“Consent is sexy”: A poster campaign using sex-positive images and messages to increase dyadic sexual communication

References

• Black MC, Basile KC, Breiding MJ. The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS): 2010 Summary Report. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Muehlenhard CL, Humphreys TP, Jozkowski KN, Peterson ZD. The complexities of sexual consent among college students: a conceptual and empirical review. J Sex Res. 2016;53:457–487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbey A, McAuslan P, Zawacki T, Clinton A, Buck P. Attitudinal, experiential, and situational predictors of sexual assault perpetration. J Interpers Violence. 2001;16:784–807.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krebs CP, Lindquist CH, Warner TD, Fisher BS, Martin SL. Campus Sexual Assault (CSA) Study, Final Report. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Fedina L, Holmes JL, Backes BL. Campus sexual assault: a systematic review of prevalence research from 2000 to 2015. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2016; 19:76–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somander T. President Obama Launches the “It's on Us” Campaign to End Sexual ssault on Campus. The White House web site. Available at: https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/blog/2014/09/19/president-obama-launches-its-us-campaign-end-sexual-assault-campus. Published 2014. Accessed September 19, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• US Department of Education. Violence against Women Act. Washington DC: Federal Register; 2014. Vol. 79. No. 202.
   Google Scholar
• Wakefield MA, Loken B, Hornik RC. Use of mass media campaigns to change health behaviour. Lancet. 2010;376:1261–1271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeGue S, Valle LA, Holt MK, Massetti GM, Matjasko JL, Tharp AT. A systematic review of primary prevention strategies for sexual violence perpetration. Agress Violent Behav. 2014;19:346–362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basile KC. A comprehensive approach to sexual violence prevention. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:2350–2352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AdlibStudio. Want Consent is Sexy for your College or University? Available at: http://www.consentissexy.net. Published 2011. Accessed April 11, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson LA, Whiston SC. Sexual assault education programs: a meta-analytic examination of their effectiveness. Psychol. Women Q. 2005;29:374–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brecklin LR, Forde DR. A meta-analysis of rape education programs. Violence Vict. 2001;16:303–321.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Donat PLN, White JW. Re-examining the issue of nonconsent in acquaintance rape. In: Travis CB, White JW, eds. Sexuality, Society, and Feminism. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2000:355–376.
   Google Scholar
• Beres MA. Spontaneous’ sexual consent: an analysis of sexual consent literature. Fem Psychol. 2007;17:93–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jozkowski KN, Peterson ZD, Sanders SA, Dennis B, Reece M. Gender differences in heterosexual college students’ conceptualizations and indicators of sexual consent: implications for contemporary sexual assault prevention education. J Sex Res. 2014;51:904–916.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickman SE, Muehlenhard CL. By the semi‐mystical appearance of a condom: how young women and men communicate sexual consent in heterosexual situations. J Sex Res. 1999;36:258–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphreys T. Perceptions of sexual consent: the impact of relationship history and gender. J Sex Res. 2007;44:307–315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowling M, Reynolds P. Making Sense of Sexual Consent. Burlington, VT: Aldershot, Hants, England; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Beres MA. Rethinking the concept of consent for anti-sexual violence activism and education. Fem Psychol. 2014;24:373–389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmody M. Preventing adult sexual violence through education. Curr Issues Crim Justice. 2006;18:342–356.
   Google Scholar
• Philpott A, Knerr W, Boydell V. Pleasure and prevention: when good sex is safer sex. Reprod Health Matters. 2006;14:23–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philpott A, Knerr W, Maher D. Promoting protection and pleasure: amplifying the effectiveness of barriers against sexually transmitted infections and pregnancy. Lancet. 2006;368:2028–2031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flowers P, McDaid LM, Knussen C. Exposure and impact of a mass media campaign targeting sexual health amongst Scottish men who have sex with men: an outcome evaluation. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas KA, Sorenson SB, Joshi M. “Consent is Good, Joyous, Sexy”: a banner campaign to market consent to college students. J Am Coll Health. 2016;64:639–650.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh J. Email Communication. 2018.
   Google Scholar
• AdlibStudio. Yes is Yes! Consent is Sexy Campaign poster. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• AdlibStudio. Why so sexy? Consent is Sexy Campaign poster. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• AdlibStudio. Consent. Get Some. Consent is Sexy Campaign poster. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• AdlibStudio. Consent is Sexy! Consent is Sexy Campaign poster. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1991;50:179–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canan SN, Jozkowski KN, Crawford BL. Sexual assault supportive attitudes: rape myth acceptance and token tesistance in Greek and non-Greek college students from two university samples in the United States. J Interpers Violence. 2016. doi: 10.1177/0886260516636064.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American College Health Association. National College Health Assessment 2011 Survey. American College Health Association Web site. Available at: http://www.acha-ncha.org/docs/ACHA-NCHAII_sample.pdf. Accessed April 21, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Ajzen I. Constructing a TPB Questionnaire: Conceptual and Methodological Considerations. Ajzen personal Web site. Available at: http://people.umass.edu/aizen/pdf/tpb.measurement.pdf. Accessed June 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric Theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Catania J. Dyadic sexual communication scale. In: Fisher TD, Davis CM, Yarber WL, Davis SL, eds. Handbook of Sexuality-Related Measures. New York: Routledge; 2011:130–132.
   Google Scholar
• Baranowski T, Stables G. Process evaluations of 5-a-day projects. Health Educ Behav. 2000;27:157–166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hovick SR, Bevers TB, Vidrine JI, et al. User perceptions and reactions to an online cancer risk assessment tool: a process evaluation of cancer risk check. J Cancer Educ. 2017;32:141–147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White A, Hingson R. The burden of alcohol use: excessive alcohol consumption and related consequences among college students. Alcohol Res. 2014;35:201–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byers ES, Demmons S. Sexual satisfaction and sexual self-disclosure within dating relationships. J Sex Res. 1999;36:180–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American College Health Association. Healthy Campus 2020. Available at: https://www.acha.org/HealthyCampus/HealthyCampus/Student_Objectives.aspx. Accessed April 18, 2018.
   Google Scholar