Iconicity and productive recall of a selected sample of signs from signed Swedish

References

• Bellugi, U., & Klima, E. (1976). Two faces of sign: Iconic and abstract. In Hamad, Harst & Lancaster (Eds.), Origins and evolution of language and speech (Vol. 280, pp. 514–538). New York: Annals of the New York Academy of Science.
   Google Scholar
• Boyes-Braem, P. (1975). The Acquisition of DEZ in American Sign Language. Unpublished manuscript, SALK Institutes for Biological Studies, University of California at Berkeley.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, R. (1977). Why are signed languages easier to learn than spoken languages? Keynote address presented at the National Symposium on Sign Language Research and Teaching, Chicago. DePaul, R., & Yoder, D. (1986). Iconicity in manual Sign systems for the augmentative communication user: Is that all there is? Aug-mentative and Alternative Communication, 2, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Doherty, J. E. (1985). The effects of sign characteristic on sign acquisition and retention; an integrative review of the literature. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 1, 108–121. Doherty, J., & Lloyd, L. L. (1983). The effects of production mode, translucency and manuality on sign acquisition by retarded adults. Paper presented at the 107th Annual Conference of the American Association on Mental Deficiency, Dallas.
   Google Scholar
• Goossens, C. (1983). The relative iconicity and leamability of verb referents differentially represented as manual signs, Blissymbolics and Rebus symbols: An investigation with moderately retarded individuals. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Purdue University, W. Lafayette, IN.
   Google Scholar
• Granlund, M., & Olsson, C. (1983). Talspra ksaltemativ kommunikation och begavningshandikapp. [Augmentative Communication for Men-tally Retarded: a research proposal]. Stockholm: Stifelsen ALA. Griffith, P. L.. & Robinson, J. H. (1980). Influence of iconicity on sign learning by mentally retarded children. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 85, 291–298.
   Google Scholar
• Hamre-Nietupski, S., Fullerton, P., Holtz, K., Ryan-Flottum, M., Stoll, A., & Brown, L. (1977). Curricular strategies for teaching selected nonverbal communication skills to nonverbal and severely handi- capped students. In L. Brown, I. Nietupski, T. Browner, & L. Grumenwald (Eds). Curricular strategies for teaching functional object use, non-verbal communication, problem solving and meal-time skills to severely handicapped students (Vol VII, Par. 1). Madison, WI: Madison Metropolitan School District.
   Google Scholar
• Karlan, G.. & Lloyd, L. L. (1983). Considerations in planning the Communication Intervention, part II: Manual signs and gestural systems for representing the lexicon. Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped.
   Google Scholar
• Kazdin, A. E. (1980). Research design in clinical psychology. London: Harper & Row, Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Kohl, F., Wilcox, B., & Karlan, G. (1978). Effects of training conditions on the generalization of manual signs with moderately handicapped students. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 13, 327–335.
   Google Scholar
• Kohl, F. (1981). Effects of motoric requirements on the acquisition of manual sign responses by severely handicapped students. Ameri-can Journal of Mental Deficiency, 85, 396–403.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Konstanteras, M., Oxman, J., & Webster, C. (1978). Iconicity: Effects on the acquisition of sign language by autistic and other severely dysfunctional children. In P. Siple (Ed.), Understanding language through sign language research. New York: Academic Press. Lloyd, L. L., & Karlan. G. (1985). Translucency and transparency of Signed English signs. Manuscript in preparation. Purdue University, W. Lafayette, IN.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, L. L.. & Doherty, J. (1983). The influence of production mode on recall of signs in normal adult subjects. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 26, 595–600.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, L. L., & Fristoe, M. (1978, March). Iconicity of signs: Evidence in vocabularies used with severely impaired individuals in contrast with American Sign Language in general. Proceedings of the Elev-enth Annual Gatlinburg Conference on Research in Mental Retar-dation, Gatlinburg, TN.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, L. L., Loeding, B., & Doherty, J. E. (1985). The role of iconicity in sign acquisition. (Letter to the Editor of Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders in response to Orlansky and Bonvillian paper.) Luftig, R. (1983). Translucency of sign and concreteness of gloss in the manual sign learning of moderately/severely retarded students. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 88, 279–286.
   Google Scholar
• Malmström, C. (1980). Förstandshandikappades motorik. Ett littera-turarbete. [Motor ability in mentally retarded: A literature review]. Stockholm: Stiftelsen ALA.
   Google Scholar
• Nietupski, J., & Hamre-Nietupski, S, (1977). Curricular strategies for teaching selected nonverbal communication skills to severely hand-icapped students in L. Brown, J. Nietupski, S. Lyon, S. Hamre-Nietupski, T. Crowner, & L. Grunewald (Eds.), Curricular strategies for teaching nonverbal communication, functional object use prob-lem solving and mealtime skills to severely handicapped students (Vol. VII, part 1). Madison: University of Wisconsin and Madison Metropolitan District.
   Google Scholar
• Romski, M. A. R., & Sevcik, R. A. (1988). Augmentative and alter-native communication systems: Considerations for individuals with severe intellectual disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Com-munication, 4, 83–93.
   Google Scholar
• Stremel-Campbell, K., Cantrell, D., & Halle, J. (1977). Manual signing as a language system and as a speech initiator for the non-verbal severely handicapped student. In E. Sontag, J. Smith, & N. Certo (Eds.), Educational programming for the severely and profoundly handicapped. Reston, VA: Division on Mental Retardation, Council for Exceptional Children.
   Google Scholar