A longitudinal study of interest and membership in a fraternity, rape myth acceptance, and proclivity to perpetrate sexual assault

References

• Cantor D, Fisher B, Chibnall S, et al. Report on the AAU Campus Climate Survey on Sexual Assault and Sexual Misconduct. Rockville, MD: Westat; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Tjaden P, Thoennes N. Extent, Nature, and Consequences of Rape Victimization: Findings From the National Violence Against Women Survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan CE, Combs JL, Smith GT. An exploration of sexual victimization and academic performance among college women. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse. 2014;15(3):191–200. doi:10.1177/1524838014520637.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali R. Dear Colleague Letter. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Civil Rights; April 4, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall R. Will it really save you? Analyzing the campus sexual violence elimination act. Legislation & Policy Brief. 2014;6(2):271–294.
   Google Scholar
• Carr JL, VanDeusen KM. Risk factors for male sexual aggression on college campuses. J Fam Violence. 2004;19(5):279–289. doi:10.1023/B:JOFV.0000042078.55308.4d.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loh C, Gidycz CA, Lobo TR, Luthra R. A prospective analysis of sexual assault perpetration: risk factors related to perpetrator characteristics. J Interpers Violence. 2005;20(10):1325–1348. doi:10.1177/0886260505278528. PMID:16162492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin CA, Bouffard LA, Pratt TC. Sexual assault on the college campus: fraternity affiliation, male peer support, and low self-control. Crim Justice Behav. 2012;39(11):1457–1480. doi:10.1177/0093854812456527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murnen SK, Kohlman MH. Athletic participation, fraternity membership, and sexual aggression among college men: a meta-analytic review. Sex Roles. 2007;57(1-2):145–157. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9225-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingree JB, Thompson MP. Fraternity membership and sexual aggression: an examination of mediators of the association. J Am Coll Health. 2013;61(4):213–221. doi:10.1080/07448481.2013.781026. PMID:23663125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMahon S. Rape myth beliefs and bystander attitudes among incoming college students. J Am Coll Health. 2010;59(1):3–11. doi:10.1080/07448481.2010.483715. PMID:20670923.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seabrook RC, Ward LM, Giaccardi S. Why is fraternity membership associated with sexual assault? Exploring the roles of conformity to masculine norms, pressure to uphold masculinity, and objectification of women. Psychol Men Masculin. 2016; 19(1):3–13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canan SN, Jozkowski KN, Crawford BL. Sexual assault supportive attitudes: Rape myth acceptance and token resistance in Greek and non-Greek college students from two university samples in the United States. J Interpers Violence. 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Pettit ME, Paulk A, Hunt A, Williams Y, Zayac R. Rape myth acceptance and willingness to intervene: A comparison of Greek-affiliated and non-affilitated college students by gender. International Journal of Undergraduate Research and Creative Activities. 2017;9(3):1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz MD, DeKeseredy WS. Sexual Assault on the College Campus: The Role of Male Peer Support. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Corprew CS, Mitchell AD. Keeping it frat: exploring the interaction among fraternity membership, disinhibition, and hypermasculinity on sexually aggressive attitudes in college-aged males. J Coll Student Dev. 2014;55(6):548–562. doi:10.1353/csd.2014.0062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson MP, Morrison DJ. Prospective predictors of technology-based sexual coercion by college males. Psychol Violence. 2013;3(3):233–246. doi:10.1037/a0030904. PMID:24073356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphreys SE, Kahn AS. Fraternities, athletic teams, and rape. J Interpers Violence. 2000;15(12):1313–1322. doi:10.1177/088626000015012005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boswell AA, Spade JZ. Fraternities and collegiate rape culture: why are some fraternities more dangerous places for women? Gender Soc. 1996;10(2):133–147. doi:10.1177/089124396010002003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouffard L, Goodson A. Sexual coercion, sexual aggression, or sexual assault: How measurement impacts our understanding of sexual violence. Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research. 2017;9(4):269–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernard P, Loughnan S, Marchal C, Godart A, Klein O. The exonerating effect of sexual objectification: sexual objectification decreases rapist blame in a stranger rape context. Sex Roles. 2015;72(11–12):499–508. doi:10.1007/s11199-015-0482-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox J, Kopkin MR. Defendant and victim sex, sexism, and decision making in an ambiguous assault case. Women Crim Justice. 2016;26(5):1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malamuth NM. Rape proclivity among males. J Soc Issues. 1981;37(4):138–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lonsway KA, Fitzgerald LF. Rape myths in review. Psychol Women Quart. 1994;18(2):133–164. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1994.tb00448.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hust SJ, Rodgers KB, Ebreo S, Stefani W. Rape myth acceptance, efficacy, and heterosexual scripts in men's magazines. J Interpers Violence. 2016:Advance online publication.
   Google Scholar
• Pina A, Gannon TA. An overview of the literature on antecedents, perceptions and behavioural consequences of sexual harassment. J Sex Aggress. 2012;18(2):209–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis KC, Danube CL, Stappenbeck CA, Norris J, George WH. Background predictors and event-specific characteristics of sexual aggression incidents: The roles of alcohol and other factors. Violence Against Wom. 2015;21(8):997–1017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tharp AT, DeGue S, Valle LA, Brookmeyer KA, Massetti GM, Matjasko JL. A systematic qualitative review of risk and protective factors for sexual violence perpetration. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2012;14(2):133–167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMahon S, Farmer GL. An updated measure for assessing subtle rape myths. Soc Work Res. 2011;35:71–81. doi:10.1093/swr/35.2.71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouilso ER, Calhoun KS. The role of rape myth acceptance and psychopathy in sexual assault perpetration. J Aggress Maltreat T. 2013;22(2):159–174. doi:10.1080/10926771.2013.743937.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMahon S. Participation in high school sports and bystander intentions, efficacy to intervene, and rape myth beliefs. J Interpers Violence. 2015;30(17):2980–2998. doi:10.1177/0886260514555009. PMID:25392384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerger H, Kley H, Bohner G, Siebler F. The acceptance of modern myths about sexual aggression scale: development and validation in German and English. Aggressive Behav. 2007;33(5):422–440. doi:10.1002/ab.20195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapleau KM, Oswald DL. Power, sex, and rape myth acceptance: testing two models of rape proclivity. J Sex Res. 2010;47(1):66–78. doi:10.1080/00224490902954323. PMID:19431039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eyssel F, Bohner G, Siebler F. Perceived rape myth acceptance of others predicts rape proclivity: social norm or judgmental anchoring? Swiss J Psychol. 2006;65:93–99. doi:10.1024/1421-0185.65.2.93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gidycz CA, Orchowski LM, Berkowitz AD. Preventing sexual aggression among college men: an evaluation of a social norms and bystander intervention program. Violence Against Wom. 2011;17(6):720–742. doi:10.1177/1077801211409727.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lisak D, Conklin A, Hopper J, Miller P, Altschuler L, Smith BM. Abuse-perpetration inventory: development of an assessment instrument for research on the cycle of violence. Family Violence & Sexual Assault Bulletin. 2000;16:21–30.
   Google Scholar
• McMahon S, Peterson NA, Winter SC, Palmer JE, Postmus JL, Koenick RA. Predicting bystander behavior to prevent sexual assault on college campuses: The role of self-efficacy and intent. Am J Commun Psychol. 2015;56:46–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malamuth NM. The attraction to sexual aggression scale: part one. J Sex Res. 1989;26:26–49. doi:10.1080/00224498909551491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman DA. Longitudinal modeling with randomly and systematically missing data: a simulations of ad hoc, maximum likelihood, and multiple imputation techniques. Organ Res Methods. 2003;6(3):328–362. doi:10.1177/1094428103254673.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen MK, Schafer JL. A two-part random-effects model for semicontinuous longitudinal data. J Am Stat Assoc. 2001;96(454):730–745. doi:10.1198/016214501753168389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanday PR. Fraternity Gang Rape: Sex, brotherhood, and Privilege on Campus. 2nd ed. New York, NY: New York University Press; 2007.
   Google Scholar