A “Working Party” approach to planning in-service training in manual signs for an entire public school staff

References

• Arizona, State of (1981). Total Communication reference dictionary for persons with developmental disabilities. Coolidge, Arizona: Arizona State Department of Economic Security, Division of De-velopmental Disabilities.
   Google Scholar
• Bacon, M. M. (1983). Team-building in quality circles. Redwood City, CA: San Mateo County Office of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Bonner, J. (1983). Strengthening ties to industry: An adult training center utilizes circles. Quality Circle Digest, October, 31–36.
   Google Scholar
• Bonnet-, J. (1985). Employee relations. The School Administrator, April, 28–29.
   Google Scholar
• Bornstein, H., Saulnier, K., & Hamilton, L. (1983). The comprehensive Signed English dictionary. Washington, DC: Gallaudet College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boyes-Braem, P. (1973). A study of the acquisition of the DEZ in American Sign Language. Working paper, Salk Institute, LaJolla, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, F. (1981). A format for selecting vocabulary for the non-speaking child. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 12, 240–245.
   Google Scholar
• Dennis, R., Reichle, J., Williams, W., & Vogelsberg, R. T. (1982). Motoric factors influencing the selection of vocabulary for sign production programs. Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 7, 20–32.
   Google Scholar
• DeWar, D. L. (1979). Quality circles: Answers to 100 frequently asked questions. Red Bluff, CA: DeWar Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Doherty, J. E. (1985a). The effects of sign characteristics on sign acquisition and retention: An integrative review of the literature. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 1, 3, 108–121.
   Google Scholar
• Doherty, J. E. (1985b). The effects of translucency and handshape difficulty on sign acquisition by preschool children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
   Google Scholar
• Doherty, J. E., & Lloyd, L. L. (1983). Effects of production mode, translucency and man uality on sign acquisition by retarded adults. Paper presented to the American Association on Mental Deficiency, May, Dallas.
   Google Scholar
• Duker, P. C., & Moonen, X. M. (1985). A program to increase manual signs with severely/profoundly retarded students in natural envi-ronments. Applied Research in Mental Retardation, 6, 147–158.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dunn, M. L. (1982). Pre-Sign Language motor skills: Skill starters for motor development. Tucson, AZ: Communication Skill Builders.
   Google Scholar
• Faw, G. D., Reid, D. H., Schepis, M. M., Fitzgerald, J. R., & Welty, P. A. (1981). Involving institutional staff in the development and maintenance of sign language skills with profoundly retarded per-sons. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, /4, 411–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fristoe, M., & Lloyd, L. L. (1979). Signs used in manual communica-tion training with persons having severe communication impair-ment. AAESPH Review, 4, 264–373.
   Google Scholar
• Fristoe, M., & Lloyd, L. L. (1980). Planning an initial expressive sign lexicon for persons with severe communication impairment. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 45, 2, 170–180.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fuller, D., & Wilbur, R. (1986). The effect of handshape metaphor cueing on the recall of phonologically similar signs. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Goosens', C. A. (1983). The relative iconocity and leamability of verb referents differentially represented as manual signs, Blissymbolics, and Rebus symbols: An investigation with moderately retarded individuals. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
   Google Scholar
• Griffith, P. L., & Robinson, J. H. (1980). Influence of iconicity and phonological similarity on sign learning by mentally retarded chil-dren. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 85, 291–298.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grove, N., & Walker, M. (1990). The Makaton Vocabulary-Using manual signs and graphic symbols to develop interpersonal com-munication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication (in press).
   Google Scholar
• Gustason, G., Pfetzing, D., & Zawolkow, D. (1980). Signing Exact English. Los Alamitos, CA: Modern Signs Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karlan, G. R. & Lloyd, L. L. (1983). Considerations in the planning of communication intervention: Part I. Selecting the lexicon. Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 8, 13–25.
   Google Scholar
• Kiernan, C. (1977). Alternatives to speech: A review of research on manual and other forms of communication with the mentally hand-icapped and other noncommunicating populations. British Journal of Mental Subnormality, 23, 6–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiernan, C. (1983). The exploration of sign and symbol effects. In J. Hogg & P. J. Mittler (Eds.), Advances in Mental Handicap Research, Vol. 2. London: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Kiernan, C. (1984). Imitation and learning of hand postures. In J. M. Berg (Ed.), Perspectives and Progress in Mental Retardation, Vol. 1, (pp 251–260). Baltimore: University Park Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kiernan, C., Reid, B., & Jones, L. (1982). Signs and symbols: A review of literature and survey of the use of non-vocal communication. London: Heinemann Educational Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kohl, F. L. (1981). Effects of motoric requirements on the acquisition of manual sign responses by severely handicapped students. Amer-ican Journal of Mental Deficiency, 85, 396–403.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kopchick, G. A., & Lloyd, L. L. (1976). Total Communication program-ming for the severely language impaired: A 24-hour approach. In L. L. Lloyd (Ed.), Communication Assessment and Intervention Strategies. Chap. 12, pp 501–521. Baltimore: University Park Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kyle, J. (1987). Sign and school. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters, Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• LAMH (1984). Language alternatives for mentally handicapped (LAMH) Manual. Dublin: LAMH.
   Google Scholar
• Langlois, J. (1982). A comparison of the learning and retention of one-handed and two-handed manual signs. Unpublished master's the-sis, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, L. L. (Ed.). (1976). Communication assessment and intervention strategies. Baltimore: University Park Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, L. L. (1980). Unaided nonspeech communication for severely handicapped individuals: An extensive bibliography. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, /5, 15–34.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, L. L., & Doherty, J. E. (1983). The influence of production mode on the recall of signs in normal adult subjects. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 26, 595–600.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lloyd, L. L., & Karlan, G. (1984). Transparency and translucency ratings for 910 manual signs. Unpublished data.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, L. L., Loeding, B., & Doherty, J. E. (1985). Role of iconicity in sign acquisition: A response to Orlansky and Bonvillian. Journal of Speech and Heating Disorders, 50, 3, 299–301.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Loeding, B. L., Zangari, C., & Lloyd, L. L. (1987). Improving the communication environment for children with severe disabilities: Final Report. Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Luftig, R. L. (1983). Translucency of sign and concreteness of gloss in the manual sign learning of moderately/severely mentally re-tarded students. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 88, 279–286.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Luftig, R. L., & Lloyd, L. L. (1981). Manual sign translucency and referential concreteness in the learning of signs. Sign Language Studies, 30, 49–60.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, C. B., & Weldon, L. J. (1983). Effects of semantic and cheremic context on acquisition of manual signs. Memory and Cognition, 11, 93–100.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Musselwhite, C. R., & St. Louis, K. W. (1982). Communication pro-gramming for the severely handicapped: Vocal and non-vocal strat-egies. San Diego, CA: College-Hill Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newell, W. (1981). Basic sign communication. Silver Spring, MD: National Association for the Deaf.
   Google Scholar
• Rafferty, M., Malocca, D., Kearns, T., Kelly-Meldon, F., O'Connell, A. (1988). The development of L.A.M.H. (Language Alternative for Mentally Handicapped). Unpublished manuscript, St. Michael's House. Assessment & Child Development Clinic, Ballymun Road, Dublin 9, Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• Redinger, R., Alger, K., & Ahnen, E. (1987). Teaching direct care staff sign language to work with the developmentally disabled in a residential environment. Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Reichle, J., Williams, W., & Ryan, S. (1981). Selecting signs for the formulation of an augmentative communicative modality. Technical Aids for the Severely Handicapped, 6, 48–56.
   Google Scholar
• Schaeffer, B., Musil, A., & Kollinzas, G. (1980). Total Communication: A signed speech approach to program for nonverbal children. Champaign, IL: Research Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schiefelbusch, R. L. (Ed.) (1980). Nonspeech language and commu-nication: Analysis and intervention. Baltimore: University Park Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schiefelbusch, R. L., & Lloyd, L. L. (Eds.). 1974. Language perspec-tives- Acquisition, retardation and intervention. Baltimore: University Park Press.
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, F. (1980). Communication for the speechless. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder-McLean, L. K. (1977). Performative function as a variable in initial lexical training with severely retarded nonverbal subjects. Doctoral dissertation. George Peabody College for Teachers. Dis-sertation Abstracts International, 39, 228A.
   Google Scholar
• Spragale, D., & Micucci, D. (1990). Signs of the week: A functional approach to sign language training. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, On press).
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, M. (1981). American Sign Language: A comprehensive dictionary. New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Stremel-Campbell, K., Cantrell, D., & Halle, J. (1977). Manual signing as a language system and as a speech initiator for the nonverbal severely handicapped student. In Sontag, E., Smith, J. & Certo, N. (Eds.) Educational programming for the severely and profoundly handicapped. Reston, VA: CEO Division of Mental Retardation. Sutcliff, B. M. (1983). "Total Communication" or total confusion. Journal of the British Teachers of the Deaf, 5, 7, 134–136.
   Google Scholar