References
- United States Drug Enforcement Administration. 2018. Drug scheduling. Springfield, VA: U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration, United States Department of Justice. Available at: https://www.dea.gov/druginfo/ds.shtml.
- National Conference of State Legislatures. 2019. State medical cannabis laws. Available at: http://www.ncsl.org/research/health/state-medical-cannabis-laws.aspx.
- Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. 2019. Key substance use and mental health indicators in the United States: Results from the 2018 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (HHS Publication No. PEP19-5068, NSDUH Series H-54). Rockville, MD: Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Available at: https://www.samhsa.gov/data/.
- Schulenberg JE, Johnston LD, O’Malley PM, Bachman JG, Miech RA, Patrick ME. 2019. Monitoring the Future National Survey Results on Drug Use, 1975–2018: Volume II. College Students and Adults Ages 19–55. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan. Available at: http://monitoringthefuture.org/pubs.html#monographs.
- Pinchevsky GM, Arria AM, Caldeira KM, Garnier-Dykstra LM, Vincent KB, O’Grady KE. Cannabis exposure opportunity and initiation during college: parent and peer influences. Prev Sci. 2012;13(1):43–54. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-011-0243-4.
- Volkow ND, Baler RD, Compton WM, Weiss SR. Adverse health effects of marijuana use. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(23):2219–2227. doi:https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1402309.
- Arria AM, Caldeira KM, Bugbee BA, Vincent KB, O’Grady KE. The academic consequences of cannabis use during college. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors. 2015;29(3):564–575. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/adb0000108.
- Cooper ML, Kuntsche E, Levitt A, Barber LL, Wolf S. Motivational models of substance use: A review of theory and research on motives for using alcohol, cannabis, and tobacco. In: K. Sher, ed. The Oxford Handbook of Substance Use and Substance Use Disorders: Two-Volume Set. New York: Oxford University Press; 2016:375–421.
- Simons J, Correia CJ, Carey KB, Borsari BE. Validating a five-factor cannabis motives measure: Relations with use, problems, and alcohol motives. J Couns Psychol. 1998;45(3):265–273. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.45.3.265.
- Napper LE, Kenney SR, Hummer JF, Fiorot S, LaBrie JW. Longitudinal relationships among perceived injunctive and descriptive norms and cannabis use. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2016;77(3):457–463. doi:https://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.2016.77.457.
- Neighbors C, Geisner IM, Lee CM. Perceived cannabis norms and social expectancies among entering college student cannabis users. Psychol Addict Behav. 2008;22(3):433–438. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-164X.22.3.433.
- Swaim RC. Individual and school level effects of perceived harm, perceived availability, and community size on cannabis use among 12th-grade students: A random effects model. Prev Sci. 2003;4(2):89–98.
- Neighbors C, Foster DW, Walker DD, Kilmer JR, Lee CM. Social identity as a moderator of the association between perceived norms and cannabis use. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2013;74(3):479–483. doi:https://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.2013.74.479.
- Wilson AD, Montes KS, Bravo AJ, Conner BT, Pearson MR, Marijuana Outcomes Study Team. Making decisions with trees: Examining marijuana outcomes among college students using recursive partitioning. Clin Psychol Sci. 2018;6(5):744–754. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702618775405.
- Parnes JE, Smith JK, Conner BT. Reefer madness or much ado about nothing? Cannabis legalization outcomes among young adults in the United States. Int J Drug Policy. 2018;56:116–120. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.03.011.
- Schuermeyer J, Salomonsen-Sautel S, Price RK, et al. Temporal trends in cannabis attitudes, availability and use in Colorado compared to non-medical cannabis states: 2003–11. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014;140:145–155. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.04.016.
- Johnston LD, O’Malley PM, Bachman JG, Schulenberg JE, Miech RA. 2016. Monitoring the Future National Survey Results on Drug Use, 1975–2015: volume II, College Students and Adults Ages 19–55. Ann Arbor (MI): Institute for Social Research, the University of Michigan.
- Khatapoush S, Hallfors D. “Sending the wrong message”: Did medical cannabis legalization in California change attitudes about and use of cannabis. J Drug Issues. 2004;34(4):751–770. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/002204260403400402.
- Pacek LR, Mauro PM, Martins SS. Perceived risk of regular cannabis use in the United States from 2002 to 2012: Differences by sex, age, and race/ethnicity. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015;149:232–244. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.02.009.
- Wen H, Hockenberry JM, Druss BG. The effect of medical cannabis laws on cannabis-related attitude and perception among US adolescents and young adults. Prev Sci. 2019;20(2):215–223. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-018-0903-8.
- Pearson MR, Bravo AJ, Sotelo M, Cross-Cultural Addictions Study Team. Cross-cultural examination of college cannabis culture in five countries: Measurement invariance of the perceived importance of cannabis to the college experience scale. Addict Behav. 2019;96:11–17. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.04.004.
- Pearson MR, Kholodkov T, Gray MJ, Cannabis Outcomes Study Team. Perceived Importance of Cannabis to the College Experience Scale (PIMCES): Initial development and validation. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2017a;78(2):319–324. doi:https://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.2017.78.319.
- Payne JB, Getachew B, Shah J, Berg CJ. Cannabis use among young adults: Who quits and why? Health Behav Policy Rev. 2018;5(3):77–90. doi:https://doi.org/10.14485/HBPR.5.3.8.
- Pearson MR, Liese BS, Dvorak RD, Cannabis Outcomes Study Team. College student cannabis involvement: perceptions, use, and consequences across 11 college campuses. Addict Behav. 2017;66:83–89. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.10.019.
- Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101. doi:https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
- Kitzinger J. The methodology of focus groups: The importance of interaction between research participants. Sociol Health Illness. 1994;16(1):103–121. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.ep11347023.
- Kitzinger J. Qualitative research: Introducing focus groups. BMJ. 1995;311(7000):299–302. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.311.7000.299.
- Creswell JW. 2012. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches. London, UK: Sage Publications.
- Strauss A, Corbin J. 1990. Basics of Qualitative Research. Vol. 15. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
- Bowen GA. Naturalistic inquiry and the saturation concept: A research note. Qual Res. 2008;8(1):137–152. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794107085301.
- O’Reilly M, Parker N. ‘Unsatisfactory Saturation’: A critical exploration of the notion of saturated sample sizes in qualitative research. Qual Res. 2013;13(2):190–197. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794112446106.
- Dahl SL, Heggen K. Negotiating identities: Patterns of self-presentations among socially integrated cannabis users. Young. 2014;22(4):381–398. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1103308814548106.
- Hathaway AD. Cannabis users’ informal rules for managing stigma and risk. Deviant Behav. 2004;25(6):559–577. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01639620490484095.
- Sandberg S. Is cannabis use normalized, celebrated or neutralized? Analysing talk as action. Addict Res Theory. 2012;20(5):372–381. doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/16066359.2011.638147.
- Amos A, Wiltshire S, Bostock Y, Haw S, McNeill A. ‘You can’t go without a fag… you need it for your hash’—A qualitative exploration of smoking, cannabis and young people. Addiction. 2004;99(1):77–81. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2004.00531.x.
- Järvinen M, Demant J. The normalisation of cannabis use among young people: Symbolic boundary work in focus groups. Health Risk Society. 2011;13(2):165–182. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13698575.2011.556184.
- Lincoln YS, Guba EG. 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
- Bravo AJ, Prince MA, Pearson MR, Cannabis Outcomes Study Team. Can I use cannabis safely? An examination of distal antecedents, cannabis protective behavioral strategies, and cannabis outcomes. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2017;78(2):203–212. doi:https://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.2017.78.203.
- Bravo AJ, Weinstein AP, Pearson MR, Protective Strategies Study Team. The relationship between risk factors and alcohol and cannabis use outcomes among concurrent users: A comprehensive examination of protective behavioral strategies. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2019;80(1):102–108. doi:https://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.2019.80.102.
- Pedersen ER, Huang W, Dvorak RD, Prince MA, Hummer JF, Cannabis Outcomes Study Team. The protective behavioral strategies for cannabis scale: Further examination using item response theory. Psychol Addict Behav. 2017;31(5):548–559. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/adb0000271.
- Pedersen ER, Hummer JF, Rinker DV, Traylor ZK, Neighbors C. Measuring protective behavioral strategies for cannabis use among young adults. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2016;77(3):441–450. doi:https://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.2016.77.441.
- San Diego State University Research Foundation. 2009. Cannabis eCHECKUP TO GO (e-TOKE) for universities and colleges. Available at: http://www.echeckuptogo.com/usa/programs/coll_mj.php.
- Elliott JC, Carey KB. Correcting exaggerated cannabis use norms among college abstainers: a preliminary test of a preventive intervention. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2012;73(6):976–980. doi:https://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.2012.73.976.
- Elliott JC, Carey KB, Vanable PA. A preliminary evaluation of a web-based intervention for college cannabis use. Psychol Addict Behav. 2014;28(1):288–293. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034995.
- Palfai TP, Saitz R, Winter M, et al. Web-based screening and brief intervention for student cannabis use in a university health center: Pilot study to examine the implementation of eCHECKUP TO GO in different contexts. Addict Behav. 2014;39(9):1346–1352. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.04.025.
- Riggs NR, Conner BT, Parnes JE, Prince MA, Shillington AM, George MW. Cannabis eCHECKUPTO GO: Effects of a personalized feedback plus protective behavioral strategies intervention for heavy cannabis-using college students. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018;190:13–19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.05.020.
- Lee CM, Neighbors C, Woods BA. Cannabis motives: young adults’ reasons for using cannabis. Addict Behav. 2007;32(7):1384–1394. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2006.09.010.