Crews,Wusses, and Whoppas: core and fringe vocabularies of Australian meal-break conversations in the workplace

References

• Baker, B. (1993). The Pittsburgh Employment Conference: Focus and synergy. In The Pittsburgh Employment Conference, 1 (pp. v-vi). Pittsburgh: SHOUT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Balandin, S. (1994). Symbol board vocabularies. In Sixth Biennial Conference of the International Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communication (pp. 548–550). Maastricht, The Netherlands: IRV.
   Google Scholar
• Balandin, S. (1995). The topics and vocabulary of meal break con-versations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Macquarie Uni-versity, Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Balandin, S., & Iacono, T. (1993). Symbol vocabularies: A study of vocabulary found on communication boards used by adults with cerebral palsy. In Australian 01 Conference on Technology for People with Disabilities (pp. 85–87). Adelaide, SA: The Crippled Children's Association of SA Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Balandin, S., & Iacono, T. (1998a). A few well-chosen words. Aug-mentative and Alternative Communication, /4,147–161.
   Google Scholar
• Balandin, S., & Iacono, T. (1998b). Topics of meal-break conver-sations. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 14, 131–146.
   Google Scholar
• Bedrosian, J. L. (1993). Making minds meet: Assessment of con-versational topic in adults with mild to moderate mental retar-dation. Topics in Language Disorders, /3(3), 36–46.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, K. (1967). The most common words used in conversation. Journal of Communication Disorders, 1, 201–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D., McGinnis, J., & Morrow, D. (1991). Vocabulary selection in augmentative and alternative communication. Aug-mentative and Alternative Communication, 7, 171–185.
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D. R., Jones, R. S., & Rowan, M. (1989). Frequency of word usage by nondisabled peers in integrated preschool classrooms. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 5, 243–248.
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D. R., & Yorkston, K. M. (1982). Communication inter-action of adult communication augmentation system use. Top-ics in Language Disorders, 2(2), 39–54.
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D. R., Yorkston, K. M., Poblete, M., & Naranjo, C. (1984). Frequency of word occurrence in communication sam-ples produced by adult communication aid users. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 49, 360–367.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blackstone, S. W. (1988). Vocabulary selection: Current practices and a glimpse at the future. Augmentative Communication News, 1(5), 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Blackstone, S. W. (1993). For consumers. Augmentative Commu-nication News, 6(4), 1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G. D. A. (1984). A frequency count of 190,000 words in the London-Lund Corpus of English Conversation. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 16, 502–532.
   Google Scholar
• Burroughs, G. E. R. (1957). A study of the vocabulary of young children. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.
   Google Scholar
• Calculator, S. N. (1988). Exploring the language of adults with mental retardation. In S. N. Calculator & J. L. Bedrosian (Eds.), Communication assessment and intervention for adults with mental retardation (pp. 95–106). London: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, F. (1981). A format for selecting vocabulary for the non-speaking child. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, /2,240–245.
   Google Scholar
• Castles, E. E. A., & Glass, C. R. (1986). Training in social and inter-personal problem-solving skills for mildly and moderately men-tally retarded adults. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 9/(1), 35–42.
   Google Scholar
• Chadsey-Rusch, J., DeStefano, L., O'Reilly, M., Gonzalez, P., & Collet-Klingenberg, L. (1992). Assessing the loneliness of work-ers with mental retardation. Mental Retardation, 30, 85–92.
   Google Scholar
• Creech, R. (1993). Productive employment for augmentative com-municators. In The Pittsburgh Employment Conference, 1 (pp. 105–108). Pittsburgh: SHOUT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elder, P. S. (1994). Vocabulary selection for vocational train-ing activities with augmented speakers who are moderate-ly/severely developmentally delayed. In The Pittsburgh Employment Conference, 2 (pp. 56–60). Pittsburgh: SHOUT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fried-Oken, M., & More, L. (1992). An initial vocabulary for non-speaking preschool children based on developmental and envi-ronmental language sources. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 8, 41–56.
   Google Scholar
• Fried-Oken, M., & Stuart, S. (1992). A few selected words about word selection: Vocabulary issues in AAC. In D. J. Gardner-Bonneau (Ed.), The Second ISAAC Research Symposium in Augmentative and Alternative Communication (pp. 68–78). Philadelphia: ISAAC.
   Google Scholar
• Greenspan, S., & Schouts, G. (1981). Why mentally retarded adults lose their jobs: Social competence as a factor in work adjustment. Applied Research in Mental Retardation, 2(1), 23–28.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hanley-Maxwell, C., Rusch, F. R., Chadsey-Rusch, J., & Renza-glia, A. (1986). Reported factors contributing to job termina-tions of individuals with severe disability. The Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 11(1), 45–52.
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, D. J. (1995). Use of nondisabled subjects in AAC research: Confessions of a research infidel. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 11, 2–5.
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, J., Bak, C., Drazek, A., Kelly, C., & White, K. (1992a). Consuming technology: Word prediction in MS DOS land. Communicating Together, 10(1), 10–13.
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, J., Bak, C., Drazek, A., Kelly, C., & White, K. (1992b). Consuming technology: Word prediction in MS DOS land part 2: Performance and ease of use evaluation. Commu-nicating Together, 10(2), 9–10.
   Google Scholar
• Hopper, R., Koch, S., & Mandelbaum, J. (1986). Conversational analysis methods. In D. G. Ellis & W. A. Donohue (Eds.), Con-temporary issues in language and discourse processes (pp. 169–186). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Hurtig, R. (1977). Toward a functional theory of discourse. In R. 0. Freedle (Ed.), Discourse production and comprehension (pp. 89–106). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Jiranek, D., & Kirby, N. (1990). The job satisfaction and/or psy-chological well being of young adults with an intellectual dis-ability and nondisabled young adults in either sheltered employ-ment, competitive employment or unemployment. Australia and New Zealand Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 16, 133–148.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, T. (1994). AAC and employment in the United Kingdom. In Pittsburgh Employment Conference, 2 (pp. 97–108). Pittsburgh: SHOUT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kazdin, A. E. (1982). Single-case research designs. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• LaPlante, M. P. (1993). Estimating the size of the speech-impaired population, use of speech aids and employment patterns. In The Pittsburgh Employment Conference, / (pp. 7–11). Pitts-burgh: SHOUT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Little, M. F., McFarland, M. L., & Williams, H. M. (1937). Develop-ment of language and vocabulary in young children. Iowa: Uni-versity of Iowa.
   Google Scholar
• Marvin, C. A., Beukelman, D. R., & Bilyeu, D. (1994). Vocabulary-use patterns in preschool children: Effects of context and time sampling. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 10, 224–236.
   Google Scholar
• McGinnis, J. S., & Beukelman, D. R. (1989). Vocabulary require-ments for writing activities for the academically mainstreamed student with disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Com-munication, 5,183–191.
   Google Scholar
• Mein, R., & O'Connor, N. (1960). A study of the oral vocabularies of severely subnormal patients. Journal of Mental Deficiency Research, 4, 130–143.
   Google Scholar
• Merchen, M. A. (1984). Technology and people. Communication Outlook, 6(2), 12–13.
   Google Scholar
• Merchen, M. A. (1990). Some reasons for being passive from a personal perspective. Communication Outlook, 12(1), 10–11.
   Google Scholar
• Millward, C. M. (1983). Handbook for writers. New York: Holt, Rine-hart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Morrow, D. R., Mirenda, P., Beukelman, D. R., & Yorkston, K. M. (1993). Vocabulary selection for augmentative communication systems: A comparison of three techniques. American Journal of Speech and Language Pathology, 2(2), 19–30.
   Google Scholar
• Morse, J. L. (1988). Assessment procedures for people with men-tal retardation: The dilemma and suggested adaptive proce-dures. In S. N. Calculator & J. L. Bedrosian (Eds.), Communi-cation assessment and intervention for adults with mental retardation (pp. 109–138). London: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Newell, A. (1992). Social communication: Chattering, nattering and cheek. Communication Outlook, /4(1), 6–8.
   Google Scholar
• Parent, W. S., Kregel, J., Metzler, H. M. D., & Twardzik, G. (1992). Social integration in the workplace: An analysis of the interac-tion activities of workers with mental retardation and their co-workers. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, March, 28–38.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, P. (1995). The natural language. Sydney: Dictionary Research Centre, Macquarie University.
   Google Scholar
• Searle, J. (1991). Communication at work: An ethnography of check-out operators. Brisbane: Queensland Council for Adult Literacy.
   Google Scholar
• Shafer, M. S., Rice, M. L., Metzler, H. M. D., & Haring, M. (1989). A survey of nondisabled employees' attitudes toward supported employees' with mental retardation. The Journal of the Associ-ation for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 14, 137–146.
   Google Scholar
• Sowers, J., & Powers, P. (1991). Vocational preparation and employment of students with physical and multiple disabilities. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Stenstrom, A. B. (1994). An introduction to spoken interaction. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Storey, K., Ezell, H., & Lengyel, L. (1995). Communication strate-gies for increasing the integration of persons in supported employment: A review. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 4(2), 45–54.
   Google Scholar
• Storey, K., & Knutson, N. (1989). A comparative analysis of social interactions of workers with and without disabilities in integrated work sites: A pilot study. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 265–272.
   Google Scholar
• Stuart, S. (1988). Vocabulary selection-augmentative communi-cation. South Dakota State Speech-Language-Hearing Jour-nal, 31, 17–19.
   Google Scholar
• Stuart, S., & Beukelman, D. R. (1993). Customising communica-tion technology for older persons. Technology and Disability, 2(1), 43–55.
   Google Scholar
• Stuart, S., Jones, R., & Beukelman, D. (1992, August). Vocabulary by topic analysis in the speech of elderly persons. Paper presented at the 5th Biennial Conference of the International Society of Aug-mentative and Alternative Communication, Philadephia, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Stuart, S., Beukelman, D. R., & King, J. (1997). Vocabulary use during extended conversations by two cohorts of older adults. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 13, 40–47.
   Google Scholar
• Stuart, S., Vanderhoof, D., & Beukelman, D. R. (1993). Topic and vocabulary use patterns of elderly women. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 9, 95–118.
   Google Scholar
• Stump, R. T. (1993). The vocational counselor and the augmen-tative communicator: From the intake interview to the job inter-view. In The Pittsburgh Employment Conference, 1 (pp. 16–23). Pittsburgh: SHOUT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tice, R. (1989). Vocabulary Frequency Analyzer. Lincoln, NE: Uni-versity of Lincoln-Nebraska.
   Google Scholar
• Todman, J., Alm, N., Elder, L., & File, P. (1994). TALK: A computer based conversation aid using prestored text. In Sixth Biennial Conference of the International Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communication (pp. 490–492). Maastricht, The Netherlands: IRV.
   Google Scholar
• Vanderheiden, G. C., & Kelso, D. P. (1987). Comparative analysis of fixed-vocabulary communication acceleration techniques. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 3,196-206. guage, /3,308–319.
   Google Scholar
• Ylvisaker, M., Urbanczyk, B., & Feeney, T. J. (1992). Social skills following traumatic brain injury. Seminars in Speech and Language, 13, 308�319.
   Google Scholar
• Yorkston, K. M., Beukelman, D. R., Smith, K., & Tice, R. (1990a). Extended communication samples of augmented communicators II: Analysis of multiword sequences. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 55, 225�230.
   Google Scholar
• Yorkston, K. M., Dowden, P. A., Honsinger, M. J., Marriner, N., & Smith, K. (1988). A comparison of standard and user vocabulary lists. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 4, 189�210.
   Google Scholar
• Yorkston, K. M., Beukelman, D. R., Smith, K., & Tice, R. (1990a). Smith, K. (1988). A comparison of standard and user vocabu- parison of individualised versus standard single-word vocabu- lanes. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 55,217–224.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar