Combining Primary Prevention and Risk Reduction Approaches in Sexual Assault Protection Programming

REFERENCES

• Obama B. Establishing a White House task force to protect students from sexual assault. Available at: http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2014/01/22/memorandum-establishing-white-house-task-force-protect-students-sexual-a. Accessed May 20, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Dartmouth University Summit on Sexual Assault. Home page. Available at: http://www.dartmouth.edu/sosa. Accessed June 15, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor V. Columbia student carrying mattress on campus brings attention to anti-sexual assault movement. Available at: http://www.nydailynews.com/life-style/columbia-mattress-student-draws-attention-anti-rape-movement-article-1.1948842. Accessed October 30, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Brener N, McMahon P, Warren C, Douglas K. Forced sexual intercourse and associated health-risk behaviors among female college students in the United States. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1999;67:252–259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher B, Cullen F, Turner M. The Sexual Victimization of College Women. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice and the Bureau of Justice Statistics; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Koss M, Gidycz C, Wisniewski N. The scope of rape: incidence and prevalence of sexual aggression and victimization in a national sample of higher education students. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1987;55:162–170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romeo F. Acquaintance rape on college and university campuses. Coll Stud J. 2004;38:61–65.
   Google Scholar
• O'Sullivan L, Byers E, Finkelman L. A comparison of male and female college students’ experiences of sexual coercion. Psychol Women Q. 1998;22:177–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Struckman-Johnson C, Struckman-Johnson D, Anderson P. Tactics of sexual coercion: when men and women won't take no for an answer. J Sex Res. 2003;40:76–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tewksbury R, Mustaine E. Lifestyle factors associated with the sexual assault of men: a routine activity theory analysis. J Mens Stud. 2001;9:153–182.
   Google Scholar
• Black MC, Basile KC, Breiding MJ, et al. The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS): 2010 Summary Report. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• American College Health Association. Shifting the Paradigm: Primary Prevention of Sexual Violence. Baltimore, MD: American College Health Association; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Lonsway K. Rape Prevention and Risk Reduction: Review of the Research Literature for Practitioners. Harrisburg, PA: VAWnet. Available at: http://www.vawnet.org. Accessed September 21, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Orchowski L, Gidycz C, Raffle H. Evaluation of a sexual assault risk reduction and self-defense program: a prospective analysis of a revised protocol. Psychol Women Q. 2008;32:204–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holtzman M, Menning C. A new model for sexual assault protection: creation and initial testing of Elemental. J Appl Soc Sci. 2015;9:139–155
   Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sexual Violence Prevention: Beginning the Dialogue. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• White House Task Force to Protect Students From Sexual Assault. Not Alone. Washington, DC: Office of the Vice President and the White House Council on Women and Girls; 2014. Available at: http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/docs/report_0.pdf. Accessed June 11, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• DeGue S, Valle L, Holt M, Massetti G, Matjasko J, Tharp A. A systematic review of primary prevention strategies for sexual violence perpetration. Aggress Violent Behav. 2014;19:346–362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vladutiu C, Martin S, Macy R. College- or university-based sexual assault prevention programs: a review of program outcomes, characteristics, and recommendations. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2011;12:67–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nation M, Crusto C, Wandersman A, et al. What works in prevention: principles of effective prevention programs. Am Psychol. 2003;58:449–456.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Backes BL. Building a solid foundation for sexual violence research: applying lessons learned to inform research priorities. Violence Against Women. 2013;19:737–755.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeGue S, Simon TR, Basile KC, Yee SL, Lang K, Spivak H. Moving forward by looking back: reflecting on a decade of DCD's work in sexual violence prevention, 2000–2010. J Womens Health. 2012;21:1211–1218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul LA, Gray MJ. Sexual assault programming on college campuses: using social psychological belief and behavior change principles to improve outcomes. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2011;12:99–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitaker DJ, Murphy CM, Eckhardt, CI, Hodges AE, Cowart M. Effectiveness of primary prevention efforts for intimate partner violence. Partner Abuse. 2013;4:175–195.
   Google Scholar
• Casey EA, Lindhorst TP. Toward a multi-level, ecological approach to the primary prevention of sexual assault prevention in peer and community contexts. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2009;10:91–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espelage DL, Low S, Polanin JR, Brown EC. The impact of a middle school program to reduce aggression, victimization, and sexual violence. J Adolesc Health. 2013;53:180–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollander J. The roots of resistance to women's self-defense. Violence Against Women. 2009;15:574–594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollander J. Does self-defense training prevent sexual violence against women? Violence Against Women. 2014;20:252–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brecklin LR, Ullman SE. Self-defense or assertiveness training and women's responses to sexual attacks. J Interpers Violence. 2005;20:738–762.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Coalition Against Sexual Assault. Guidelines on Choosing a Women's Self-Defense Course. Available at: http://www.portlandoregon.gov/Police/article/61885. Accessed on November 4, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Breitenbecher K, Scarce M. An evaluation of the effectiveness of a sexual assault education program focusing on psychological barriers to resistance. J Interpers Violence. 2001;16:387–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris J, Nurius P, Dimeff L. Through her eyes: factors affecting women's perceptions of and resistance to acquaintance sexual aggression threat. Psychol Women Q. 1996;20:123–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nurius P, Norris J, Young D, Graham T, Gaylord J. Interpreting and defensively responding to threat: examining appraisals and coping with acquaintance sexual aggression. Violence Vict. 2000;15:187–208.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rozee PD, Koss MP. Rape: a century of resistance. Psychol Women Q. 2001;25:295–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson RK, Broom I. The utility of cumulative meta-analyses: application to programs for reducing sexual violence. Sex Abuse. 2005;17:357–373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brecklin LR. Evaluation outcomes of self-defense training for women: a review. Aggress Violent Behav. 2007;13:60–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ullman SE. A 10-year update of ‘Review and critique of empirical studies of rape avoidance.’ Crim Justice and Behav. 2007;34:411–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pizone-Glover H, Gidycz C, Jacobs C. An acquaintance rape prevention program: effects on attitudes toward women, rape-related attitudes, and perceptions of rape scenarios. Psychol Women Q. 1998;22:605–621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gidycz C, Layman M, Rich C, Crothers J, Matorin A, Jacobs C. An evaluation of an acquaintance rape prevention program: impact on attitudes, sexual aggression, and sexual victimization. J Interpers Violence. 2001;16:1120–1138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gidycz C, Lynn S, Rich C, et al. The evaluation of a sexual assault risk reduction program: a multisite investigation. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2001;69:1073–1078.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gidycz C, Rich C, Orchowski L, King C, Miller A. The evaluation of a sexual assault self-defense and risk reduction program for college women: a prospective study. Psychol Women Q. 2006;30:173–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moynihan M, Banyard V, Arnold J, Eckstein R, Stapleton J. Engaging intercollegiate athletes in preventing and intervening in sexual and intimate partner violence. J Am Coll Health. 2010;59:197–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gidycz C, Nelson Coble C, Latham L, Layman MJ. Sexual assault experience in adulthood and prior victimization experiences. Psychol Women Q. 1993;17:151–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Classen C, Palesh O, Aggarwal R. Sexual revictimization: a review of the empirical literature. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2005;6:103–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koenig L. From Child Sexual Abuse to Adult Sexual Risk: Trauma, Revictimization, and Intervention. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Fritz M, MacKinnon D. Required sample size to detect the mediated effect. Psychol Sci. 2007;18:233–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar