Augmentative and alternative communication decision making for children with severely unintelligible speech

References

• Beliveau, C., Hodge, M. M. & Hagler, P. (1995). Effects of sup-plemental linguistic cues on the intelligibility of severely dysarthric speakers. Augmentative and Alternative Communi-cation, 11, 176–186.
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D. R., & Yorkston, K. M. (1980). Influence of passage familiarity on intelligibility estimates of dysarthric speech. Jour-nal of Communication Disorders, 13, 33–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, J. B. (1974). Statistic analysis of the corpus. In J. B. Car-roll, P. Davis, & H. Richman (Eds.), Word frequency book (pp. 536–629). Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, J. G. (1985). Alaryngeal speech intelligibility and the older listener. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 50, 60–65.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cutting, J. E., & Pisoni, D. B. (1978). An information-processing approach to speech perception. In J. F. Kavanaugh & W. Strange (Eds.), Speech and language in the laboratory, school, and clinic (pp. 38–72). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dale, P. S., & Fenson, L. (1993). LEX: A lexical development norms database [Computer program]. Seattle, WA: University of Washington, Department of Psychology.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, P., & Mehan, H. (1988). Professional and family under-standing of impaired communication. British Journal of Disor-ders of Communication, 23, 141–151.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dongilli, P. A., Jr. (1994). Semantic context and speech intelligi-bility. In J. A. Till, K. M. Yorkston, & D. R. Beukelman (Eds.), Motor speech disorders, advances in assessment and treat-ment (pp. 175–191). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Dowden, P. A. (1992). The effects of listener training on the speech intelligibility of severely dysarthric individuals. Unpublished doc-toral dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
   Google Scholar
• Dowden, P. A., Yorkston, K. M., & Stoel-Gammon, C. (1987, November). Speech intelligibility of augmented system users: Effects of context. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Speech-Language and Hearing Association, Ana-heim, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1981). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test—Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
   Google Scholar
• Fenson, L., Dale, P. S., Reznick, J. S., Thal, D., Bates, E., Hartung, J., Pethick, S., & Reilly, J. S. (1993). User's guide and techni-cal manual for the MacArthur Communicative Development Inventories. San Diego, CA: Singular Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fried-Oken, M., & More, L. (1992). An initial vocabulary for non-speaking preschool children based on developmental and envi-ronmental language sources. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 8, 41–56.
   Google Scholar
• Hammen, V. L., Yorkston, K. M., & Dowden, P. (1991). Index of contextual intelligibility I: Impact of semantic context in dysarthria. In C. Moore, K. M. Yorkston, & D. R. Beukelman (Eds.), Dysarthria and apraxia of speech: Perspectives on inter-vention. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Hubbard, D. J., & Kushner, D. (1980). A comparison of speech intelligibility between esophageal and normal speakers via three modes of presentation. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 23, 909–916.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hunter, L., Pring, T., & Martin, S. (1991). The use of strategies to increase speech intelligibility in cerebral palsy: An experimental eval-uation. British Journal of Disorders of Communication, 26, 163–174.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kent, R. D., Miolo, G., & Bloedel, S. (1994). The intelligibility of chil-dren's speech: A review of evaluation procedures. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology: A Journal of Clinical Practice, 3,81–95.
   Google Scholar
• Lindblom, B. (1990). On the communication process: Speaker-lis-tener interaction and the development of speech. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 6,220–230.
   Google Scholar
• Ling, D., & Ling, A. H. (1977). Basic vocabulary and language the-saurus for hearing-impaired children. Washington, DC: A. G. Bell Association for the Deaf.
   Google Scholar
• McGarr, N. S. (1980). Evaluation of speech in intermediate school-aged deaf children. In J. Subtelny (Ed.), Speech assessment and speech improvement for the hearing impaired (pp. 45–66). Washington, DC: A. G. Bell Association for the Deaf.
   Google Scholar
• McGarr, N. (1983). The intelligibility of deaf speech to experienced and inexperienced listeners. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 26, 451–458.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Metz, D. E., Schiavetti, N., & Sitler, R. W. (1980). Toward an objec-tive description of the dependent and independent variables associated with intelligibility assessments of hearing-impaired adults. In J. Subtelny (Ed.), Speech assessment and speech improvement for the hearing impaired (pp. 72–81). Washington, DC: A. G. Bell Association for the Deaf.
   Google Scholar
• Microsoft Corporaton. (1985–1992). Microsoft Excel: Spreadsheet with business graphics and database (Version 4.0) [Computer software]. Redmond, WA: Microsoft Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Monsen, R. B. (1978). Toward measuring how well hearing-impaired children speak. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 21, 197–219.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morris, S. R. (1995). The Preschool Speech Intelligibility Measure. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 4(4), 22–28.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, J. W. (1995, March). The use of language immersion to facilitate augmentative communication training with a dysarthric speaker. Paper presented to the Technology for Persons with Disabilities Conference at California State University at North-ridge, Los Angeles, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, K. (1973). Structure and strategy in learning to talk. Mono-graphs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 38(1-2), 29–34.
   Google Scholar
• Pollack, I., & Pickett, J. M. (1963). The intelligibility of excerpts from conversation. Language and Speech, 6,165–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollack, I., & Pickett, J. M. (1964). The intelligibility of excerpts from fluent speech: Auditory Vs structural context. Verbal Learn-ing and Verbal Behavior, 3,79–84.
   Google Scholar
• Tikofsky, R. S., & Tikofsky, R. P. (1964). Intelligibility measures of dysarthric speech. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 7, 325–333.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yorkston, K. M., & Beukelman, D. R. (1978). A comparison of tech-niques for measuring intelligibility of dysarthric speech. Journal of Communication Disorders, 11, 499–512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yorkston, K. M., & Beukelman, D. R. (1983). The influence of judge familiarization with the speaker on dysarthric speech intelligi-bility. In W. R. Berry (Ed.), Clinical dysarthria (pp. 155–163). San Diego, CA: College-Hill Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yorkston, K. M., Strand, E. A., & Kennedy, M. R. T. (1996). Com-prehensibility of dysarthric speech: Implications for assessment and treatment planning. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 5(1), 55–66.
   Google Scholar