References
- Pew Research Center. Internet and Technology: Social Media Fact Sheet. Available at: https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/social-media/. Updated 2019. Accessed July 20, 2020.
- Rice LL, Moffett KW. Snapchat and civic engagement among college students. J Info Tech Pol. 2019;16(2):87–104. doi:10.1080/19331681.2019.1574249.
- Sherman LE, Greenfield PM, Hernandez LM, Dapretto M. Peer influence via Instagram: Effects on brain and behavior in adolescence and young adulthood. Child Dev. 2018;89(1):37–47. doi:10.1111/cdev.12838.
- Frost RL, Rickwood DJ. A systematic review of the mental health outcomes associated with Facebook use. Comput Human Behav. 2017;76:576–600. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.001.
- Vaterlaus JM, Barnett K, Roche C, Young JA. “Snapchat is more personal”: An exploratory study on Snapchat behaviors and young adult interpersonal relationships. Comput Human Behav. 2016;62:594–601. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.04.029.
- Curtis BL, Lookatch SJ, Ramo DE, McKay JR, Feinn RS, Kranzler HR. Meta-analysis of the associatoin of alcohol-related social media use with alcohol consumption and alcohol-related problems in adolescents and young adults. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2018;42(6):978–986. doi:10.1111/acer.13642.
- Lorant V, Nicaise P, Soto VE, d’Hoore W. Alcohol drinking among college students: College responsibility for personal troubles. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:615–619. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-13-615.
- Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Key substance use and mental health indicators in the United States: Results from the 2018 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (HHS Publication No. PEP19-5068, NSDUH Series H-54). Rockville, MD: Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Available at: https://www.samhsa.gov/data/. Updated 2019. Accessed July 20, 2020.
- Fournier AK, Hall E, Ricke P, Storey B. Alcohol and the social network: Onlinesocial networking sites and college students’ perceived drinking norms. Psychol Pop Media Cultur. 2013;2(2):86–95. doi:10.1037/a0032097.
- Glassman T. Implications for college students posting pictures of themselves drinking alcohol on Facebook. J Alcohol Drug Educ. 2011;56:38–58.
- Moreno MA, Cox ED, Young HN, Haaland W . Underage college students’ alcohol displays on Facebook and real-time alcohol behaviors. J Adolesc Health. 2015;56(6):646–651. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.02.020.
- Westgate EC, Neighbors C, Heppner H, Jahn S, Lindgren KP. “I will take a shot for every ‘Like’ I get on this status”: Posting alcohol-related Facebook content is linked to drinking outcomes. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2014;75(3):390–398. doi:10.15288/jsad.2014.75.390.
- Laws R, Hunt G, Antin TM. Social media platforms as a photo-elicitation tool in research on alcohol intoxication and gender. Nordisk Alkohol Nark. 2018;35(4):288–303. doi:10.1177/1455072518781998.
- Boyle SC, Earle AM, LaBrie JW, Ballou K . Facebook dethroned: Revealing the more likely social media destinations for college students’ depictions of underage drinking. Addict Behav. 2017;65:63–67. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.10.004.
- Snap, Inc. Snapchat (version 11.0.1.67) [Mobile application software]. Available at: https://apps.apple.com/us/app/snapchat/id447188370 Updated 2020. Accessed July 20, 2020.
- Davis JP, Pedersen ER, Tucker JS, et al. Long-term associations between substance use-related media exposure, descriptive norms, and alcohol use from adolescence to young adulthood. J Youth Adolesc. 2019;48(7):1311–1326. doi:10.1007/s10964-019-01024-z.
- Roberson AA, McKinney C, Walker C, Coleman A. Peer, social media, and alcohol marketing influences on college student drinking. J Am Coll Health. 2018;66(5):369–379. doi:10.1080/07448481.2018.1431903.
- Nesi J, Rothenberg WA, Hussong AM, Jackson KM . Friends’ alcohol-related social networking site activity predicts escalations in adolescent drinking: Mediation by Peer Norms. J Adolesc Health. 2017;60(6):641–647. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.01.009.
- Leung RK, Toumbourou JW, Hemphill SA. The effect of peer influence and selection processes on adolescent alcohol use: A systematic review of longitudinal studies. Health Psychol Rev. 2014;8(4):426–457. doi:10.1080/17437199.2011.587961.
- Borsari B, Carey KB. Descriptive and injunctive norms in college drinking: A meta-analytic integration. J Stud Alcohol. 2003;64(3):331–341. doi:10.15288/jsa.2003.64.331.
- Baer RA, Smith GT, Hopkins J, Krietemeyer J, Toney L. Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness. Assess. 2006;13(1):27–45. doi:10.1177/1073191105283504.
- Poon K, Jiang Y. Getting less likes on social media: Mindfulness ameliorates the detrimental effects of feeling left out online. Mindfulness. 2020;11(4):1038–1048. doi:10.1007/s12671-020-01313-w.
- Charoensukmongkol P. Contribution of mindfulness to individuals’ tendency to believe and share social media content. Int J Tech Human Interact 2016; 12:47–63. doi:10.4018/IJTHI.2016070104.
- Sriwilai K, Charoensukmongkol P . Face it, don’t Facebook it: Impacts of social media addiction on mindfulness, coping strategies and the consequence on emotional exhaustion. Stress Health. 2016;32(4):427–434. doi:10.1002/smi.2637.
- Baker ZG, Krieger H, LeRoy AS. Fear of missing out: Relationships with depression, mindfulness, and physical symptoms. Trans Issue Psychol Sci. 2016;2(3):275–282. doi:10.1037/tps0000075.
- Hong J, Tsai CH, Chiang C, Hwang M. Mindfulness in learning safe sex via social media: Perspectives of personality and experiential value. Comp Human Behav. 2016; 64:337–346. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.033.
- Yang C, Holden SM, Carter MDK. Emerging adults’ social media self-presentation and identity development at college transition: Mindfulness as a moderator. J Appl Dev Psychol. 2017;52:212–221. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2017.08.006.
- Bravo AJ, Boothe LG, Pearson MR. Getting personal with mindfulness: A latent profile analysis of mindfulness and psychological outcomes. Mindful. 2016;7(2):420–432. doi:10.1007/s12671-015-0459-7.
- McConnell PA, Froeliger B. Mindfulness, mechanisms and meaning: Perspectives from the cognitive neuroscience of addiction. Psychol Inq. 2015;26(4):349–357. doi:10.1080/1047840X.2015.1076701.
- Brewer JA, Elwafi HM, Davis JH. Craving to quit: Psychological models and neurobiological mechanisms of mindfulness training as treatment for addictions. Psychol Addict Behav. 2013;27(2):366–379. doi:10.1037/a0028490.
- Brown KW, Ryan RM. The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003;84(4):822–848. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.822.
- Saunders JB, Aasland OG, Babor TF, de la Fuente JR, Grant M . Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO collaborative project on early detection of persons with harmful alcohol Consumption-II. Addiction. 1993;88(6):791–804. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.1993.tb02093.x.
- Kokotailo PK, Egan J, Gangnon R, Brown D, Mundt M, Fleming M. Validity of the alcohol use disorders identification test in college students. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2004;28(6):914–920. doi:10.1097/01.alc.0000128239.87611.f5.
- Reinert DF, Allen JP. The alcohol use disorders identification test: An update of research findings. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2007;31(2):185–199. doi:10.1111/j.1530-0277.2006.00295.x.
- White HR, Labouvie EW. Towards the assessment of adolescent problem drinking. J Stud Alcohol. 1989;50(1):30–37. doi:10.15288/jsa.1989.50.30.
- Dick DM, Aliev F, Viken R, Kaprio J, Rose RJ . Rutgers Alcohol Problem Index scores at age 18 predict alcohol dependence diagnoses 7 years later. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2011;35(5):1011–1014. doi:10.1111/j.1530-0277.2010.01432.x.
- Enders CK. Applied Missing Data Analysis. New York, NY: The Guilford Press; 2010.
- Tabachnik BG, Fidell LS. Using Multivariate Statistics. 6th ed. New York, NY: Pearson; 2013.
- IBM Corporation. SPSS Statistics for Windows (Version 22.0). Available at: https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/spss-statistics-220-available-download Updated 2020. Accessed July 20, 2020.
- Hayes AF. PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling [White paper]. Available at: http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2010.pdf. Updated 2012. Accessed 2020.
- Muthén LK, Muthén BO. Mplus User’s Guide. 8th ed. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén; 1998–2017.
- Shrout PE, Bolger N. Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychol Methods. 2002;7(4):422–445.
- Kline RB. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. 4th ed. New York, NY: The Guilford Press; 2016.
- Hayes AF. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis. 2nd ed. New York, NY: The Guilford Press; 2018.
- Shapiro SL, Carlson LE, Astin JA, Freedman B. Mechanisms of mindfulness. J Clin Psychol. 2006;62(3):373–386. doi:10.1002/jclp.20237.
- Shapiro S. The integration of mindfulness and psychology. J Clin Psychol. 2009;65(6):555–560. doi:10.1002/jclp.20602.
- Hagman BT. Diagnostic performance of the Rutgers Alcohol Problem Inventory (RAPI) in detecting DSM-5 alcohol use disorders among college students. J Addict Prevent. 2017;5:7–14.
- Earleywine M, LaBrie JW, Pedersen ER. A brief Rutgers Alcohol Problem Index with less potential for bias. Addict Behav. 2008;33(9):1249–1253. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2008.05.006.
- Martens MP, Neighbors C, Dams-O’Connor K, Lee CM, Larimer M . The factor structure of a dichotomously scored Rutgers Alcohol Problem Index. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2007;68(4):597–606. doi:10.15288/jsad.2007.68.597.
- Higgins-Biddle JC, Babor TF. A review of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT), AUDIT-C, and USAUDIT for screening in the United States: Past issues and future directions. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2018;44(6):578–586. doi:10.1080/00952990.2018.1456545.
- Plotnikoff RC, Costigan SA, Kennedy SG, Robards SL, Germov J, Wild C . Efficacy of interventions targeting alcohol, drug and smoking behaviors in university and college students: A review of randomized controlled trials. J Am Coll Health. 2019;67(1):68–84. doi:10.1080/07448481.2018.1462821.
- Boyle SC, LaBrie JW, Froidevaux NM, Witkovic YD . Different digital paths to the keg? How exposure to peers’ alcohol-related social media content influences drinking among male and female first-year college students . Addict Behav. 2016;57:21–29. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.01.011.
- Huang GC, Unger JB, Soto D, et al. Peer influences: The impact of online and offline friendship networks on adolescent smoking and alcohol use. J Adoles Health. 2014;54(5):508–514. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.07.001.
- Chiodelli R, de Mello LT, de Jesus SN, Beneton ER, Russel T, Andretta I. Mindfulness-based interventions in undergraduate students: A systematic review. J Am Coll Health. 2020;1–10. doi:10.1080/07448481.2020.1767109.
- Li W, Howard MO, Garland EL, McGovern P, Lazar M. Mindfulness treatment for substance misuse: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2017;75:62–96. doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2017.01.008.
- Wilson SL, Cooper RL, Nugent WR, Champion D. BASICS, ACT, mindfulness, and BMI: Effective evidence-based practices that treat collegiate high-risk drinking. J Human Behav Soc Environ. 2016;26(1):81–88. doi:10.1080/10911359.2015.1062670.