Cross-national comparisons of college students' attitudes toward diet/fitness apps on smartphones

Reference

• Smith A. Smartphone Ownership 2013. Pew Research Center. Washington DC; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley J, Barbier J, Handler D. Embracing the Internet of things to capture your share of $14.4 trillion. Available at: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/ac79/docs/innov/IoE_Economy.pdf. Accessed March 14, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Fox S, Duggan M. Mobile Health 2012. Pew Research Center. Washington, DC; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Cho J, Lee HE, Kim S, Park D. Effects of body image on college students' attitudes toward diet/fitness apps on smartphones. Cyberpyschology Behav Soc Netw. 2015;18:41–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buis LR, Hirzel L, Turske SA, Jardins RT, Yarandi H. Use of a text message program to raise type 2 diabetes risk awareness and promote health behavior change (Part I): Assessment of participant reach and adoption. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15:e.281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter MC, Burley VJ, Nykjaer C, Cade JE. Adherence to a smartphone application for weight loss compared to website and paper diary: Pilot randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15:e.32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Manage Sci. 1989;35:982–1003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi J, Geistfeld LV. A cross-cultural investigation of consumer e-shopping adoption. J Econ Psychol. 2004;25:821–838.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erumban AA, Jong SB. Cross-country differences in ICT adoption: A consequence of culture? J. World Bus. 2006;41:302–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Im I, Hong S, Kang MS. An international comparison of technology acceptance testing the UTAUT model. Inform Manage. 2011;48:1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim Y, Sohn D, Choi S. Cultural difference in motivations for using social network sites: A comparative study of American and Korean college students. Comput Hum Behav. 2011;27:365–372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee I, Choi B, Kim J, Hong S. Culture-technology fit: Effects of cultural characteristics on the post-adoption beliefs of mobile Internet users. Int J Electron Commer. 2007;11:11–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu C, Zhu Q, Holroyd KA, Seng EK. Status and trends of mobile-health applications for iOS devices: A developer's perspective. J Syst Softw. 2011;84:2022–2033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummiskey M. There's an app for that smartphone use in health and physical education. J Phys Educ Recreat Danc. 2011;82:24–30.
   Google Scholar
• Frøisland EH, Årsand E, Skårderud F. Improving diabetes care for young people with type 1 diabetes through visual learning on mobile phones: Mixed-methods study. J Med Internet Res. 2012;14:e.111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luxton DD, McCann RA, Bush NE, Mishkind MC, Reger GM. mHealth for mental health: Integrating smartphone technology in behavioral healthcare. Prof Psychol Res Pract. 2011;42:505–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris ME, Kathawala Q, Leen TK, Gorenstein EE, Guilak F, Labhard M, Deleeuw W. Mobile therapy: Case study evaluations of a cell phone application for emotional self-awareness. J Med Internet Res. 2010;12:e.10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xue L, Yen CC, Chang L, Chan HC, Tai BC, Tan SB, Duh HBL, Choolain M, An exploratory study of ageing women's perception on access to health informatics via a mobile phone-based intervention. Int J Med Inform. 2012;81:637–648.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim S, Xue L, Yen CC, Change L, Chan HC, Tai BC, Duh HBL, Choolani M. A study on Singaporean women's acceptance of using mobile phones to seek health information. J Med Internet Res. 2011;80:e.189–e.202.
   Google Scholar
• Cho J, Quinlan M, Park D, Noh G. Determinants of adoption of smartphone health app among college students. Am J Health Behav. 2014;38:860–870.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egea JMO, Gonzalez MVR. Explaining physicians' acceptance of EHCR systems: An extension of TAM with trust and risk factors. Comput Hum Behav. 2011;27:319–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Davis FD. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Manage Sci. 2000;46:186–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yarbrough AK, Smith TB. Technology acceptance among physicians: A new take on TAM. Med Care Res Rev. 2007;64:650–672.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ketikidis P, Dimitrovski T, Lazuras L, Bath PA. Acceptance of health information technology in health professionals: An application of the revised technology acceptance model. Health Inform J. 2012;18:124–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen GM. Tweet this: A uses and gratifications perspective on how active Twitter use gratifies a need to connect with others. Comput Hum Behav. 2011;27:755–762.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joo Y, Sang Y. Exploring Koreans' smartphone usage: An integrated model of the technology acceptance model and uses and gratifications theory. Comput Hum Behav. 2013;29:2512–2518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrocharidou A, Efthymiou I. Computer mediated communication for social and academic purposes: Profiles of use and university students' gratifications. Comput Educ. 2012;58:609–616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park N, Kee KF, Valenzuela S. Being immersed in social networking environment Facebook groups, uses and gratifications, and social outcomes. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2009;12:729–733.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ho H, Syu L. Uses and gratifications of mobile application users. International Conference on Electronics and Information Engineering (ICEIE). 2010;315–319.
   Google Scholar
• Vekasalo H, Lopez-Nicolas C, Molina-Castillo FJ, Bouwman H. Analysis of users and non-users of smartphone application. Telemat Inform. 2010;27:242–255.
   Google Scholar
• Arnhold M, Quade M, Kirch W. Mobile applications for diabetics: A systematic review and expert-based usability evaluation considering the special requirements of diabetes patients age 50 years or older. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16:e.104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison LG, Hargood C, Lin SX, Dennison L, Joseph J, Hughes S, Michaelides DT, Johnston D, Johnston M, Michie S, Little P, Smith P, Weal MJ, Yardley L. Understanding usage of a hybrid website and smartphone apps for weight management: A mixed-methods study. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16:e. 201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee HE, Cho J. What motivates users to continue to use diet and fitness apps? Application of the uses and gratifications approach. Health Comm. 2016 ( in press).
   Google Scholar
• PEW Research Center. Mobile technology fact sheet. Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org/fact-sheets/mobile-technology-fact-sheet/ Accessed March 14, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Goldman J. The best weight loss iPhone and Android apps for the year. Available at: http://www.healthline.com/health/diet-and-weight-loss/top-iphone-android-apps. Accessed March 14, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Holden RJ, Karsh B. The technology acceptance model: Its past and its future in health care. J Biomed Inform. 2010;43:159–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legis P, Ingham J, Collerette P. Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Inform Manage. 2003;40:191–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenner GH, Renn RW. Technology-assisted supplemental work and work-to-family conflict: The role of instrumentality beliefs, organizational expectations and time management. Hum Relat. 2010;63:63–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tennakoon KLUS, Silveira GJC, Taras DG. Drivers of context-specific ICT use across work and nonwork domains: A boundary theory perspective. Inform Organ. 2013;23:107–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargittai E. Second-level digital divide: Differences in people's online skills. First Monday. 2002;7. Available at http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue7_4/hargittai/
   Google Scholar
• Katz JE, Rice RE, Aspden P. The Internet 1995–2000: Access, civic involvement and social interaction. Am Behav Sci. 2001;45:405–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsatsou P. Digital divides revisited: What is new about divides and their research? Media, Cult Soc. 2011;33:317–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Deursen A, van Dijk J. Internet skills and the digital divide. New Media Soc. 2011;13:893–911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandtzæga PB, Heim J, Karahasanović a A. Understanding the new digital divide—A typology of Internet users in Europe. Int J Hum-Comput Stud. 2011;69:123–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortunati L, Taipale S. The advanced use of mobile phones in five European countries. Br J Sociol. 2014;65:317–337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavlou PA, Chai L. What drives electronic commerce across cultures? A cross-cultural empirical investigation of the theory of planned behavior. J Electron Commer Res. 2002;3:240–253.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede G. The cultural relativity of organizational practices and theories. J Int Bus Stud. 1983;14:75–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstede G. Motivation, leadership, and organization: Do American theories apply abroad? Organ Dyn. 1980;9:42–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstede G. Cultural dimensions in management and planning. Asian Pac J Manage. 1984;81–99.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede G. Cultures Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations. Sage. Thousand Oaks, CA; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Strite M, Karahanna E. The role of espoused national cultural values in technology acceptance. MIS Q. 2006;30:679–704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straub D, Keil M, Brenner W. Testing the technology acceptance model across cultures: A three country study. Inform Manage. 1997;33:1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951;16:297–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model: Multidiscip J. 1999;6:1–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shulka P. Impact of interpersonal influences, brand origin and brand image on luxury purchase intentions: Measuring interfunctional interactions and a cross-national comparison. J World Bus. 2011;46:242–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West JH, Hall PC, Hanson CL, Barnes MD, Giraud-Carrier C, Barrett J. There's an app for that: Content analysis of paid health and fitness apps. J Med Internet Res. 2012;14(3):e72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox S, Rainie L. How the Internet Has Woven Itself into American Life. Pew Research Center. Washington, DC; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Korea Internet & Security Agency. 2012 Korea Internet white paper. Available at: http://isis.kisa.or.kr/board/fileDown.jsp?pageId=040000&bbsId=7&itemId=792&athSeq=1. Accessed March 14, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Im J, Yu J, Jang S, Lee J, Yu J. 2013 Mobile Internet Use. Korea Internet & Security Agency. Seoul, Korea; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• McCombs M. Mass media in the marketplace. J Monogr. 1972;24:1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Bonfadelli H. The Internet and knowledge gaps: A theoretical and empirical investigation. Eur J Commun. 2002;17:65–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiMaggio P, Hargittai E, Celeste C, Shafer S. Digital inequality: From unequal access to differentiated use. In: Neckerman K, ed. Social Inequality. Russell Sage Foundation. New York, NY; 2004:355–400.
   Google Scholar
• Bhattacherjee A. Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. MIS Q. 2001;17:351–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar