References
- Bedrosian, J. L. (1995). Limitations in the use of nondisabled subjects in AAC research. Augmentative and Alternative Com-munication, 11, 6–10.
- Buettemier, C. (1983). Evaluation of communication board use in a residential setting. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.
- Higginbotham, D. J. (1990). Considering single subject experi-mental designs in social interaction and discourse research. In J. Brodin & E. Bjorck-Akesson (Eds.), Methodological is-sues in research in augmentative and alternative communica-tion (pp. 79–85). Stockholm, Sweden: The Swedish Handicap Institute.
- Higginbotham, D. J. (1995). The use of nondisabled subjects in AAC research: Confessions of a research infidel. Augmenta-tive and Alternative Communication, 11, 2–5.
- Higginbotham, D. J., & Yoder, D. E. (1982). Communication within natural conversational interaction: Implications for severely communicatively impaired persons. Topics in Lan-guage Disorders, 2, 1–20.
- Marriner, N. A. (1987). The effect of communication aid output on the control of augmented communication interaction. Unpub-lished doctoral dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
- Remington, B. (1990). Why use single subject methods in AAC? In J. Brodin & E. Bjorck-Akesson (Eds.), Methodological is-sues in research in augmentative and alternative communica-tion (pp. 74–78). Stockholm, Sweden: The Swedish Handicap Institute.