Exposure to conflicting COVID-19 information in undergraduates: Implications for pandemic-related information-seeking and concern, attention, and cognitive workload

References

• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. COVID data tracker. Office of the Associate Director for Communication, Digital Media Branch, Division of Public Affairs. https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#datatracker-home. Published December 24, 2021. Accessed December 24, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Managing the COVID-19 infodemic: promoting healthy behaviours and mitigating the harm from misinformation and disinformation. https://www.who.int/news/item/23-09-2020-managing-the-covid-19-infodemic-promoting-healthy-behaviours-and-mitigating-the-harm-from-misinformation-and-disinformation. Published September 23, 2020. Accessed December 1, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Frenkel S, Alba D, Zong R. Surge of virus misinformation stumps Facebook and Twitter. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/08/technology/coronavirus-misinformation-social-media.html. Published March 8, 2020. Accessed December 1, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Russonello G. Biden asks Fauci to stay, and plans a mask plea. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/04/us/politics/biden-fauci-masks-virus.html. Published December 4, 2020. Accessed December 1, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Jamieson KH, Albarracín D. The relation between media consumption and misinformation at the outset of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in the US. HKS Mis Rev. 2020;1(2):1–22. doi:10.37016/mr-2020-012.
   Google Scholar
• Pennycook G, McPhetres J, Zhang Y, Lu JG, Rand DG. Fighting COVID-19 misinformation on social media: experimental evidence for a scalable accuracy-nudge intervention. Psychol Sci. 2020;31(7):770–780. doi:10.1177/0956797620939054.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vraga EK, Tully M, Bode L. Empowering users to respond to misinformation about Covid-19. MaC. 2020;8(2):475–479. doi:10.17645/mac.v8i2.3200.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter DM, Geryk LL, Chen AT, Nagler RH, Dieckmann NF, Han PKJ. Conflicting health information: a critical research need. Health Expect. 2016;19(6):1173–1182. doi:10.1111/hex.12438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagler RH, Vogel RI, Gollust SE, Rothman AJ, Fowler EF, Yzer MC. Public perceptions of conflicting information surrounding COVID-19: results from a nationally representative survey of U.S. adults. PLoS One. 2020;15(10):e0240776. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0240776.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breslow J. Fauci: mixed messaging on masks set U.S. public health response back. National Public Radio. https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2020/07/01/ 886299190/it-does-not-have-to-be-100-000-cases-a-day-fauci-urges-u-s-to-follow- guidelines. Published July 1, 2020. Accessed December 1, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Rabin R. Why not just tell everyone to wear masks? New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/08/12/health/covid-masks-cdc.html. Published August 12, 2021. Accessed December 1, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Lee C, Nagler RH, Wang N. Source-specific exposure to contradictory nutrition information: documenting prevalence and effects on adverse cognitive and behavioral outcomes. Health Commun. 2018;33(4):453–461. doi:10.1080/10410236.2016.1278495.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nan X, Daily K. Biased assimilation and need for closure: examining the effects of mixed blogs on vaccine-related beliefs. J Health Commun. 2015;20(4):462–471. doi:10.1080/10810730.2014.989343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon GN, Clarke CE. Heightening uncertainty around certain science: media coverage, false balance, and the Autism-vaccine controversy. Sci Commun. 2013;35(3):358–382. doi:10.1177/1075547012458290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall LH, Comello ML. Stymied by a wealth of health information: how viewing conflicting information online diminishes efficacy. J Commun Healthc. 2019;12(1):4–12. doi:10.1080/17538068.2019.1580064.
   Google Scholar
• Chang C. Motivated processing: how people perceive news covering novel or contradictory health research findings. Sci Commun. 2015;37(5):602–634. doi:10.1177/1075547015597914.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kecojevic A, Basch CH, Sullivan M, Davi NK. The impact of the COVID-19 epidemic on mental health of undergraduate students in New Jersey, cross-sectional study. PLoS One. 2020;15(9):e0239696. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0239696.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesser A, Drassen Ham A, Keene Woods N. Assessment of COVID-19 knowledge among university students: implications for future risk communication strategies. Health Educ Behav. 2020;47(4):540–543. doi:10.1177/1090198120931420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patil U, Kostareva U, Hadley M, et al. Health literacy, digital health literacy, and COVID-19 pandemic attitudes and behaviors in U.S. college students: implications for interventions. IJERPH. 2021;18(6):3301. doi:10.3390/ijerph18063301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stellefson M, Hanik B, Chaney B, Chaney D, Tennant B, Chavarria EA. eHealth literacy among college students: a systematic review with implications for eHealth education. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(4):e102. doi:10.2196/jmir.1703.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong KJ, Park NL, Heo SY, Jung SH, Lee YB, Hwang JH. Effect of e-Health literacy on COVID-19 infection-preventive behaviors of undergraduate students majoring in healthcare. Healthcare. 2021;9(5):573. doi:10.3390/healthcare9050573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinson DJ. A conception of adult development. Am Psychol. 1986;41(1):3–13. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.41.1.3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frech A. Healthy behavior trajectories between adolescence and young adulthood. Adv Life Course Res. 2012;17(2):59–68. doi:10.1016/j.alcr.2012.01.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Te Poel F, Baumgartner SE, Hartmann T, Tanis M. The curious case of cyberchondria: a longitudinal study on the reciprocal relationship between health anxiety and online health information seeking. J Anxiety Disord. 2016;43:32–40. doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2016.07.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soroya SH, Farooq A, Mahmood K, Isoaho J, Zara S-E. From information seeking to information avoidance: Understanding the health information behavior during a global health crisis. Inf Process Manag. 2021;58(2):102440. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2020.102440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu A, Wilkes M, Iosif AM, et al. Exploring the relationships between resilience and news monitoring with COVID distress in health profession students. Acad Psychiatry. 2021;45(5):566–574. doi:10.1007/s40596-021-01444-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American College Health Association. American college health association-national college health assessment III: reference group executive summary spring 2021. https://www.acha.org/documents/ncha/NCHA-III_SPRING-2021_REFERENCE_GROUP_EXECUTIVE_SUMMARY_updated.pdf. Published December 7, 2021. Accessed December 15, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Son C, Hegde S, Smith A, Wang X, Sasangohar F. Effects of COVID-19 on college students’ mental health in the United States: interview survey study. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(9):e21279. doi:10.2196/21279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farris SG, Kibbey MM, Fedorenko EJ, DiBello AM. A qualitative study of COVID-19 distress in university students. Emerg Adulthood. 2021;9(5):462–478 [published online ahead of print June 29, 2021]. doi:10.1177/21676968211025128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aucejo EM, French J, Ugalde Araya MP, Zafar B. The impact of COVID-19 on student experiences and expectations: evidence from a survey. J Public Econ. 2020;191:104271. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnwell PV, Fedorenko EJ, Contrada RJ. Healthy or not? The impact of conflicting health-related information on attentional resources. J Behav Med. 2022;45(2):306–317 [published online ahead print September 18, 2021]. doi:10.1007/s10865-021-00256-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweller J. Cognitive load theory. In: Mestre JP, Ross BH, eds. Psychology of Learning and Motivation. Vol 55. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier; 2011:37–76. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-387691-1.00002-8.
   Google Scholar
• Nagler RH, Hornik RC. Measuring media exposure to contradictory health information: a comparative analysis of four potential measures. Commun Methods Meas. 2012;6(1):56–75. doi:10.1080/19312458.2011.651348.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nagler RH, LoRusso SM. Conflicting information and message competition in health and risk messaging. In: Nussbaum J, ed. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2017. doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.292.
   Google Scholar
• Nagler RH, Yzer MC, Rothman AJ. Effects of media exposure to conflicting information about mammography: results from a population-based survey experiment. Ann Behav Med. 2019;53(10):896–908. doi:10.1093/abm/kay098.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vohs KD, Baumeister RF, Schmeichel BJ, Twenge JM, Nelson NM, Tice DM. Making choices impairs subsequent self-control: a limited-resource account of decision making, self-regulation, and active initiative. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008;94(5):883–898. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.5.883.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han G, Helm J, Iucha C, Zahn-Waxler C, Hastings PD, Klimes-Dougan B. Are executive functioning deficits concurrently and predictively associated with depressive and anxiety symptoms in adolescents? J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2016;45(1):44–58. doi:10.1080/15374416.2015.1041592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allan JL, McMinn D, Daly M. A bidirectional relationship between executive function and health behavior: evidence, implications, and future directions. Front Neurosci. 2016;10:1–13. doi:10.3389/fnins.2016.00386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu P, Cheng J. Individual differences in social distancing and mask-wearing in the pandemic of COVID-19: the role of need for cognition, self-control and risk attitude. Pers Individ Dif. 2021;175:110706. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2021.110706.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gramlich J. Why are COVID-19 cases rising in U.S.? Republicans point to more testing, Democrats to more infections. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/08/14/why-are-covid-19-cases-rising-in-u-s-republicans-point-to-more-testing-democrats-to-more-infections/. Published August 14, 2020. Accessed December 1, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell A, Jurkowitz M, Oliphant JB, Shearer E. Three months in, many Americans aee exaggeration, conspiracy theories and partisanship in COVID-19 news. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/journalism/2020/06/29/three-months-in-many-americans-see-exaggeration-conspiracy-theories-and-partisanship-in-covid-19-news/. Published June 29, 2020. Accessed December 1, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. Most Americans say state governments have lifted COVID-19 restrictions too quickly. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2020/08/06/most-americans-say-state-governments-have-lifted-covid-19-restrictions-too-quickly/. Published August 6, 2020. Accessed December 1, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy PD. Transcript August 12, 2020, coronavirus briefing media. Official Site of the State of New Jersey. https://www.nj.gov/governor/news/news/562020/approved/20200812c.shtml. Published August 12, 2020. Accessed December 1, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Pennsylvania Department of Health. Universal face coverings order FAQ. sais.health.pa.gov/CommonPOC/content/FacilityWeb/attachment.asp?messageid=3950&filename=FINAL++Universal+Masking+Order+FAQ+20200703%2Epdf&attachmentnumber=1. Published July 3, 2020. Accessed December 1, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Champely S. Pwr: Basic Functions for Power Analysis [Computer Software]. Version 1.3-0. Lyon: The R Project for Statistical Computing; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Fan J, McCandliss BD, Sommer T, Raz A, Posner MI. Testing the efficiency and independence of attentional networks. J Cogn Neurosci. 2002;14(3):340–347. doi:10.1162/089892902317361886.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posner MI, Snyder CR, Davidson BJ. Attention and the detection of signals. J Exp Psychol. 1980;109(2):160–174. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.109.2.160.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eriksen BA, Eriksen CW. Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Percept Psychophys. 1974;16(1):143–149. doi:10.3758/BF03203267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posner MI, Petersen SE. The attention system of the human brain. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1990;13(1):25–42. doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.13.030190.000325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang YF, Jing XJ, Liu F, et al. Reliable attention network scores and mutually inhibited inter-network relationships revealed by mixed design and non-orthogonal method. Sci Rep. 2015;5(1):10251. doi:10.1038/srep10251.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rueda MR, Fan J, McCandliss BD, et al. Development of attentional networks in childhood. Neuropsychologia. 2004;42(8):1029–1040. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2003.12.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Togo F, Lange G, Natelson BH, Quigley KS. Attention network test: assessment of cognitive function in chronic fatigue syndrome. J Neuropsychol. 2015;9(1):1–9. doi:10.1111/jnp.12030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Backes V, Kellermann T, Voss B, et al. Neural correlates of the attention network test in schizophrenia. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2011;261(S2):155–160. doi:10.1007/s00406-011-0264-9.
   Google Scholar
• Xiao M, Ge H, Khundrakpam BS, et al. Attention performance measured by Attention Network Test is correlated with global and regional efficiency of structural brain networks. Front Behav Neurosci. 2016;10:1–12. doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fossella J, Sommer T, Fan J, et al. Assessing the molecular genetics of attention networks. BMC Neurosci. 2002;3(1):14. doi:10.1186/1471-2202-3-14.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hart SG, Staveland LE. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research. In Advances in Psychology. Vol. 52. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier; 1988:139–183. doi:10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62386-9.
   Google Scholar
• Hart SG. Nasa-Task Load Index (NASA-TLX); 20 years later. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. Vol. 50; 2006:904–908. doi:10.1177/154193120605000909.
   Google Scholar
• Xiao Y, Wang Z, Wang M, Lan Y. The appraisal of reliability and validity of subjective workload assessment technique and NASA-Task Load Index. Chin J Indus Hyg Occupat Dis. 2005;23(3):178–181.
   Google Scholar
• Battiste V, Bortolussi M. Transport pilot workload: a comparison of two subjective techniques. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society Annual Meeting. Vol. 32. 1988:150–154. doi:10.1177/154193128803200232.
   Google Scholar
• Hill SG, Iavecchia HP, Byers JC, Bittner AC, Zaklade AL, Christ RE. Comparison of four subjective workload rating scales. Hum Factors. 1992;34(4):429–439. doi:10.1177/001872089203400405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inquisit 5 [Computer Software]. Version 5. Seattle, WA: Millisecond; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Pinet S, Zielinski C, Mathôt S, Dufau S, Alario FX, Longcamp M. Measuring sequences of keystrokes with jsPsych: reliability of response times and interkeystroke intervals. Behav Res Methods. 2017;49(3):1163–1176. doi:10.3758/s13428-016-0776-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cousineau D, Chartier S. Outliers detection and treatment: a review. Int J Psychol Res. 2010;3(1):58–67. doi:10.21500/20112084.844.
   Google Scholar
• DeSimone JA, Harms PD, DeSimone AJ. Best practice recommendations for data screening. J Organiz Behav. 2015;36(2):171–181. doi:10.1002/job.1962.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald JH. Handbook of Biological Statistics. 3rd ed. Baltimore, MD: Sparky House Publishing; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher RA. On the “probable error” of a coefficient of correlation deduced from a small sample. Metron. 1921;1:3–32.
   Google Scholar
• Rosseel Y. lavaan: an R package for structural equation modeling. J Stat Soft. 2012;48(2):1–36. doi:10.18637/jss.v048.i02.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westland JC. Structural Equation Models: From Paths to Networks. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Springer; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Lazarus RS. From psychological stress to the emotions: a history of changing outlooks. Annu Rev Psychol. 1993;44(1):1–21. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.44.020193.000245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumenthal-Barby JS, Krieger H. Cognitive biases and heuristics in medical decision making: a critical review using a systematic search strategy. Med Decis Making. 2015;35(4):539–557. doi:10.1177/0272989X14547740.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keselman A, Browne AC, Kaufman DR. Consumer health information seeking as hypothesis testing. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008;15(4):484–495. doi:10.1197/jamia.M2449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hibbard JH, Slovic P, Jewett JJ. Informing consumer decisions in health care: implications from decision‐making research. Milbank Q. 1997;75(3):395–414. doi:10.1111/1468-0009.00061.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne JW, Bettman JR, Johnson EJ. The Adaptive Decision Maker. 1st ed. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 1993. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139173933.
   Google Scholar
• Mann T, Ward A. Attention, self-control, and health behaviors. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2007;16(5):280–283. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00520.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer NT, Rimer BK. Perspectives on health behavior theories that focus on individuals. In: K. Glanz, B. K. Rimer, K. Viswanath, eds. Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice. Hoboken, NJ: Jossey-Bass; 2008:149–165.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher JD, Fisher WA. Changing AIDS-risk behavior. Psychol Bull. 1992;111(3):455–474. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.111.3.455.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohlman J, Basch C. The language of university communications during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Am Coll Health. 2022;70(8):2253–2256. doi:10.1080/07448481.2020.1856116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen X, Ariati J, McMaughan DJ, Han H, Hubach RD, Miller BM. COVID-19 information-seeking behaviors and preventive behaviors among college students in Oklahoma. J Am Coll Health. 2022:1–9 (Online ahead of print). doi:10.1080/07448481.2022.2090842.
   Google Scholar
• Gravagna K, Basta NE, Nederhoff D, et al. Willingness to be vaccinated, preventative behaviors, and social contact patterns during the COVID-19 pandemic among US college students. J Am Coll Health. 2022;15:1–7. doi:10.1080/07448481.2022.2115301.
   Google Scholar
• Gamber M, Henderson D, Ruelas DM. The impact of COVID-19 on health professions student’s perceptions, future education and career aspirations and confidence in public health responses. J Am Coll Health. 2022:1–7 (Online ahead of print). doi:10.1080/07448481.2022.2077111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar