Interaction involving individuals using augmentative and alternative communication systems: State of the art and future directions

References

• Andrews, N. (1980). The use of Blissymbolics in a special school. In A. W. Kraat (Ed.), (1985) Communication interaction between aided and natural speakers: An IPCAS study report (pp 170–171). Toronto: Canadian Rehabilitation Council for the Disabled.
   Google Scholar
• Basil, C. (1987). Social interaction and learned helplessness in non-vocal severely handicapped children. Unpublished manuscript, Bar-celona University, Barcelona, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D. (1986). Evaluating the effectiveness of intervention programs. In S. W. Blackstone (Ed.), Augmentative communication: An introduction (pp. 423–445). Rockville, MD: American-Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D., & Garrett, K. (1988). Augmentative and alternative communication for adults with acquired severe communication disorders. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 4, 104–121.
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D., & Yorkston, K. (1980). Nonvocal communication: Performance evaluation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Reha-bilitation, 6/, 272–275.
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D., Yorkston, K., & Dowden, P. (1985). Communication augmentation: A casebook of clinical management. San Diego, CA: College-Hill Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D., Yorkston, K., Poblete, M., & Naranjo, C. (1984). Frequency of word occurrence in communication samples pro-duced by adult communication aid users. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 49, 360–367.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blackstone, S., & Cassatt-James, E. (1984). Communicative compe-tence in communication aid users and their partners. Paper pre-sented at the Third International Conference on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Blau, A. F. (1986). Communication in the back-channel: Social struc-tural analyses of nonspeech/speech conversations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, City University of New York, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Bruno, J., & Bryen, D. (1986). The impact of modeling procedures on physically disabled nonspeaking children. Paper presented at the Fourth Biennial International Conference on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, Cardiff, Wales.
   Google Scholar
• Buettemeier, C. (1983). Evaluation of communication board use in a residential setting. In A. W. Kraat (1985). Communication interaction between aided and natural speakers: An IPCAS study report (pp. 174–175). Toronto: Canadian Rehabilitation Council for the Disabled.
   Google Scholar
• Buzolich, M. J. (1983). Interaction analysis of augmented and normal adult communicators. In A. W. Kraat (1985). Communication inter-action between aided and natural speakers: An IPCAS study report (pp. 179–181). Toronto: Canadian Rehabilitation Council for the Disabled.
   Google Scholar
• Calculator, S. (1988). Promoting the acquisition and generalization of conversational skills by individuals with severe disabilities. Aug-mentative and Alternative Communication, 4, 94–103.
   Google Scholar
• Calculator, S., & Delaney, D. (1986). Comparison of nonspeaking and speaking mentally retarded adults' clarification strategies. Journal of Speech and Heating Disorders, 51, 252–259.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Calculator, S., & Dollaghan, C. (1982). The use of communication boards in a residential setting: An evaluation. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 47, 281–287.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Calculator, S., & Luchko, C. (1983). Evaluating the effectiveness of a communication board training program. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 48, 185–191.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Colquhoun, A. (1982). Augmentative communication systems: The interaction process. Paper presented at the American Speech, Language and Hearing Association Annual Convention, Toronto, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Colquhoun-Sutton, A. (1983). The social-verbal competence of non-speaking individuals. Unpublished manuscript, Boston University, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Coxson, L., & Mathy-Laikko, P. (1983). Listener reactions to three nonvocal communication outputs. In A. W. Kraat (1985). Commu-nication interaction between aided and natural speakers: An IPCAS study report (pp. 188–189). Toronto: Canadian Rehabilitation Council for the Disabled.
   Google Scholar
• Culp, D. M. (1982). Communication interactions-nonspeaking chil-dren using augmentative systems. Unpublished manuscript, Callier Center for Communication Disorders, Dallas, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Culp, D. M., & Stahlecker, J. (1986). Development and documentation of a communication facilitation program for nonspeaking children and their parents. Paper presented at the Fourth Biennial Interna-tional Conference on Augmentative and Alternative Communica-tion, Cardiff, Wales.
   Google Scholar
• Dowden, P., Beukelman, D., & Lossing, C. (1986). Serving nonspeak-ing patients in acute care settings: Intervention outcomes. Aug-mentative and Alternative Communication, 2, 38–44.
   Google Scholar
• Dowden, P., Honsinger, M., & Beukelman, D. (1986). Serving non-speaking patients in acute care settings: An intervention approach. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 2, 25–32.
   Google Scholar
• Farrier, L., Yorkston, K., Marriner, N., Beukelman, D. (1985). Conver-sational control in nonimpaired speakers using an augmentative communication system. Augmentative and Alternative Communi-cation, 1, 65–73.
   Google Scholar
• Fey, M. (1986). Language intervention with young children. San Diego, CA: College-Hill Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fishman, 1., & Kerman-Lerner, P. (1983). Use of augmentative com-munication systems by quadriplegic non-speaking adults. In A. W. Kraat (Ed.), (1985), Communication interaction between aided and natural speakers: An IPCAS study report (pp. 194–195). Toronto: Canadian Rehabilitation Council for the Disabled.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, T. M. (1983). Pre-assessment: A procedure for accom-modating language use variability. In T. M. Gallagher, & C. A. Prutting (Eds.), Pragmatic assessment and intervention issues in language (pp. 1–28). San Diego: College-Hill Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glennen, S., & Calculator, S. (1985). Training functional communica-tion board use: A pragmatic approach. Augmentative and Alterna-tive Communication, 1, 134–142.
   Google Scholar
• Halle, J. W., Baer, D. M., & Spradlin, J. E. (1981). Teachers' gener-alized use of delay as a stimulus control procedure to increase language use in handicapped children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, /4, 389–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. (1975). Learning how to mean. New York: Elsevier North-Holland Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, D. (1982). Communicative interaction processes involving nonvocal physically handicapped children. Topics in Language Dis-orders, 2(2), 21–37.
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, D. J., & Mathy-Laikko, P. (1984). The application of videotape recording for the collection and analysis of communica-tive behavior data. Paper presented at the Third International Conference on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, Bos-ton, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, D. J., & Yoder, D. E. (1982). Communication within natural conversational interaction: Implications for severe commu-nicatively impaired persons. Topics in Language Disorders, 42), 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Huschle, M., & Staudenbaur, T. (1983). The occurrence of breakdown during the interaction between a familiar and unfamiliar listener and an augmentative system user. In A. W. Kraat (1985). Communica-tion interaction between aided and natural speakers: An IPCAS study report (pp. 203–204). Toronto: Canadian Rehabilitation Council for the Disabled.
   Google Scholar
• James, J. (1984). Research study-Analysis of spontaneous symbol usage of 10 cerebral palsied children of average intellect. Paper presented at the Third International Conference on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Kazdin, A. E. (1977). Assessing the clinical or applied importance of behavior change through social validation. Behavior Modification, 1, 427–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraat, A. W. (1979). Augmentative communication system use in an institutional setting-A case study. In A. W. Kraat (Ed.), (1985), Communication interaction between aided and natural speakers: An IPCAS study report (pp. 208–210). Toronto: Canadian Rehabil-itation Council for the Disabled.
   Google Scholar
• Kraat, A. W. (1985). Communication interaction between aided and natural speakers: An IPCAS study report. Toronto: Canadian Re-habilitation Council for the Disabled.
   Google Scholar
• Kraat, A. W. (1986). Developing intervention goals. In S. W. Black-stone (Ed.), Augmentative communication: An introduction (pp. 197–266). Rockville, MD: American Speech-Language Hearing As-sociation.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J. (1985). The communicative interaction patterns of young nonspeaking physically disabled children and their primary care-givers. Master's thesis, University of Toronto. (Available from the Easter Seal Communication Institute, 24 Ferrand Drive, Don Mills, Ontario, Canada M3C 3N2).
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., Beesley, M., & Collier, B. (1988). Transition through multiple augmentative communication systems: A three year case study of a head injured adolescent. Augmentative and Alternative Commu-nication, 4, 2–14.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., Collier, B., & Parnes, P. (1985a). Communicative interaction between young nonspeaking physically disabled children and their primary caregivers: Part 1:-Discourse patterns. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 1, 74–83.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., Collier, B., & Pars, P. (1985b). Communicative interaction between young nonspeaking physically disabled children and their primary caregivers: Part II:-Communicative functions. Augment-ative and Alternative Communication, 1, 98–107.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., Collier, B., & Pames, P. (1985c). Communicative interaction between young nonspeaking physically disabled children and their primary caregivers: Part III:-Modes of communication. Augment-ative and Alternative Communication, 1, 125–133.
   Google Scholar
• Lossing, C., Yorkston, K., & Beukelman, D. (1985). Communication augmentation systems: Quantification in natural settings. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 66, 380–383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathy-Laikko, P., & Higginbotham, D. J. (1987). Doing communication research in a work day setting: Methods for accomplishing research goals. Workshop presented at the Easter Seal Communication Institute, Toronto, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Mathy-Laikko, P., & Ratcliff, A. (1983). What was that you pointed to?: An examination of breakdown in augmentative communication interaction. In A. W. Kraat (Ed.), (1985) Communication interaction between aided and natural speakers: An IPCAS study report (pp. 221–222). Toronto: Canadian Rehabilitation Council for the Disabled
   Google Scholar
• Mathy-Laikko, P., & Yoder, D. (1986). Future needs and directions in augmentative communication. In S. W. Blackstone (Ed.), Augment-ative communication: An introduction (pp. 471–494). Rockville, MD: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, M., & Kraat, A. (1984). Hey you, I've got something to say: A study of the attention-getting ability of a nonspeaking, physically disabled pre-schooler. In A. W. Kraat (Ed.), (1985) Communication interaction between aided and natural speakers: An IPCAS study report (pp. 223–225). Toronto: Canadian Rehabilitation Council for the Disabled.
   Google Scholar
• Mirenda, P., & Santogrossi, J. (1985). A prompt-free strategy to teach pictorial communication system use. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 1, 143–150.
   Google Scholar
• Morningstar, D. (1981). Blissymbol communication: Comparison of interaction with naive vs. experienced listeners. Unpublished man-uscript, University of Toronto, Toronto.
   Google Scholar
• Prutting, C. (1982). Pragmatics as social competence. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 47, 123–134.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Prutting, C., & Kirchner, D. (1987). A clinical appraisal of the pragmatic aspects of language. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 52, 105–119.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rankin, R. (1981). Methodology in environmental research. In R. Henderson (Ed.), Parent-child interaction (pp. 235–261). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Riechle, J., & Ward, M. (1985). Teaching discriminative use of an encoding electronic communication device and Signing Exact Eng-lish to a moderately handicapped child. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, /6, 58–63.
   Google Scholar
• Romski, M., & Sevcik, R. (1988). Augmentative and alternative com-munication systems: Considerations for individuals with severe intellectual disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communica-tion, 4, 83–93.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H., Schegloff, E., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest system-atics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shane, H., & Cohen, C. (1981). A discussion of communication strategies and patterns by nonspeaking persons. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, /2, 205–210.
   Google Scholar
• Smith-Lewis, M., & Ford, A. (1987). A user's perspective on aug-mentative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Commu-nication, 3, 12–17.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, D. N. (1973). Mother and infant at play: The dyadic interaction involving facial, vocal, and gaze behaviors. In M. Lewis, & L. Rosenblum (Eds.), The Origins of Behaviors, Vol I (pp. 187–213). New York: Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Trefler, E., & Crislip, D. (1985). No aid, an Etran, a Minspeak: A comparison of efficiency and effectiveness during structured use. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 1, 151–155.
   Google Scholar
• Vanderheiden, G., & Lloyd, L. (1986). Communication systems and their components. In S. W. Blackstone (Ed.), Augmentative com-munication: An introduction (pp. 49–161). Rockville, MD: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
   Google Scholar
• Warrick, A. (1988). Socio-communicative considerations within aug-mentative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Commu-nication, 4, 46–52.
   Google Scholar
• Wexler, K., Blau, A., Leslie, S., & Dore, J. (1983). Conversational interaction of nonspeaking cerebral palsied individuals and their speaking partners, with and without augmentative communication aids. Unpublished manuscript, Helen Hayes Hospital, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Wieder, S., & Kornet, R. (1983). Assessing pragmatic abilities in a multi-handicapped child. In A. W. Kraat (1985). Communication interaction between aided and natural speakers: An IPCAS study report (pp. 241–242). Toronto: Canadian Rehabilitation Council for the Disabled.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcox, M. J., & Campbell, P. (1985). Developing communication skills in young children with severe handicaps. Paper presented at the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Annual Conven-tion, Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar