References
- Dills J, Fowler D, Payne G. Sexual violence on campus: Strategies for prevention. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2016. https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/campussvprevention.pdf
- Cantor D, Fisher B, Chibnail SH, et al. Report on the AAU Campus Climate Survey on Sexual Assault and Sexual Misconduct, 2015. https://www.aau.edu/sites/default/files/AAU-Files/Key-Issues/Campus-Safety/AAU-Campus-Climate-Survey-FINAL-10-20-17.pdf
- Jouriles EN, Krauss A, Vu NL, Banyard VL, McDonald R. Bystander programs addressing sexual violence on college campuses: a systematic review and meta-analysis of program outcomes and delivery methods. J Am Coll Health. 2018;66(6):457–466. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2018.1431906.
- Orchowski LM, Gidycz CA. Sexual Assault Risk Reduction: Theory, Research and Practice. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2018.
- DeGue S, Valle LA, Holt MK, Massetti GM, Matjasko JL, Tharp AT. A systematic review of primary prevention strategies for sexual violence perpetration. Aggress Violent Behav. 2014;19(4):346–362. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2014.05.004.
- Gidycz CA. Sexual assault risk reduction: current state and historical underpinnings. In Orchowski, LM, Gidycz, CA, eds. Sexual Assault Risk Reduction and Resistance: Theory, Research and Practice. Elsevier: London; 2018:3–14.
- Rozee PD, Koss MP. Rape: a century of resistance. Psychol Women Q. 2001;25(4):295–311. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-6402.00030.
- Senn CY, Eliasziw M, Barata PC, et al. Efficacy of a sexual assault resistance program for university women. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(24):2326–2335. doi:https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa1411131.
- Senn CY, Eliasziw M, Hobden KL, et al. Secondary and 2-year outcomes of a sexual assault resistance program for university women. Psychol Women Q. 2017;41(2):147–162. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684317690119.
- Orchowski LM, Gidycz CA, Raffle H. Evaluation of a sexual assault risk reduction and self‐defense program: a prospective analysis of a revised protocol. Psychol Women Q. 2008;32(2):204–218. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00425.x.
- Gidycz CA, Orchowski LM, Probst DR, Edwards KM, Murphy M, Tansill E. Concurrent administration of sexual assault prevention and risk reduction programming: outcomes for women. Violence against Women. 2015;21(6):780–800. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801215576579.
- Gidycz CA, Rich CL, Orchowski L, King C, Miller AK. The evaluation of a sexual assault self‐defense and risk‐reduction program for college women: a prospective study. Psychol Women Q. 2006;30(2):173–186. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00280.x.
- Hollander JA. Does self-defense training prevent sexual violence against women? Violence against Women. 2014;20(3):252–269. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801214526046.
- Senn CY, Gee SS, Thake J. Emancipatory sexuality education and sexual assault resistance: does the former enhance the latter?. Psychol Women Q. 2011;35(1):72–91. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684310384101.
- Macy RJ, Nurius PS, Norris J. Responding in their best interests contextualizing women’s coping with acquaintance sexual aggression. Violence against Women. 2006;12(5):478–500. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801206288104.
- Ames DR. Assertiveness expectancies: How hard people push depends on the consequences they predict. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008;95(6):1541–1557. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013334.
- Kennedy JA, Kray LA. Pawn in someone else’s game?: the cognitive, motivational, and paradigmatic barriers to women’s excelling in negotiation. Res Organ Behav. 2015;35:3–28. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2015.09.002.
- Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC, Norcross JC. In search of how people change: applications to addictive behaviors. Am Psychol. 1992;47(9):1102–1114. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.47.9.1102.
- Evers KE, Prochaska JO, Van Marter DF, Johnson JL, Prochaska JM. Transtheoretical-based bullying prevention effectiveness trials in middle schools and high schools. Educ Res. 2007;49(4):397–414. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00131880701717271.
- Galavotti C, Cabral RJ, Lansky A, Grimley DM, Riley GE, Prochaska JO. Validation of measures of condom and other contraceptive use among women at high risk for HIV infection and unintended pregnancy. Health Psychol. 1995;14(6):570–578. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.14.6.570.
- Haggerty LA, Goodman LA. Stages of change‐based nursing interventions for victims of interpersonal violence. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2003;32(1):68–75. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0884217502239802.
- Santelli JS, Kouzis AC, Hoover DR, Polacsek M, Burwell LG, Celentano DD. Stage of behavior change for condom use: the influence of partner type, relationship and pregnancy factors. Fam Plann Persp. 1996;28(3):101–107. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2136221.
- Petrocelli JV. Processes and stages of change: counseling with the transtheoretical model of change. J Couns Dev. 2002;80(1):22–30. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6678.2002.tb00162.x.
- Prochaska JO, Velicer WF. The transtheoretical model of health behavior change. Am J Health Promot. 1997;12(1):38–48. doi:https://doi.org/10.4278/0890-1171-12.1.38.
- Hall KL, Rossi JS. Meta-analytic examination of the strong and weak principles across 48 health behaviors. Prev Med. 2008;46(3):266–274. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.11.006.
- DiClemente CC, Prochaska JO, Gibertini M. Self-efficacy and the stages of self-change of smoking. Cogn Ther Res. 1985;9(2):181–200. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01204849.
- Bliss MJ, Ogley-Oliver E, Jackson E, Harp S, Kaslow NJ. African American women’s readiness to change abusive relationships. J Fam Viol. 2008;23(3):161–171. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-007-9138-3.
- Kail BL. Motivating women with substance abuse and intimate partner violence. J Soc Work Pract Addict. 2010;10(1):25–43. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15332560903526002.
- Burke JG, Gielen AC, McDonnell KA, O’Campo P, Maman S. The process of ending abuse in intimate relationships: a qualitative exploration of the transtheoretical model. Violence against Women. 2001;7(10):1144–1163. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/10778010122183784.
- Burkitt KH, Larkin GL. The transtheoretical model in intimate partner violence victimization: stage changes over time. Violence Vict. 2008;23(4):411–431. doi:https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.23.4.411.
- Koraleski SF, Larson LM. A partial test of the transtheoretical model in therapy with adult survivors of childhood sexual abuse. J Couns Psychol. 1997;44(3):302–306. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.44.3.302.
- Brodeur N, Rondeau G, Brochu S, Lindsay J, Phelps J. Does the transtheoretical model predict attrition in domestic violence treatment programs? Violence Vict. 2008;23(4):493–507. doi:doi:https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.23.4.493.
- Scott KL, Wolfe DA. Readiness to change as a predictor of outcome in batterer treatment. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2003;71(5):879–889. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.71.5.879.
- Banyard VL, Eckstein RP, Moynihan MM. Sexual violence prevention: the role of stages of change. J Interpers Violence. 2010;25(1):111–135. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260508329123.
- Gidycz CA, Lynn SJ, Rich CL, et al. The evaluation of a sexual assault risk reduction program: A multisite investigation. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2001;69(6):1073–1078. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.69.6.1073.
- Brecklin LR, Ullman SE. Self-defense or assertiveness training and women’s responses to sexual attacks. J Interpers Violence. 2005;20(6):738–762. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260504272894.
- Greene DM, Navarro RL. Situation-specific assertiveness in the epidemiology of sexual victimization among university women. Psychol Women Q. 1998;22(4):589–604. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1998.tb00179.x.
- Kelley EL, Orchowski LM, Gidycz CA. Sexual victimization among college women: Role of sexual assertiveness and resistance variables. Psychol Violence. 2016;6(2):243–252. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039407.
- Rowe LS, Jouriles EN, McDonald R. Reducing sexual victimization among adolescent girls: a randomized controlled pilot trial of my voice, my choice. Behav Ther. 2015;46(3):315–327. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2014.11.003.
- Rowe LS, Jouriles EN, McDonald R, Platt CG, Gomez GS. Enhancing women’s resistance to sexual coercion: a randomized controlled trial of the DATE program. J Am Coll Health. 2012;60(3):211–218. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2011.587068.
- Orchowski L. Risk reduction interventions to prevent sexual victimization in college women: updating protocol and evaluating efficacy. [Electronic Thesis or Dissertation]. Athens, OH: Ohio University, 2006. https://etd.ohiolink.edu/
- Koss MP, Gidycz CA. Sexual experiences survey: reliability and validity. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1985;53(3):422–423. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.53.3.422.
- McConnaughy EA, DiClemente CC, Prochaska JO, Velicer WF. Stages of change in psychotherapy: a follow-up report. Psychotherapy: theory, Research, Practice, Training. 1989;26(4):494–503. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/h0085468.
- McConnaughy EA, Prochaska JO, Velicer WF. Stages of change in psychotherapy: measurement and sample profiles. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice. 1983;20(3):368–375. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/h0090198.
- Moore CD, Waterman CK. Predicting self-protection against sexual assault in dating relationships among heterosexual men and women, gay men, lesbians, and bisexuals. J Coll Stud Dev 1999;40(2):132–140.
- Hanson KA, Gidycz CA. Evaluation of a sexual assault prevention program. J Consult Clin Psychol.1993;61(6):1046–1052. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.61.6.1046.
- Breitenbecher KH, Gidycz CA. An empirical evaluation of a program designed to reduce the risk of multiple sexual victimization. J Interpers Violence. 1998;13(4):472–488. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/088626098013004004.
- Marx BP, Calhoun KS, Wilson AE, Meyerson LA. Sexual revictimization prevention: an outcome evaluation. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2001;69(1):25–32. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.69.1.25.
- Ozer EM, Bandura A. Mechanisms governing empowerment effects: a self-efficacy analysis. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1990;58(3):472–486. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.3.472.
- Hu LT, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling. 1999;6(1):1–55. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.
- Browne MW, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sage Focus Editions 1993; 154:136–136.
- Horn JL. A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika 1965;30(2):179–185. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289447.
- Velicer WF. The relation between factor score estimates, image scores, and principal component scores. Educ Psychol Meas. 1976;36(1):149–159. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447603600114.
- Kline RB. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. New York: Guilford Publications. 2015.
- Begun AL, Brondino MJ, Bolt D, Weinstein B, Strodthoff T, Shelley G. The revised Safe At Home Instrument for assessing readiness to change intimate partner violence. Violence Vict. 2008;23(4):508–524. doi:https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.23.4.508.
- Larsen ML, Hilden M. Male victims of sexual assault; 10 years’ experience from a Danish Assault Center. J Forensic Legal Med. 2016;43:8–11. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2016.06.007.
- Davies M. Male sexual assault victims: A selective review of the literature and implications for support services. Aggress Violent Behav. 2002;7(3):203–214. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-1789(00)00043-4.
- Johnson SM, Murphy MJ, Gidycz CA. Reliability and validity of the sexual experiences survey–short forms victimization and perpetration. Violence Vict. 2017;32(1):78–92. doi:https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-15-00110.