2019.1686538
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iacono, T., Trembath, D., & Erickson, S. (2016). The role of augmentative and alternative communication for children with autism: Current status and future trends. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, 12, 2349–2361. https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S95967
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, S., O’Reilly, M., Lancioni, G., Falcomata, T. S., Sigafoos, J., & Xu, Z. (2013). Comparison of the predictive validity and consistency among preference assessment procedures: A review of the literature. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34(4), 1125–1133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2012.12.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, J. D., & Gast, D. L. (2014). Visual analysis in single case experimental design studies: Brief review and guidelines. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 24(3–4), 445–463. https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2013.815636
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, J., & McNaughton, D. (2012a). Supporting the communication, language, and literacy development of children with complex communication needs: State of the science and future research priorities. Assistive Technology, 24(1), 34–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2011.648717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, J., & McNaughton, D. (2012b). The changing face of augmentative and alternative communication: Past, present, and future challenges. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 28(4), 197–204. https://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2012.737024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, J., McNaughton, D., & Caron, J. (2018). New and emerging AAC technology supports for children with complex communication needs and their communication partners: State of the science and future research directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 35(1), 26–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2018.1557251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, J., Wilkinson, K. M., Thiessen, A., Beukelman, D. R., & Fager, S. K. (2019). Designing effective AAC displays for individuals with developmental or acquired disabilities: State of the science and future research directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 35(1), 42–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2018.1558283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord, C., Rutter, M., Dilavore, P., Risi, S., Gotham, K., & Bishop, S. (2012). Autism diagnostic observation schedule. (2nd ed.). Western Psychological Services.
   Google Scholar
• Luyster, R., Lopez, K., & Lord, C. (2007). Characterizing communicative development in children referred for autism spectrum disorders using the MacArthur-Bates communicative development inventory (CDI). Journal of Child Language, 34(3), 623–654. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0305000907008094
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIntosh, D. N., Miller, L. J., Shyu, V., & Dunn, W., (1999). Overview of the short sensory profile. In. W. Dunn (Ed.), Sensory profile user’s manual. (pp.59–73) Pearsons.
   Google Scholar
• Mirenda, P. (2008). A back door approach to autism and AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24(3), 220–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/08990220802388263
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirenda, P. (2009). Introduction to AAC for individuals with autism spectrum disorders. In P. Mirenda & T. Iacono (Eds.), Autism spectrum disorders and AAC. (pp.3–22). Paul. H. Brookes Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, R. I., Vannest, K. J., Davis, J. L., & Sauber, S. B. (2011). Combining nonoverlap and trend for single-case research: Tau-U. Behavior Therapy, 42(2), 284–299.
   Google Scholar
• Romski, M., & Sevcik, R. A. (2005). Augmentative communication and early intervention: Myths and realities. Infants & Young Children, 18(3), 174–185. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001163-200507000-00002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romski, M. A., & Sevcik, R. (1993). Language comprehension: Considerations for augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 9(4), 281–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434619312331276701
   Google Scholar
• Rose, V., Trembath, D., Keen, D., & Paynter, J. (2016). The proportion of minimally verbal children with autism spectrum disorder in a community‐based early intervention programme. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 60(5), 464–477. https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.12284
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaaf, R. C., Benevides, T., Mailloux, Z., Faller, P., Hunt, J., Van Hooydonk, E., Freeman, R., Leiby, B., Sendecki, J., & Kelly, D. (2014). An intervention for sensory difficulties in children with autism: A randomized trial. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 44(7), 1493–1506. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-013-1983-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W. (2003). The Efficacy of augmentative and alternative communication. Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sievers, S. B., Trembath, D., & Westerveld, M. F. (2018). A systematic review of predictors, moderators, and mediators of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) outcomes for children with autism spectrum disorder. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 34(3), 219–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2018.1462849
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, R. L. (2019). Characteristics of individuals with autism spectrum disorder who have complex communication needs. In: J. B. Ganz & R. L. (Eds.), Interventions for individuals with autism spectrum disorder and complex communication needs. (pp.3–20). Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Sparrow, S. S., Cicchetti, D. V., Balla, D. A., & Doll, E. A. (2005). Vineland adaptive behavior scales: Survey forms manual. AGS Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Tager-Flusberg, H., Rogers, S., Cooper, J., Landa, R., Lord, C., Paul, R., Rice, M., Stoel-Gammon, C., Wetherby, A., & Yoder, P. (2009). Defining spoken language benchmarks and selecting measures of expressive language development for young children with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 52(3), 643–652. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2009/08-0136)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiessen, A., Thistle, J., & Brown, J. (2021). Clinical and research perspectives on visual scene displays. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 30(3), 1134–1156.
   Google Scholar
• von Tetzchner, S. (2015). The semiotics of aided language development. Cognitive Development, 36, 180–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2015.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, K. M., & Jagaroo, V. (2004). Contributions of principles of visual cognitive science to AAC system display design. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 20(3), 123–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434610410001699717
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, K. M., Light, J., & Drager, K. (2012). Considerations for the composition of visual scene displays: Potential contributions of information from visual and cognitive sciences. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 28(3), 137–147. https://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2012.704522
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolery, M. (2013). A commentary: Single-case design technical document of the What Works Clearinghouse. Remedial and Special Education, 34(1), 39–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932512468038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolery, M., Gast, D., & Ledford, J. (2014). Comparison designs. In J. Ledford & D. Gast (Eds.), Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences. (pp.297–345). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar