Further development of an Augmentative and Alternative Communication symbol taxonomy

REFERENCES

• Brown, R. (1977, June). Why are signed languages easier to learn than spoken languages? Keynote address presented at the Na-tional Symposium on Sign Language Research and Teaching, Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, R. (1978). Why are signed languages easier to learn than spoken languages? — Part Two. Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 32(3), 25–44.
   Google Scholar
• Doherty, J. E., & Lloyd, L. L. (1983, May). The effects of production mode, translucency and manuality on sign acquisition by retarded adults. Paper presented at the 107th Annual Conference of the American Association on Mental Deficiency, Dallas.
   Google Scholar
• Fristoe, M., & Bristow, D. (1982, November). Blissymbol translucency rating changes following three experimental manipulations. Poster session presented at the Annual Convention of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Toronto.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, D. R. (1987/1988). Effects of translucency and complexity on the associative learning of Blissymbols by cognitively normal chil-dren and adults. (Doctoral dissertation, Purdue University, 1987.) Dissertation Abstracts International, 49, 710B.
   Google Scholar
• Goodenough-Trepagnier, C. (1981, June). Representation of lan-guage for nonvocal communication. Paper presented at the AACP&T-NEMC meeting, Advances in Technical Aids for Children with Physical Disabilities, Tufts, Medford, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Goossens', C. A. (1983/1984). The relative iconicity and leamability of verb referents differentially represented as manual signs, Blis-symbols, and Rebus symbols: An investigation with moderately retarded individuals. (Doctoral dissertation, Purdue University, 1983). Dissertation Abstracts International, 45, 809A.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, P. R., & Cregan, A. (1986). Sign and symbol communication for mentally handicapped people. London: Groom Helm, Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Kiernan, C., Reid, B., & Jones, L. (1982). Signs and symbols: Use of non-vocal communication systems. London: Heinemann Educa-tional Books, Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, L. L., & Fuller, D. R. (1986). Toward an augmentative and alternative communication symbol taxonomy: A proposed superordinate classification. Augmentative and Alternative Communica-tion, 2, 165–171.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, L. L., & Fuller, D. R. (1990). The role of iconicity in augmentative and alternative communication-symbol learning. In W. I. Fraser (Ed.), Key issues in mental retardation research. London: Rout-ledge. (Based upon an invited presentation at the August 1988 Congress of the International Association for the Scientific Study of Mental Deficiency, Dublin, Ireland.)
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, L. L., & Karlan, G. R. (1983, August). Nonspeech communica-tion symbol selection considerations. Paper presented at the XIX Congress of the International Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrics, Edinburgh, Scotland.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, L. L., & Karlan, G. R. (1984). Nonspeech communication symbols and systems: Where have we been and where are we going? Journal of Mental Deficiency Research, 28, 3–20.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, L. L., Karlan, G. R., & Nail, B. (1991). Translucency values of 910 Blissymbols. Augmentative and Alternative Communication (under review).
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, L. L., Quist, R. W., & Windsor, J. (1990). A proposed AAC model. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 6, 168–179.
   Google Scholar
• Luftig, R. L., & Bersani, H. A. (1985). An investigation of two variables influencing Blissymbol learnability with nonhandicapped adults. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 1, 32–37.
   Google Scholar
• Luftig, R. L., & Lloyd, L. L. (1981). Manual sign translucency and referential concreteness in the learning of signs. Sign Language Studies, 30, 49–60.
   Google Scholar
• Mandel, M. (1977). Iconicity of signs and their leamability by non-sign-ers. Paper presented to the National Symposium on Sign Lan-guage Research and Training, Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Mirenda, P., & Locke, P. (1989). Acomparison of symbol transparency in nonspeaking persons with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 54, 131–140.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mizuko, M. I. (1987). Transparency and ease of learning of symbols represented by Blissymbolics, PCS, and Picsyms. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 3, 129–136.
   Google Scholar
• Musselwhite, C. R. (1982). A comparison of three symbolic commu-nication systems. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Western Virginia.
   Google Scholar
• Musselwhite, C. R., & Ruscello, D. M. (1984). Transparency of three communication symbol systems. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 27, 436–443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musselwhite, C. R., & St. Louis, K. W. (1982). Communication pro-gramming for the severely handicapped: Vocal and non-vocal strategies. Houston: College-Hill Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nietupski, J., & Hamre-Nietupski, S. (1979). Teaching auxiliary com-munication skills to severely handicapped learners. AAESPH Re-view, 4, 107–124.
   Google Scholar
• Sevcik, R. A., Romski, M. A., & Wilkinson, K. M. (1991). Roles of graphic symbols in the language acquisition process for persons with severe cognitive disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 7, 161–170.
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, F. H. (1980). Communication for the speechless. Engle-wood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder-McLean, L. (1978, November). Functional stimulus and re-sponse variables in sign training with retarded subjects. Paper presented at the 53rd Annual Convention of the American Speech and Hearing Association, San Francisco.
   Google Scholar
• van Balkom, H., & Welle Donker-Gimbrere, M. (1988). Kiezen voor communicatie: een handboek over communicatie van mensen met een motorische of meervoudige handicap (Choosing for commu-nication: a handbook about the communication of motoric and multiple handicapped children). Nykerk: Intro.
   Google Scholar
• Vanderheiden, G., & Harris-Vanderheiden, D. (1976). Communication techniques and aids for the nonvocal severely handicapped. In L. L. Lloyd (Ed.), Communication assessment and intervention strate-gies. Baltimore: University Park Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vanderheiden, G., & Lloyd, L. L. (1986). Communication systems and their components. In S. Blackstone (Ed.), Augmentative communi-cation: An introduction. Rockville, MD: American Speech-Lan-guage-Hearing Association.
   Google Scholar
• Yoder, D. (1980). Communication systems for nonspeech children. New Directions for Exceptional Children, 2, 63–78.
   Google Scholar
• Yovetich, W. S., & Paivio, A. (1980). Cognitive processing of Bliss-like symbols by normal populations: A report on four studies. Proceed-ings of the European Association for Special Education. Helsinki, Finland.
   Google Scholar