Hookup experiences and feelings of regret: The effects of gender, college context, and hookup characteristics

References

• Fielder RL, Carey MP. Prevalence and characteristics of sexual hookups among first-semester female college students. Int Braz J Urol. 2010;36(5):643. doi:https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-55382010000500026.
   Google Scholar
• Paul EL, Hayes KA. The casualties ofcasual’sex: a qualitative exploration of the phenomenology of college students’ hookups. J Soc Pers Relat. 2002;19(5):639–661. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407502195006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grello CM, Welsh DP, Harper MS, Dickson JW. Dating and sexual relationship trajectories and adolescent functioning. Adolesc Fam Health. 2003;3(3):103–112.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton L, Armstrong EA. Gendered sexuality in young adulthood: double binds and flawed options. Gend Soc. 2009;23(5):589–616. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243209345829.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grello CM, Welsh DP, Harper MS. No strings attached: the nature of casual sex in college students. J Sex Res. 2006;43(3):255–267. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490609552324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul EL, McManus B, Hayes A. “Hookups”: characteristics and correlates of college students’ spontaneous and anonymous sexual experiences. J Sex Res. 2000;37(1):76–88. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490009552023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kettrey HH. What's gender got to do with it? Sexual double standards and power in heterosexual college hookups. J Sex Res. 2016;53(7):754–765. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2016.1145181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• England P, Bearak J. The sexual double standard and gender differences in attitudes toward casual sex among U.S. university students. Demogr Res. 2014;30(1):1327–1338. doi:https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2014.30.46.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver MB, Hyde JS. Gender differences in sexuality: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull. 1993;114(1):29–51.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia JR, Reiber C. Hook-up behavior: a biopsychosocial perspective. J Soc Evol Cult Psychol. 2008;2(4):192–208. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/h0099345.
   Google Scholar
• Wiederman MW. The gendered nature of sexual scripts. Fam J. 2005;13(4):496–502. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/349726.
   Google Scholar
• Reiss IL. The scaling of premarital sexual permissiveness. J Marriage Fam. 1964;26(2):188–198. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/349726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford M, Popp D. Sexual double standards: a review and methodological critique of two decades of research. J Sex Res. 2003;40(1):13–26. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490309552163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreager DA, Staff J, Gauthier R, Lefkowitz ES, Feinberg ME. The double standard at sexual debut: gender, sexual behavior and adolescent peer acceptance. Sex Roles. 2016;75(7):377–392. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0618-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farvid P, Braun V, Rowney C. ‘No girl wants to be called a slut!’: women, heterosexual casual sex and the sexual double standard. J Gend Stud. 2017;26(5):544–560. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2016.1150818.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen JL, Hyde JS. Gender differences in sexual attitudes and behaviors: a review of meta-analytic results and large datasets. J Sex Res. 2011;48(2-3):149–165. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2011.551851.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher ML, Worth K, Garcia JR, Meredith T. Feelings of regret following uncommitted sexual encounters in Canadian university students. Cult Health Sex. 2012;14(1):45–57. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2011.619579.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Victor E. Mental health and hooking up: a self-discrepancy perspective. New School Psychol Bull. 2012;9(2):24–34. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/e534932013-004.
   Google Scholar
• Herold ES, Mewhinney DMK. Gender differences in casual sex and AIDS prevention: a survey of dating bars. J Sex Res. 1993;30(1):36–42. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499309551676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Summit AK, Kalmuss D, DeAtley J, Levack A. Unraveling the slut narrative: gender constraints on adolescent girls’ sexual decision-making. Am J Sex Educ. 2016;11(2):113–128. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15546128.2016.1168755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis MA, Granato H, Blayney JA, Lostutter TW, Kilmer JR. Predictors of hooking up sexual behaviors and emotional reactions among U.S. college students. Arch Sex Behav. 2012;41(5):1219–1229. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-011-9817-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eshbaugh EM, Gute G. Hookups and sexual regret among college women. J Soc Psychol. 2008;148(1):77–89. doi:https://doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.148.1.77-90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen J, Fincham FD. Young adults' emotional reactions after hooking up encounters. Arch Sex Behav. 2011;40(2):321–330. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-010-9652-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uecker JE, Martinez BC. When and why women regret sex in hookups more than men do: an analysis of the online college social life survey. Sociol Q. 2017;58(3):470–494. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00380253.2017.1331716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaBrie JW, Hummer JF, Ghaidarov TM, Lac A, Kenney SR. Hooking up in the college context: the event-level effects of alcohol use and partner familiarity on hookup behaviors and contentment. J Sex Res. 2014;51(1):62–73. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2012.714010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnett JJ. Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. Am Psychol. 2000;55(5):469–480. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.469
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Twenge JM. Generation Me: Why Today’s Young Americans Are More Confident, Assertive, and Entitled - and More Miserable than Ever Before. New York, NY: Free Press; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Holman A, Sillars A. Talk about “hooking up”: the influence of college student social networks on nonrelationship sex. Health Commun. 2012;27(2):205–216. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2011.575540.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siebenbruner J. Are college students replacing dating and romantic relationships with hooking up? J Coll Stud Dev. 2013;54(4):433–438. doi:https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2013.0065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder TD, de Brey C, Dillow, SA. Digest of education statistics, 2014. NCES 2016-006. National Center for Education Statistics; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Attin OM. Comparing Two-Year Community College and Four-Year University Student Social and Behavioral Sexually Transmitted Infection Risk Factors [dissertation]. Minneapolis, MN: Walden University; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Kuperberg A, Padgett JE. The role of culture in explaining college students’ selection into hookups, dates, and long-term romantic relationships. J Soc Pers Relat. 2016;33(8):1070–1096. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407515616876.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson RJ, Snapp S, Wang S. What we know and where we go from here: a review of lesbian, gay, and bisexual youth hookup literature. Sex Roles. 2017;77(11–12):801–811. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0831-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall WJ, Erausquin JT, Nichols TR, Tanner AE, Brown-Jeffy S. Relationship intentions, race, and gender: student differences in condom use during hookups involving vaginal sex. J Am Coll Health. 2018;67(8):733–742. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2018.1506788.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar