Fallacies, Flaws, and Flimflam

References

• ‘Let's Let's a deal’ revisited, (On the lighter side), The Actuary, March, 1991; April, 1991 M
   Google Scholar
• Cecil Adams, The straight dope, (Response to query of Robert E. Johanson), Chicago Reader (Isthmus, The Culture), Dec. 7, 1990 M
   Google Scholar
• Igor Alexeff, Ask Marilyn, (Letter), Mensa Bulletin, July/August, 1991. Page 13. M
   Google Scholar
• Karl V. Amatneek, Letter to the editor, New York Times, Aug. 11, 1991 M
   Google Scholar
• W. W. Rouse Ball & H. S. M. Coxeter, Mathematical Recreations and Essays, 12th edition, University of Toronto, 1974, Page 44. A
   Google Scholar
• Maya Bar-Hillel & Ruma Falk, Some teasers concerning conditional probabilities, Cognition 11 (1982), 109–122 PCFA
   Google Scholar
• J. Bertrand, Calcul des Probabilités, Gauthier-Villars, 1888. Page 2. B
   Google Scholar
• D. Brunk, An Introduction to Mathematical Statistics, Ginn-Blaisdell, 1965. Page 31. B
   Google Scholar
• Donald C. Butler, Letter to the editor, American Statistician 20 (No. 5, Dec., 1966), 36–37 A
   Google Scholar
• Stephen K. Campbell, Flaws and Fallacies in Statistical Thinking, Prentice-Hall, 1974. Page 132. C
   Google Scholar
• Young H. Chun, Game show problem, (Letters to the editor), OR/MS Today (June, 1991), 9 M
   Google Scholar
• Darwin DeLapp, The three boxes, Letters to the editor, Bostonia (July/August, 1991), 10 M
   Google Scholar
• Robert Frankel, Monty's return, (Reader reflections), Mathematics Teacher 85 (1992), 176 M
   Google Scholar
• Cory Franklin, Letter to the editor, New York Times, Aug. 11, 1991 M
   Google Scholar
• Kendrick Frazier, ‘Three Three’ problem provokes letters, controversy, John Geohegan, SI readers show their stuff, (Follow-up and letters), Skeptical Inquirer 16 (1992), 192–199 M
   Google Scholar
• Sidney Freeman, The three boxes, (Letters to the editor), Bostonia (July/August, 1991), 10 M
   Google Scholar
• John E. Freund, Puzzle or paradox?, American Statistician 19 (No. 4, Oct., 1965), 29, 44 A
   Google Scholar
• John E. Freund, Modem Elementary Statistics, Seventh edition, Prentice-Hall, (1952), 1988. Page 153. B
   Google Scholar
• George Gamow & Marvin Stern, Puzzle Math, Viking, NY, 1958 A
   Google Scholar
• Martin Gardner, Scientific American 196 (#4, April, 1957), 166. Reprinted in Mathematical Puzzles and Diversions, Simon & Schuster, 1959. Pages 49–51. A
   Google Scholar
• Martin Gardner, Scientific American 200 (#5, May, 1959), 166; 200 (#6, June, 1959), 164; 201 (#4, Oct., 1959), 180, 182; 201 (#5 Nov. 1959), 188. Reprinted in Second Scientific American Book of Mathematical Puzzles and Diversions Simon & Schuster, 1961 PFA
   Google Scholar
• Martin Gardner, Probability paradoxes, (Notes of a fringe-watcher), Skeptical Inquirer 16 (1992), 129–132 SPFA
   Google Scholar
• Leonard Gillman, The car-and-goat fiasco, MAA Focus, Vol. 11, No. 3, June-July, 1991. Page 8 M
   Google Scholar
• Leonard Gillman, The car and the goats, American Mathematical Monthly 99 (1992), 3–7 MAR
   Google Scholar
• N. T. Gridgeman, Letter to the editor, American Statistician 21 (No. 3, June, 1967), 38–39 A
   Google Scholar
• Ralph Haertel, Letter to the editor, American Statistician 20 (No. 1, Feb., 1966), 34–36 A
   Google Scholar
• Deborah Hecht, Simple dilemma, (Reader Reflections), Mathematics Teacher 85 (1992), 90–91 M
   Google Scholar
• David Jacobson, Read this! It's got math and a bit of everything, Hartford Courant, March 1, 1991 M
   Google Scholar
• Jeremy Kahan, Alternative solution for Monty, (Reader Reflections), Mathematics Teacher 85 (1992), 90 M
   Google Scholar
• S. Knight, Let's make a deal, (Reader Reflections) Mathematics Teacher 85 (1992), 250, 252 M
   Google Scholar
• Anthony Lo Bello, Ask Marilyn: the mathematical controversy in Parade Magazine, Mathematical Gazette 75 (Oct., 1991), 275–277 M
   Google Scholar
• Janet S. Milton & David L. Albig, To switch or…, (Reader Reflections), Mathematics Teacher 85 (1992), 8, 10 M
   Google Scholar
• J. P. Morgan, N. R. Chaganty, R. C. Dahiya & M. J. Doviak, Let's make a deal, (Comment by Richard G. Seymann), American Statistician 45 (1991), 284–289 MB
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Mosteller, Fifty Challenging Problems in Probability with Solutions, Addison Wesley, 1965. Problem 13, page 28. P
   Google Scholar
• Richard Pearson, The three boxes, Letters to the editor, Bostonia (July/August, 1991), 9–10 M
   Google Scholar
• Massimo Piattelli-Palmarini, Probability blindness: neither rational nor capricious, Bostonia (Boston University) (March/April, 1991), 28–35. Sidebar C: The three boxes. Pages 33–34. M
   Google Scholar
• E. F. Porter, Mathematicians are the goat when they challenge Marilyn vos Savant on probability. St. Louis Post Dispatch, Tues., March 19, 1991 MS
   Google Scholar
• Gary P. Posner, Nation's mathematicians guilty of ‘innumeracy’, Skeptical Inquirer 15 (1991), 342–345 M
   Google Scholar
• Anatol Rapoport, Decision Theory and Decision Behaviour, Kluwer, 1989. Pages 72–75. PF
   Google Scholar
• Michael Rapoport, Brain boggier no big deal to professor, Waterbury Republican-American, Feb. 20, 1991 M
   Google Scholar
• Domenico Rosa, Letter to the editor, New York Times, Aug. 11, 1991 M
   Google Scholar
• Domenico Rosa, Letter to the editor, American Statistician (submitted) M
   Google Scholar
• Sheldon Ross, A First Course in Probability. (2nd ed., 1984), 70 C
   Google Scholar
• Sam C. Saunders, The shell game, prisoner paradox and other paradoxes of conditional probability, Mathematical Notes from Washington State University, Vol. 33, No. 2, April, 1990 MSPF
   Google Scholar
• Lore Segal, Letter to the editor, New York Times, Aug. 11, 1991 M
   Google Scholar
• Steve Selvin, A problem in probability, (Letters to the editor), American Statistician 29 (1975), 67 M
   Google Scholar
• Steve Selvin, On the Monty Hall problem, (Letters to the editor), American Statistician 29 (1975), 134 M
   Google Scholar
• J. Michael Shaughnessy & Thomas Dick, Monty's dilemma: should you stick or switch?, Mathematics Teacher 84 (1991), 252–256 M
   Google Scholar
• H. Fairfield Smith, “Puzzle or paradox?”-and Bayes, (Letter to the editor), American Statistician (No. 2, April, 1967), 42–44 A
   Google Scholar
• Norton Starr, A paradox in probability theory, Mathematics Teacher 66 (1973), 166–168 P
   Google Scholar
• Ira S. Steinberg, The three boxes, (Letters to the editor), Bostonia (July/August, 1991), 8–9 M
   Google Scholar
• Ian Stewart, A budget of trisections, (Book review), Mathematical Intelligencer 14 (1992), 73–74 M
   Google Scholar
• James Stewart, Lothar Redlin & Saleem Watson, College Algebra, Brooks/Cole, 1992. Pages 469–471. M
   Google Scholar
• Gábor J. Székely, Paradoxes in Probability Theory and Mathematical Statistics, Akademiai Kiadó, Budapest; D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland, 1986. Pages 68–69. P
   Google Scholar
• John Tierney, Behind Monty Hall's doors: puzzle, debate and answer?, New York Times, July 21, 1991 M
   Google Scholar
• Alan Truscott, Understanding restricted choice is a guide to choosing right door, and the right play, Syndicated bridge column, Aug. 4, 1991 R
   Google Scholar
• Marilyn vos Savant, Ask Marilyn, Parade Magazine, Sept. 9, 1990; Dec. 2, 1990; Feb. 17, 1991; July 7, 1991 M
   Google Scholar
• Marilyn vos Savant, Marilyn vos Savant's reply, (Letters to the editor; response by J. P. Morgan, et al.), American Statistician 45 (1991), 347 M
   Google Scholar
• Marilyn vos Savant, Ask Marilyn-the last word, (Letter), Mensa Bulletin, September, 1991 M
   Google Scholar
• Marilyn vos Savant, Ask Marilyn, Parade Magazine, Sept. 8, 1991; Jan. 26, 1992 A
   Google Scholar
• Marilyn vos Savant, Ask Marilyn, Parade Magazine, Oct. 13, 1991; Jan 5, 1992 F
   Google Scholar
• Michael R. Wise, Letter to Marilyn, March 26, 1991. Reprinted in the Prudential Newsletter. M
   Google Scholar
• Joseph Woolfson, Letter to the editor, New York Times, Aug. 11, 1991 M
   Google Scholar