Nomenclature of category levels in graphic symbols, Part I: is a flower a flower a flower?

References

• Berlin, B., Breedlove, D., & Raven, P. H. (1973). General principles of classification and nomenclature in folk biology. American Anthropologist, 75, 214–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D. R., & Mirenda, P. (1992). Augmentative and alter-native communication: Management of severe communication disorders in children and adults. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Bliss, C. K. (1965). Semantography. Sydney, Australia: Seman-tography Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Bliss, C. K., & McNaughton, S. (1975). The book of the film: "Mr. Symbol Man. "Sydney, Australia: Semantography Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, T. R. (1983). An investigation of the efficiency and effec-tiveness of three non vocal communication systems with severely handicapped students. Unpublished doctoral disserta-tion, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, R. (1958). Words and things. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bryen, D. N., Goldman, A. S., & Quinslik-Gill, S. (1988). Sign lan-guage with students with severe/profound mental retardation: How effective is it? Education and Training in Mental Retarda-tion, 23, 129–137.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, E. V. (1991). Acquisitional principles in lexical development. In S. A. Gelman & J. P. Byrnes (Eds.), Perspectives on lan-guage and thought: Interrelations in development (pp. 31–71). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Doss, L. S., Locke, P. A., Johnston, S. S., Reichle, J., Sigafoos, J., Carpentier, P. J., & Foster, D. J. (1991). Initial comparison of the efficacy of a variety of AAC systems for ordering meals in fast food restaurants. Augmentative and Alternative Commu-nication, 7, 256–265.
   Google Scholar
• Estes, W. K. (1986). Array models for category learning. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 500–549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller, D. R., Lloyd, L. L., & Schlosser, R. W. (1992). The further development of an augmentative and alternative communication symbol taxonomy. Augmentative and Alternative Communica-tion, 8, 67–73.
   Google Scholar
• Funnel, E., & Allport, A. (1989). Symbolically speaking: Commu-nicating with Blissymbols in aphasia. Aphasiology, 3, 279–300.
   Google Scholar
• Gelman, S. A., & Coley, J. D. (1991). Language and categoriza-tion: The acquisition of natural kind terms. In S. A. Gelman & J. P. Byrnes (Eds.), Perspectives on language and thought: Inter-relations in development (pp. 146–196). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstone, R. L. (1994). The role of similarity in categorization: Providing a groundwork. Cognition, 52, 125–157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goossens', C. A. (1984). The relative iconicity and learnability of verb referents differentially represented by manual signs, Blis-symbols, and Rebus symbols: An investigation with moderately retarded individuals (Doctoral dissertation, Purdue University, 1983). Dissertation Abstracts International, 45, 809A.
   Google Scholar
• Goossens', C. A. (1989). Aided communication intervention before assessment: A case study of a child with cerebral palsy. Aug-mentative and Alternative Communication, 5, 14–26.
   Google Scholar
• Harris-Vanderheiden, D., Brown, W., MacKenzie, P., Reinen, S., & Scheibe, C. (1975). Symbol communication for the mentally handicapped. Mental Retardation, 13, 34–37.
   Google Scholar
• Homa, D., Rhoads, D., & Chambliss, D. (1979). Evolution of concep-tual structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learn-ing and Memory, 5, 11–23.
   Google Scholar
• Hurlbut, B. I., lwata, B. A., & Green, J. D. (1982). Nonvocal lan-guage acquisition in adolescents with severe physical disabili-ties: Blissymbol versus iconic stimulus formats. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 15, 241–258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iacono, T. A. (1992). Individual language learning styles and aug-mentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 8, 33–40.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. M. (1994). The Picture Communication Symbols-Combination book. Solana Beach, CA: Mayer-Johnson.
   Google Scholar
• Koul, R. (1995). Comparison of graphic symbol learning in indi-viduals with aphasia and right hemisphere brain damage (sym-bol processing) (Doctoral dissertation, Purdue University, 1994). Dissertation Abstracts International, 56, 770.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, L. L., & Fuller, D. R. (1990). The role of iconicity in aug-mentative and alternative communication symbol learning. In W. I. Fraser (Ed.), Key issues in mental retardation research (pp. 295–306). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Low, L. A. (1988a). Contextual effect on encoding and recognition of category members subsumed by two levels of classification. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 26, 301–304.
   Google Scholar
• Low, L. A. (1988b). Effects of contextual composition of category triads on semantic interrelatedness among members. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 26, 403–406.
   Google Scholar
• Marchand, H. (1969). The categories and types of present-day English word-formation (2nd ed.). Munich: Beck.
   Google Scholar
• McNaughton, S. (1985). Communicating with Blissymbols. Toronto: Blissymbolics Communication Institute.
   Google Scholar
• McNaughton, S. (1993). Graphic representational systems and lit-eracy learning. Topics in Language Disorders, 13, 58–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNaughton, S., & Kates, B. (1980). The application of Blissym-bolics. In R. L. Schiefelbusch (Ed.)., Nonspeech language and communication (pp. 303–321). Baltimore: University Park Press.
   Google Scholar
• McNaughton, S., & Lindsay, P. (1995). Approaching literacy with AAC graphics. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 11,212–228.
   Google Scholar
• Medin, D. L., & Smith, E. E. (1984). Concepts and concept forma-tion. Annual Reviews in Psychology, 35,113–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mervis, C. B. (1987). Child-basic object categories and early lexi-cal development. In U. Neisser (Ed.)., Concepts and conceptual development: Ecological and intellectual factors in categoriza-tion (pp. 201–233). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mervis, C. B., & Crisafi, M. A. (1982). Order of acquisition of sub-ordinate-, basic-, and superordinate-level categories. Child Development, 53,258–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mervis, C. B., & Rosch, E. (1981). Categorization of natural objects. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 89–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirenda, P., & Santogrossi, J. (1985). A prompt-free strategy to teach pictorial communication system use. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 1, 143–150.
   Google Scholar
• Mizuko, M. I. (1987). Transparency and ease of learning symbols represented by Blissymbols, PCS, and Picsyms. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 3,129–136.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, G. L., & Smith, E. E. (1982). Basic-level superiority in pic-ture categorization. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Nail-Chiwetalu, B. (1992). The influence of symbol and learner factors on the learning of Blissymbols by students with mental retardation (Doctoral dissertation, Purdue University, 1991). Dissertation Abstracts International, 53,1125–A.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, N. (1992). Performance is the prize: Language compe-tence and performance among AAC users. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 8, 3–32.
   Google Scholar
• Newport, E. L., & Bellugi, U. (1978). Linguistic expression of cat-egory levels in a visual-gestural language: A flower is a flower is a flower. In E. Rosch & B. B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and cat-egorization (pp. 49–71). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Rankin, J. L., Harwood, K., & Mirenda, P. (1994). Influence of graphic symbol use on reading comprehension. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 10, 269–281.
   Google Scholar
• Rodale, J. I. (1978). The synonym finder. Emmaus, PA: Rodale Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosch, E. (1975). Cognitive representation of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 104, 192–233.
   Google Scholar
• Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch & B. B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization (pp. 27–48). Hills-dale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Rosch, E., & Mervis, C. B. (1975). Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 573–605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W., Johnson, D., & Boyes-Braem, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psy-chology, 8, 382–439.
   Google Scholar
• Rotholz, D., Berkowitz, S., & Burberry, J. (1989). Functionality of two modes of communication in the community by students with developmental disabilities: A comparison of signing and com-munication books. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 14, 227–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawyer-Woods, L. (1987). Symbolic function in a severe non-ver-bal aphasic. Aphasiology, 1, 287–290.
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W. (1995). Effectiveness of three teaching strategies on Blissymbol learning, retention, generalization, and use (Doctoral dissertation, Purdue University, 1994). Dissertation Abstracts Inter-national, 56–038, 892.
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W. (1997). Nomenclature of category levels in graphic symbols, Part II: Role of similarity in categorization. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 13, 14–29.
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W., & Lloyd, L. L. (1993). Effects of initial element teaching in a storytelling context on Blissymbol acquisition and generalization. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 979–995.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sevcik, R. A., Romski, M. A., & Wilkinson, K. M. (1991). Roles of graphic symbols in the language acquisition process for persons with severe cognitive disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 7, 161–170.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, C. E. (1991). Diverse conversational contexts for the acquisi-tion of language skills. In J. Miller (Ed.), Research on child lan-guage disorders: A decade of progress (pp. 105–124). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Song, A. (1979). Acquisition and use of Blissymbols by severely mentally retarded adolescents. Mental Retardation, 17, 253–255.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tversky, B., & Hemenway, K. (1984). Objects, parts, and cate-gories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 169–193.
   Google Scholar
• Vanderheiden, G. C., & Lloyd, L. L. (1986). Communication systems and their components. In S. W. Blackstone (Ed.), Augmentative communication: An introduction (pp. 49–162). Rockville, MD: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
   Google Scholar
• Waxman, S. R. (1990). Linguistic biases and the establishment of conceptual hierarchies: Evidence from preschool children. Cog-nitive Development, 5,123–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waxman, S. R. (1991). Convergences between semantic and con-ceptual organization in the preschool years. In S. A. Gelman & J. P. Byrnes (Eds.), Perspectives on language and thought: Interrelations in development (pp. 107–145). New York: Cam-bridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waxman, S. R., & Gelman, R. (1986). Preschoolers' use of super-ordinate relations in classification and language. Cognitive Development, 1, 139–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waxman, S. R., & Kosowski, T. D. (1990). Nouns mark category relations: Toddlers' and preschoolers' word-learning biases. Child Development, 61, 1461–1473.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Waxman, S. R., Shipley, E. E., & Shepperson, B. (1990). Estab-lishing new subcategories: The role of category labels and exist-ing knowledge. Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, C., Storr, J., & Reich, P. A. (Eds.) (1992). Blissymbol reference guide. Toronto: Blissymbolics Communication International.
   Google Scholar