References
- Peterson ZD, Muehlenhard CL. Conceptualizing the “wantedness” of women’s consensual and nonconsensual sexual experiences: implications for how women label their experiences with rape. J Sex Res. 2007;44(1):72–88. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490709336794.
- Katz J, Tirone V. Going along with it: sexually coercive partner behavior predicts dating women’s compliance with unwanted sex. Violence Women. 2010;16(7):730–742. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801210374867.
- Katz J, Schneider ME. (Hetero)sexual compliance with unwanted casual sex: associations with feelings about first sex and sexual self-perceptions. Sex Roles. 2015;72(9-10):451–461. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0467-z.
- O’Sullivan LF, Allgeier ER. Feigning sexual desire: consenting to unwanted sexual activity in heterosexual dating relationships. J Sex Res. 1998;35(3):234–243. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499809551938.
- Willis M, Jozkowski KN. Sexual precedent’s effect on sexual consent communication. Arch Sex Behav. 2019;48(6):1723–1734. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1348-7.
- Livingston JA, Buddie AM, Testa M, VanZile-Tamsen C. The role of sexual precedence in verbal sexual coercion. Psychol Women Q. 2004;28(4):287–297. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2004.00146.x.
- Shotland RL, Goodstein L. Sexual precedence reduces the perceived legitimacy of sexual refusal: an examination of attributions concerning date rape and consensual sex. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 1992;18(6):756–764. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167292186012.
- Bay-Cheng LY, Eliseo-Arras RK. The making of unwanted sex: gendered and neoliberal norms in college women’s unwanted sexual experiences. J Sex Res. 2008;45(4):386–397. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490802398381.
- Marcantonio T, Jozkowski KN, Wiersma-Mosley J. The influence of partner status and sexual behavior on college women’s consent communication and feelings. J Sex Marital Ther. 2018;44(8):776–786. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2018.1474410.
- Conroy NE, Krishnakumar A, Leone JM. Reexamining issues of conceptualization and willing consent: the hidden role of coercion in experiences of sexual acquiescence. J Interpers Violence. 2015;30(11):1828–1846. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260514549050.
- Quinn-Nilas C, Kennett DJ. Reasons why undergraduate women comply with unwanted, non-coercive sexual advances: a serial indirect effect model integrating sexual script theory and sexual self-control perspectives. J Soc Psychol. 2018;158(5):603–615. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2018.1427039.
- Drouin M, Tobin E. Unwanted but consensual sexting among young adults: relations with attachment and sexual motivations. Comput Hum Behav. 2014;31:412–418. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.11.001.
- Willis M, Nelson-Gray RO. Borderline personality disorder traits and sexual compliance: a fear of abandonment manipulation. Personal Individ Differ. 2017;117:216–220. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.06.012.
- Vannier SA, O'Sullivan LF. Sex without desire: characteristics of occasions of sexual compliance in young adults’ committed relationships. J Sex Res. 2010;47(5):429–439. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490903132051.
- Paul EL, McManus B, Hayes A. “Hookups”: characteristics and correlates of college students’ spontaneous and anonymous sexual experiences. J Sex Res. 2000;37(1):76–88. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490009552023.
- Herbenick D, Fu T-C(J), Dodge B, Fortenberry JD. The alcohol contexts of consent, wanted sex, sexual pleasure, and sexual assault: results from a probability survey of undergraduate students. J Am Coll Health. 2019;67(2):144–152. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2018.1462827.
- Reece M, Herbenick D, Schick V, Sanders SA, Dodge B, Fortenberry JD. Background and considerations on the National Survey of Sexual Health and Behavior (NSSHB) from the investigators. J Sex Med. 2010;7:243–245. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.02038.x.
- Lawyer S, Resnick H, Bakanic V, Burkett T, Kilpatrick D. Forcible, drug-facilitated, and incapacitated rape and sexual assault among undergraduate women. J Am Coll Health. 2010;58(5):453–460. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07448480903540515.
- Kline RB. Beyond Significance Testing: Reforming Data Analysis Methods in Behavioral Research. Washington: American Psychological Association; 2004. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/10693-000.
- Armstrong EA, Hamilton L, Sweeney B. Sexual assault on campus: a multilevel, integrative approach to party rape. Soc Probl. 2006;53(4):483–499. doi:https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2006.53.4.483.
- Jozkowski KN, Marcantonio TL, Hunt ME. College students’ sexual consent communication and perceptions of sexual double standards: a qualitative investigation. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2017;49(4):237–244. doi:https://doi.org/10.1363/psrh.12041.
- Jozkowski KN, Wiersma JD. Does drinking alcohol prior to sexual activity influence college students’ consent? Int J Sex Health. 2015;27(2):156–174. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/19317611.2014.951505.
- Willis M, Jozkowski KN, Lo W-J, Sanders SA. Are women’s orgasms hindered by phallocentric imperatives? Arch Sex Behav. 2018;47(6):1565–1576. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1149-z.
- Garcia JR, Gesselman AN, Reynolds TA, Mark KP, Frederick JD. Behavioral repertoires at last partnered sexual event: associations with variation in relationship satisfaction, sexual satisfaction, and orgasm. Oral presentation at: Society for Personality and Social Psychology Annual Convention; February, 2019; Portland, OR.
- Willis M, Jozkowski KN. Using smartphones to collect daily sexual behavior data from college students. J Am Coll Health. 2018;66(7):529–532. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2018.1440577.
- Emmers-Sommer TM. Do men and women differ in their perceptions of women’s and men’s saying “no” when they mean “yes” to sex?: an examination between and within gender. Sex Cult. 2016;20(2):373–385. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-015-9330-1.
- Jozkowski KN, Sanders S, Peterson ZD, Dennis B, Reece M. Consenting to sexual activity: the development and psychometric assessment of dual measures of consent. Arch Sex Behav. 2014;43(3):437–450. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-013-0225-7.