The Condom Fairy program: A novel mail-order service for condoms and sexual health supplies

References

• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance 2013. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• American College Health Association. American College Health Association – National College Health Assessment II: Reference Group Executive Summary Spring 2017. Linthicum, MD: American College Health Association; 2017
   Google Scholar
• American College Health Association. (2012). Healthy campus 2020. Available at https://www.acha.org/HealthyCampus/Home/HealthyCampus/Home.aspx?hkey =66e6892e-786c-4739-a156-f7def495f53c. Published 2012. Accessed January 1, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed S, Lutalo T, Wawer M. HIV incidence and sexually transmitted disease prevalence association with condom use: a population study in Rakai, Uganda. AIDS 2001;15(16):2171–2179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CDC. Condom fact sheet in brief. Available at https://www.cdc.gov/condomeffectiveness/brief.html. Published 2013. Accessed December 1, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes KK, Levine R, Weaver M. Effectiveness of condom in preventing sexually transmitted infections. Bull WHO 2004;84:454–461.
   Google Scholar
• Bleeker MCG, Hogewoning CJA, Voorhorst FJ, et al. Condom use promotes regression of human papillomavirus-associated penile lesions in male sexual partners of women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Int J Cancer. 2003;107(5):804–810.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallo MF, Steiner MJ, Warner L, et al. Self-reported condom use is associated with reduced risk of chlamydia, gonorrhea, and trichomoniasis. Sex Transm Dis. 2007;34(10):829–833.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogewoning JA, Bleeker CG, van den Brule AJC, et al. Condom use promotes regression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and clearance of human papillomavirus: a randomized clinical trial. Int J Cancer. 2003;107(5):811–816.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanaway JD, Wald A, Martin ET, Gottlieb SL, Magaret AS. Case-crossover analysis of condom use and herpes simplex virus type 2 acquisition. Sex Transm Dis. 2012;39(5):388
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson AM, Ickes MJ. Purchasing condoms near a college campus: environmental barriers. Sex Health. 2015;12(1):67–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeves B, Ickes M, Mark K. Gender differences and condom-associated embarrassment in the acquisition of purchased versus free condoms among college students. American Journal of Sexuality Education. 2016;11(1):61–75. 2016;
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boldero J, Moore S, Rosenthal D. Intention, context, and safe sex: Australian adolescents’ responses to AIDS. J Appl Social Pyschol. 1992;22(17):1374–1396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crosby RA, Sanders SA, Yarber WL, Graham CA, Dodge B. Condom use errors and problems among college men. Sex Transm Dis. 2002;29(9):552–557.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell J. Why embarrassment inhibits the acquisition and use of condoms: a qualitative approach to understanding risky sexual behaviour. J Adolesc. 2009;32(2):379–391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl DW, Gorn GJ, Weinberg CB. The impact of embarrassment on condom purchase behaviour. Can J Public Health. 1998;89(6):368–370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore SG, Dahl DW, Gorn GJ, Weinberg CB. Coping with condom embarrassment. Psychology, Health & Medicine. 2006;11(1):70–79.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moore S, Dahl D, Gorn G, Weinberg C, Park J, Jiang Y. Condom embarrassment: coping and consequences for condom use in three countries. AIDS Care. 2008;20(5):553–559.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picca L, Joos K. The great condom adventure: analyzing students’ condom narratives of buying condoms. J Sociol Res. 2009;1(1):1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Yarber WL, Graham CA, Sanders SA, Crosby RA, Butler SM, Hartzell RM. Do you know what you’re doing? ‘College students’ experiences with male condoms. Am J Health Educ. 2007;38(6):322–331.
   Google Scholar
• CDC. (2015). Condom distribution as a structural level distribution. Available at https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pdf/programresources/guideance/condoms/cdc-hiv-condom-distribution.pdf. Published 2015. Accessed December 20, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Blankenship KM, Bray SJ, Merson MH. Structural interventions in public health. AIDS 2000; 14:S11–S21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charania MR, Crepaz N, Guenther-Gray C, et al. Efficacy of structural-level condom distribution interventions: a meta-analysis of U.S. and international studies, 1998-2007. AIDS Behav. 2011;15(7):1283–1297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benbrook A, Brown J, Butler S, Oswalt S. ACHA 2015 Pap & STI Survey. Available at http://www.acha.org/documents/resources/survey_data/Pap_sti/ACHA_CY2014_PapTest_and_STI_Survey_fulldatareport.pdf. Published 2016. Accessed December 20, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Butler S, Black DR, Avery G. Emergency contraceptive pill, contraceptive, and sexually transmitted infection service availability among U.S. college health centers. Electron J Human Sex. 2012;15. Available at http://www.ejhs.org/volume15/Health.html.
   Google Scholar
• Butler SM, Black DR, Coster D. Condom and safer sex product availability among U.S. college health centers. Electron J Human Sex. 2011;14:1–17. Available at http://www.ejhs.org/volume14/safersex.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Butler SM, Procopio M, Ragan K, Funke B, Black DR. Condom and safer sex product availability among colleges and universities in rural settings. Health Educ Monogr Ser. 2008;28:10–15.
   Google Scholar
• Butler S, Procopio M, Ragan K, Funke B, Black D. Assessment of university condom distribution programs: results of a national study. Electr J Human Sex. 2014;17. Available at http://www.ejhs.org/volume17/distribution.html.
   Google Scholar
• Koumans EH, Sternberg MR, Motamed C, Kohl K, Schillinger JA, Markowitz LE. Sexually transmitted disease services at U.S. colleges and universities. J Am Coll Health. 2005;53(5):211–217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler SM, Ragan KR, Black DR, Funke B. Theoretical assessment of university condom distribution programs: an institutional perspective. Electr J Human Sex. 2014;17. Available at http://www.ejhs.org/volume17/assessment.html.
   Google Scholar
• Francis DB, Noar SM, Widman L, Willoughby JF, Sanchez DM, Garrett KP. Perceptions of a campus-wide condom distribution programme: an exploratory study. Health Educ J. 2016;75(8):998–1011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eastman-Mueller HP, Gomez-Scott JR, Jung AK, Oswalt SB, Hagglund K. Implementation and evaluation of a condom availability program on a college campus: lessons from the field. Am J Sex Educ. 2016; 11(3):189–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CDC. Oral sex and HIV risk. Available at https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/risk/oralsex.html. Published 2016. Accessed December 20, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Vijayakumar G, Mabude Z, Smit J, Beksinska M, Lurie M. A review of female-condom effectiveness: patterns of use and impact on protected sex acts and STI incidence. Int J STD Aids. 2006;17(10):652–659.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bontempi JB, Mugno R, Bulmer SM, Danvers K, Vancour ML. Exploring gender differences in the relationship between HIV/STD testing and condom use among undergraduate college students. Am J Health Educ. 2009;40(2):97–105.
   Google Scholar
• Field A. Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. 2nd ed. London: Sage; 2005:33.
   Google Scholar