Case studies: Why and how

References

• Barlow, D. H., & Hersen, M. (1984). Single case experimental designs (2nd ed.). New York: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Bennis, W. G. (1968). The case study I. Introduction. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 4, 227–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolgar, H. (1965). The case study method. In B. B. Wolman (Ed.), Handbook of clinical psychology (pp. 28–39). New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, R., & Miller, J. (1980). Analyzing language and communi-cation in the child. In R. C. Schiefelbusch (Ed.), Nonspeech lan-guage and communication: Acquisition and intervention (pp. 159–196). Baltimore: University Park Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crystal, D. (1986). ISAAC in chains: The future of communication systems. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 2, 140–145.
   Google Scholar
• Crystal, D. (1987). Meeting the need for case studies. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 3, 305–310.
   Google Scholar
• Dukes, W. R. (1965). N = 1. Psychological Bulletin, 64, 74–79.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Edgington, E. S. (1983). Response-guided experimentation. Contem-porary Psychology, 28, 64–65.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, K. L., Beukelman, D. R., & Low-Morrow, D. (1989). A comprehensive augmentative communication system for an adult with Broca's aphasia. Augmentative and Alternative Communica-tion, 5, 55–61.
   Google Scholar
• Goossens', C. (1989). Aided communication intervention before as-sessment: A case study of a child with cerebral palsy. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 5, 14–26.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, L. J. (1968). The case study III. From introductory lec-tures: Sociology 23. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 4, 236–240.
   Google Scholar
• Henson, K. T. (1988). Case study in teacher education. The Educa-tional Forum, 52, 236–241.
   Google Scholar
• Honsinger, M. J. (1989). Midcourse intervention in multiple sclerosis: A case presentation. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 5, 71–73.
   Google Scholar
• Hooper, J., Connell, T. M., & Flett, P. J. (1987). Blissymbols and manual signs: A multimodal approach to intervention in a case of multiple disability. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 3, 68–76.
   Google Scholar
• Huer, M. B. (1986, October). White's gestural system for lower extremities. Paper presented at the Fourth Biennial International Conference on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, Car-diff, Wales.
   Google Scholar
• Kazdin, A. E. (1980). Research design in clinical psychology. New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Kazdin, A. E. (1981). Drawing valid inferences from case studies. Journal of Counseling and Clinical Psychology, 49, 183–192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazarus, A. A., & Davison, G. C. (1971). Clinical innovation in research and practice. In A. E. Bergin, & S. L. Garfield (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change: An empirical analysis (pp. 196–213). New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Y. S. (1983). Public management and case study methods. Teaching Political Science, 11, 6–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, J., Beesly, M., & Collier, B. (1988). Transition through multiple augmentative and alternative communication systems: A three-year case study of a head-injured adolescent. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 4, 2–14.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, L. L., & Kangas, K. A. (1988). Think ink: Perspectives on why, when, where, and how to publish. The proceedings of the 3rd Annual Minspeak Conference. Wooster, OH: Prentke Romich.
   Google Scholar
• Locke, P. A., & Mirenda, P. (1988). A computer-supported commu-nication approach for a child with severe communication, visual, and cognitive impairments: A case study. Augmentative and Alter-native Communication, 4, 15–22.
   Google Scholar
• McCorcle, M. D. (1984). Stories in context: Characteristics of useful case studies in planning and evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning, 7, 205–208.
   Google Scholar
• McNaughton, D., & Light, J. (1989). Teaching facilitatiors to support the communication skills of an adult with severe cognitive disabili-ties: A case study. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 5, 35–41.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, G. L. (1969). Behavior modification research: Design and tactics. In C. M. Franks (Ed.)., Behavior therapy: Appraisal and status (pp. 29–62). New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Petrusa, E. R., & Weiss, G. B. (1982). Writing case reports: An educationally valuable experience for house officers. Journal of Medical Education, 57, 415–417.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ready, R. K. (1968). The case study II. Letter to the editor. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 4, 232–235.
   Google Scholar
• Reichle, J., & Yoder, D. E. (1985). Communication board use in severely handicapped learners. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 16, 146–157.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenblinth, J. F., & Sims-Knight, J. E. (1985). In the beginning: Development in the first two years of life. Monterey, CA: Brooks/ Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, R., & Cassatt-James, L. (1989). The language assessment process: Clinical implications for individuals with severe speech impairments. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 5, 165–172.
   Google Scholar
• Runyan, W. M. (1982). In defense of the case study method. American Journal of Orthopsychiatly, 52, 440–446.
   Google Scholar
• Shane, H., & Bashir, A. (1980). Election criteria for the adoption of an augmentative communication system: Preliminary considerations. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 45, 408–414.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vanderheiden, G. C., & Smith, R. O. (1989). Application of commu-nicative technologies to an adult with a high spinal cord injury. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 5, 62–66.
   Google Scholar
• Walton, R. E. (1972). Advantages and attributes of the case study. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 8, 73–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, S. (1979). Explorations of the usefulness of case study evaluations. Evaluation Quarterly, 3, 446–459.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (1981). The case study crisis: Some answers. Administra-tive Science Quarterly, 26, 58–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar